Quantcast
Channel: Melkin's Prophecy
Viewing all 25 articles
Browse latest View live

The island of Avalon is not located at Glastonbury

$
0
0
In the Dark Ages, after the death of King Arthur, a monk known as Melkin, left for posterity a riddle or prophecy which exposed the burial site of Joseph of Arimathea. This location, known as the Island of Avalon, has long been thought to exist near Glastonbury abbey. Glastonbury is also thought to have been the place where King Arthur's tomb was found. However, in this exposé, we will show the location of the yet unearthed tomb of King Arthur. Arthur's resting place is also on the same island where Joseph of Arimathea's sepulchre still lies undiscovered.


The Island of Avalon has been associated with the tor at Glastonbury because the monks at the medieval abbey exaggerated the previous association with Joseph of Arimathea to attract pilgrims. The myth that Glastonbury tor is somehow connected or even synonymous with the Island of Avalon is probably down to a man called Henry Blois, better known as Master Blihis, who was an abbot at Glastonbury abbey.
The author has deciphered the meaning behind the riddle known as Melkin's prophecy, upon which the mythical status of Glastonbury is founded. It is due to the fragment of Melkin's prophecy that Glastonbury polemicists, recognizing its antiquity, desperately contrived an association with Joseph of Arimathea's burial site and that of King Arthur.
This was possible due to everyone's ignorance in the middle ages of the location of Avalon. The subtle translocation of the isle of Avalon can be witnessed in the evolving interpolation of the prophecy by Glastonbury chroniclers keen to promote the connection with the uncle of Jesus. The 'Vaus d'Avaron' of French Grail literature is described in the story line in some Grail romances as pertaining to a region of valleys south of Dartmoor and the island of Avalon fits the description of Burgh Island. The genuine historical Avalon had beaches; it was tidal and had ships that visited it...... unlike Glastonbury or its environs.

The monks riddle which he left for posterity, when deciphered, clearly indicates with pinpoint geometrical accuracy, the whereabouts of the resting place of King Arthur and Joseph of Arimathea in the Island of Avalon. This is evidently not at Glastonbury.
The strange thing is that the geometric puzzle left by Melkin describes directions that are derived from the Saint Michael line of churches which runs across southern England.


For the skeptic, the fact that a 'bifurcated line' mentioned in Melkin's prophecy (Joseph lies on a bifurcated line), is the Saint Michael line..... causes many to assume there could be no link between the two. Most researchers have assumed the directions are local and relative to the old church at Glastonbury Abbey. This is all part of the interpolation purposely propagated by the Glastonbury establishment's chroniclers, in an attempt to be accounted the resting place of such an illustrious person.
The churches and chapels, built upon an ancient line of earthworks that demarcate the St. Michael line has been put there by design. When interlinked with other St. Michael churches (not on the Michael line), these Michaeline chapels act as markers on a map, leading to the lost island of Avalon. They clearly show that the chapels have be built as a devise to coincide with the precise instructional data provided by the prophecy of Melkin.

This site will show how this huge display of geometrical precision across the British landscape was understood and known to exist as late as late the 1300’s.
The accuracy of the geometry confirms that in antiquity, the presence of the St. Michael line was known about by Melkin in the sixth century..... long before the churches and chapels dedicated to the prince of the heavenly host were built. The array of churches dedicated to the archangel were built upon this ancient line of earthworks to point out to posterity the location of the tomb of Jesus by the ‘illuminati’ of the Templar order with the dual intent...... to mark the spot where they buried their treasure.


This hitherto hidden location is called the Island of Avalon and Melkin visited this island nowadays is known as Burgh Island. It becomes apparent that Melkin was present at the death of Britain’s famous King Arthur and he states who and what he saw in the Tomb.
In the tomb, Melkin found arcane information from the Temple in Jerusalem which had been brought to England by Joseph of Arimathea. This information, with an account of the Holy Family's arrival with Mary Magdalene, was written in a book composed by Melkin. This book gave account of the time from the arrival of these early Christians through a bloodline of 'Grail Keepers'...... up until the time of King Arthur.
The book became known as 'The Grail book', which found its way to France, Evidence points to Melkin who may well have established an early hermitage on Mont-Saint-Michel in Normandy.
'The book of the Grail', through the troubadour family of the counts of Pitou and Aquitaine, gave rise to the wide array of Grail stories propagated through the medieval courts of France. A close family connection to Eleanor of Aquitaine in the person of Henry Blois (or as many knew him 'Monseigneur Blois'), became the 'Master Blohis' who was Abbot of Glastonbury. He was the first to expound from the French Grail literature by compiling the 'Perlesvaus', but he also was aware of the English traditions of the prophecy of Melkin which existed at Glastonbury and was aware of other manuscripts written by Melkin that became the source of Welsh Arthurian literature.
Henry of Blois however never knew the location of Avalon, but it was him who left the clue regarding Joseph of Arimathea being 'carefully hidden' at Montacute. This essential confirmational clue, not mentioned in the original prophecy, eventually came into the possession of Father William Good. It confirms Melkin's directions to the Island of Avalon and also endorses the proposition that the Michaeline chapels were constructed upon an older network of prominent earth mounds.
Unfortunately many researchers have denied the existence of alignment in the design of these ancient earthworks which became known as Ley lines. The mention of a Ley line for the majority of researchers has led to the refusal to accept the obvious parallels with the Michaeline structures and the denial of any association with the precision of Melkin's geometry. In fact some professed archaeologists refuse the existence of the ancient alignment of Avebury, Glastonbury tor, Burrow Mump and the Hurlers (to give but a few), simply because it is called a 'Ley line' and they don't understand the reasons behind the alignment.


‘And did those feet’, a book by Michael Goldsworthy, clearly shows that the body of Jesus is in fact buried with Joseph of Arimathea within this newly determined Avalon island in Devon. The Island used to be known as the fabled Island of Ictis by classical Greek and Latin chroniclers. However the Island contains within it an ancient tin vault. This hewn out tin storage deposit, which was used by the 'emporium' tin trading island of Ictis..... became the tomb for Jesus, Joseph and a collection of British nobles from antiquity . It had originally been used to store tin ingots when the Island of Ictis monopolised the trade of tin through the Phoenicians to the ancient world.

The confirmation of the whereabouts of this tomb is given by precise geometrical instructions upon the British landscape. These directions left in the obtuse Latin puzzle by the monk Melkin, (once deciphered), lead us to the grave site. The islands position is verified by the clue given to the Jesuit priest, Father Good, who lived in the sixteenth century. He deposited this vital corroborative clue concerning the sepulchre of Joseph of Arimathea in the English college in Rome.
Father Good however, was unaware of the significance of the clue he was given concerning how Joseph of Arimathea was 'Carefully hidden' in Montacute. However, someone else knew of the island's location and how its location was determined by these St. Michael dedicated sites. Since the time that the Templars visited the island with three treasure ships, to bury their treasure some one or some organisation has tried to hide the evidence that was rigourously guarded and passed to posterity by William Good. The reason for this seems to be that should we not have decoded Melkin's instructions..... the island might have been discovered sooner by the geometry which pertains to the Michaeline structures alone i.e both Burgh Island and Montecute both being prominent hill top features like the other St. Michael sites.
The three copies of 'Maihew's Trophea' have all had this information concerning Montacute removed. Were it not for a copy that existed in a private collection..... the chapel that existed atop St. Michael's hill would not have been known to act as a corroborative marker within the array of Michaeline chapels. These act as geometric points, that, when joined up in straight lines, confirm the angle and measurement that points to the Island and the tomb indicated by Melkin as the burial Island of Joseph of Arimathea.



The Templars in the middle ages were aware of the location of this tomb and deposited their treasure in the same sepulchre on Christmas day 1307. They were also aware of the instructional data within Melkin's prophecy. Thus the Templars were responsible for re-defining the line that Melkin had referred to by the re-dedication of church sites.
The line of St. Michael churches built upon an ancient alignment that includes Glastonbury was probably instigated by the Megalithic builders of Avebury. What function this line had is at the moment unanswered, but the fact that St. Michael's hill at Montacute is similar to both the prominent hilltop sites of Glastonbury and Burrow Mump would indicate by its subsequent dedication to St.Michael that it, (before Melkin's geometry was known), could have been part of this alignment from the early Megalith culture of Britain.

However, the Templars removed one item from the old hewn out vault within the island, which, because science has been unable to explain its formation..... has been classed as a fake. This artifact mentioned in the Gospels and throughout Grail literature has now become known as the Turin Shroud.

The Turin Shroud is described perfectly in Melkin's Latin puzzle once the solution is unravelled.
'Habet enim secum Ioseph in sarcophago duo fassula alba & argentea, cruore prophete Jhesu & sudore perimpleta': Joseph has with him in the sarcophagus a doubled white swaddling cloth covered with the blood and sweat of the prophet Jesus that was folded around him.

It must not be forgotten by the pedant that Melkin had purposely constructed an obtuse riddle which needed to be unraveled. It is for this reason the Glastonbury establishment found it easy to convince the gullible that the old church at the abbey and some superfluous line (that was supposedly indicated by a bronze plaque on a pillar), was relevant to the resting place of Joseph.
This fairly precise description of the shroud was given six hundred years before the shroud supposedly first appeared at Lirey in France. This was just fifty years after the Templar's visit to Burgh Island....... so how could it be a fake?!!! This artifact, described to exist in the tomb with Joseph can be derived from Melkin’s description as 'duo fassula.' This was due to misinterpretation encouraged at Glastonbury and so the arbitrary understanding of two jugs, later became synonymous with the Holy Grail.
This misconception occurred mostly by ignorance of the intended meaning of the puzzle. Thus the two vessels which were misunderstood to contain the blood and sweat of Jesus, became synonymous with the object of the Holy Grail. This misleading interpretation has transpired by the subtle twists of the prophecy's interpretation at Glastonbury by polemicists and of course the intended subtlety of Melkin...... designing his prophecy as a riddle to be decoded.
The reader will learn on this site, that the Holy Grail is in fact something inestimably more valuable and these pages set out to explain what the Grail is and how the Grail stories came about.

The body of Jesus, around which the Turin Shroud was once wrapped, remained in the tin vault, steeped in Cedar oil. It is by being submerged in the oil that the image on the Turin Shroud was formed over a period of six hundred years. The image formation was caused by the interaction of Aneorobic detritus and Brownian motion within the oil as the shroud enveloped the body of Jesus.
Judging by Melkin’s description of the shroud and the fact that the whole cloth is covered with a yellow varnish like encrustation, left over from the evaporated oil, the shroud was most probably removed from the body around 5- 600AD by Melkin. The dried out cloth which had managed to transfer the faintest facial imprint to the back side image as it dried….. was then later removed from the Isle of Avalon by the Templars.
The Turin Shroud was essentially formed within what became known as the Grail Arc which is the tin lined coffin of Jesus. This is the box Joseph of Arimathea used to transport the body of Jesus to England that was filled with embalming fluid and from which it is said the ancient British kings were anointed. Both the shroud and the coffin are mentioned in the Grail Stories in numerous subliminal references with many references to the sweet smelling Cedar oil. This Grail ark or coffin brought to England by Joseph was not (for obvious reasons) mentioned specifically in the Grail romances, but is subliminally indicated as the tomb of an unidentified person. Eventually Joseph was laid to rest within the same Sepulchre.

The reason this Island which used to be called Ictis was chosen to house what is the holiest relic of all..... is because it was not widely known about in the ancient world and its location was kept secret from the Romans. It was rumoured to exist through a report by one of the first Greek explorers to Britain named Pytheas.
Devon and Cornwall have a history in the tin industry and it was from this island that tin was traded with Joseph of Arimathea.... who, Cornish tradition has always maintained, was a tin merchant and was accompanied on his trading missions by Jesus.
Diodorus Siculus gives us a clear description of this same island which Pytheas had named Ictis or 'Fish Island' due to the vast quantities of pilchards caught off the Island. Through Pytheas’ account of what he encountered at the tin trading island, Diodorus relates that ‘large quantities of tin’ were taken over to the island in carts across the sand bar at low tide.

The proposition that Joseph of Arimathea owned this island as 'Ictis' came under pressure from Roman hegemony, becomes plausible when we consider he was sometimes known as the Fisher king and could have recieved this name as owner of the island called Fish Island. Also when we consider the discrepancies of the Gospel accounts of a hewn out tomb owned by Joseph in which no one had been previously laid....... the Grail stories may in fact be giving a more precise rendition of accounts of a voyage related by Rabanus. The four Gospel writers are seen to be rationalising a virgin birth with a father called Joseph who disappears from the gopel accounts while at the same time relating that Joseph (of Arimathea) has taken possesion of the body of Jesus. The proposition that after the crucifixion a rumour started, that Jesus was to be buried in a hewed out tomb owned by Joseph might explain each gospel writers conflicting evidence. Nowhere in the Gospels is a singular event given account of with such variance by the four Gospel writers. the main conflicting points are about the discovery of the body. Our proposition is that it was brought back to England to an unused tin storage vault by Joseph of Arimathea (his real father).
These pages uncover an ancient Biblical link to the Devon and Cornish peninsula through a bloodline from the first born of Judah, one of the twelve sons of Israel, called Zarah. It is from Judah’s heritage a line of Kings emanated in the South West of England known as the kings of Sarras which culminated with the famous King Arthur.
This does seem fantastic, but when the reader views the evidence related on this web site, one will find that King Arthur, Jesus and Joseph of Arimathea are waiting to be unearthed on the Island today called Burgh Island. If this is not enough for the conspiracy theorist or the skeptic...... there is also the Templar treasure secreted in the tomb.

'And Did those feet, ' a book which answers Blake’s question posited in his famous anthem 'Jerusalem', traces these events. The book pulls together a wide source of detail, linking the most powerful people in Europe such as Eleanor of Aquitaine, the earliest traceable owner of the ‘Book of the Grail’, written by Melkin.

Furthermore, which seems to stretch credulity even further, a sound position may be maintained that Leonardo Da Vinci visited this island in the last three years of his life. He left clues within four paintings, which show the geographical and geological features of the Island. He also let the world know by his picture puzzle (rebus) in the Windsor Library, that he was showing us a great mystery.
Da Vinci even went as far as to say he would show where it is, in his two paintings of the Yarnwinder. The two Yarnwinder paintings known to have been by Leonardo’s hand, when merged together, show the Island of Avalon at the mouth of the river Avon below Dartmoor in geographical perspective.
Finally if the Grail quester is in any doubt as to whether a tomb exists on this island, we can see compelling evidence in the story of the Perlesvaus.
The Perlesvaux is a compilation of an early oral tradition and is derived from some of the earliest troubadours. It is from these men that the romances emanated. We can still hear the topographical detail attached to the storylines in this Grail literature that show that the Island of Avalon is synonymous with Burgh Island and the Isle of Avalon is not located at Glastonbury.

The implication and ramifications of the unearthing of this tomb will have consequences across the world. In fact this is why this ancient extract known as Melkin's prophecy which is found replicated in John of Glastonbury’s Cronica is thought to be a prophecy. Not only does Melkin leave geometrical datum which leads us to the tomb, but he unequivocally and specifically states that the discovery of the tomb will have worldwide ramifications.

This King Arthur website is not specifically about King Arthur, but includes the role of the fraudulent unearthing at Glastonbury of King Arthur’s remains. This one act has played a significant role in distorting the historical truths related by the Grail literature and our understanding of these events. This faked dis-interment of King Arthur has warped the understanding of how these events originally transpired so that the Grail stories are considered to relate no historical fact. These pages that follow uncover the relationship between the unveiling of Arthur's tomb at Glastonbury and how it has prevented the discovery of the bodies of Jesus and Joseph of Arimathea.
It is also a very strange irony that while the world looked on at the Olympic ceremony, the Island of Avalon ( as modern perception has understood) was imitated as Glastonbury tor. At the same time Blake's Anthem entitled 'Jerusalem’ was brought into popular consciousness as it was sung at the opening ceremony and seen by millions across the Globe. The Irony being that even today the question is still asked 'Did the feet of Jesus walk upon England's green and pleasant land'.

The reason the information on this site and the conclusions drawn, concerning the discovery of this tomb, have yet to be uncovered, are twofold. The first is that the proprietors of the hotel on the Island known as Burgh Island have refused any permission to uncover the entrance after many requests from various people. The conspiracy theorist would think back to the disappearance of the pages in Maihew’s Trophea and ponder....... that if someone in the sixteenth century was actively intent upon obscuring the unveiling of the tomb site…….. are there still those today who wish to prevent the tomb’s opening. However, sadly, the answer is probably a lot more mundane.
The second reason and more importantly is that scholars, researchers and archaeologists have all assumed Melkin and his prophecy to be a thirteenth century fraud and are unwilling to retract pronouncements made not only about Melkin, but a whole swathe of literature falsely rationalised upon propaganda initiated at Glastonbury in the Middle ages.
However, the prophecy, which specifically speaks of Joseph of Arimathea finding his rest in the Island of Avalon….. would have to be a very well thought out fraud which shoots in the foot the supposed promulgator who designed it to benefit Glastonbury. Especially since the instructions within it, accurately located an Island so well described in the Grail Stories at which the Fisher king (otherwise known as Joseph of Arimathea) was said to be buried.
It is these Romances that actually tell the story of Joseph of Arimathea’s arrival in Britain and were written by the same man who concerns himself with the same island and personages (Jesus and Joseph) in his British prophecy . One must then have to ask...... if the prophecy were invented for use to convince pilgrims of the presence of the gravesite of Joseph of Arimathea at Glastonbury...... why then does every pertinent instructional detail, geometrically pin point an Island in Devon. Surely even the skeptics or the sedentary academic would see this as a coincidence too far especially when not one of the 104 knights or 144,000 saints have been unearthed to date.

Melkins directions are so clear once the riddle is decoded. The subject of Melkin’s puzzle is the Island of Avalon....... the object is the whereabouts of Joseph of Arimathea’s tomb and the consequences of it being found.

There are so few instructional directions within this short prophecy that if it were a thirteenth century invention it would be extraordinary that every one of the clues lend additional information which geometrically locates Burgh Island. Previously, not one commentator has given a valid reason for the essential clues: ‘bifurcated line’,’ 104 miles’, ‘13 degrees,’ and ‘sperula’ for Avebury.
If these numerical and objective clues such as a 'spherical' Avebury stone circle (circular) and 'line' (made up of St. Michael churches) did not match the 104 mile distance and the angle of 'bifurcation' was not 13 degrees...... we might be able to go along with convention and assume the Grail stories were misguided in their description of the location of Avalon. This of course would make little sense, as we have explained the reasons for Glastonbury usurping the name Avalon.

Melkin hints that we look for a line to bifurcate. The most obvious line is the Michael Line in southern England. He also intones, (once the riddle is understood as Melkin intended it), when the line is found…within a circle (sperula), which is Avebury......... one needs to measure 104 Nautical miles at 13 degrees to the (Michael) line and one has located Avalon.
This is where he indicates we will find Joseph and the Holy Grail and is the sole purpose of his riddle.


Many have pondered as to why or how Melkin is able to give distances in nautical miles, but he does refer to them as miles 'milibus'. The fact that he could understand this nautical mile measurement has prevented many researchers accepting the 104 as a precise measurement,(even since the riddle has been decoded) and have maintained that the number must be relevant only in the context of a 13th century fraud. How does this number of 104 or the number13 mentioned in the prophecy help a supposed fraudulent monk. Surely if the prophecy were indeed a fraud, he would have stated 'saints' not milibus. However, Melkin who was real and transferring a message to decode in the future says in a subtle way 13 degrees.
Melkin has set out his code and if the reader is not able to decode this part of the riddle, one is not going to obtain the direction of 13 degrees from the St. Michael Ley line through Montacute to Burgh Island along the Joseph line. Melkin plays on the original use of the word ‘sperulis’, from which we derived sphere, which at the beginning of the prophecy related to the stone circle of Avebury. Melkin then refers back to ‘sperulis’ by using the word “aforementioned” (the normal meaning of 'supradictis') trying to convince the reader that the two words ‘sperulis’ and ‘sperulatis’ have one and the same meaning. However his use of the word for the second time has not the same sense as in circle or sphere, but rather in its composition, being comprised of degrees. Melkin surely meant ‘sperulatis’ as a diminutive form and of the symbol for degrees i.e. 13°……. the symbol being a small circle °. Funnily enough the word supradictis is meant to be split in 'supra ad ictis' which confirms the tomb is 'up high in Ictis'
Many assume the ancients were ignorant of basic mapping and Navigational skills but this is obviously inaccurate and is attested to by the Phoenician voyages to Britain. Even Pytheas in 350 BC knew of the necessary breakdown of 60 nautical miles into 1 degree as an immutable and unchangeable law calibrated by the confines of the circumference of the globe.
This conclusion that the ancients recognised 60 nautical miles as 1 degree is easily drawn if we split the globe into the four quadrants of 90 degrees giving the 360 degrees encompassed in a circular line of Latitude or Longitude. By what other means could Pytheas measure the declination of the sun. Don’t forget there are chroniclers that attest that Melkin was not only a geometer, but an astronomer also, who was interested in Comets.


Island of Avalon, coveting the pagans in death, above all others (places) in the world for their entombment there, it is before the circle(sperula) that predicts prophesy (Avebury) and in the future will be adorned by those that give praise to the highest. The father’s pearl, (Jesus) virtuous through the new wine, the noblest of pagans, sleeps 104 miles from it (Avebury), by whom he received interment by the sea from Joseph named from Arimathea, and has taken his eternal rest there, and he lies on a line that is two forked between that and a meridian, in an angle on a coastal Tor, in a crater, that was already prepared and above is where one prays which one can go at the extremity of the verge, high up in Ictis is the place they abide to the south at thirteen degrees.

Insula auallonis auida funere paganorum, pre ceteris in orbe ad sepulturam eorum omnium sperulis propheciae vaticinantibus decorata, & in futurum ornata erit altissimum laudantibus. Abbadare, potens in Saphat, paganorum nobilissimus, cum centum et quatuor milibus domiicionem ibi accepit. Inter quos ioseph de marmore, ab Armathia nomine, cepit sompnum perpetuum; Et iacet in linea bifurcata iuxta meridianum angulum oratori, cratibus praeparatis, super potentem adorandam virginem, supradictis sperulatis locum habitantibus tredecim. Habet enim secum Ioseph in sarcophago duo fassula alba & argentea, cruore prophete Jhesu & sudore perimpleta. Cum reperietur ejus sarcofagum, integrum illibatum in futuris videbitur, & erit apertum toto orbi terrarium. Ex tunc aqua, nec ros coeli insulam nobilissimam habitantibus poterit deficere. Per multum tempus ante diem Judioialem in iosaphat erunt aperta haec, & viventibus declarata.
How the prophecy has been variously translated in the past completely misunderstanding the geometric references

‘The Isle of Avalon, greedy for the death of pagans, more than all others in the world, for their entombment, decorated beyond all others by portentous spheres of prophecy, and in the future, adorned shall it be, by them that praise the most high. Abbadare, mighty in judgement, noblest of pagans, has fallen asleep there with 104,000 others (or 104 knights), among these, Joseph of Arimathea has found perpetual sleep in a marble tomb, and he lies on a two forked line, next to the southern angle of an oratory, where the wattle is prepared above the mighty maiden and in the place of the 13 spheres.
For Joseph has with him in his sarcophagus two white and silver vessels, filled with the blood and sweat of the prophet Jesus and when his sarcophagus is uncovered, it will be seen whole and undisturbed, and will be opened to the whole world.
Thenceforth those who dwell in that noble isle, will lack neither water nor the dew of heaven. For a long while before the day of judgment (ludioialem) in Josaphat, open shall these things be and declared to the living’.

If you do not wish to commit to reading the whole exposé you will find the breakdown of the instructional part of Melkin’s prophecy enlightening.......... confirming the geometry shown above.





'And Did those feet' a book written by Michael Goldsworthy, is an explanation of the rumours of Jesus in Britain. It explains the stories of Jesus's sojourn to England and  brings together the Grail story traditions with the Glastonbury legends of King Arthur and Joseph of Arimathea. 

In 1191 the bones of King Arthur were unearthed supposedly at Glastonbury Abbey. It was rumoured that a cross was found with him which convieniently stated that King Arthur i.e the bones just unearthed, were found in Avalon confirming to those that needed to be persuaded.... that Avalon was in fact Glastonbury. The reason the monks at Glastonbury committed such a fraud was because of the Grail legends that emanated from France associated King Arthur with Joseph of Arimathea and were becoming more prevalent. Also because of Melkin’s prophecy, Joseph had always been associated with Glastonbury because of his Church.

 Nobody was too sure where the island of Avalon was, but everybody knew that King Arthur and Joseph of Arimathea, were buried in Avalon. Neither William of Malmesbury nor Geoffrey of Monmouth associated Glastonbury with the Island of Avalon at the time they wrote. This was a later corruption by monks and the sole purpose of producing the cross found with Arthur was to establish Glastonbury as Avalon. If Glastonbury  could only be established as Avalon by the unearthing of King Arthur, then it must follow the Joseph of Arimathea was also buried within the Abbey grounds. To unearth Joseph of Arimathea, however, would prove difficult as it was known that he was buried with the holy Grail. Since the monks were not apprised of what the holy Grail consisted of, it was easier to fabricate the unearthing of King Arthur with a cross attesting to the fact that where he was unearthed was indeed Glastonbury and therefore it must be the island of Avalon. The reason Joseph of Arimathea needed to be associated with Glastonbury is because the monks needed funding to rebuild their Abbey after the fire.

Prior to the fire of 1184, there existed a prophecy written by a monk called Melkin about Insula Avallonis or the Isle of Avalon. In this prophecy, once it is decoded, Melkin supplies very pertinent information in geometric instructions that gives precise directions to an island in Devon. This island is Burgh island in Devon. Melkin states that the body of Joseph of Arimathea lies in the southern angle of a bifurcated line. Once Melkin's code is deciphered, it clearly portrays that Avebury stone Circle is the point on the St. Michael’s ley line which in his puzzle he refers to as a ‘sperula’ or sphere which confirms the point of bifurcation as the stone circle. This is the point within the Avebury stone circle complex which, at 13°.... if one scribe's  a line through Montacute to Burgh island (which Melkin calls the island of Avalon), it is exactly one hundred and Four nautical miles, the exact number that Melkin gives.  It was Father Good a jesuit priest born and raised and who sung in the Choir at Glastonbury who also confirms the Joseph line from Avebury to Avalon passes through Montacute.

 



 The location of Avalon has always been thought to exist at Glastonbury but with a recent study of some of the oldest text and the uncovering of the fraud concerning King Arthur carried out by the monks at Glastonbury, it is evident that Avalon is in Devon . The references that Melkin gives are part of a geometric riddle.... that once solved, points straight to the island in Devon which obviously fits Diodorus’s description as Ictis. Diodorus had described an Island to which Pytheas the Greek Explorer had visited that sold tin. We know that this island fits Pytheas' description once all the extraneas misinformation is excluded. This is the Island described by Pytheas as drying out at high tide to which large cart loads of tin were brought to be stored. Strange that Joseph of Arimathea was a tin Merchant and Melkin says he is buried on this Island. it is also a misunderstanding of the Greeks that Pytheas went to look for Amber. He infact asked directions to an Island that sold tin but the Amber he was rumoured to be looking for at that Island was in fact British Glass which is a natural by product of tin and bronze smelting.




This is in fact named in the Grail stories as the island of Sarra named after Judah’s eldest son Zarah, who broke the womb first. His name has the same pronunciation as Sarra in French and his descendants came to the south-west and were the primordial miners of tin on southern Dartmoor who brought their tin to this island to be sold. This is the reason that in the Grail stories the island is called Sarras and to which the holy Grail was brought. It is to this island that after the crucifixion of Jesus, when his body was taken down from the cross by his uncle Joseph of Arimathea, it was then conveyed to a box filled with Cedar oil so that it might preserve his corpse. This box or coffin known as the Grail Ark was then conveyed with Joseph and several others from Jerusalem to the island of Sarras, which Joseph knew well, having visited many times previously on his mercantile trips with Jesus. This island had been known about in the Greek Chronicles because Pytheas a Greek explorer had visited the island on his expedition. The island was kept secret over many years since Pytheas’ visit, until Joseph of Arimathea visited the island with Jesus on one of his trips abroad gathering metals.
 

 It was here that he chose to convey the Grail and place Jesus in an old tin vault that had been shut down or made redundant due to the Roman invasion. For about 1000 years, the island called Burgh island been the place on the coast where all the tin miners up on southern Dartmoor had brought their tin to be stored in the vault. This transpired so that visiting traders could take away tin at any time and the island acted as a trading post. It is for this reason Diodorous refers to it as an ‘emporium’. It becomes clear now the reason that Joseph of Arimathea knew the island very well.

The gospels relate that Jesus was laid to rest in a hewed out tomb belonging to Joseph of Arimathea and the rumours still persisted as eyewitnesses had seen the doubled over white shroud that covered his body. One wonders if the Gospel accounts of the burial of Jesus are just the echoes of the truth of eyewitness accounts existed in Jerusalem just after the resurrection. In a book called ‘And did those feet’, a new theory as to how the Grail stories, the Arthurian legend at Glastonbury and the gospels interlink and provide evidence of the whereabouts of the body of Jesus.

 

Melkin, who actually wrote the original book of the Grail, which ended up over in France and gave rise to the many Arthurian Grail romances now interlinks with the same man who provided the rumours of Joseph of Arimathea at Glastonbury. So now we have a tomb containing King Arthur, Joseph of Arimathea and Jesus that was last shut when Melkin moved to France in around 600 sometime after the Saxon invasion. Towever the Templars once they have been disbanded in the Middle Ages were also privy to this island location and they knew what was buried within. It was here on Christmas Day in 1307 that they decided after King Philip and the Pope had disbanded their organisation, to bury the treasure that they had managed to recuperate in three treasure ship that left La Rochelle on 13Tth October 1307.

While depositing their treasure in the tomb they removed the shroud of Jesus that had been submerged in the Cedar oil for 600 years while covering his body. It is here that the image of Jesus on the Turin Shroud was formed while draped over the body of Jesus in Cedar oil. The evaporated Cedar oil has left a caramel like substance all over the Turin Shroud, but the image itself was formed by the detritus left behind by anaerobic bacteria.

 Only 50 years later, one of the Templars that died with Jack de Molay near Notre Dame in Paris, had a granddaughter that produced the Turin Shroud. This is not coincidence and answers the many questions of why there is no provenance for the Shroud of Turin prior to 1354. The Shroud had existed within the tin vault until the Templars arrive and remove it. The song or Christmas Carol ‘I saw three ships come sailing in on Christmas Day in the morning’ is really the Echo of the Templars bringing their treasure to the island of Avalon in Devon. However, this song had always been associated in Cornish tradition to the visit of Jesus and Joseph of Arimathea. It was the Templars, however, that marked out all the churches dedicated to St Michael that lie along the St Michael Ley line. Oddly enough, it is the other St. Michael churches that we used as markers, that confirm that the island of Avalon is indeed Burgh island in Devon.
 

 It is this line that Melkin refers to, which, when bifurcated within the Avebury stones and at 13° and a line is scribed for 104 nautical miles it lands on this same island. Unequivocably Melkin understands the connection between the island of Ictis used by Joseph of Arimathea and clearly calls it the island of Avalon. Firstly,  it is known by the Greeks as Ictis, secondly, by the island of Sarras by the French Grail writers and thirdly, by the island of Avalon named as such  by Melkin. It is even referred to as the island of Avaron by some of the Grail writers.
 The unofficial anthem written by William Blake called Jerusalem starts with the line ‘And did those feet’. This is the title of the book written by Michael  Goldsworthy , which conveys the same story that Jesus visited England while accompanying his father, Joseph of Arimathea to Britain. The book called ‘And did those feet’ clearly deciphers Melkin’s prophecy, so that it becomes apparent that Melkin knew where the island of Avalon was and what existed within it. To fully understand this extraordinary set of events, go to the links provided below and buy the ebook.


In a book entitled 'And did those feet' by Michael Goldsworthy, the explanations of how the Island of Avalon has been misinterpreted as existing at Glastonbury is fully elucidated. The Island of Sarras of the Grail Romances and the Island of Ictis from which Joseph of Arimathea traded tin, are one and the same as the Island of Avalon which is located at Burgh Island in Devon.




This book revolves around an island named the island of Avalon that used to be known as the island of ictis by the greek and latin chroniclers… and anybody familiar with the Grail stories would know that it is referred to as the island of Sarras. These three alternative names all refer to an island that is located off the coast of Devon in England. Today the island is known as Burgh island, but it is what is contained within that will interest you most. If you follow the evidence of what this book has  set out to account for the various traditions; it brings into the public arena, the location of the holy Grail deep within this Island accompanied with the bodies of Joseph of Arimathea and King Arthur.



Glastonbury tor supposed to be the Island of Avalon  from Melkin's Prophecy. This was never Melkin's intended location but Glastonbury Acolytes have used clever etymology to convince us that this is the place.




The island of Avalon has long been considered to exist at Glastonbury. The basis for this assumption is that long before the fire that ruined the church that was rumoured to have been built by Joseph of Arimathea, there was a prophecy known as Melkin’s prophecy. The prophecy of melkin, an ancient latin text, is what Glastonbury has used as its authority to support their claim that Joseph of Arimathea was buried within the Glastonbury Abbey grounds.  The prophecy of Melkin however once decoded gives precise directions to the island of Avalon and this Island is an Island called Burgh Island in Devon in southern England

A recently published book called ‘And did those feet’ explains in much more detail how this fraud has been perpetrated down through the centuries, but before we deal with this riddle that has been set for us to unravel let us deal with the synopsis of how this misunderstanding has transpired.
Glastonbury Abbey where King Arthur is supposedly buried. King Arthur is buried in Avalon in the same Island location as Joseph of Arimathea. Neither of them were buried within the Abbey grounds

Because experts have been unable to decode Melkin's prophecy, they have assumed that Melkin never existed and his prophecy was a 13th century fraud, but one has to ask why is it that the directions in this prophecy lead to an island known to have been used by Joseph of Arimathea on his mercantile trips to Britain with his nephew Jesus to buy tin. The island used to be known as the island of Ictis by the ancient Greeks and Pytheas, a Greek explorer, wrote about this island that supplied tin to the ancient world. This island was never discovered by the Romans but Diodorous an ancient chronicler,  describes exactly the features of this island from the writings of Pytheas.

Straight after the crucifixion of Jesus, Joseph of Arimathea regained the body of Jesus from Pontius Pilate and put it in a box that was filled with cedar oil to preserve his body. This box later became known as the Grail Ark from Arthurian Grail literature and specifically from the account ‘Joseph de Arimathie’. Joseph of Arimathea brought Jesus to the ancient island of Ictis to lay him to rest. He was, as the gospels relate, laid in the tomb ‘that never man had been laid in before’ which had been hewed out and he was also wrapped in white doubled over linen sheet Grave cloth. This grave cloth or duo fassula as Melken refers to it, gradually got imprinted with an image of Jesus over the period of 600 years.



Habet enim secum Ioseph in sarcophago duo fassula alba & argentea, cruore prophete Jhesu & sudore perimpleta: Joseph has with him in the sarcophagus a doubled white swaddling cloth covered with the blood and sweat of the prophet Jesus that was folded around him.

It is hard to get more precise than this description by Melkin especially since he is the man who gives account of how these events unfolded. This by itself confirms that the ‘duo fassula’ is not the Grail of popular conception but now focuses our attention on the other things that the Grail has had associated with it.  In this same extract from the writings of milk in the person of Abba Dari mentioned in the prophecy refers to Jesus himself. This will be elucidated later in the deconstruction of Melkin’s prophecy

 The Templars who built a huge geometric alignment upon the British landscape through dedicated marker churches  all with the name of St Michael, specifically sited these churches to preserve for posterity where they had buried their treasure. This was the same place as Jesus had been transported from the holy land by Joseph of Arimathea, who was later buried alongside him.

 It is this amazing set of coincidences that Melkin the prophet relates in the prophecy of Melkin. Melkin gives precise details of the island and the entrance to the cave in this prophecy and attests to the fact that he was the last to see King Arthur when he was buried there in the island of Avalon. It is because Jesus was known to have been buried there that King Arthur after his fight with Mordred, was taken to the island of Avalon, in the hope of procuring a miracle. Sadly, King Arthur died at the island and was buried in the same tomb as the body of Jesus and Joseph of Arimathea about 550 years after Jesus had been brought to the British coastline.

 Melkin even goes so far as to show us that he knows that this island used to be called Ictis by telling us that the tomb is to be found ‘up high in a Ictis’ or “Supra ad Ictis”, once decoded from the word ‘Supradictis’. It is Melkin who is responsible for the British tradition of Joseph of Arimathea coming to Britain in search of tin and also he is responsible for what became known as the matter of Britain or as the French refer to it ‘Le Matière de Brétagne’.







http://isleofavallon.blogspot.co.uk #3






Rendered below is probably a more accurate translation (Melkin’s intended meaning), with reference to an abridgment of Ainsworth's English and Latin dictionary, by Robert Ainsworth, Thomas Morell and John Carey and the Glossarium Mediae et Infimae Latinitatis by Domino Du Cange.

The first part of the prophecy we shall cover as a whole so the sense is not lost before we dissect each phrase. This first half of the prophecy is the instructional part, where pertinent facts are relayed as to the confirmation of the tombs location and entrance. The second half of the prophecy is assuredly divinely inspired as it speaks in Time with biblical metaphorical language and will be elucidated in the following commentary when we disentangle the various layers of meaning.



Island of Avalon, coveting the pagans in death, above all others (places) in the world for their entombment there, it is honoured by the circle of portentous prophesy (Avebury) and in the future will be adorned by those that give praise to the highest. The father’s pearl, (Jesus) mighty in judgement (or virtuous through new wine), the noblest of pagans, sleeps 104 miles from it (Avebury), by whom he recieved interment by the sea from Joseph named from Arimathea, and has taken his eternal rest there, and he lies on a line that is two forked between that and a meridian, in an  angle on a coastal Tor, in a crater, that was already prepared, (with powers from on high, as from an adorable maiden, up high in Ictis is the tomb and those dwelling there are at 13 degrees.) above which one can go at the extremity of the verge, high up in Ictis to the place they abide to the south at thirteen degrees.

Any commentator on this passage will find it impossible to transliterate, simply because Melkin is concealing information sub textually, word clues rendering the passage as a whole incapable of fluid translation. The puns and double meanings are carefully thought out, but obtuse by deflection. The only way to understand the difficulty he must have had, conveying his message in layers of meaning and grasp what he has achieved, is to evaluate his choice of words. What follows is some of the hidden sub text in meanings he was trying to convey. It is almost as if he was appealing through the layers to different ways of understanding. The task of elucidating becomes less muddled if we take each word separately or if inseparable from another, using the combination.

 Adjectives, adverbs, verbs and nouns seem to be intermingled without respect to tense, conjugation, case or declention and one may be lacking other scribal clues such as capitals or punctuation which are now missing.  There is evidence also within the text that words are split, which leads one to consider that these splits, may be interchangeable with other root words and thus a cipher could be disentangled if an original copy was extant.

So that we might discover the mind-set of Melkin, let us briefly transliterate what he was trying to convey in his riddle and manifest at the same time how his mind worked. Melkin formulates his prophecy in a combination of blurred Latin incorporating Teutonic and low Latin, purposely entangled double entendres, sometimes leaving little to be comprehended from the text that has survived. If one adds to this muddle any scribal changes made at Glastonbury, we are left with a collection of meaningless ‘word strings’, in effect rendering Melkin’s intended riddle as mute through the ages as it has remained.

The most powerful thing about this prophecy now we have understood, is the latent truth that it holds, and its ability to have survived down through the centuries while muted, to convey its intended message, a message of mystery and expectation that has entered the psyche of the British people and will be responsible for changing the outward expression of religion throughout the world.



Insula Aualonis avida funere paganorum:

·  island of Avalon,where both Arthur and Joseph are said to be buried, coveting (guarding preciously) pagans in death.

·  Avide; an adverb or avidus, an adjective-Greedy, Hungry or Covetous. The sense that Melkin portrays by use of this word is essentially, ‘not relinquishing’, nor ‘releasing’ (until the appointed time); The Island as a custodial guardian.

·  Funere; from funero, funera, etc, giving funeral, to bury or of a dead body.

·  Paganorum; from paganus, a man of the country or peasant.  ‘pagan,’ in classical Latin "villager, rustic, civilian, but in the medieval religious sense not Christian-of the old religion. The word Pagan has many connotations and could mean, not of Britain.  Overall a very difficult sentence to cobble together, possibly rendering the sense of a pagan island, rather than the bodies of pagans buried there.  The pagan island scenario would concur in conjunction with Ley Lines, and would indicate that Melkin was aware of the existence of the Ley Line system and the island's inter-relation with Avebury , Montacute  and the Lyonesse line.  This word string also could give a sense of pagan island that is guardian over those buried, and the ‘pre ceteris’ refers to their pre-eminence in all the world or alternatively it could be referring to the island, being covetous of the bodies in front of the rest of the world. Island of Avalon – hungering after (looking after, happy to be taking care of), being covetous of the buried occupants that are not from this island of Britain, before the entire world, (until the world is ready).  As the reader will understand shortly, Melkin’s use of the word ‘sperulatis or sperulis’, twice in this prophecy, is rendered with two completely different meanings, even though Melkin ostensibly refers back to its first meaning as being the same as its second use, by employing the word ‘supradictis’ (aforesaid).  So it is with the word ‘paganorum’ in the sense that it is used here as possibly being a pagan island (part of the old religion), yet the second use of the word after Abbadare, has a completely different sense. Remember that Melkin is directing our thoughts toward an Island in the true sense of the word (unlike Glastonbury) and this island is at the river Avon. Presumably this was the rivers name when Melkin was alive but the etymology of Avon is ‘river’, thus the explanation of so many ‘River Avons’ in Britain.  Another ruse that could have been employed by Melkin using the word paganorum, is in direct reference to the Pyramids at Glastonbury. These were step pyramids with writing on each step which most probably were of ancient antiquity but had been recently covered since the Saxon invasion and through centuries with the names of Saxons, as an attempt to denigrate a much older temple. Much like the British, the Saxons were hardly pyramid builders themselves and this could have been one of many misleading hints supplied by Melkin that Avalon was where the pagan pyramids were.

pre ceteris in orbe ad sepulturam eorum omnium:

·  pre ceteris; gives the sense, before others or before the rest,

·  in orbe ; in the globe, planet or world, giving the sense of pre-eminence.

·  ad sepulturam ; from sepultura, giving a burial site or sepulchre.

·  eorum ; of them, or their.

·  omnium ; of all.

The sentence has generally been translated as: ‘at the burial of them all will be decorated (from decorata), beyond the others in the world’, which of course makes difficult reading.  The most likely sentence would be, ‘ their burial site is honoured above all others in the world’, as one is honoured in receipt of a decoration. This in fact, is confirming what later directions indicate,  that the sepulchre is on the island and is accountedabove all others (places) in the world or there is no greater tomb (of importance).Melkin refers to the sepulchre twice in conjunction with the word ‘orbe or orbi terrarum’ (around the world), thus indicating, what we expect to be a global event, having global ramifications on the tombs unveiling.

sperulis prophecie uaticinantibus decorate:

Sperulis: Firstly let us look at the etymology of the word ‘pearl’.  The Arabic language called it a ‘dar’, a term which was then translated by the Greeks as "Pinna's stone", thus identifying its origin from the Mediterranean pearl mollusks.  The pearl is also referred to as "pirula" or "perula" in Latin texts, probably because of its spherical (sphaerula, pronounced "sperula") or pear-like shape. Also ‘perla’ is formed from ‘perula’ for ‘sperula’ the diminutive of sphaera. A more probable origin is that the word is formed from the Latin pirum as suggested by Diez in allusion to the pear shaped form of the pearl. Du Cange in volume five says that the extremity of the nose was called ‘pirula nasi’ from its resemblance to the form of a pearl. But ‘pirus’ which surely was not unknown by Melkin was used to denote a “boundary stone made in a pyramidal shape”.  Du Cange says also, this seems to have been the origin of the singular expression ‘pirula nasi’ as being something at the extremity and probably Melkin’s allusion to Avalon acting as a marker in our Pyramidal shape.  From Du Cange ‘sperula’ is given as; ‘parva rotunditas volubilis, sicut solet, in sphæræ modum,’-- round compass, of a small volume, as is usually the manner of a sphere. The word is used twice, once as ‘sperulis’ as in this instance and once as ‘sperulatis’ secondarily, both of them having different meanings. The meaning here though is in direct reference to Avebury stone circle.



·  Prophecie;that which is foretold in the future by a prophet.

·  Vaticinantibus; giving prediction, soothsaying, prophecy or portentfrom vaticinari from ‘vates’ meaning a prophet + canere to foretell. However this could be Melkin’s way of saying what is located in this sepulchre will be against the Vatican i.e. anti-Vatican.  It should not be forgotten that Jesus knew exactly what his mission entailed and the suffering (proved by the Shroud) that he was about to endure and was not about to be dissuaded from it by Peter, and said to him "Get behind me, Satan! You are a stumbling block to me; you do not have in mind the things of God, but the things of men." The Roman Church is built upon Peter and in no way is peter at fault but Jesus knew that the Popes would usurp his legacy for this world and not the heaven that Jesus spoke of . The Grail keepers would certainly have precedence before Papal pretensions passing from Josephes to Brons and could be considered another line of succession or Branch other than the self-proclaiming imposter of Jesus’ inheritance. The Roman Pontiff the first Bishop of Christendom deriving his claim by hypothesis from St. Peter, who only by Roman self-profession was ‘episcopus primus et Pontifex primordialis’. Melkin knew of what lay in this tomb and therefore was aware of the inaccuracies peddled by the Roman Church.  Melkin understood the Divine plan and of the true meaning of Jesus’ reference to the Temple being rebuilt upon the third day (or within three days) and hence the story of Peter’s denial of Jesus three times being equatable with the three Grades to enlightenement. These three days are the grades of the Grail but we will come to this in ‘Time’. Are the words of Jesus ‘And I tell you that you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of Hades will not overcome it,’ similar to the promise given to David from which the Church and Gentiles inherited. Is Christendom  and Islam along with the Jewish faith now to become like the Davidic line, to be the precursor of a global inheritance set forth in a Divine Plan by the God of Israel?  What is certain is that, without the Roman church most of the Globe would not be aware of the God of Israel.

·  Decorate from ‘decorates’ translating as, set forth or adorned.

This sentence is generally translated as ‘soothsaying spheres of prophecy or portentous circles of prophecy’.  It is essential to remember that Melkin is actually directing us on this quest from a starting place that is a stone circle namely Avebury.  His description of the circles or spheres having been ‘set forth or adorned’, might indicate that Melkin is referring directly to a stone circle. Stone circles were important to the ancients who were preoccupied with discerning the future. Melkin refers to stone circles as if they have a connection with man’s ability to predict or as if it is the circles themselves that have some impact on leading us to the tomb of Joseph through Ley lines. The irony of disentangling Melkin’s prophecy through our initial investigation into the ‘Perpetual Choirs’ and scribing circles on the landscape, gives rise to even more perplexity. Could Melkin’s sense be that, Avebury adorning the British landscape, from which Ley line's interconnect or thread through the tomb of Joseph, have some attribute or function in the foretelling of its discovery. The reader should not be too sceptical here as the two words following ‘sperulatis’ both impart a sense of future knowledge presently unknown. We must not dismiss the fact that Melkin has knowledge of the St. Michael Ley line; so is he imparting to us through this statement that these stone circles have some effect on, or direct our thoughts for the future collective benefit. No one today has an idea of the stone circles proper function, but recognising that Melkin probably understood the use of stone circles; is he implying some sort of telepathic system ordering the thoughts of the collective?  Melkin knew of the existence of the St. Michael Ley line, yet we have only recently rediscovered it. We should not ignore the use of two words which essentially mean ‘looking into the future’. So are the circles physical attributes on the landscape for channelling thought from individual communities or interlinking them in some way as their prevalence and conformity of shape seems to indicate relative functionality?



et in futurum ornate erit altissimum laudantibus:

·    in futurum; although being an obvious reference to the future, it is also a reference to ‘Biblical Time’ and is reiterated as a reference to the same time as ‘ex tunc’ in the penultimate sentence of the prophecy, which is indicating the thousand years of time from the discovery of Joseph's tomb, the day of Jehosaphat.  This is a sure indication that Melkin has understood ‘Biblical Time’ i.e. time, Times and Half of that time (or the Times Halved). We shall explain this concept in a later chapter  as it appears in Daniel 7:12, 12:7 and Revelation 12:14

·  Ornate; adorned, arrayed, crowned with or decreed, in reference to the island of Avalon.

·  altissimum laudantibus, rendering praise to the most high.  The sentence giving the impression that when Joseph's tomb is discovered, the Island of Avalon will be arrayed by the mass of new converts, giving praise to God.  This sense does concur with the final part of the prophecy that indicates that Joseph's sepulchre will be opened to the whole world, giving an impression that the island will become a pilgrimage and a new religious re-awakening will occur globally on the discovery of Jesus’s body.  There will be a new cognitive view of the world order and an elevated understanding amongst spiritual Jews that the living and the dead are bound by a Divine plan. Those pilgrims visiting the Island of Avalon, giving praise to the most high. This could also be a reference to Britain rather than Avalon specifically as the last sentence of the prophecy infers.



Abbadare, potens in Saphat, paganorum nobilissimus:
 
·  Abbadare, has given rise to much speculation about the word’s provenance and meaning, but it would seem to be a reference to Jesus, meaning “The father's pearl”, (Abba- father, Dar- pearl from the Arabic, Aramaic, and Hebrew).  As is intonated in the Grail romances, added to Joseph's connection with the importation of the Holy Grail, this reference would seem to indicate the presence also of Jesus's body within the island of Avalon.Joseph leaves Jerusalem, and arrives at Sarras, taking with him the Holy Graal, which is carried inside an ark or box. This refers metaphorically to Jesus, specifically with reference to a pearl being formed by the flesh just as it is grown in an oysters shell. It is formed in our body and its beautiful and precious substance remains long after the flesh that made it, has died. This is a profound reference to the spirit being a precious object born by something organic, yet remaining after the flesh has died. Not a metal, nor a gem but ‘a pearl of great price,’-a spiritual soul created through God’s divine plan as in Mathew 13:46.  As the reader will be aware the word ‘Abbadare’ would have been used by Melkin to avoid direct reference to Jesus's body to avoid adverse reaction from fundamentalist sensibilities.  The Holy Grail, having a direct connection with Jesus, but in no way a substitute for his body; the references to the Grail in the romances being of a different order involving a spiritual quest, the likes of which cannot be found by searching or by hastening its occurrence in a lifetime. The Holy Grail is a derivative of the Latin ‘gradus’ meaning by degree', 'by stages', applied to a dish from a transliteration by Helinand. This dish was brought to the table in different stages or services during a meal in the Chrétien de Troyes poem. Essentially the pearl of great price is Jesus through whom by the will of his Father spiritual enlightenement is attained, hence ‘the Father’s pearl’

·  Potens; powerful, mighty, of great virtue.

·        Saphat; by most commentators is translated as ‘judgement’ derived from its reference to Jehosaphat in the last sentence of the prophecy rendering, ‘Mighty in judgement’ from Jehosaphat’s meaning as ‘judgement day’ or God’s judgement. Shaphat in Hebrew translating as judge or judgement . Melkin could possibly be giving us a double entendre in ‘Sapa’, translating as ’New wine’. ’potens in saphat’ could then give the sense of “virtuous through new wine”, deriving its sense from having been made perfect through the Holy Spirit.  The most obvious translation is from ‘potens’ meaning also ‘pre-eminent’ or as Du Cange has it, ‘having pre-eminence’ rendering ‘having pre-eminence in the new wine’ which of course would be a precise description of Jesus as the pre-cursor to the New wine as in Mark 2:22;  ‘no one pours new wine into old wineskins. If he does, the wine will burst the skins, and both the wine and the wineskins will be ruined’.   No, Jesus pours new wine into new wineskins and thus the passage through the Grades. (Also in Mathew 9:17 & Luke 5:37).  Most attempts at translation have rendered this word string as, ’Abbadare, mighty in judgement, most noble of the pagans’. One possible sense would be, if we can assume that Melkin is aware of the Zerah connection and his reference to ‘paganorum’ is the old religion or even Jewish; ‘Jesus preeminent in the new wine, the noblest of the Jews’. The most poignant transliteration of ‘potentem in Saphat’ should be understood as ‘he who’s might is in spiritual awakening’ which we shall see in connection with Jehosaphat.



cum centum et quatuor milibus domiicionem ibi accepit:

·        cum centum et quatuor;translating as ‘with one hundred and four’.

·         Milibus;confusing most translators into thinking its meaning is derived from ‘Mille’, a thousand; but Melkin’s real intention is ‘mille passuum' which gives a thousand paces which equals one mile or miles even though he is referring to Nautical miles.The reader will remember the unit of nautical miles is used so that a unit of measurement correlates to a sixtieth of a degree; this same unit having been employed by the ancients.  The nautical knot only came into use in 1630 AD, but the ancients had sub divided the globe into degrees of a circle as was evident by Pytheas’s calculations.  Melkin was aware (being a geometer and astrologer) of this unit and probably named it after the Roman or statutory unit. The term was not commonly used but the Ancient Roman mile was 1,000 double paces, one-step with each foot, for about 4,860 feet, and there were many local variants, a modern statute mile measuring about 400 feet longer.

Most translations have used the word ‘Knight’s’ from the Latin word ‘Militus’ with the assumption that it refers to ‘the others’ that are said to be buried in Avalon. Other translators have opted for the word “saints” assuming a scribal error for 104. Some commentators, while not replacing the number, have assumed that a mistake has been made and that Melkin is referring to the 144 thousand saints that fall down, to give praise to God in Heaven in the Book of Revelation 7:4,14:1 & 14:3.  This misrepresentation has been highlighted by later interpolators as in the case of Capgraves ‘Nova Legenda Angliae’, which renders the sense of Melkin’s words to ‘milia dormientium accepit’ which has 104,000 sleeping with him, while some translators have added the word ‘Saints’.  In place of the common translation error rendering 104 thousand, Melkin is telling us that it is 104 nautical miles from Avebury to the Island of Avalon. This measurement is precisely 104 miles from a point just right of centre within the Avebury circle, to the ‘Huer’s hut’ on Burgh Island as seen in figure 25.  The Joseph line drawn from Avebury to the resting place of Joseph, confirmed by Father William Good as it passes directly over St. Michael’s Montacute.



Figure 24 Showing the Joseph line tangentially touching St. Michael’s hill Montacute. The Joseph line forming the acute angle of 13° at Avebury, between the St. Michael line and Mons Acutus (Montacute). This Is the clue that was left by Father william Good in the English college at Rome that says the Joseph of Arimathea is 'Carefully hidden' in Montacute.



·         domiicionem ibi accepit; conveying the sense ‘took his sleep there or received his rest there’.  This sentence is usually translated as ‘Abbadare’, powerful in judgement, the most noble of the pagans took his sleep there with 104,000’. Obviously Melkin deliberately sets out his sentence to obfuscate, inserting the word ‘cum’ meaning ‘with’, so that ‘Abbadare’ is appearing to be taking his rest with 104,000 others, especially when the first words of the next sentence are ‘inter quos’ which translates as ‘among whom’.  The real information which Melkin is trying to convey here is that Joseph and Jesus are taking their rest there; 104 miles from the circle of prophecy, which is Avebury as seen in figure 25.

Inter quos ioseph de marmore, ab Armathia nomine, cepit sompnum perpetuum:

·         Inter quos; The usual translation of the sentence is: ’among these Joseph of Arimathea received eternal slumber in a marble tomb.  In the previous word string Melkin used ‘domiicionem ibi accepit’ and here he is using ‘cepit sompnum perpetuum’ immediately afterwards. Aware of Melkin’s cleverness and the fact that he is confounding normal thought processes, it would appear, as if he is clearly speaking of two different people. ‘Jesus received his rest there’ and ‘Joseph named from Arimathea took his perpetual sleep there’.  The word ‘Inter’ by most commentators is translated as ’among’ but Melkin has his derivative from ‘interrare’"put in the earth, bury” or interr

·         amentum giving ‘to inter’.  ‘Inter quos’  most researchers have as ‘among whom’ but here Melkin is using a play on words and his meaning is ‘Interred’ or ‘Interred with whom’ also inferring two people.  The implication of this is; that it now establishes Abbadare as another separate subject and the translation becomes,’ interred with whom is Joseph, named from Arimathea taking his eternal slumber by the sea.

·         marmore  ‘Marmor’  translates as a marble stone or as ’the sea’; its derivative being the similarity of small wave motion in a calm water, giving the expression ‘a marbled sea’ and is also found in Ainsworth’s dictionary. It was said that King Arthur, when he was fictitiously found, was ‘not in a marble tomb’ to distinguish and confirm the monks find as ‘the other important body’  to be buried within the Glastonbury grounds.

·         cepit sompnum perpetuum: The repetition of ‘dormicionem’ as referring to Abbadare, then immediately followed by ‘sopnum perpetuum’, referring directly to Joseph of Arimathea, does clearly indicate that Abbadare and Joseph are two different entities especially since the mighty in Judgement is referring to Jesus.This example of Melkin’s direct obfuscation gives us an idea into the mind-set of the man.  He has set out to misdirect his readers with this pun on ‘inter’ while sub textually informing us that Jesus has received his rest there.  This he has done by not offending Christian sensibilities during the intervening years until the present, while at the same time in the same sentence, preparing his readers for the appointed time. It is strange to contemplate that Joseph has buried Jesus twice in a ‘hewn tomb’ that is owned by Joseph himself. Once with a ‘fasciola’ as related by the Gospel accounts and the second time with a ‘doubled fasciola’ which of course fits with the description of the Shroud of Turin which as we shall see shortly suddenly appeared on the world stage just after the Templars had visited the Isle of Avalon. As we have uncovered already, Melkin wrote the book of the Grail. The original source for Melkin’s book of the Grail was obviously Joseph. Joseph brought the Grail to Britain and so affirms that he was responsible for depositing Jesus’ relics in Avalon before being buried there himself.

Et iacet in linea bifurcata iuxta meridianum angulum oratorii:

·         Et iacet in linea this is the sentence most frequently quoted in reference to Melkin’s prophecy, the usual translation being, ‘and he lies on a two forked line next to the southern corner of the oratory’. Et iacet in linea; renders ‘and he (or they) lie(s) in a line’.  As all commentators have previously suspected correctly, the line thus referred to is an indicator to where the tomb is located and the root cause of all misdirection has been the word ‘oratorii’.

·         Bifurcata; to bifurcate literally means ‘to divide into two branches or forks’. Melkin becomes remarkably un-obtuse when he gets to his specific instructions about the bifurcated line. All translators agree that ‘he lies on a bifurcated line’ but Melkin obviously felt confident that this information would be hard to unlock. Without a St. Michael ley line and a point at which the two lines cross inside Avebury, the information given quite clearly, would be irrelevant. Melkin also could be assured that Joseph would not be associated with Neolithic stone circles or Ley lines.

·         Juxta; translates as nearby, next to, close to, bordering upon or beside.

·         meridianum angulum; A ‘meridian’ is half of a great circle that passes through the centre of the earth at the North and South poles; as if half a vertical plane on the globe, giving constant longitude. It could also be described as an imaginary line of half of a great circle route from pole to pole. Melkin is clearly trying to show the reader that the Joseph line is ‘Imaginary’ or conceptual much like a true meridian line only becomes real when plotted.  It is interesting to note that Capgrave, Leland and Hardyng say that Melkin was an astrologer but it is John Bale that tells us that Melkin, wrote the book called ‘De Arturii mensa rotunda’ while at the same time informing us that he was a geometer also. It would seem then that the mention by Bale of these two topics (the book, then the observation about geometry) would indicate Bale saw either Grail table geometry or landscape geometry in the book he was referring to.  It seems probable that at some stage this book, copy or fragment, existed at Glastonbury. The information about Montacute as a geometrical marker for the Joseph line could only have reached Father Good by two sources; Henry of Blois as already discussed or out of this possible geometrical source that Bale refers to.

Melkin was well aware of what a ‘meridian’ was but was possibly hinting to the Lyonesse line as a Horizontal Meridian, like a line of latitude. Most probably though the reference is giving the clue to look for a line that is similar to those found on a Map. Although lines of longitude (the truest definition of a Meridian) were not easy to calculate on a map at this stage and were largely responsible for their distortion, it clearly shows Melkin’s great grasp of technical issues such as these, through his precise surveying Data. ‘Meridianus’, in Ainsworth, is described as ‘pertaining to noon or noontide’, referring to the Sun’s change in longitude at its daily zenith. Ainsworth also has another translation which gives ‘Southern Meridional’ which would only be an accurate description if viewed from the northern hemisphere, so it is technically not a definitive translation. This somewhat oblique definition would be derived from the declination of the sun to the horizon viewed and defined by observers north of the equator.  However, it is from this translation that most commentators have derived ‘Southern angle’ from Melkin's text.  It is also worth noting that ‘meridianum anglum’ could be translated as an ‘English Meridian’; surely a pun not unobserved by Melkin.  It would seem, however, that Melkin is referring to the angle created at Burgh Island between the Lyonesse line and the Joseph line that runs from Burgh Island to Avebury as shown in figure 25. Essentially the word ‘meridianum’ is conveying the sense to us, of an imaginary line and this was surely Melkin’s intent. It could however be a word that he used to substitute for another descriptive word, known in his day, which would convey a sense of a Ley Line. The recent nomenclature of ‘Ley or Ley line’ must have had an earlier appellation before the knowledge of the system was lost and it is apparent that Melkin knew of its existence.

Again this brings us back to the question; was Melkin aware of the functions of the Ley line system, or did he just construct the riddle from geometric information given in another text that he sourced; that may have been old Judaic, from Zerah’s descendents and the Hebraic supplied by Joseph.  This presents a confusing set of circumstances where a Megalithic site is referenced by a Monk who lived anywhere from the fifth to the eighth century AD, that draws on Kabbalistic material; who writes a Grail book about the steps or grades to the temple ,thereby manifesting his understanding of a divine plan. Not only does he have knowledge of historical fact relating to Jesus and Joseph, four to seven Hundred years after they were buried in Avalon but also is aware that Avalon exists within a network of Leys, part of which was built before Zerah’s offspring came to England and was built by early Megalithic Man. Did Melkin really have an angel deliver this information as Helinand says, if so, was it Michael the Archangel?

We arrive back at the same circuitous dilemma of whether Melkin was the actual surveyor and the reader will only be able to make his own judgement at the penultimate sentence of the prophecy, where Melkin is giving directions within the local vicinity of the island. From this it becomes clear that he visited the Island upon which probably stood a small monastic building (rumoured to have existed by locals) built before the St. Michael Chapel referred to by Camden (circa 1610). By 1680 there is no mention of a chapel and by 1752 it was recorded as a ruin and brings us back to the point that it appears to have been purposely dismantled. This leads to another puzzle, who did the dissembling of the St. Michael churches and who tried their hardest to hide Father Good’s message from Rome by eradicating Maihews reference and is this group, society or order still actively suppressing through the ages? The most intriguing puzzle (second only to Melkin and his riddle) is the Megalithic usage of sites and Ley’s and the surveying of such a construct being conveyed to Melkin. Was this knowledge through Neolithic Zerah down to Joseph then passed on to Melkin over a period of two thousand years or even longer? If the Saxons had not invaded Britain would this information about Ley lines and stone circles be widely known today.


·         Oratori;from ‘oratorium’ in late Latin meaning a small or private chapel of prayer which would fit the description of the wattle church or the later wooden clad building in Glastonbury.  The question of whether Melkin’s prophecy has had scribal changes will seem to be an unanswerable question. Melkin has most emphatically set us a riddle but did he write the word ‘oratori’, or was this a later interpolation. The reason we should ask such a question is because if he wanted to keep our attentions at Glastonbury why did he write about the Isle of Avalon and how could he be assured in the seventh century that the Monks would  eventually change Glastonbury into Avalon.  Although his manuscripts were read by several chroniclers at Glastonbury, we do not know if he was a Glastonbury acolyte and therefore would have wished to concentrate the gaze of the quester toward the grounds of Glastonbury, but it seems logically highly unlikely. However when dealing with Melkin logic is the last attribute to use, to peel back the layers on every level of understanding.  We do not know if he set out deliberately to misdirect enquirers from locating the island of Avalon by confining their search to Glastonbury,  but the convoluted arguments involved to elucidate such an answer cannot be followed through with logic, as we take into account such concepts associated with the Grail as ‘Appointed time’.  It would seem that following the word ‘oratori’ with ‘cratibus’, which all commentators have translated as ‘wattled’, as in the construction of the first church; is too much of a coincidence, for it not to have been part of Melkin’s original text however if we start on this investigation we will be none the wiser. Cratibus fits descriptive clues in the local vicinity of Burgh Island and so does ‘ora tor’.  It is as if Melkin would have us blindfolded and pointed in the wrong direction and begs the question; just how difficult should a riddle be, to be solvable?  However Melkin’s original text could have read ‘orari’ from Orarius –giving ‘sea shore’ and an addition of the letters ‘t’ and ‘o’ to the middle of the word by a Glastonbury scribe would have rendered the word ‘oratori’.  This is a possibility having already seen the interpolations and fabrications that Glastonbury perpetrated, to locate Joseph's burial place within the Abbey grounds.  The best solution would be that the Latin word ‘ora’ and ‘tor’ from ‘torus’ were split.  ‘Ora’ translates as ‘the border or coast of a country; particularly the sea coast or maritime district’, while the Latin word ‘oralis’ translates as ‘mouth, entrance or mouth of the River’.  The word  tor’ from the Latin ‘torus’ meaning ‘a knoll or high mound of earth’, or from Old English torr; a ‘tor’ being a high rock, lofty hill or tower, possibly from Celtic,or Old Welsh, meaning a hill or acraggy outcrop of rock on the summit of a hill.  If Melkin set out to combine these words which gives the real sense of where Joseph's body lay i.e. ‘a Tor by the coast’; then the word string ‘oratorii cratibus preparatis’ has rendered the sense of a ‘hill at the mouth of the river’ or ‘Tor by the sea’ which has been pre-readied (this could either refer to the tomb which used to be the tin depository or the island within the ley line network), and which is interwoven (Ley Lines tangentially passing nodal points) in the Ley Line system.  If Melkin’s intention was to give us the sense of a tower (dedicated to the Virgin Mary) by the sea, this would admit to a previous building (maybe part of a monastic building) before the other St. Michael chapel was constructed  that existed prior to 1307. ‘Oratorii cratibus preparatis’ does lead the inquirer to conclude it relates to the wattled oratory in Glastonbury yet the ‘prepared’ in that sense has little relevance.  As an ‘oratori’ is a religious hymn and an oratorium is a place of prayer, there appears an obvious association with choir, thus an association with the Perpetual Choirs, of which, as we have seen Glastonbury is undisputed.  The translations that have written ‘chanting spheres of prophecy’, when ‘vaticinantibus’ has little to do with chanting; is realistically just a case of the mind associating ‘oratori’ (religious hymn) with church (wattled) where monks chant; giving rise to an association with ‘Perpetual Choirs’ singing an ‘oratori’ (religious hymn).  However it was this association of spheres, chanting and perpetual choirs that initiated our geometric structure.  The association of a geometric design, namely a sphere, coupled with religious hymns that would be sung in an oratory, has led many researchers to associate the Glastonbury choir with ‘Perpetual Choirs’ of the Triads.  This all combining and adding credibility as to Joseph’s burial site being within the grounds of the Abbey and subsequently enforced by geometric information supplied on the bronze plaque. This plaque as we have covered was purportedly to save for posterity’s sake, directions to where the Choir of “Yeald Chirche” was once located, before it succumbed to fire.  These directions were made to seem relevant to the shapes that were inscribed on the floor in lead that were now lost. This again as we have seen, was a gambit by Monkish acolytes to establish a proximity to a holy relic that had never existed on the site but we must not forget it was William of Malmesbury who first mentions the business of wattle. What is the relationship of this man’s ‘ut ferunt’ in reference to Joseph on the one hand, then Joseph’s wattled church being described by him on the other and  the corruptions of association we have seen so much of in the intervening years between when Melkin wrote and the obvious associations made from Melkin’s prophecy regarding ‘cratibus’ and Joseph. ‘Oratorii cratibus preparatis’  would seem to be best translated as ‘a tor on the coast with a prepared crater’



Cratibus preparatis,

·         Cratibus:crates’ from which we derive the modern word ‘crate’ (originally from a wicker basket for transporting) gives the Latin form ‘cratibus’, which translates as ‘a bundle of rods wattled together’ literally, wicker-work or hurdle, wattled or interwoven. ‘Cratibus’ as an adjective, literally means wicker, but ‘cratitius’ translated means wattle and daubed’. It would translate as ‘Wicker,’ as in woven strands of straight poles giving ‘hurdle’. This could be a play on words from ‘Crater’, a cup or bowl, goblet … a platter for meat, with an obvious association to the Grail stories and the Grail's association with Joseph, both rumoured to be buried in the Isle of Avalon. ‘Cratis’ gives us a ‘grill’ as in rods or wood interwoven. The monks of Glastonbury could have been trying to perpetuate an association with ‘wattle’ just to tie in with Melkin’s prophecy or indeed this was the construction method and a small scribal change establishing a direct link to Glastonbury. Melkin on one level could be referring to the wicker like way that ley lines have been interwoven throughout the countryside, ‘serpentinely’ weaving and tangentially touching the nodal markers on the landscape. Because of the words proximity to ‘Supradictis’ it would look as if Melkin could on one plane, be using the word in the sense of Crater which of course is a major feature on the Island. The author is unable to elaborate further as this gives direct instruction as to the tunnel entrance.

·         Preparatis  from ‘parate’, set purpose, by design, giving ‘pre parate’ predesigned or Paratum ‘a thing made ready’ The literal interpretation on one level could refer to the power that has been interwoven and prepared ‘aforetime’ from on high (by God).This could have been Melkin’s understanding of the old Neolithic networks supernatural power in as much as we are still ignorant today of its effect; yet at least he knew of the existence of Ley lines and may have had complete or partial understanding of their function. Melkin could also be using the term ‘Crater’ to describe a cave or cavern that was pre prepared that refers to the Ictis Vault. In the Glastonbury scenario the ‘preparatis’ is hard to rationalise but assuredly the cave was pre-readied because without the cave Ictis’ function of an Emporium would be redundant and the Island would not be specifically pointed to as the place where the tin was taken to. Now we know that Melkin’s puzzle works on many planes and if we use the word ‘potenter’ as meaning ‘effectually or Judiciously’ from the next line in conjunction with cratibus preparatis and super potentem adorandam uirginem, we could contrive the meaning ‘The Tor by the sea with a pre-prepared crater over which effectually is the Adorable Virgin’. There is a long standing tradition on the Island that a monastery once existed, so when Melkin wrote his riddle, did he know of a previous building dedicated to the Virgin Mary, situated over the Crater before the dedication of a chapel to St. Michael after 1307 AD.  One could even get the sense of ’a crate containing a preparation’ from ‘praeparatio’ and  from ‘crateris’ a receptacle or trough with a preparation, referring to the embalming fluid contained within. This will become clear when we investigate the cedar embalming fluid surrounding Jesus’ body .There is however on another level a completely different meaning that can be extricated specifically relevant to the tunnels entrance.  This seems to be the real clue to the Tombs entrance with specific localised instructions assuming in Melkins day there was a monastery on Burgh Island which becomes clear in a later chapter.

super potentem adorandam uirginem supradictis:

·         super, rendering above, upward or on high,

·         potentem, translates as mighty, powerful or being able ,having power or being capable, but it also has the sense of potential i.e  reaching  or attaining

·         adorandam , meaning adorable or venerable. ‘ad’ by itself translating as; on, at, to  or towards is directional. If we look at splitting the word into ad orandam we could be looking at the word orandam, giving ‘to pray to’ or be pleaded with, and also means to pray as in this usage ‘ad orandumvero et communicandum’ which translates as ‘to communicate truth and to pray’.  Is Melkin  sending us toward where one prays ? ‘Ora’ as we have seen translates as ‘by the sea coast’, but also has another sense giving ‘extremity, brim or edge’, so with ‘virge’ is this Melkin’s meaning ‘extremity of the verge’.

·         Virginem derived from ‘Virga’ giving virginalis with an obvious reference to the Virgin Mary. ‘adorandam virginem’ means “The adorable virgin or maiden”. This sentence essentially is intonating precise local instructions to the entrance of the vault, giving its relation in the local vicinity to the crater and where an old church used to be situated.  Perhaps on another level altogether and in reference to Ley lines, Melkin has knowledge or might be suggesting that, whatever the ‘praeparatis, super potentem’, the ‘pre-pared power from on high’ consists of; it is either entrapped or emanates from Avebury the A and the V subliminally indicating Avebury but this is dependant upon Avebury having that appellation in the 600’s.  Diodorus Siculus who leads us to Ictis in the preceding chapters, bears witness that:  “Opposite to the coast of Celtic Gaul there is an island in the ocean, (Britain) not smaller than Sicily, lying to the north… tradition says that Latona was born there and for this reason, the inhabitants venerate Apollo (the Sun God) more than any other god. They are, in a manor, his priests (Druids), for they daily celebrate him with continual song (Perpetual Choirs) and pay him abundant honours… In this island, there is a magnificent grove of Apollo (St Michael Ley line), and a remarkable temple of the spherical form (Avebury), adorned with many consecrated gifts” (Ley lines).  Latona had to give birth to Apollo and Artemis the twins of Zeus on an Island not accounted as land and not attached to the sea floor; Procopius’s ‘Otherworld’ which existed in Britain.

However, it would seem as if Melkin is giving direct instructions as to where the entrance to the sepulchre is. If we split ‘adorandam’ into ‘ad orandam’ it renders ‘in prayer’ if we use the root ‘oran’ it gives again the coast or brim or extremity or edge as before. ‘Vergere’ gives slope or incline which is a multi-levelled instruction.  The English word ‘verge’ has the same derivative root of virga which gives virgin or verga.  If we attempt this word stringsuper potentem adorandam uirginem supradictis’  as a whole whilst splitting ‘supradictis’ into ‘supra ad ictis’, we get the sense ’upwards one is able at the edge of the verge up high in Ictis’.

supradictis : Normally translates as ‘aforementioned’. Melkin is clever here with the word‘supradictis’ to make it look like he is relating to the ‘sperulatis’, as if ‘supradictis’ is referring to the ‘aforementioned sperulis’ in the early part of the prophecy. ‘supradictis’ translates as ‘spoken of, said before, mentioned above or aforesaid’, as most translators have it, and could even be word play on supra-dictis and could be rendered as  “foretold from above”.  As the reader will be aware, Melkin is not only naming the fabled island of Ictis, the very same island the prophecy is about; but ‘supra-ad-ictis’; informing us that Joseph and Jesus are ‘high up in Ictis’. ‘Supra’ rendering,above ,aloft or on high. This may be an indicator of Melkin’s confidence at having entangled the enquirer sufficiently or could even be a creeping anxiety that the intended purport of his message may never reach posterity with all its subtlety. However he was cognisant of the fact that Ictis was Avalon and is responsible for changing the name as well as obscuring both. We will investigate further in relation to Leonardo Da Vinci, the subliminal effects and the way that words are used to allude to concealed meanings. The most striking revelation about this obvious reference to Ictis is; how does Melkin know it was called Ictis? Had Melkin indeed read the Greek and Roman accounts of Ictis and deduced himself, that the place is synonymous with Joseph’s burial place or was the history explained in a manuscript that expressly gave an account of Joseph’s connection with Ictis. The latter seems most probable as even in Melkin’s era Ictis’ whereabouts was lost to classical chroniclers.  Even if Melkin did witness Arthur’s burial and saw Jesus’s remains, there would have to be some form of writing that related the islands historical name six hundred years after Joseph’s burial. It is this body of writing that would appear to be part of the source for Melkin’s Book of the Grail. It would also seem that the Templars that built the St. Michael church design returned the Book of the Grail to the sarcophagus; otherwise this information would have come to light. Melkin’s Book of the Grail was deposited in the sepulchre when the Turin Shroud was removed and shortly thereafter made public. The treasure and the Ark were also deposited at the same time which we will understand shortly.

However now we get precise instructions as to the entrance of the old tin vault if we take the meaning of ‘cratibus praeparatis’ having a dual meaning in that it applies to the external crater dug by the original operators of Ictis so that they could get their cart to the tunnel entrance leading to the storage vault: ‘cratibus praeparatis, super potentem adorandam virginem, supradictis’  meaning’ in a prepared crater at reaching the verge toward where one prays up high in Ictis.   

sperulatis locum habitantibus tredecim:

·         sperulatis:  Most translators have rendered this word string ‘where the aforesaid 13 spheres rest’ butwith the word ‘sperulatis’, Melkin has set out to baffle the reader. If the enquirer is unable to resolve this last clause of the directional part of the riddle, one is not going to obtain the direction of 13 degrees from the St. Michael Ley line through Montacute to Burgh Island along the Joseph line. Melkin plays on the original use of the word ‘sperulis’, from which we derived sphere, which at the beginning of the prophecy related to the stone circle of Avebury.  Melkin then refers back to ‘sperulis’ by using the word “aforementioned” trying to convince the reader that the two words ‘sperulis’ and ‘sperulatis’ have one and the same meaning. However his use of the word for the second time has not the same sense as in circle or sphere, but rather in its composition, being comprised of degrees. Melkin surely meant ‘sperulatis’ as a diminutive form and of the symbol for degrees i.e. 13°; the symbol being a small circle. By the association with a sphere or circle being comprised of degrees and the fact we are dealing with geometric instructions, it is possible Melkin imagined that one would associate the word with its composition or definition and derive from it the enumerated angle. It might appear that Melkin has used a play on words assuming that the reader would know that ‘speraulus’ means ‘to be looked for’.

·         The word locumis rendered as ‘where’ by most commentators but this same word also translates as ‘tomb or sepulchre’ in Ainsworth.  Locum generally understood by translators as locus, refers to a place such as the location or place being discussed.

·         The word habitantibusrendering to ‘dwell’ or ‘abide’, seems very out of place in this sentence and it would be no surprise if ‘habit’ and ‘antibus’ were split to give the sense of ‘dwelling opposite’ at 13 degrees or some such contortion. We could arrive at ‘antiboreus’ which translates as ‘looking towards the north’ or from ‘anticus’ translating as the fore part or southward.  It is only because habitantibus is unusual especially in this section of the directional part of the prophecy that it would seem that the word needs to be split; so we could have the ‘locum’ as a sepulchre abiding in the fore part or southward of the 13 degrees, or those that dwell in the tomb are looking toward the north to the 13 degree angle. The reader can see how accurate Melkin has been by carrying out a simple trigonometric example by drawing a line at right angles down from the point at which the Ley lines cross each side of Glastonbury tor and this gives the precise angle of 12.838568 degrees, which is only 9 ‘seconds’ out and considering the fact that Melkin is trying to conceal that he is referring to degrees, can be accounted as a rounded up 13 degrees.



·         Tredecim: translating as thirteen. Sperulatis may give the translation ‘degree’ by its relationship with a sphere. A sphere is made up of 360°, so Melkin is giving a visual  pun of the small circle that is the degree symbol because ‘Sperulatis’ is the diminutive form of Sperula. This is a novel yet apt description that the word conveys as long as the sense is understood, i.e. a tiny sphere or circle as the symbol used for degrees.  However the angle of 13° between the Joseph and St. Michael Ley Line is so precise that it could have no other meaning, but the 13 degrees as shown in figure 25. Without Google Earth this investigation into Melkin’s directions would be difficult in the extreme but it is oddly quaint that a crop circle nestles comfortably in the opposite angle to that indicating the 13 degrees just to the right of the Avebury circle as shown in figure 25.


Figure 25 Showing the 13° formed between the St. Michael Ley line and the Joseph line that ‘Bifurcate’ at Avebury.



Habet enim secum Ioseph in sarcophago duo fassula alba & argentea, cruore prophete Jhesu & sudore perimpleta:

·         Habet enim secum, literally translates as ‘for he has with him’, ‘secus’ giving ‘nigh to’ or ‘with’. This sentence usually translates asJoseph has with him in the sarcophagus two vessels, white and silver, filled with the blood and sweat of the Prophet Jesus’. Melkin in this second-half of the prophecy seems to get less obtuse but his use of words indicates he is still supplying occult information. One assumes these days that the ‘duo fassula’ is synonymous with the Holy Grail, as indicated on the heraldic shield of Glastonbury.  But what was rendered as a singular ‘graal’ originally in the Grail stories was corrupted into two beer jug like vessels on the Glastonbury Arms.

·         Ioseph in sarcophago: in the sarcophagus or sepulchre or tomb, Joseph…. has with him.

·         Duo Fassula: two ‘fassula’, before the Grail stories were written, must have confused the monks when the singular Grail appeared around 1150AD. At least this might have prevented a falsified find of Joseph’s remains, being totally unable to produce something so sacred as the blood and sweat of their Lord.  It is not clear if there is an exact translation of ‘fassula’ and it seems a direct obfuscation. Commentators have assumed that the Grail is a receptacle and it would seem that even Helinand is trying to rationalise three threads; 1) two vessels that he must have heard about. 2) The degrees, steps or grades that the word Graal suggested with his Latin derivatives. 3) The processional taking place in the Grail story while sitting at meat. Thus he came up with the etymology of a platter as a serving dish for meat.

In the Glastonbury case, we are led to believe that it holds two liquids, blood and sweat. So from the Latin ‘vas’, a vase, commentators have assumed ‘vassula. This sounds like ‘vascula’ which, as the reader will know is a vessel and therefore would seem the obvious deduction.  As Melkin has proved to be accurate up to this point in the information that he is providing us, probably from a much older text, it would seem that the duality of the Grail as an object within the sarcophagus is more likely than the singularity of the Grail in the romances as the sense of Graal.  In the Romances as we have covered, it has been largely misunderstood.  As we have discussed, Melkin was the consolidator of that tradition in the Book of the Grail and, as a religious rite will have referred to it in the singular.  This will be elucidated later, when we will see that the Graal from Gradatim are the degrees or stages of spiritual enlightenment in ‘Biblical Time’, rather than the physical object or receptacles containing the blood and sweat. A ‘fasciola’ however, is a bandage and a ‘fasceola’ is a swaddling cloth or a cloth swathe.

·         alba translates as the word  ‘Pearl’ in Latin but also has its translation as the word ‘white’ by most translators. In fact it directly refers to a ‘white garment’. This of course would confirm the assumption of the white grave cloth otherwise known as the Turin Shroud.

·         argentea from ‘argenteus’ meaning ‘of silver’ also translating as ‘clear or bright’ but usually to do with silver, a mass of bullion, coin or money. It also has another meaning of plated or ‘overlaid’. ‘Argentatus’ giving silvered, over plated or again ‘overlaid’. Is this the heart of Melkin’s message that really shows who it is that Joseph brought to England and the proof?

·         cruore from ‘Cruor’, translating as blood from a wound or gore. ‘Cruentatus’  giving made bloody or died with blood. The Glastonbury cruets as vessels or as Father Good referred to them as golden ampullae, are purely derived from word association from that Latin word for blood, ‘cruore’  then led to ‘cruet’ and from blood to vessel. Many researchers have chosen to translate as ‘two cruets’, leaving out ‘fassula’ as the vessel and converting the blood supposedly contained in the vessel into the vessel itself, holding the blood. Thus we have the vessel holding the blood turning into a vessel that sounds like what the vessel is purported to contain.

·         Sudore,‘sudor’ giving sweat, labour, travail or pains. Melkin has given us here the answer to this problem of the ‘duo fassula’ in that ‘fascla’ a swathe or breast cloth and ‘fasciola’ swathing cloth, is meant  as a ‘doubled’  white cloth covered in sweat and blood from Jesus, (overlaid, from ‘argentea’, as one would overlay an image with silver  i.e. following the outline of the image) . If Geoffrey de Charneywho was the first to exhibit the Turin Shroud, had removed it from the tomb it would explain its sudden appearance in the 1350’s.

Perimpleta; has always provided the word for ‘full’, in the context of ‘filled with the blood and sweat’ by nearly every commentator on the prophecy.Perimpleta is not a word in its own right that has meaning

 but this is common with Melkin. It can be made up from ‘per – impleta’, coming from the verb 'impleo' which means 'I fill up/satiate'. The 'per-' on the front is a common latin prefix for emphasis i.e. 'completely full/satiated'.
'pleta' comes from 'pleo' which simply means 'I fill'. In the form 'pleta' it is acting as an adjective meaning 'filled'. This is obviously Melkin’s misdirectional intention.

However there is no evidence of the word existing as written here so one can conclude it must be part of the riddle to be solved. 'peri' is a Greek word meaning 'around' and is usual as a prefix meaning "about, enclosing,"as in the word ‘perimeter’ -- a "line or outline around a figure or surface”.  ‘Pleta’, literally giving, ‘I plait’ in English, meaning to fold or as the definition gives, "to bend cloth back over itself”.  This seems to show that Melkin has a message to convey that Jesus is in an ‘enclosed fold’ or ‘enclosed in a fold’.  It appears to confirm and describe the Turin Shroud as the article that Melkin is describing; that is the white cloth that covered Jesus while he was in Joseph’s tomb in Jerusalem. The different accounts regarding the cloth after the tomb was found empty, can largely be regarded as stuffing for justification of a first-hand account, also adding credibility to the gospel account of the resurrection. There is no doubt that Melkin is letting the world know that a ‘doubled grave cloth, covered with blood (from wounds) and sweat from the prophet Jesus, who was enclosed in this folded cloth just as it is shown on the Turin Shroud. The explanation of how the outline was formed and when the shroud left the sepulcher will be elucidated shortly.

·         The prophete Jhesu is a poignant appellation, many researchers linking this expression with an eastern origin, as the Koran refers to Jesus in this way. Melkin as we shall see is fully aware that not only did the Prophets predict Jesus’s coming forth but also that he was the fulfilment on one level of understanding, of what they had predicted and thus, was one of their Genre and part of the Divine plan. We now have Melkin’s intended meaning of;  ‘Joseph has with him in the tomb a doubled white folded grave cloth that was laid over the prophet Jesus and outlined by his sweat and blood’.



Cum reperietur eius sarchofagum integrum illibatum, in futuris videbitur et erit apertum toto orbi terranum:

·         Cum reperietur eius sarchofagu; translates as ‘with the discovery of his sarcophagus’ .

·         Integrum; from  ‘integrates’ translating as ‘entire or whole’. This is in reference to the body of Jesus being preserved by cedar oil in the Grail Ark.

·         Illibatum; giving ‘untouched,  pure or undefiled’, from libatum ‘defiled’ as in ‘virginitas libata’

·         in futuris videbitur;  translating As ‘in the future, it will be seen’.

·         et erit apertum toto orbi terranum; gives ‘and will be opened to all, around the world’.

The translations of this sentence appear for the most part as;‘once his sarcophagus is discovered, it will be seen whole and untouched and then open to the whole world’ or similarly, ‘with the discovery of his tomb, which will be whole and undefiled, from thenceforth it will be viewed and open to the entire world’. As in the beginning part of the prophecy, where Melkin speaks of the future referring to a period when Joseph's body is uncovered, as a time when pilgrims would give praise to God at the island; so is this sentence referring to that same point in the future.  This does infer a religious change at the discovery of the tomb and Melkin twice, in this short prophecy, mentions the ‘whole world’ or ‘all around the world’, indicating that it will be a change in the religious system with global ramifications.  ‘Open to the whole world’; indicating, not a Christian world, but an all-inclusive world of Muslims and Jews of the Abrahamic traditions, but also including all faiths that are understanding the proofs of Divine intervention by prediction, convinced by that which is revealed, upon the opening of the tomb.

Melkin starts the sentence with ‘cum’ and with its various forms of transliteration, by inference, is indicating a point in time i.e. ‘with the unveiling of the sarcophagus’.  This is the commencement of a 1000 year period spoken of in Revelation 26:6 ‘Blessed and holy are those who have part in the first resurrection. The second death has no power over them, but they will be priests of God and of Christ and will reign with him for a thousand years’.  Melkin’s understanding of ‘Time’ is what most qualifies him as a prophet and why such great importance should be attached to this prophecy because he is speaking in ‘The Times’ i.e. from the birth of Jesus to the uncovering of the tomb and speaking about the commencement of a new age, the 1000 years which are to follow . A fuller explanation of ‘time, times and half of time’ will come shortly.



Ex tunc nec aqua nec ros celi insulam nobilissimam habitantibus poterit deficere.

Ex tunc;  gives, ‘from thenceforth’. This whole sentence ismost commonly translated as, ‘from then on, those who dwell in that noble island will lack neither water nor the dew of heaven’.  Melkin starts the sentence ‘ex tunc’ or literally ‘from that time’, indicating again the expectation of change at the point of time when the tomb is unveiled.What Melkin understands is that religion in general with its multitudinous dead practices across the world (starting in Britain) will now accept the God of Israel as the only truth, in amongst the myriad of other gods by which men contrive their ‘modus operandi’

nec aqua nec ros celi; thisis again confirming God-given blessings from that time forward.  Rain and dew are metaphorical for spiritual blessings sent from heaven and from thenceforth, never failing those who are converted in that island.  However, Melkin is imparting occult information here on one level, in that, he is using the word ‘nekros’ from the Greek, which gives us ‘dead, dead body, corpse’ or ‘nekrosis’ "a becoming dead, state of death. This is, Melkin’s reference to the ‘spiritually dead’ and shows that he is fully aware of the ‘degrees’ of spiritual progress of Man set within the finite parameters of ‘Biblical Time’. This expression ‘Spiritually dead’ is encapsulated throughout the prophets as those who come out of ‘spiritual Egypt’ and do not obey the Law engraved within them i.e. the denial of the testimony of Jesus. Those that do this are accounted ‘spiritually dead’ but those that accept his testimony are accounted as alive-or living. This is overcoming the first death spoken of in Revelation. However those that accept the testimony of Jesus by coming out of Egypt yet afterward with the pressures of life, and the innate qualities of corruptness that are the lot of the human condition, fall away into ‘non-compliance with conscience’ or disobedience to that engraved upon their heart.  These then undergo and experience the likened Fall of Jerusalem. This is referred to throughout the prophets and of course is followed by the seven years of compliance  (known spiritually as ‘the captivity’), a period to put away sin and of purification and acknowledgement that there is a God (The whole point of the divine plan to self-realisation or Gnosis).  After the acknowledgement and compliance, spiritual peace is found, and this is the overcoming of the second death also mentioned in Revelation. Failure to comply in the ‘spiritual captivity’ period, results in the second death i.e. spiritual death.  The three periods or degrees of Gnosis;  firstly the coming out of Egypt, secondly the return from the Captivity (in the Spiritual sense) and thirdly the heavenly state of spiritual peace, are synonymous with the three days that Jesus speaks of, when he refers to the rebuilding of the Temple. These three days are also synonymous as, the three periods of time i.e. Time, the Times and Half Time. ‘And when he cometh, he shall smite the land of Egypt, and deliver such as arefor death to death; and such as arefor captivity to captivity; and such as are for the sword to the sword’.  Jeremiah 43:10.

What Melkin is referring to here are those persons that in the seven years of captivity after the fall of spiritual Jerusalem, who do not acknowledge that there is a God; from that time forward there will be no more water from heaven.‘Seven times will pass by for you, until you acknowledge that the Most High is sovereign over the kingdoms of men and gives them to anyone he wishes.’ Daniel 4:32.  Daniel 4:25.

The evidences for Melkin’s double meaning here rely on elucidation in a later chapter as a digression here is not opportune and the explanation involves the issue of ‘Biblical Time’.

It is here however that it becomes evident that one scribal change has been made for reasons to accord or marry with the word ‘insula’ the first word of the prophecy and the Island of Avalon we have been trying to locate.  This scribal alteration was most probably innocently changed before or by John of Glastonbury when transcribing Melkin’s prophecy. Melkin wrote originally the word ‘insalem’ as a pun because with this word the purport of his occult meaning is passed to the initiated but also the mundane sense is conveyed.  Melkin’s original would have read;  Ex tunc nec aqua nec ros celi insalemnobilissimam habitantibus poterit deficere. If one were to split ’insalem’ as intended by Melkin to, ‘in salem’, then the sentence reads ‘from that time there is no water for the dead but those that live in (heavenly) peace, will not lack drink’. This is the peace of which comes to those who have come out of Egypt initially and then subsequently purified themselves during the seven year Captivity after the spiritual fall of Jerusalem. ‘In that day the Lord will reach out his hand a second time to reclaim the remnant that is left of his people. Isaiah 11:11.

insulam nobilissimam;  ostensibly translating as ‘noble Island’ in the one sense as Melkin intended but as we have seen,  this originally would have been written as the non existant Latin word ‘insalem’, which when split gives ‘in peace’ the very objective of Gnosis and the understanding behind the essence of the Grail. ‘Mental rest’ in the landscape of the mind,  which allegorically has its similitude in the Holy land, is the key to the understanding of the vast body of knowledge incorporated in the prophets. A difficult concept to allow but the ‘rest and peace’, that the prophets speak of is spiritual and not historical. However like so many words in Melkin’s prophecy, the outward word suggests a mis-spelt meaning, yet when uncovered, the occult sense is revealed just as in Usher’s version giving Judioialem instead of the modern corrected or assumed  form of ‘Judicialem’ to conform with Saphat.‘Judioialem’ was probably a corruption or conscious scribal correction and almost certainly the original word that Melkin would have written was ‘Judiosalem’. The reason that this assumption can be posited is because it is a certainty that Melkin understood the message of the Biblical prophets. This can be assumed by his understanding of Biblical time which can only be gleaned from the prophets of Israel.



habitantibus poterit deficere

·         habitantibus from a root of ‘habitatio’ ,  ‘habitator’ , ‘habitatus’ or ‘habito’   giving ‘to dwell, live in, or abide. Melkin’s choice of words is exact and precise to convey the sense of a spiritual place where one lives at peace, much as today the modern expression of describing someone as being ‘in a good place’ in reference to their state of mind or mental wellbeing. This concept of a spiritual location is vital to the understanding of the prophets, as what was essentially a landscape in historical time (set in Biblical time) by mental transformation, as Melkin comprehends, is a mental landscape of peace within which one can potentially live. This essentially is the Kingdom of Heaven that is referred to by Jesus as an earthly attainable state; of which he proclaimed to be at hand or attainable.  Unfortunately the opposite state being equally attainable. The subject requires an elucidation that is grounded in the prophets and the subject analysis is too broad to be dealt with within these pages excepting the subject of Biblical Time which we will cover only to show that Melkin was certain that what he prophesied would take place at a point in that time.

·         Poterit; from a root describing ‘drink or drinking’ which again has biblical connotations.  Drinking is synonymous with acceptance of the divine plan or God’s word and of what is revealed by the prophets of Israel. The real sense of spiritual drinking can by association be equated with the satiation of spiritual thirst as in Jeremiah 49:12‘This is what the LORD says: "If those who do not deserve to drink the cup;  must drinkit, why should you go unpunished? ... You must drink this cup of judgment!’.  Or again in Obadiah 4:16‘Just as you drank on my holy hill, so all the nations will drink continually; they will drink and drink and be as if they had never been!’  Here again in Mark 10:38‘Can you drink the cup? But Jesus said to them, "You don't know what you are asking! Are you able to drink from the bitter cup of suffering I am about to drink from.

·         Deficere from ‘deficio’ meaning, to leave or fail one’ giving the word ‘lack’ as most translators have it.





Per multum tempus ante diem Judioialem in iosaphat erunt aperta haec, & viventibus declarata: Most translations of this passage differ only slightly;‘for a long time before the day of judgement in Josaphat, these things will be openly declared to the living’.

·         Per multum tempus ante; translates as ‘a long time before’ and relates as we have already seen to  the 1000 year period from the time the tomb is unveiled before the day of Judgement i.e  from the time that Joseph’s and Jesus’ tomb is unveiled. This is the last period of the seven day period of 7,000 years that constitute the framework of ‘Biblical Time’.

·         diem Judioialem from Usher’s text, rather than the assumed or corrupted ‘diem Judicialem’ of the later transcriptions.  The scribal change and word association has come from the original which would have been ‘Judiosalem’ through Judioalem to the assumed ‘diem Judicialem’  which is purely conforming to the notion of its connection to judgement day. This has been due to its connection with Jehosaphat which the Abrahamic faiths believe refers to judgement day. Melkin again can only be understood with a grasp of the Prophets prophesying in time, as biblical spans of time are often misunderstood being dependant upon how the prophet is referencing the subject, this determining the unit time measure expressed.

Melkin here wrote ‘Judiosalem’ which obviously is word play on Jerusalem as well as being a subliminal joining of Judah and Salem, rendering exactly what Melkin intented; ‘The day of Judah’s peace’ or ‘peace of the Jews’ referring to the spiritual peace of those coming out of spiritual Babylon which takes place on the day of Jehosaphat,  as long as the thousand year period is understood as a day being the seventh day of the one week of Biblical time.  Melkin is using the word ‘Salem’ from which Jerusalem is derived from Urušalimum , ‘Foundation of Shalem’; Salem coming from the word shalem, shalom, shalim or salam meaning peace; the city of Jerusalem which dates back to the early bronze age, where Abraham and Melchizedek met.  ‘Judah’s peace’ is the goal of the Divine plan if one accepts that a ‘Jew’ is a spiritual Jew i.e. a person having come out of Egypt and returned from the Babylonian captivity, (Babylon the Great in the spiritual sense) and then found peace through adherence to the Law and acknowledgement of the existence of God. This view of the prophets being not only historical seems newly contrived but is the essential perception although not intellectually or theologically comprehended,that unites and is perceived by the Abrahamic faiths.  Not to complicate matters but just to show how many ways one can interpret Melkin, ‘salum’ also translates as near a coast or to the sea so if we take judiosalum as a word we get the sense  ‘along time before those days when the Jews near the coast (in the period of Iosahat) are opened up and declared to the living.

·         in iosaphat: Melkin has steered the reader into assuming a place, by prefixing ’Josaphat’ with ‘in’, when he is quite aware of Jehosaphat’s meaning as a period of biblical time (which is the 1000 years of ‘The Times’ halved) and accounted as a degree of spiritual awakening being the third day of the three time periods, time times, and halftime as these were referred to by Jesus as days. The reader will remember that ‘saphat’ was rendered as judgement in the earlier part of the prophecy.  ‘Judiosalem’,  became  Judioalem  and was then changed to ‘Judicialem’ because of its association with Jehosaphat being commonly associated with the last Judgement. The rendering of ‘Saphat’ as ‘judgement’ in the previous passage is incorrect, when ‘potens in Saphat’, should be understood as ‘he who’s might is in spiritual awakening’ in direct reference to spiritual Jews.

The Valley of Josaphat or Valley of Jehoshaphat is mentioned in only one passage of the Bible, in Joel 3.2 : "I will gather together all nations, and will bring them down into the valley of Josaphat: and I will plead with them there for my people, and for my inheritance Israel, whom they have scattered among the nations".  It is from this passage that Christians derive Jehosaphat as the ‘last judgement’, which is exactly what Melkin is alluding to. Due to its attachment to a valley, theologians have assumed it has a geographical location, but like ‘mountain’ in biblical texts; it rarely, especially in prophetical literature, has the sense of geographical location. When the reader of prophetical literature becomes aware of the concept of a historical location( i.e the Holy land and its tribes) set in ‘Biblical Time’ that has become a blueprint for a spiritual landscape, this transliterable approach to the comprehension of the Prophets words becomes clearer. The prophets speak of the nations and their attributes dualistically applying to real time historical prophecy but also understandable within an individual mental landscape.   Josaphat incidentally is the name given to the forth king of Judah.  The essence of Jehosaphat’s meaning is captured with the passage in Matthew. 25, and bears witness that the voice of Jesus can be heard by everyone that spiritually came out of Egypt i.e. heard the Law; but then subsequently most of those who were initially blessed with this miraculous correcting toward gnosis, chose to ignore their conscience, eventually being sent to captivity in Spiritual Babylon at the destruction of Spiritual Jerusalem.  This does sound oversimplified and contrived but we will come to this when discussing ‘Biblical time’ but the point is that Jesus did not only come for the Gentiles but all the children of Israel.  Evidence of the Divine plan can be witnessed in Mathew 25 showing the relationship of choice with deed which as we have stated, takes place within the seven year period which is the defining time of purification through compliance or as it is Biblically known ‘the troublous times’ :  31 When the Son of man shall come in his glory, and all the holy angels with him, then shall he sit upon the throne of his glory: 32And before him shall be gathered all nations: and he shall separate them one from another, as a shepherd divideth his sheep from the goats: 33And he shall set the sheep on his right hand, but the goats on the left. 34Then shall the King say unto them on his right hand, ‘Come, ye blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world: 35For I was an hungered, and ye gave me meat: I was thirsty, and ye gave me drink: I was a stranger, and ye took me in: 36 Naked, and ye clothed me: I was sick, and ye visited me: I was in prison, and ye came unto me’. 37Then shall the righteous answer him, saying, Lord, ‘when did we see you hungry, and fed thee? or thirsty, and gave thee drink? 38 When saw we thee a stranger, and took thee in? or naked, and clothed thee? 39 Or when saw we thee sick, or in prison, and came unto thee?’ 40 And the King shall answer and say unto them, ‘Verily I say unto you, inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me’. 41Then shall he say also unto them on the left hand, depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels; 42 For I was an hungered, and ye gave me no meat; I was thirsty, and ye gave me no drink; 43 I was a stranger, and ye took me not in; naked, and ye clothed me not; sick, and in prison, and ye visited me not .  44 Then shall they also answer him, saying, Lord, when saw we thee an hungered, or athirst, or a stranger, or naked, or sick, or in prison, and did not minister unto thee?  45 Then shall he answer them, saying, ‘Verily I say unto you, inasmuch as ye did it not to one of the least of these, ye did it not to me’. 46  And these shall go away into everlasting punishment: but the righteous into life eternal.

erunt aperta haec, & viventibus declarata; usually translated as ’openly shall these things be declared to the living’ but another interpretation could be that ‘these things will be openly accepted or made apparent by those having reached spiritual awareness’.  ‘Viventibus’, the living or alive, has the same connotation as in prophetical literature, as those not spiritually dead. Throughout the prophets this notion is held that man can be alive, not in the sense that humans are either dead or alive but spiritually alive, as opposed to those in whom their conscience no longer councils to do good but instead, acts conversely as a ‘fearful looking for of judgement’. It is from this understanding that we might grasp God not being a ‘respector of persons’ but only of those who are spiritually alive.



Melkin specifically points to a period in time and this point in time is the uncovering of Jesus’ body. The reason for this is obvious in the proofs it will provide for the future not only of the veracity of his prophecy but substantiating the words of the Prophets of Israel and these confirmations and the realisation of a Divine plan will cause a paradigm shift in consciousness. Jesus and the Archangel Michael  mentioned in Revelation and Daniel seem to be both part of the raising of Human consciousness and are accounted as witnesses to the Divine Plan.


Insula auallonis auida funere paganorum, pre ceteris in orbe ad sepulturam eorum omnium sperulis propheciae vaticinantibus decorata, & in futurum ornata erit altissimum laudantibus. Abbadare, potens in Saphat, paganorum nobilissimus, cum centum et quatuor milibus domiicionem ibi accepit. Inter quos ioseph de marmore, ab Armathia nomine, cepit sompnum perpetuum; Et iacet in linea bifurcata iuxta meridianum angulum oratori, cratibus praeparatis, super potentem adorandam virginem, supradictis  sperulatis locum habitantibus tredecim. Habet enim secum Ioseph in sarcophago duo fassula alba & argentea, cruore prophete Jhesu & sudore perimpleta. Cum reperietur ejus sarcofagum, integrum illibatum in futuris videbitur, & erit apertum toto orbi terrarium. Ex tunc aqua, nec ros coeli insulam nobilissimam habitantibus poterit deficere. Per multum tempus ante diem Judioialem in iosaphat erunt aperta haec, & viventibus declarata. 
  Hucusque melkinus.

In ancient times around 350 bc a Greek navigator who  visited Britain wrote a journal and in it he described an island where tin was produced and he called it fish island or in Greek Ichthys, Ichthus and Ikhthus i.ethe island of Ictis. This Island was surrounded by Pilchards at certain times of the year hence its name.  The tin trade which had existed since the 1000bc  through Phoenician traders was Later commented upon by a Latin chronicler named Diodorus and his comments  on the British were that.

 The inhabitants who dwell near the promontory of Britain, known as Belerium, mine tin  and when they have melted it into tin ingots, they carry it to a certain island, which lies off Britain, and is called Ictis. For at the ebbing’s of the tide, the space between this island and the mainland is left dry and then they can convey the tin in large quantities over to the island on their wagons.

 This is the island of Burgh Island in S.Devon with its sand causeway that dries out a low tide upon which the carts of tin mentioned by Pytheas were brought down from southern Dartmoor through Loddiswell upon an ancient cart track. The only ‘linch pin’ from one of these wagons found in Devon and Cornwall from pytheas’ era was found on this same track from   Dartmoor to Ictis.  They travelled along a tidal road in Aveton Gifford to reach the Island of Ictis



As many are aware there is a legend in Cornwall that Joseph of Arimathea Jesus’ uncle was a Tin merchant and that he came to this coast to pick up tin with Jesus when he was still a boy. No one was quite sure why Ictis was called an Emporium which means market place, but it is now known that within this island is an old vault originally used for storing tin by the old miners but around the time the Romans invaded Britain this came increasingly difficult to keep secret so Joseph bought this island with the huge tin vault within it. The body of Jesus is yet to be discovered within the Island. This is why the gospels relate three pertinent facts, the tomb belonged to Joseph, it was a hewed out tomb that no other man had lain in before and in it was a white cloth. This is what the gospels concur upon but they do not let on that the tomb site is in England.

 In fact Strabo another chronicler states that a Captain ran his boat on the rocks rather than give away the islands position to the Romans and it just so happens that next to this island we have the only two maritime wrecks from the ancient tin industry. This is where the biggest cache of tin ingots was found just a couple of miles from ictis.

Melkin a prophet and monk who lived in about 450 to 650AD  wrote a very strange prophecy in Latin,  which up until now has remained an obscure piece of literature which gives directions to the burial place of Joseph of Arimathea. Joseph is supposed to have with him what is thought to be the Holy grail with him where he is buried in the island of Avalon.

For many years Grail hunters have assumed that the Grail and Joseph lie at Glastonbury but the prophecy was given in the form of a puzzle and recently this riddle has been unlocked and is now revealed in a book called ‘And Did Those Feet’.

 The book ‘And Did Those Feet’ is named after the poem written by William Blake which as most Britons know is the anthem of Jerusalem , which speaks of New Jerusalem existing in Britain  and asks the question ‘did Jesus’ feet walk upon England’s pleasant pastures green.  Well now we have the answer because Jesus is buried within this Island beside Joseph of Arimathea. 

The prophet melkin visited the gravesite after king Arthur was buried there and left these directions for posterity that we might uncover his grave site  and calls the island the island of Avalon.



Island of Avalon, coveting the pagans in death, above all others (places) in the world because they have their entombment there and it is honoured by a circle that portends of a prophesy (and this circle is the stone circle of Avebury).  It then goes on to say that in the future the island will be adorned by those that give praise to the highest and ‘Abbadare’ (which translated means The father’s pearl, who is of course Jesus) mighty in judgement the noblest of those foreigners sleeps 104 nautical miles from Avebury, and by whom he recieved interment by the sea from Joseph who is named after Arimathea, and he has also taken his eternal rest there, and they lie on the southern fork of a ‘bifurcated meridional’ line in an  angle on a coastal Tor,  in a crater, above which one can go at the extremity of the verge as it was already preparedhigh up in Ictis.  this  tomb is now their  dwelling  and is located 13 degrees from the st. Michael ley line.

This is what melkin tells us and it is laid out word for word so that the prophecy can be fully understood in the book And did those feet . Click on the link above.

The Templars built an array of churches all dedicated to St Michael which comprise the St Michael ley line and like St Michael’s mount in Cornwall this small island had a St Michael church on it but it is father Good a fifteenth century Jesuit monk who confirms this position who tells us that Joseph of Arimathea is ‘carefully hidden’ in Montacute and you can see that the line passes through St.Michaels hill where there once also stood a church dedicated to him EXACTLY 104 MILES ON A LINE THAT IS BIFURCATED  AT THIRTEEN DEGREES AND RUNS THROUGH MONTECUTE.

 Many scholars and historians that have dealt with the Glastonbury material say the Melkin was an invention of the twelvth or thirteenth century. This is simply not true and this position is only arrived at because no one has been able to decipher  Melkin’s Prophecy before the current era. Ask yourself ,why would someone make a puzzle that no one could understand yet all the details in it are so precise and lead to the very island named in the prophecy.

 Not only did Melkin write the original of the Grail book which establishes the location of this Island, but Leonardo Da vinci was aware of where this island was and also told us that in his paintings of the Madonna and the yarnwinder he would show us where this island is.  He painted two Yarnwinder paintings which show exactly where the geographical location is . We can see if we merge the two paintings that we know to be painted by him, he gives every geographical detail that locates the island of Avalon as the present day Burgh island in Devon which we can also see this same perspective on google earth.

This is a complicated story but it is revealed in this new and enlightening book that gives evidence of how this island became known as the island of Sarras in the Grail stories and how the Turin shroud is in fact the real grave cloth of jesus seen by Melkin and  that he referred to it as the ‘Duo Fassula’.

In fact you can see Melkin’s latin description matches the shroud completely if we understand that his riddle of the Duo Fassula is really a Duplico fasciola or doubled over grave cloth because it says that….



Habet enim secum Ioseph in sarcophago duo fassula alba & argentea, cruore prophete Jhesu & sudore perimpleta:

 Joseph has with him in the sarcophagus a doubled white swaddling cloth covered with the blood and sweat of the prophet Jesus that was folded around him.



The Templars who built the St.Michael churches to mark this grave site buried their treasure on this island on Christmas day in 1307 after arriving in three treasure ships. As they unloaded the treasure and before they closed up the tomb for the last time one of them, (probably Geoffrey de Charney) removed the Shroud of Jesus from the tomb that is presently on exibit in Turin.



King Arthur’s body was also buried within this island and it is here that he came to look for a miracle to cure his fatal wounds after the battle for his kingdom as he knew that Jesus was buried within it. Goeffrey of Monmouth also recounts that Arthur is buried in the island of Avalon but it is Melkin who confirms we have the right location by saying the word Supradictis meaning up high in Ictis

And Did Those feet by Michael Goldsworthy, is a revealing book with all the maps and evidence that explains how it is that, what was known as the Grail ark in the Grail romances contains Jesus body and confirms how the image on the Turin shroud was formulated in cedar oil. The mystery is now uncovered but what will the world learn from this unveiling of the tomb on this sacred island and what will be the effect of the discovery of this tomb and its contents on all the major religions today.


This is an exciting book released on ebook or in paperback and is full of excellent photographs and diagrams that provide evidences.















The following is an extract from a book which decodes an old Prophecy by a monk called Melkin.





When this Puzzle, (which is the main cause for Glastonbury’s association with the Holy Grail and Joseph of Arimathea) is fully understood, it shows that the two vessels that have been described as containing the blood and sweat of Jesus are in fact a misunderstood reference to the grave cloth of Jesus better known as the shroud of Turin.  

Habet enim secum Ioseph in sarcophago duo fassula(duplico Fasciola) alba & argentea,(covering) cruore prophete Jhesu & sudore perim pleta: Joseph has with him in the sarcophagus a doubled white swaddling cloth covered with the blood and sweat of the prophet Jesus that was folded around him.

The monk Melkin has deliberately concealed the real meaning of the Grail which is explained in the Book.

Also the when the Prophecy or puzzle is fully understood, we can actually determine that Abbadare is in fact Jesus and his body is preserved in the Grail Ark which is also in the same Tomb  along with Joseph of Arimathea and both lay still undiscovered in the real Island of Avalon which Melkin leads us to with pinpoint geometrical Acurracy being less than 100 yards out over a measure of 104 nautical miles and less than 9 seconds of one degree in error in the 13 degrees that he gives as a direction from the Bifurcated line.



The saga of how this transpired is romanticised in the Grail stories but is clearly elucidated upon in a new book called ‘And did those feet’ by Michael Goldsworthy.

The sign displayed in the grounds of Glastonbury Abbey marking the spot where some previously enearthed bones had been miraculously discovered with a fake cross stipulating that the bones were those of King Arthur. To convince the ignorant it was also marked on the cross that the location was Avalon; a fraud carried out by the monks at Glastonbury.



The relationship of Melkin’s prophecy to the French Grail material.



Father William Good, a Jesuit priest, born at Glastonbury, served mass in the Abbey at Glastonbury as a boy just before its dissolution. This was before Queen Elizabeth I changed the religion of the country to Protestantism. He also held a secret as to the whereabouts of Joseph of Arimathea’s burial place.  Father William was educated in Glastonbury, and later attended Corpus Christi College in 1546 where he became a fellow in 1548, and studied for his Master of Arts in 1552. Throughout all the early days of his life while he studied and before he came to the priesthood, he carried around with him the information that was passed on to him by Abbot Richard Whiting at the time of the dissolution of the monasteries in 1539.

As was usual in those days, secret knowledge was handed down to chosen choirboys or likely candidates for the priesthood, by Bishops and Abbots rather than writing it down and running the risk of having it discovered by persons who were not privileged.  Just before Richard Whiting was about to be hanged on Glastonbury Tor at the start of the dissolution, he related to the young William Good, that Joseph of Arimathea was ‘carefully hidden in Montacute’,  most probably with the added instruction to say nothing to anybody.  Father Good, while Queen Mary reigned in the interim, obtained the benefice of Middle Chinnock in Somerset, the prebend of Comba Octava in the Church of Wells, and was given the head-mastership of a school in Wells.

When Elizabeth I came to the throne, he travelled to Tourni where in 1562 he was admitted into the Society of Jesus, thereafter travelling to Ireland to become a missionary for many years.  Afterwards he travelled to Belgium, where he met Robert Parsons, who persuaded him to become a member of the Jesuit order, while the rest of his days were passed as confessor to the English College in Rome.

It was during this time in Rome that he passed on the message to alleviate himself of the burden he had carried with him since he was a boy. He left to posterity at the English college in Rome the information conveyed to him by Richard Whiting with the added addition of his own précis of the last part of Melkin’s prophecy, indicating how important he felt it was; “The monks, never knew for certain the place of this saints burial (Joseph’s) or pointed it out.  They said the body was most “carefully hidden” on a hill near Montacute and that when his body would be found, the whole world would wend their way there, on account of the number and wondrous nature of the miracles worked there”.

In Archbishop Usher’s account describing the Arms of Glastonbury, he quotes from an account given by William Good, and refers to him as “a Jesuit born at Glastonbury in the reign of Henry VIII”:

"Antiqua arma Glastoniensis Monasterii sunt hujusmodi. Scutum album, in quo per longum erigitur stipes crucis viridis & nudosas, & de latere ad latus extenduntur brachia seu rami crucis stipiti consimilia. Sparguntur guttse sanguinis per oninem aream scuti. Utrinqwe ad latera stipitis, & sub alis crucis, ponitur ampulla inaurata. Et haec semper denominabantur insignia Sancti Josephi, qui ibi habitue pie credebatur, & fortasse sepultus esse.



Such are the ancient Arms of the monastery of Glastonbury. A white shield in which, for a long time, a green and gnarled stake of a cross sticks out, and from side to side stretch branches or boughs as if they were the beam of the cross. Drops of blood are spattered around the whole expanse of the shield. And at the sides of the stake, under the beam of the cross, is placed a gilded flask. And these were always referred to as the tokens of St Joseph, who is believed to have lived piously, and perhaps to have been buried there.’



 The Reverend Walter Skeat make his own remarks on Father Good’s passage; “The knotted cross evidently refers to the legend of St Joseph's thorny staff (from which a tree had sprouted at Glastonbury until recently cut down by vandals), the drops of blood denote his receiving the blood of Christ in the Holy Grail, and the two cruets are the "duo fassula" mentioned in the book of Melkin, which resulted from the duplication of the Grail of the original legend”.

We can conclude from this, that Father Good had read Melkin while in the British Isles and had been privately engaged investigating the whereabouts of the sepulchre of Joseph.  It would seem that Father William assumed that within the Heraldry depicted on the shield, there could have been a clue to where Joseph lay.It would also appear that he was probably taking this line of investigation, having previously read the Seint Graal, and its associations with Joseph, where "a white knight relates to Galahad the mystery of a certain wonderful shield."It is fairly evident that Father Good had tried to locate the burial place of Joseph having been motivated by the possession of a clue but unfortunately didn't piece together the relevance of Montacute.


Figure 22 Showing the Folly tower where there once stood a chapel dedicated to St.Michael on this hilltop ‘marker’ site.



Geoffrey of Monmouth writing in 1130 makes no allusion to the Graal, or to Lancelot or Gawain, or to the prophecy of Melkin and does not say one word about Joseph of Arimathea in his popularHistoria Regum Britanniae.Geoffrey wrote many works, all in Latin, but in his History of the Kings of Britain, he writes about Arthur, Merlin and Vortigern at length, but draws nothing from Melkin’s genealogy of Arthur, yet includes the previously unknown prophecies of Merlin.  Geoffrey claims in his dedication that his book is a translation of an "ancient book in the British language that told in orderly fashion the deeds of all the kings of Britain", given to him by Walter, Archdeacon of Oxford.  Much of his material was invented, but the main body of manuscript text was supplied by the Archdeacon of Oxford, which mainly came from Welsh sources, most probably from the writings of Melkin that were embellished upon and subsequently places Arthur in a Welsh backdrop. Geoffrey's works seem to show acquaintance with the place names of the region and most commentators think Geoffrey was Welsh and spoke Welsh.  He seems to have come from the French-speaking Welsh border country and was probably educated in a Benedictine monastery.  There were probably many French speaking Bretons in this region from the monastic houses that were to influence the likes of Gerald of Wales (Gerald de Barri), who is half Welsh, half Normanand Walter Map. Maep or Mapes was born on the Marches of Wales and calls the Welsh his countrymen, and England ‘our mother.’ It is posited that the Bretons and the Welsh spoke a similar language and it was from this connection that the Grail stories were easily assimilated with a similar Arthurian tradition that existed in Wales.  William of Malmesburythe product of intermarriage between Norman and Saxon noticed but a slight difference in his time between Welsh and Breton:  ‘Lingua nonnihil a nostris Brittonibus Degeneres’  and Giraldus calls the Breton an old-fashioned Welsh. : ‘Magis antiquo linguae Britannicae idiomati appropriato’.

This tradition could have existed in Wales through copies of the works of Melkin that remained in Britain but as we have covered, it seems that the Book of the Grail went to France caused by the Saxon invasion and later returned to revitalise and mix with Welsh legend after having come from a French romanticisation of original, yet overlapping historical Material. The route of this information having probably travelled to Mont St. Michel near St. Malo and Avranche which of course would have had links with the tin traders since ancient times and as we will cover in a later chapter the probable landing point of Melkin which is why Helinand relates the account of the Graal and the supposed apparition to the Hermit (in Britain) taking place in 707 or as Walter map has it as 717AD. It becomes apparent later that Melkin probably took this book to France in his old age and thus an account of a British monk experiencing an angelic apparition was known in France.

Geoffrey’s omission of the Joseph material, despite his book's popular success, meant that the French tradition was not as widely known and did not appear until after Geoffrey’s death in 1154. If there was an early tradition that included the Nicodemus and Joseph stories at Glastonbury it was ignored by William and Geoffrey, but then proliferated at the advent of the French Grail material as if in response, to set the record straight and counter the more Welsh and strictly Arthurian material.  That's not to say that the legends had not persisted about Arthur and his connection with Joseph before then, this being evidenced by St. Augustin's argument with the Britons, "who preferred their own traditions before all the churches in the world", which of course is a referral to the Joseph tradition and possibly the bloodline ties of Arthur to Joseph.

Helinand,the Cistercian Abbot of Froidemont or in latin Frigidus Mons on the river Tera near Beauvais wrote a chronicle. The Abbey was founded in 1134 but found among manuscripts in the library including accounts of the lives of St. Bernard and St. Thomas of Cantorbery is ‘La Chronique d’Helinand’ written around 1215AD. Here in the diocese of Beauvais was a Cistercian monk who died circa 1220, but he wrote a chronicle of events in history which terminates with the year 1209 and seems to have heard an account of Melkin having had an apparition of an Angel and this account seems to relate to the Grail and matches the date when Melkin possibly visited Mont-Saint-Michel in Normandy around 700AD.

John of Tynemouth, writing later quotes an extract from Helinand (below) referring to the Graal for the first time by its name at a date given in his chronicle as 707A.D. As the chronicle was laid out by date and it was at this point in time where the extract was inserted in the chronicle, it infers that the Graal was so named at this date. There has been much discussion about the early date of the insertion of this reference to the ‘Graal’ and due to preconceived ideas of the ‘Graal’ being an invention of the Grail writers, commentators have looked for reasons to show this date to be inaccurate and a fabrication of a later date.

The extract from Helinand:

De loseph centurione: Hoc tempore in britannia cuidam heremitae demonstrata fuit mirabilis quaedam visio per angelum de loseph decurione nobili, qui corpus domini deposuit de cruce, et de catino illo vel parapside in quo dominus cenavit cum discipulis suis; de quo ab eodem heremita descripta est historia que dicitur gradale.  Gradalis autem vel gradale gallice dicitur scutella lata et aliquantulum profunda, in qua preciose dapes divitibus a solent apponi gradatim, unus morsellus post alium in diversis ordinibus. Dicitur vulgari nomine greal, quia grata et acceptabilis est in ea comedenti, tum propter continens, quia forte argentea est vel de alia preciosa materia, tum propter contentum ordinem multiplicem dapium preciosarum.  Hanc historiam latine scriptam inuenire non potui sed tantum gallice scripta habetur a quibusdem proceribus, nec facile, ut aiunt, tota inueniri potest.

‘At this time a certain marvellous vision was revealed by an angel to a certain hermit in Britain concerning St. Joseph the decurion who deposed from the cross the body of our Lord, as well as concerning the paten or dish in which our Lord supped with his disciples, whereof the history was written out by the said hermit and is called ‘Of The Graal’ (De Gradali). Now a platter, broad and somewhat deep is called in French ‘gradalis’ or ‘gradale’, wherein costly meats (with their sauce) are want to be set before rich folk by degrees (gradatim), one morsel after another in divers orders, and in the vulgar speech it is called graalz, for that it is grateful and acceptable to him that eateth therein, as well.  For that which containeth the victual, for that haply it is of silver and other precious material, as for the contents thereof, to wit, the manifold courses of costly meats. I have not been able to find this history written in Latin, but it is in the possession of certain noble written in French only, nor, as they say, can it easily be found complete.  This however,  I have not hitherto been able to obtain from any person, so as to read it with attention.  As soon as I can do so, I will translate into Latin, such passages as are more useful and more likely to be true.’

The fact that Helinand could not find a copy of an early French source indicates contrarily as some commentators have proposed. The commentators have supposed that the reason that Helinand is unable to locate a French copy is because of its recent popularity and production. The opposite is true in that it is not widely copied and those bits that have been obtained from a copy in the original Latin are held by some un-named noble family. It is more likely, the reason for the books scarcity is that it had been in possession of a French noble family from a very early date and from which troubadours close to that family accessed and romanticised its material into the French. The fact that Helinand is not finding (but has heard of the Latin original) shows us that he has come across Grail extracts in French from which he understands are derived from a Latin source. The fact that it is purportedly only fragmentary or not easily found complete, adds to the veracity of this supposition as having been written by an early Grail writer . One explanation of the French book not being found complete is that troubadours were given extracts to embellish upon by the noble French Family.  Was the sense of the Graal as assumed by Helinand and elaborated upon as relating to a Dish, originally conveying the sense of a ‘container’ of the Graal and can this container be the Grail Ark or box that contained the Grail that Joseph of Arimathea conveyed to Britain. 

Let us assume that a French noble family possessed a manuscript of Melkin’s original compilation of ancient Joseph material written in Latin and later had it translated into French, to be called or referred to as the ‘Book of the Graal.’ The reason behind this assumption is, we know definitively that Melkin has knowledge of Joseph’s whereabouts around six hundred years after his death. He knows also of the place where Arthur is buried because it is the same location at which Joseph was buried. Melkin was said to have written a book about Arthur entitled ‘De Regis Arthurii mensa rotunda’, which means he lived contemporaneously or soon thereafter but given Melkin’s understanding of directions to the tomb and his accuracy in describing what will be found within it, we must conclude he entered it at Arthur’s death. It would also seem probable that Geoffrey sourced the location of Arthur’s burial as being in Avalon from Melkin’s work that remained in Britain and Geoffrey’s - 'Arthur's grave is nowhere seen, whence antiquity of fables still claims that he will return', is based upon Melkin’s knowledge that Joseph’s grave would be found thus uncovering Arthur.  The probable scenario might be that Melkin, witnessed Arthur’s interment in Avalon but it is still unfathomable how Melkin was able to give us such accurate co-ordinates, not only Geometrically but topographically describing the locale, in a clearly well-constructed puzzle, if he had not visited the site.

The inclusion of the Grail in French, Welsh, Irish and English variations of the romances, makes it virtually impossible to divine its substance, provenance, or essential meaning and most elucidations are fraught with supposition and contradiction so, digressing slightly, let us assume as we posited earlier, that the book of the Grail was written in Latin from a source that included Hebrew arcane terminology and material brought by Joseph and his associates to Britain. It was expanded upon, with information of a bloodline that existed from Joseph (or possibly Jesus through the Magdalene) down through Arthur inclusive of his exploits and that of the family from Roman to Saxon times. This book was originally written as a compilation of this body of knowledge, giving the origins of the religious nature of the Grail, (i.e. the gradual steps or degrees of enlightenment) that conveyed and gave meaning to the substance of the Grail and this book was compiled by Melkin.

Hardyng, Leland, Capgrave and Bale all cite Melkin as an ancient authority on Arthurian and British history and of the four titles he is supposed to have written that are referenced by these later chroniclers, let us assume a crossover of material between these manuscripts and the ‘Book of the Grail’. Melkin’s Grail book in France not only contained a historical account of Joseph’s journey to Britain but also occult temple knowledge having come directly from Jerusalem that explained or gave meaning to the original purport of the Grail. Let us also assume that this Gnostic material from the Temple contained an account of the Divine plan, the striving of man for spiritual enlightenment and its history through the Davidic heritage. Over time the Grail metamorphosed into an object and this transformation was partly due to Melkin who had written his riddle which included mention of the ‘duo fassula’. Now this misrepresentation of the ‘duo fassula’ were said to contain liquids of blood and sweat and thus the necessity for a receptacle to hold a liquid or two.  This puzzle or prophecy survived in one of his other four books or was duplicated in other manuscripts to be reproduced by John of Glastonbury and possibly from other sources. Melkin’s book ‘Arthurii mensa rotunda’ obviously supplying much of the early Arthurian material for Welsh manuscripts that would, of necessity be void of the specific Grail material that was to emanate from Melkin’s Book of the Grail that had wound up in the hands of a noble family in France.

The Welsh Greal material however, contains the adventures of Gwalchmei Peredur and Lancelot, and of the Knights of the Round Table; but these are not found in Malory’s "Morte d'Arthur". The Peniarth manuscript is dated to Henry VI, the earlier part of the fifteenth century. This is similar to that of the "Mabinogion of the Llyvr Coch Hergest", which is of that same date but it is probably transcribed from an earlier copy and it is not known when it was first translated into Welsh, some scholars  saying it was written around 1070 or in Henry I’s time, but this is debatable. Whatever the date of the Welsh version, the translator had no great mastery of the original French from the source and the Welsh scribe by his own volition chose not translate portions, because the French was difficult to translate and the story was itself erratic and for the most part misunderstood by the French collator. It can be seen that the Welsh versions have been assimilated from French sources and sometimes changed or interpolated or polemicized conferring a Welsh perspective to names places and events as can be witnessed in the early Welsh versions which gives a differing outlook from those in the French and can be so examplified. Perceval in the Welsh is called Peredur. Perceval's father, Alain li Gros, is in the Welsh Earl Evrawg, and his sister Dindrane becomes Danbrann. King Arthur becomes Emperor Arthur while Queen Guenievre becomes Gwenhwyvar and so on. This leads to a comparable lack of rigour with place names;  Cardoil becomes Caerlleon on Usk, Pannenoisance, Penvoisins; Tintagel translates into Tindagoyl and Avalon becomes Avallach.  These are examples of deliberate alterations, and it is probable that those capable of such practice would have been prepared to usurp Arthur’s Cornish heritage.

This passage in the History of Fulke Fitz-Warine, originally written around 1260 is the first to mention the Graal from Welsh sources:

‘And when Kahuz was awake, he put his hand to his side. There hath he found the knife that had smitten him through, so telleth us the Graal, The Book of the Holy Vessel. There the King Arthur recovered his bounty and his valour when he had lost all his chivalry and his virtue’

Thus it seems that "The Graal, the Book of the Holy Vessel" to which the Welsh biographer of Fulke refers is from a French source. It would seem that because he uses the definite article, it indicates that he thought this book to be the original authority on the subject either having heard about it from a different source or seeing this in his written source. Melkin’s works had been in amongst older books at Glastonbury now lost, burnt or dispersed which John of Glastonbury describes as “Vetustissimi”. The Vetustissimi were the books of very ancient scribes, copied before the Norman Conquest, so copies of Melkin’s original Arthurian material had plenty of time to be transformed to a Welsh arena.   In around 1280, the troubadour Sarrazin also refers to ‘The Graal’ as ‘li Graaus’ with the same definite article, when he was trying to assert a confirmation of established fact that King Arthur was at one time ‘Lord of Great Britain’. The references to ‘The Graal’ or ‘Book of the Graal’ as being the established authority or source for all the Grail literature even before Chrétiende Troyes, is further evidenced by Sarrazin’s following statement ‘the Romance that Chrestien telleth so fairly of Perceval the adventures of the Graal’. The statement tells us that Chrétien had used a source and had portrayed or conveyed the contents with clarity and it commends him for doing so.

 Let us assume the Grail is an account of a religious rite or process of which a written explanation came to Britain with Joseph. Because what he brought was connected with Jesus, what was originally an account of a spiritual nature became synonymous with the box, Grail ark or receptacle that Joseph was believed to have brought to Britain. This gets even more confused if the French Troubadours heard news of the British account of a ‘Vessel’ buried with Joseph, which  at least would have given them something physical to romanticise rather than what seems to be some kind of unexplainable processional religious quest an hence the very erratic nature of the early Grail stories.

If Helinand’s date is nearly correct it would explain the lack of continuity and provenance in the early French versions. It would also allow for Melkin’s Arthurian material to  be corrupted in Wales, but who could have been responsible for putting together the misinterpreted ‘duo fassula’ that became a ‘vessel’ from British sources and combining them with French sources that were a Processional and which was described as a plate. This was the turning point of the Grail when it became a physical object that singularly tried to encapsulate Jesus’s body, the Turin Shroud and an account of occult meaning and this will become clear shortly.

As we have just seen, the "Book of the Graal" is to be found as a reference also in the "Chronicle of Helinand", who was also a troubadour at one time in high favour at the court of Philip II. Philip Augustus had strong Templar connections, he was on the third crusade and it has been posited that the Arc of the Covenant was retrieved in this Crusade and kept by the Templars. If there was knowledge of the Ark’s whereabouts in Melkin’s ‘Book of the Graal’, coming directly via Joseph (a Sanhedrin member), there could be some substance in the rumour that the Templars possessed the Arc.  It could equally have been Eleanor of Aquitaine during the second crusade, who also could have possessed this knowledge as she was one of the wealthiest and most powerful women in Western Europe as well as being Duchess of Aquitaine in her own right, she was queen consort of France (1137–1152) and of England (1154–1189) but more importantly she was patron to Chrétien de Troyes. Eleanor of Aquitaine is the only woman to have been queen of both France and England and as Queen of France, she participated in the unsuccessful second crusade but may also have been the personal owner of Melkin’s Book of the Grail.Eleanor had two Daughters by Louis VII, Mary who in 1164, married Henry, the great Count of Champagne and  Alix, who became Countess of Chartres by marriage with Theobald who had made Eleanor avoid Blois in 1152 because of his eagerness to have Eleanor as wife, after her divorce from Louis. Henry and Theobald were brothers whose sister Alix had married Louis VII in 1160, eight years after Eleanor’s divorce. The family ties that were forged were fantastic, especially for Queen Eleanor, who, besides her two French daughters, had eight children as Queen of England. Her second son, Richard Coeur-de-Lion, born in 1157, was affianced in 1174 to a daughter of Louis VII and Alix, a child only six years old, who was sent to England to be brought up as future queen. Eleanor’s son Richard the Lionheart could also have found opportunity to recoup the Arc on the third Crusade if anyone did in fact achieve this goal.

The name of the original author of the Book of the Grail is recorded nowhere but we know that Melkin had knowledge of Joseph having brought and been buried with a relic of Jesus. So the probability that Melkin wrote a tract specifically covering Grail material, that disappeared to France, yet left evidence and crossover material that existed in the meantime in other works in Britain, seems to be the only rationalisation.  The concurrence of two existing bodies of information that were to re-emerge and confirm their united theme at the advent of the gradual release of French material, through the Troubadour tradition, gives us an answer as to why British history was emanating from France.

Many have thought that the originator of the French material is referred to in the "Elucidation", prefixed to the rhymed version of "Percival le Gallois" under the name of "Master Blihis" and this pseudonym seems to refer to Henry de Blois who in French circles would have been known as Monseigneur Blois but in British circles as Henry of Blois (1101–1171). He was often known as Henry of Winchester and Abbot of Glastonbury Abbey from 1126, and Bishop of Winchester from 1129 to his death.

Henry de Blois was the nephew of King Henry I, and he was one of five sons of Stephen II, Count of Blois, by Adela of Normandy (daughter of William the Conqueror) and the younger brother of King Stephen.  Henry’s father died in the Crusade at Razes when Henry was only two years of age. After an exeptional education and at the young age of 23, Henry was appointed Prior of Montacute in Somerset which becomes relevant later in our investigation, where his uncle Henry I, was planning to create a royal abbey and it is for this reason we can be assured that the information which Father Good gave us about Montecute could only have come from Melkin’s book in France.
The poem of Chrétien de Troyes is the earliest surviving literary version that mentions the Grail and Chrétien, as he himself admits, was not inventing, but re-telling, an already popular tradition concerning the matière de Bretagne. The process of romanticising arcane knowledge contained in Melkin’s book had already begun with various degrees of interpretation and misunderstanding which had built layer upon layer of obfuscation from the core relevance of the original purport of the Gradatim as a spiritual pattern or divine plan laid out for mankind. If Henry of Blois is the author of the ‘High history of the Grail’ it would explain the reverence with which he treats the subject even if he had to uncomprehendingly interpret the depth of information revealed by Melkin’s original and certainly he would have been in a position to correlate this evidence with extant material at Glastonbury. It would appear that corruption of Melkin’s text into the French had taken place already. It would seem that it was probably Henry’s understanding of the ‘duo fassula’ as a vessel; understood certainly as a receptacle(s) in Britain, that might have transformed the religious rite, processional or quest of the French material into an eventual reliquary or Chalice.
 
Hear ye the history of the most holy vessel that is called Graal, wherein the precious blood of the Saviour was received on the day that He was put on rood and crucified in order that He might redeem His people from the pains of hell. Josephus set it in remembrance by annunciation of the voice of an angel, for that the truth might be known by his writing of good knights, and good worshipful men how they were willing to suffer pain and to travail for the setting forward of the Law of Jesus Christ, that He willed to make new by His death and by His crucifixion.

The High Book of the Graal beginneth in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Ghost. These three Persons are one substance, which is God, and of God moveth the High Story of the Graal. And all they that hear it ought to understand it, and to forget all the wickednesses that they have in their hearts. For right profitable shall it be to all them that shall hear it of the heart. For the sake of the worshipful men and good knights of whose deeds shall remembrance be made, doth Josephus recount this holy history, for the sake of the lineage of the Good Knight that was after the crucifixion of Our Lord. Good Knight was he without fail, for he was chaste and virgin of his body and hardy of heart and with courage, and so were his conditions without wickedness. Not boastful was he of speech, and it seemed not by his cheer that he had so great courage; Nonetheless, of one little word that he delayed to speak came to pass so sore mischances in Greater Britain, that all the islands and all the lands fell thereby into much sorrow, albeit thereafter he put them back into gladness by the authority of his good knighthood. Good knight was he of right, for he was of the lineage of Joseph of Abarimacie. And this Joseph was his mother's uncle, that had been a soldier of Pilate's seven years, nor asked he of him any other favour of his service but only to take down the body of Our Saviour from hanging on the cross. The delight to him seemed full great when it was granted him, and full little to Pilate seemed the favour; for right well had Joseph served him, and had he asked to have gold or land thereof, willingly would he have given it to him. And for this did Pilate make him a gift of the Saviour's body, for he supposed that Joseph should have dragged the same shamefully through the city of Jerusalem when it had been taken down from the cross, and should have left it without the city in some mean place. But the Good Soldier had no mind thereto, but rather honoured the body the most he might, rather laid it along in the Holy Sepulchre and kept safe the lance whereof He was smitten in the side and the most Holy Vessel wherein they that believed on Him received with awe the blood that ran down from His wounds when He was set upon the rood. Of this lineage was the Good Knight for whose sake is this High History treated.



Adela of Blois, wife of Stephen, Count of Blois, Henry’s father who had fled from the Siege of Antioch in 1098, was so ashamed of her husband that she would not permit him to stay at home. Henry's father died in 1102 while on crusade. He left, leaving an estate with more than 350 castles and large properties in France including Chartres which as many will know is a shrine of sacred geometry, which has Arthurian overtones mentioned in Lois Charpantier’s account of ‘The Mysteries of Chartres Cathedral’. Coincidentally the town of Chartres was under the judicial and tax authority of the Counts of Blois. The current cathedral, mostly constructed between 1193 and 1250 just after Henry’s Death, is one of at least five that have occupied the site since the town became a bishopric in the 4th century.

Henry of Blois was educated at a monastery in Cluny in the region of Bourgogne in eastern France. This was aBenedictine Cluny Abbey, founded by Duke William I of Aquitaine in AD 910 which adhered to the principles of Cluniac reform, including a sense of intellectual freedom and humanism, as well as adherence to a high standard of devotion and discipline. Here Henry studied in the seven liberal arts; trivium (rhetoric grammar, and logic), quadrivium (geometry, arithmetic, music and astronomy) along with architecture and he was essentially renowned later in life, with all this schooling, as a sage. It was, probably while in France during his formative years, that he heard of these early tales and later while at Glastonbury he combined later material to comprise the High history of the Grail.  It is interesting to quote from Miss Jesse Laidlaw Weston’s revealing book  From Ritual to Romance’  as this gives a clear impression of the early Grail writers development.



While the poem of Chrétien de Troyes is our earliest surviving literary version, there is the strongest possible evidence that Chrétien, as he himself admits, was not inventing, but re-telling, an already popular tale.  The Grail Quest was a theme which had been treated not once nor twice, but of which numerous, and conflicting, versions were already current, and, when Wauchier de Denain undertook to complete Chrétien's unfinished work, he drew largely upon these already existing forms, regardless of the fact that they not only contradicted the version they were ostensibly completing, but were impossible to harmonize with each other.
 
It is of importance for our investigation, however, to note that where Wauchier does refer to a definite source, it is to an evidently important and already famous collection of tales, Le Grant Conte, comprising several 'Branches,' the hero of the collection being not Chrétien's hero, Perceval, but Gawain, who, both in pseudo-historic and romantic tradition, is far more closely connected with the Arthurian legend, occupying, as he does, the traditional position of nephew, Sister's Son, to the monarch who is the centre of the cycle; even as Cuchullinn is sister's son to Conchobar, Diarmid to Finn, Tristan to Mark, and Roland to Charlemagne.  In fact this relationship was so obviously required by tradition that we find Perceval figuring now as sister's son to Arthur, now to the Grail King, according as the Arthurian, or the Grail, tradition dominates the story. The actual existence of such a group of tales as those referred to by Wauchier derives confirmation from our surviving Gawain poems, as well as from the references in the Elucidation.
 
On a couple of occasions in the re-telling of these Gawain tales, Wauchier refers to what he thinks is the original author by name and calls him ‘Bleheris’ the first time. On the second occasion he states specifically that this Bleheris was of Welsh birth and origin, ‘né et engenuïs en Galles’.  He says this in connection with a tale being told to a certain, Comte de Poitiers, whose favourite story it was, saying ‘he loved it above all others’, which would infer that it was not the only tale the said ‘Bleheris’ had recounted to the Count.
Even though it is posited that Henry was born in Blois Castle in France, this cannot be substantiated but certainly Henry used much Arthurian material for the Elucidation which might have made others think he was Welsh. Henry could possibly be the Link that combined Arthurian Welsh and Glastonbury Joseph material with French Melkin, Joseph and Nicodemus material owned by Eleanor of Aquitaine. The ‘Elucidation’ prefaces its account of the Grail Quest by a solemn statement of the gravity of the subject to be treated as ‘God moveth the High Story of the Graal. And all they that hear it ought to understand it, and to forget all the wickednesses that they have in their hearts’. These stark warnings are said to have come from a certain Master Blihis, concerning whom we hear no more but the warning does seem to derive from a firm believer with an understanding of the Grail’s sanctity in connection with a divine plan.  A little further on in the poem we meet with a knight, Blihos or Bliheris, who, made prisoner by Gawain, reveals to Arthur and his court the identity of the maidens wandering in the woods, of the Fisher King and the Grail, and is so good a story-teller that none can weary of listening to his tales. This in a form, is autobiographical by Henry speaking of Blihis as other than himself and is confirmed by the Count of Poitiers’ commendation of Blihis’s storytelling.
Monseigneur is an honorific appellation in the French language and it would seem that it has been mistranslated or wrongly scribed for Monsieur or ‘master’ by later translators from the French. It has occasional English use as well, as it may be a title before the name of a French prelate, a member of a royal family or any dignitary; all of which might be applied to ‘Monseigneur Blois’. Also it is sometimes used as a name for a Frenchman who has a position on the court which would also apply to Henry. It would seem that having studied rhetoric and Grammar, Henry would qualify in some degree as a raconteur of Grail material to William X, Count of Poitiers between (1126 - 1137), Father of Eleanor of Aquitaine just as it was said that Master Blihis had done and not forgetting, Henry would have been abreast of the Glastonbury material since 1126.

William IX, known as the Troubadour, 1071 - 1126 was Duke of Aquitaine and Gascony and Count of Poitou between 1086 and 1126. He was the son of William VIII of Aquitaine by his third wife Hildegarde of Burgundy. He inherited the duchy at the age of fifteen. In 1088, at the age of sixteen, William married his first wife, Ermengarde of Anjou the daughter of Count Fulk. It is interesting to note that the biographer of Fulke in the History of Fulke Fitz-Warine the first to mention the Grail in Welsh literature and more importantly the book of the Holy vessel, is Eleanor of Aquitaine’s Grandmother’s family name (Fulke). William IX’s greatest legacy in history was his renown as a poet. He was the first known troubadour or trouvère, a lyric poet employing the Occitan or Langued’oc tongues. Eleven of his songs survive and they are attributed to him under his title as Count of Poitou. This seems to have become a family tradition as the first Romance poets of the Middle Ages emerged as founders of the troubadour tradition because like his father before him, William X, Eleanor’s father was a patron of troubadours, music and literature. He was an educated man and gave his two daughters an excellent education. Henry of Blois was obviously entirely fluent in French and had family ties to Eleanor (His cousin Theobald was married to Eleanor of Aquitaine´s daughter, Marie)who also was a patron to Chrétien de Troyes and thus makes the Aquitaine’s the most likely noble family to possess Melkin’s ‘Book of the Grail’ and to provide Henry with the French source material.  In the fragmentary remains of Thomas's Tristan we have apassage, in which the poet refers, as source, to a certain Bréri, whoknew "all the feats, and all the tales, of all the kings, and all thecounts who had lived in Britain." With Henry’s privileged education and fascination with books he would have found available at Glastonbury, in conjunction with his royal connections; he does appear to be the obvious person to correlate British and French sources that had been temporarily separated.  Blois became Bleheris which was mispronounced as Blihis which got Latinised into Bledhericus and far from the bounds of our enquiry at the moment one can trace Henry as Gawain in his own writings.

Briefly, Giraldus Cambrensis refers to the ‘famosus ille fabulator’,Bledhericus, who had lived "shortly before our time" and whose renownhe evidently takes for granted and was familiar to his readers not necessarily for his personage, but rather for the material said to have been written by him. Now if Gerald of Wales was writing around 1210 this would be when the High History of the Grail was at its most Popular.Although Henry employed his own pseudonym in his work, it would seem that other appellations from other writers; the Bleheris who, according to Wauchier,had told tales concerning Gawain, and Arthur's court, one of thetales of which was certainly the Grail adventure; the Master Blihis, who knewthe Grail mystery, and gave solemn counselling about its revelation;the Blihos-Bliheris, who knew the Grail, and many other tales;the Bréri, who knew all the legendary tales concerning the princesof Britain; and the famous story-teller Bledhericus, of whom Gerald of Walesspeaks, are not separate people, or mere inventions ofthe separate writers. It would seem as if Henry, may well have deserved the titlefamosus ille fabulator,’ but he was only accounted as the originator of the Grail because people thought Monseigneur Blois, the consolidator of Melkin material, was the writer of the original book of the Grail. He was not but he understood the sanctity of the Material.  It was however the coincidence of his being privy to knowledge from British and French sources that was really responsible for his renown as master Blihis but it seems as if we can account Henry in some way responsible for the Grail’s evolution as an object.

In 1126 at the age of 29, Henry was appointed Abbot of Glastonbury and would certainly have come into contact with the works of Melkin which were extant at that date. He joined the Abbey in a state of decline when the monks lived in penury. Abbot Henry took immediate action, proving himself as an excellent leader and architect. He renovated and restored the monastery and it was through his efforts that by 1143, Glastonbury Abbey is noted in the Doomsday book as “the wealthiest in England”. Henry’s brother, King Stephen with Queen Matilda were two of the greatest benefactors to the Templars and it is through the Templar connection of Eleanor and her proximity to the Crusades that threads of Templar material got embedded in the romances and as we shall see became the main guardians of the truths behind the Grail. Henry might have obtained some of his other material from Templar sources across Europe as Henry’s brother gave the Templars land in London and other tracts of land where the Templars had their Manors. It would seem therefore that Henry can be accredited for having writtenone of the first compilations of Grail Romances called ‘The High History of the Holy Graal’.

 It appears to have been collated sourcing from Chrétien de Troye’s work and from sources which Eleanor’s family owned, not only evidenced by the author portraying in his writing, such good local knowledge of the environs of Glastonbury, but also becoming clearer because of his family connections and the likelihood of Henry and Chrétien’s paths crossing.

If our assumptions are correct, the ‘Book of the Grail’ was written by Melkin which approximately concurs with Helinands’ date. Henry of Blois was also aware of Melkin’s other writings at Glastonbury, adding to the fact that it is also credited in the Latin version of the ‘High History of the Holy Graal’ to have been written by a monk at Glastonbury who, incidentally must have been fluent in some dialects of the French.

 Melkin as we know through his prophesy appears to have associations with Glastonbury and appears to be single handedly responsible for coalescing the Joseph tradition. Melkin through the construction of his riddle kept alive a tradition from great antiquity through conjoining the Quest of the Grail with a search for Joseph and what was with him in his tomb. It would seem therefore that Henry de Blois was the ‘famous fabulator’ named ‘Master Blihis’ in the prologue called the Elucidation of Le Conte Del Graal where it says, "Master Blihis is ‘one who knew all the stories of the Graal’.

Chrétien de Troyes working for Eleanor of Aquitaine and her daughters states that he had been given a Grail book by them, to be romanticised (inferring a more historical or factual account), so that it could be read out at court. It would appear therefore, that the French noble family in possession of Melkin’s work which contained the historical Joseph account including the gospel of Nicodemus (which Chrétien was aware of), was Melkin’s ‘Book of the Graal’ in the possession of Eleanor.  Henry of Blois was uncle to Theobald V, Count of Blois and Troyes who was married to Alix de France, daughter of Louis VII, King of France from his first wife Eleanor d’Aquitaine. Theobald’s  brother Henry was married to Marie, Eleanor’s other daughter, so through the Aquitaine’s possible ownership of Melkin’s book of the Grail, it is not difficult to see how Henry of Blois, appraised of the fact that Melkin was the originator of these truths, and being acquainted with the Glastonbury tradition could have been the one responsible in part for the British re-emergence. This helped through Crusader and Templar influences of the Joseph and Arthurian histories, couched and propagated as popular troubadour tales. In addition, the Count of Blois’ court in Troyes became a renowned literary troubadour centre. Walter Map was among those who found hospitality there along with Chrétien.

It would appear that the source in the ‘Conte du Graal’ came originally from Britain but it seems likely that Henry used other works of Melkin’s at Glastonbury to draw upon. We should not forget that Melkin was probably the hermit (pious monk) referred to by Helinand and that Melkin had of course, to have been aware of arcane Joseph material, to have portrayed the Joseph and Grail material as the base for his Prophecy. As we shall see further in our investigation, it is through Melkin’s thorough understanding of the essence of the Grail that he can link its discovery with the unveiling of the tomb with a specific point in time.  It is partly due to this prediction of the unveiling that subsequent commentators referred to his extract about Joseph’s tomb and the ‘duo fassula’, as a prophecy.

Henry was a highly intelligent person, probably not wishing to be associated with the more romanticised and plainly embellished Grail material proliferating at the time because he understood the Grail’s sanctity in that it was originally an expression of God’s work in man. He Knew that it was a subject (although not fully comprehended by him) that should not be treated irreverently and so for reasons regarding his ecclesiastical position, ‘The High History of the Grail’, was written and alluded to himself by a pseudonym or nickname.

 Henry was brought to England by King Henry I, to be Abbot of Glastonbury. On 4 October 1129, he was given the Bishopric of Winchester but allowed to keep his beloved Glastonbury Abbey. He was consecrated as bishop on 17 November 1129.  He had ambitions to become Archbishop of Canterbury but was thwarted. However he did not abandon his work and obligations to Glastonbury.Except for a few brief months in 1141 when he changed his alliance to Empress Matilda, when he thought he would be on the winning side, Henry supported and advised Stephen his brother and is credited as one of the clergy who helped convince William of Corbeil, the Archbishop of Canterbury, to crown Stephen.  Soon after his appointment to the See of Winchester, Henry came to resent his subservience to Canterbury. Henry was the patron of great writers one of whom was Archdeacon, Gerald of Wales who later unwittingly referred to him as Bledhericus and through his family connections, had links to the Templars and the Crusades and was well acquainted with William of Malmesbury. One of the finest buildings Henry had constructed, was the Hospital of St. Cross on the outskirts of Winchester. A few years after completion, Henry was to assign the guardianship over to the Knights Templar.  In William of Malmsbury’s work, ‘De Antiquitate Glasttonie Ecclesie’, which he dedicated to Henry, he tells us that “the monk he knew personally and in fact whom he “served” was shy, learned and a great writer”. Henry of Blois gave some sixty books to the great library at Glastonbury and had ancient books copied, such as Pliny’s Natural History, the book of Enoch, and several other books of Origen, St. Jerome and St. Augustine which probably would have been lost except for his efforts. Mostly he will be remembered for sponsoring the Winchester Bible, the largest illustrated Bible ever produced (which was still unfinished at his death).

It is in 1155 though, that Master Robert Wace completes his "Roman de Brut," a version of Geoffrey of Monmouth’s "History" in French. Wace dedicated his work to Eleanor of Aquitaine his patron, and is remembered as being the first writer to introduce the concept of the "Round Table" to the Arthurian cycle.  Presumably it was Eleanor who had provided him with a source containing arcane geomatria supplied by Melkin’s book mixed with the information from British sources found at Glastonbury supplied by Henry of Blois that were to be included in the Architecture of Chartres then under the jurisdiction of the Counts of Blois. Of Arthur, Robert Wace says,

"I know not if you have heard tell the marvellous gestes and errant deeds related so often of King Arthur. They have been noised about this mighty realm for so great a space that the truth has turned to fable and an idle song. Such rhymes are neither sheer bare lies, nor gospel truths. They should not be considered either an idiot's tale, or given by inspiration. The minstrel has sung his ballad, the storyteller told over his tale so frequently; little by little he has decked and painted, till by reason of his embellishment the truth stands hid in the trappings of a tale. Thus to make a delectable tune to your ear, history goes masking as fable.



Melkin was a geometer, which was not only borne out by his Prophesy, but also if we take into account information regarding Montacute as a marker.  This Information would have been derived from the Grail book originally and passed on by Henry of Blois the first Abbot to pass on this clue that seems to have come down through the ages to Father Good. It was generally understood that Joseph was hidden within some geometric puzzle, all the clues of which seem to emanate from Melkin, the one man who knew the whereabouts of Joseph. Henry of Blois, being Abbot of Glastonbury, presumably would have passed on the information that Father Good was to possess at a later date regarding Montacute (that he could have only gleaned from Eleanor’s Book of the Grail) and the clue it gave to Joseph’s burial site.

 It also seems a little suspect that he chose to be appointed at the young age of 23, as Prior of Montacute. The one person we suspect of having read Melkin’s Grail book and who most likely discovered that there was a connection between Montacute and finding Joseph, just happens to be prior there. If we assume that the studious Henry had come across the Joseph material from a source that Melkin had written i.e. the Book of the Grail, then one can understand how the detail of Montacute was probably obtained by Henry and this information acted as a motivation for Henry’s first post as a mature man recently arrived from his education in France.



Strangely enough, it was Eleanor who married King Henry II, the same King Henry who was supposedly told by a sage the exact place to start digging at Glastonbury Abbey to find King Arthur’s bones there between two pyramids. As we have covered Henry II was already dead when Arthur was unearthed but the story could have a grain of truth, if indeed Henry had learnt of Arthur’s burial in Avalon from Eleanor or her material. If it was widely accepted that Joseph was buried in Avalon and because of Joseph’s Glastonbury connection to the church there; it is possible that the King, learning Arthur was also buried in Avalon also from the French source, may indeed have put this very idea of Avalon being equated with Glastonbury into the monks heads. It is possible that subsequently after the kings death they eventually, having lost their patron, decided to carry out the bogus unearthing of Arthur citing him as a witness.



Although John Leland, in 1534 says that the book he saw of Melkin’s, he dated to 450AD and this passage from Helinand’s chronicle relates the angels appearance to Melkin in 717, it seems safe to assume that the 500 year difference until Helinand actually wrote would allow for an error of a century or two.

One can only deduce that Helinand is referring to Melkin, as Melkin deals with the same two subjects, that of Joseph and the Grail in his Prophesy. It will become apparent to the reader, as we progress, that Melkin’s ‘Book of the Graal’ or ‘Of the Grades or by Degrees’ had express knowledge of what the Gradatim was, as a series of ‘grades’ toward spiritual enlightenment and this revelation of the Grail was known and understood by Melkin. He knew that it would be marked by an event in time, i.e. the unveiling of the tomb at a predestined point in time, but we will deal with this explanation of ‘Time’ later.

One cannot be certain if Helinand’s extract is the first passage which refers to the Grail directly at this early date, but the same date was quoted by Walter Map, an early Grail writer in reference as a source. If it is genuine, it is the closest we get to the original source of Melkin the consolidator of material found in the tomb. This is the point at which it becomes a question of faith for those who believe in Angels or for the pragmatic to answer  ‘from where did Melkin receive instruction’?  If we consider the Grail as arcane knowledge linked to a Divine Plan then divine intervention by apparition should not be excluded especially when we consider Melkin’s link to an apparition by St. Michael that is attributed to St. Aubert at Mont –St- Michel discussed in a later chapter.



Who imparted the knowledge for the original source if it was not an angel that indeed gave Melkin his insight? More importantly, how were they or he able to leave behind such exact geometrical and geographic instructions with surveying pin point accuracy?  One must remember that if Melkin did live around 450 to 650AD then where was this source and in what language, before Melkin transcribed all its information into Latin? This source and the Grail book will be found at the unveiling of the tomb. The arcane source material will have remained in the tomb but certainly the Grail book was returned to the tomb by the Templars. There must be a source book for Melkin to have transcribed from Hebrew to render Shirei ha Ma'a lot’ but to understand and relate in the Grail book about the Grades of Enlightenement would indicate some exterior inspiration.



In Helinand’s chronicle, he derives ‘graal’ from ‘gradalis’ and sets the date for the British hermit's vision of the Grail at 707 or 717 A.D, but we are told that Melkin was ‘before’ Arthur and Merlin. This proposition now seems inaccurate if we take this date and the fact that Melkin knows where Arthur is buried.  It is still not certain how this transition of the ‘Grades’ evolved into an object except from obvious misinterpretation, but Helinand's ‘gradalis’ did not resemble a chalice but rather a dish on which meats were served. This semantically fits with the other descriptions of the Holy Grail as a receptacle, since Joseph of Arimathea uses the Grail to catch blood and sweat alluded to by Melkin and implies that it is a vessel that holds liquid.  Helinand states that Gradalisor Gradale means a dish, wide and somewhat deep by definition, in which rich meats are served to the rich in degrees-gradatim. One wonders again if this is not a misunderstanding of the spiritually rich as opposed to the wasteland or dearth which is cured on attainment of the Grail in the romances.The singular Chalice is often thought of as the receptacle used at the Last Supper or is a relic of the Passion in which both blood and sweat were contained. Some scholars posit that the concept of the Grail as a platter preceded the notion of the Grail as the "Kiddush Cup" from the Last Supper positing that primarily it was a Paschal Dish and not the Eucharistic vessel used by the twelve disciples. The Grail is none of these because Melkin describes it so accurately, he leaves no doubt as to its composition.



 When Chrétien de Troyes refers to the ‘Graal’ in ‘le Conte du Graal, Chrétien refers to his object not as “the Grail”, but as “un graal”, “a grail”, implying that in the source document it was used in context as a common noun and that there were more than one as implied by Melkin’s book of the Grail about Grades or Degrees to enlightenment which is the whole essence of what the Grail is; an objective description of the ‘Divine Plan’ and the romances have in a way achieved a heightened awareness or preparation in readying the world as a form of pre-cognition.



It is difficult to ascertain whether Melkin, did survey the angles and distances that we will be elucidating when we investigate Melkin’s prophecy, because this art was supposedly lost in the sixth century Dark Ages, when European mapping techniques were still very crude.  Melkin, however, passes on precise and accurate information given in his riddle so where did he get it from?  If it was not Melkin who surveyed the British landscape by his own skill, which points to where Joseph and Jesus were buried in the Island of Ictis, then how was it that he could leave us such precise directions? Was it truly by divine intervention as Helinand posits, or was there original ancient mapping instructions which indicated and marked Ley lines from which Melkin compiled his prophecy? If one considers that an entire body of knowledge may have existed since very early days from the offspring of Zerah through a line of Kings that ended with Arthur, then Melkin could have had access to this when he buried King Arthur.  Was he, like Father Good, just the messenger, perpetuating a tradition and preserving directions to Joseph’s resting place to be found in a future generation?  The hardest question to answer is; “who did the original surveying and at what stage in history were the coordinates of these Ley Lines recorded and surveyed as pertaining to what was hidden in Ictis”? If we assume that the French Templars possessed knowledge of this Ley line system (which will become apparent), then this geometry was also contained in the French Book of the Grail. If this assumption is correct then it might explain where Henry of Blois got the information about Montacute that was passed on to Father Good down through the ages by the Abbots. The argument against it being divine intervention leaves only two options, one being Melkin did survey the lines but how is this then linked to the Geometry of the pyramid. The other option would be that the Island was surveyed long ago as part of the pyramid construct but to what purpose and what part does the island play in relation to the original St.Michael Ley line before the Templars put their stamp on it and named it as such.

If the extract account of the Grail from Helinand was written in Latin around 707AD, it indicates that, before the five main romance writers, Guiot le Provencal, Chrétien de Troyes, Walter Map, Wolfram von Eschenbach, and Albrecht von Scharfenberg, began their works, there was a Latin original which would explain how Henry of Blois might have made the Montacute connection that was passed to Father Good. But then one has to question whether Henry actually saw the French original translation of the Grail book or the original Latin from Melkin.

 As regards to when the original was written given the Saxon connection to Arthur, it would seem soon after Arthur’s demise and possibly even written in France although Helinand’s source seems to indicate an Apparition as taking place in Britain.  The original Latin version written by Melkin we should guess at around 650 AD to be followed by a French translation (the one Helinand is referring to) and this is what Eleanor’s father and Grandfather were captivated by.  It is with this family that the troubadour tradition concerning the Grail commenced to evolve into the various forms of romances. Before any of the early named Grail writers mentioned above came on the scene there was most probably a more oral court tradition and it would seem these early troubadours recognised at this early date that the Grail book contained sacred information. The Grail books appearance was either then ascribed the date by Helinand or more probably given the date of when his source wrote of the Latin originals first appearance at court.  Because of the book’s profundity, knowledge and the nature of its material, it was assumed it could only have been delivered by an angel who duly relayed it to the hermit better known as Melkin. In a later chapter we will cover the possibility that Burgh Island’s association as a Tomb in connection with St. Michael preceded even the Templars and if indeed it is the cause for the naming of Mont- Saint-Michel as Mons Tomba and its association with an angelic apparition by St. Michael to a monk.  



It was Robert de Boron circa 1170 who relates the story of the shield that was later to become the Arms of Glastonbury that Father Good investigated to find a clue to Joseph’s burial site. The shield given to Evalak by Josaphes, Joseph of Arimathea’s son, had a red cross on it that was also to become the symbol of the Rosicrucians and the Templars.  Robert tells us that, following Evalak's victory over Tholomer, the red cross upon it disappeared, then Josaphes, just before his death, asked Mordrains to bring the shield to him.  Continuing the story he then recounts that Josaphes with his own blood inscribed another cross on the shield and gave it back to Mordrains, and afterward it was placed upon the grave of Duke Nasciens, until Galahad would come and retrieve it. Galahad then possesses a sword which had belonged to King David, the hilt of which was covered by King Solomon with precious stones and the story ensues with an adventure with the holy bleeding lance, and Galahad’s eventual achievement of the Saint Graal, followed by his death at Sarras.

Thomas Malory's Morte D’Arthur has very much the same story with his own additions, the early French tradition keeping links with the Holy Land threaded throughout the narrative. Is Solomon’s sword’s iconic appearance in the original sources hinting at the inter-relationship of the two twins Pharez and Zerah’s separate bloodlines, as far back as King David, Solomon’s father, but somehow imputing the transference of kingship to Britain. The shield obviously being transformed in the tale with blood marks on it, to a Rosicrucian emblem and an association with the Templars, who not only were probably at this stage in possession of the Latin source in France after Eleanor but were now releasing their source material in response to the new interest shown in Geoffrey of Monmouth’s widely read history of the kings of Britain.

  Evalak’s shield then by close association with Joseph was adopted as the Arms of Glastonbury. Glastonbury substituted the knotted wooden cross from the staff planted by Joseph at Glastonbury and then added the two vessels each side to coincide with the ‘duo fassula’ while the blood inscribed cross of Evalak also become the Templar emblem.

The subject matter of our investigation seems so wide, and interrelated from Ictis to Avalon via Glastonbury and the Grail stories.  Evalak king of Sarras, Knights looking for the Graal in the East, Egypt, Jerusalem, the Templars’ cross, stories of Jesus in England, Joseph of Arimathea being buried with the Grail, Arthur,the oil with which Josaphes was consecrated, being kept in the Grail-ark. This oil with which a line of Kings are consecrated, while being kept at Sarras, swords and ships from Solomon, pyramids at Glastonbury, and prophecies in riddle form, but all of these having a link to Jesus.



Man from the dawn of consciousness, has advanced and gained a large amount of knowledge from stories recounted by previous generations that sometimes lived millennia before him and the individual has to learn and judge the validity of this corpus of knowledge in his short 70 years of life.  The relevance of the stories in this enquiry are for mankind as a whole, as if we are being prepared for a revelation, occult information couched within the Grail stories, and bardic prophecies without which, we would not comprehend a coming of heightened consciousness, and the proof that mankind needs. A proof that aligns with scriptures held as sacred by the Abrahamic religions i.e. the Prophets. The proof that is necessary for Mankind to progress in consciousness is the knowledge that there is some form of divine intervention which directs events. If Man were to have a more intellectual knowledge of God rather than wholly Faith based, there would be a shift in the consciousness of Mankind. There is understanding of this expectation even outside the arena of our investigation in the prophecy of Paracelcus, and the reformation of the whole world order.

Quod utilius Deus patefieri sinet, quod autem majoris momenti est, vulgo adhuc latet usque ad Eliæ Artistæ adventum, quando is venerit.

"God will permit a discovery of the highest importance to be made, it must be hidden till the advent of the artist Elias." He also states;

Hoc item verum est nihil est absconditum quod non sit retegendum; ideo, post me veniet cujus magnale nundum vivit qui multa revelabit.

"And it is true, there is nothing concealed which shall not be discovered; for which cause a marvellous being shall come after me, who as yet lives not, and who shall reveal many things."

In Malachi 4:5 See, I will send you the prophet Elijah before that great and dreadful day of the LORD comes. This passage comes straight after an admonishment to obey the Law of Moses the very subject the Archangel is supposed to dispute with the Dragon. Jehosaphat mentioned in Melkin’s prophecy, is the same day to which Malachi refers; so is St. Michael synonymous with Elijah? It would seem that the different religions would need a proof of provenance of some sort to reunite them, especially those of the Abrahamic tradition, as all have been derived from one heritage and been guided by one divine plan.  Of course, in Jewish, Moslem and Christian traditions this unifier is Michael the Archangel, attested by Enoch first and then confirmed later by the Biblical prophets.  The very purpose of prophecy is realisation or gnosis and if St. Michael is to bring together these three Abrahamic faiths there will be a need to eradicate religion in all its divisive forms of theological dogma and creed.  The very reality of what was foretold by these prophets needs to actually transpire and then there will be the proof needed by mankind. The problem is that gnosis of an omnipotent God needs be re-cognised . The Grail stories with what they reveal, when aligned with the prophets are just the vehicle to bring about this paradigm shift of consciousness. After all, the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand and has been for 2000 years but it is only a heightened consciousness that recognises this fact until the time comes when this shift in consciousness occurs and this is at the discovery of the Tomb and what it reveals to mankind.



Chrétien de Troyes poem tells of the passages through life of a young knight called Percival, but it is written in an uneasy form and suddenly goes from a story about Percival into the adventures he has on the way to being a knight.  Percival is the first of the three Grail stories to be published and in the narrative it describes the vessel of the Holy Grail as a golden dish and also speaks of a Lance dripping with blood that appears with the Grail conveyed ceremoniously at times throughout a meal he is having. The Grail romances cover too many variations to be discussed here, but as we focused on the essential information provided by Pytheas that led us to the Island of Ictis, so, too, must we look at the essential core of what the Grail romances have in common, to understand their meaning. It is evident that the Grail writers were not really concerned with historical time as they interwove their various versions from a core body of material.

 The essential threads of information that align themselves even semantically and allegorically seem to consist of Joseph of Arimathea, the Grail, Knightly pursuits and a quest, but essentially it was a British matter.  Joseph has a connection to Jesus and most of the Grail heroes have a connection to Joseph and so it would seem a bloodline or inheritance is inferred.  The Grail seems to be an object with direct connections to Jesus having been brought to Britain by Joseph.  The quest appears to be, to find the Grail but the Grail seems hard to define and thus looking for it makes it all the more difficult. The Grail although greatly connected to Jesus (who was the one responsible for a major part of Man’s enlightenment) is also synonymous with the developmental stages of enlightenment in the individual, referred to as grades in the Book of the Grail and allegorised as knightly pursuits.
 Melkin having prior knowledge of this process or divine plan would in effect equate him as having equal standing with Biblical prophets, informing us of future events in ’Time’ but also having knowledge that his prophecy relates in part to degrees of Spiritual enlightenment which are set in a finite timespan.


Glastonbury is not the Island of Avalon when one takes into account also that Burgh Island used to be Ictis, but this entire story is clearly laid out in the Book And Did Those Feet by Michael Goldsworthy.






Bigbury, aptly named, after the immense importance of what is buried there, is a small village situated one and a half miles from Bigbury on Sea, the small seaside Hamlet that derives its name from that which is buried on the island opposite, across the sand causeway.  For years, the wagons related by Pytheas would have passed through Bigbury, having come along the tidal road from Aveton Gifford, conveying their tin ingots down to the fabled island of Ictis.  The small village just along the road called St Anne's Chapel, named after Jesus's grandmother, most probably commemorating the arrival with the Magdalene while Kingston, the next village was named after the arrival of Jesus himself or one of Joseph’s descendants such as Arthur. Loddiswell (the Lords well) is on the route that the Tin was carried down to Ictis from Southern Dartmoor .  Challaborough opposite the Island would seem to derive its name from after the Templar visit when the Grail was deemed to be a Chalice.

Aveton Gifford situated at the tidal limit of the River Avon, received its name from being situated on the River Avon, Aune or Aven on the oldest maps, and also from Walter Giffard, Lord of Longueville, who was appointed a commissioner by William the Conqueror to compile the Domesday Book. Strangely enough it was a descendant of his a one Walter Giffard that built the St.Michael church at Brent Tor around 1155, before many of the Templar churches.

Kingsbridge the largest market town in the South Hams at the Head of the Salcombe Estuary, most probably derived its name from the northern most limit of the Southern promontory kingdom described by Pytheas as Belerion which defined the southernmost limit of the Saxon named county of Wessex at a later date. Bolt head and Bolt tail received their name from the God Bel from Zerah’s arrival.  It is very probable that since early times Devon and Cornwall survived as a small kingdom since the arrival of Zerah, financed by the tin trade through to the time of King Arthur. Geoffrey of Monmouth’s account bestowed on Arthur a Welsh backdrop but as explained earlier, that tradition is most likely derived from Celtic association rather than from purely Welsh historical fact.  It is more likely that Arthur defended the South West, not going further than Dorset yet his fame became national when he defeated the encroaching Saxons.

The earliest writer to describe the Battle of Mons Badonicus, King Arthur's greatest victory, is in the ‘De Excidio et Conquestu Britanniae, written by the monk, Gildas in the mid-6th century. In these writings, Gildas states that the battle was a major victory for the Britons after a period of continual encroachment by the Saxon invaders.  Gildas went onto relate that this halted the Saxon advancement and brought a short period of peace.  Gildas related that this siege took place 44 years before the writing of his book.  Although not named by Gildas (but nor is anyone else), it seems that Arthur is accredited with this victory. So this puts King Arthur in the right location at the right time in history, as the siege is supposed to have taken place at Badbury hillfort in Dorset.



Figure 59 Showing the tidal road up to Aveton Gifford with the Serpentine river flowing down to Burgh Island as it is depicted in Leonardo’s ‘Yarnwinder’ painting

                                 

Aveton Gifford's history and connection with the tin trade since the earliest times, is now completely forgotten due to the secrecy maintained around the island that it once served as a probable provender of the gatekeeper community that existed on Folly hill. Domesday much later, records Jewish roots in the area, a certain ‘Judhael holds Loddiswell’ that includes a fishery that pays 30 salmon.  The island of Ictis would have been decommissioned, just prior to Jesus having been buried there, during the gradual southern advancement after the Roman invasion.  It is incredible that Pliny the Elder referred to this island of Ictis long after the island had been made redundant and Jesus had found his rest within.  The southern British tin trade would have experienced decreases in demand as the Romans captured the tin deposits in northern Spain and Portugal after the defeat of the Carthaginians in 206 BC.  Due to the overall increase in demand worldwide at that time, the lull would have been shortlived.  The Veneti, cousins of the Devonians made up a large tribe which inhabited western Gaul and who were in the business of conveying the tin over to France as Diodorous related for its 30 day journey south to Marseille.  It is probably at this point in 56 BC after Julius Caesar had destroyed all the ships of the Veniti that Ictis’s prominence started to dwindle.

The ancestry of the Dumnonni, the ‘Devon People,’ who in part were derived from Zerah, constituted the main part of a legendry kingdom with such progeny as Utherpendragon, King Arthur and Galahad, which evaded as long as possible the Roman encroachment and kept secret, the contents of the Island of Avalon.  After the Roman conquest, came the running down of stock and eventual closure of Ictis, as it would have acted as a focal point for pillage and until the time of King Arthur there was a move westwards of the tin trade into Cornwall with the advancements of mining methods.  With the arrival of the Saxons, there was a migration across the channel of some of the Dumnonian population, into western France to Amorica, where many of the Celtic race of Dumnonni had close ties to the Veniti, which eventually became known as Little Britain or Brittany.  However, the Devon and Cornwall kingdom that once existed before the Roman invasion, got squeezed further west into Cornwall as the Romans occupied Exeter and Plymouth.  Hence, for the first four or five centuries after the Roman invasion, the illustrious line of Kings descended from Judah and Joseph stayed south probably moving west of the Tamar toward Tintagel and eventually, after Rome's demise, re-emerged further north to keep the Saxons at bay. The Location of Avalon was still known as it is here that Arthur was transported in the hope that a miracle might be wrought upon his wounded body.

In ancient times, from the melting of the last ice age 10,000 years ago, there was a gradual separation of the landmass between France and Britain as rivers poured across the lowland plain of Lyonesse. Eventually this gave rise to a coastline that extended out as far as Eddystone rock around 6000 years ago as the English channel flooded.  As all these rivers ran off the Moors, cutting through the granite, the cassiterite was separated for the early ‘Tinners’ to gather and this marked the beginning of the Bronze Age in Britain.

Not only is this Bronze Age activity, evident throughout Dartmoor, but we can see its early beginnings less than 8 miles distant from Ictis, on the escarpment between the Erm and the Avon Rivers, and in the valleys on either side. Here, an early establishment fanned out, towards Plymouth and northward, centred around the obvious advantage offered by Ictis as a tin depot, which eventually came to serve the whole of Dartmoor.





Figure 60 Showing the remains of three round ’Tinners’ huts in the foreground which have nearly been submerged by the Avon dam. The picture is taken from the dam wall looking up the valley toward the river’s source on Dartmoor where a Bronze age burial Cairn is visible



Evidence of scars upon the landscape, with deep gullies and large indentations into the hillsides, contours scoured into the land by the Tinners industry, are a record of the immense mining activity carried out from the discovery of tin until the beginning of the Roman era.  The longest stone row anywhere in Britain and the abundance of standing stones and cairns above Ivybridge and South Brent, all bear witness to a hive of industry by the late Neolithic and early Bronze Age Tinners. In fact this area gives the largest density of these stone works anywhere in Britain. The early days of the Tinners after gravitating from the riverbed's themselves, evolved to the process of tin streaming, much as one would look for gold, which in turn evolved into later processes of ‘costeaning and shamelling’, leaving scars of shallow pits which followed the veins or lodes. This evolution eventually gravitated westward toward Plymouth, as aboveground sources dwindled and then to mining further north on the moors at a later date.  The smelting process from the early Tinners was fairly basic and consisted of heating the black tin and converting it into white tin at source, by simply lighting a fire in a hole in the ground or rock pool and retrieving the smelted ore from the ashes in the ground.  This process was obviously very inefficient and over a period of 1,500 years accompanied by the later evolution of bellows and furnaces, ‘blowing houses’ evolved which came to be known as ‘Jews houses’.

In an area called Shipley Bridge, just below the Avon dam there is early evidence of wooden pegs been used along fault lines within the granite outcrops, which upon expansion would separate the granite along the lode line exposing the tin ore, which could then be scraped away from the granite block.  There is also another strange feature at Shipley Bridge the like, of which is not evident elsewhere around the moors; and that is the abundance of Lebanese Barouk cedars, of the same variety as those found in Lebanon todayfrom the Chouf Region.  It is possible that these have self-perpetuated since the days of the arrival of Zerah, as it was not uncommon practice to carry the seeds of useful trees from one's own homeland, especially as these trees were ideal for construction with the minimum amount of cuts.  It is clear from archaeological evidence, that these straight poles, were used abundantly in the settlements surrounding the reservoir, such as ‘Riders Rings’ and those on Hickaton Hill, where findings showed that conical roofs of the huts were supported by a central pole and then again by an interior ring of posts a meter inside the external wall.



Figure 60a Showing ‘Riders Rings’ a Bronze age hut enclosure with the remains of several huts and the tin producing Valley in the background.



Archaeological evidence is prolific, with signs of small communities living and herding on the edge of southern Dartmoor, until the boom arrived and the tin export bonanza was born. These Tinners were in the business of supplying the Mediterranean cultures in exchange for their sophisticated wares and delicacies such as wines, pottery and jewellery.  Diodorous commenting on the Celtic thirst, related that the Mediterranean traders got a good price for each amphora of wine, being exchanged for a slave by the Dumnonian.

 Geologically the vertical nature of what used to be a horizontally formed sedimentary slate found throughout the rock at Burgh Island, gives a perfect environment in which to construct a storage cave. Just as a hump back bridge maintains its structure, so too this island will have not moved and the keystones comprising the vault ceiling will have been locked in place since the cave was hewed.






Burgh Island, ‘where the Aven's waters with the sea are mixed; Saint Michael firmly on a rock is fixed’, so aptly described by Camden, is one of the most beautiful sights to behold as one descends down the old tin route from Bigbury. Today, there stands a large Art Deco hotel where the chapel dedicated to St. Michael once stood.  The island was referred to in 1411 as St. Michael de la burgh or the island of St. Milburga later and as an iceberg translates as an island or rock of ice, so a ‘burgh’ meant rock or island, giving the appellation in this book, ‘St. Michael’s Rock’. Early maps show that the chapel stood on the top of the island where the ‘Huers hut’ now stands.  It is even rumoured that there once stood a monastery on this island, but this will be covered in a later chapter as it appears the rumour of this Island  caused much confusion for the early community of Mont-saint-Michel. There are records of Monks from Buckfastleigh maintaining a Light house on the Island which does seem a little odd given the Islands remoteness and Lack of prominence within the bay of Bigbury. The reason for their interest in keeping a light might just have been a cover, taking over guardianship from a now disbanded monastic presence. It would appear however that the Norman Benedictines of Mont-saint-Michel had heard of an Island called ‘St. Michael by the sea’ and that Island at Burgh Island was worth faking a charter to get ownership,  but they occupied St.Michael’s mount in Cornwall by mistake thinking they were in fact taking ownership of a rumoured island that was a tomb of great importance.

 If we are correct about the directions given by Melkin in his riddle refering to a place of Prayer ‘ad orandam’ at the verge, there must have been something that resembled a religious building in the  six or seven hundreds before Melkin left for Mont-saint-Michel. One must not forget that Melkin was not aware of what would transpire in the interim concerning any community at Burgh Island. The ’duo fassula’ has been taken from the vault and possibly an older place of prayer has been destroyed since the time he wrote, until the replacement St. Michael church was built. One translation of Melkin’s directions could be rendered, Ora tor cratibus preparatissuper potentem adorandam uirginem supradictis sperulatis locum habitantibus tredecim:

At a coastal tor, prepared there above a crater, (the mermaid pool) toward (or after) where one prays, at the verge high up in Ictis is where they dwell in the Sepulchre at thirteen degrees. As we have learned earlier, this could also be seen as ‘at the brim of the verge’.

It seems that local lore places the original Chapel where the hotel stands now. For any prospector wishing to find the entrance to the Sepulchre, it is made very clear how to find it within these pages, because the St. Michael Chapel was surely built on a different site than the original building that is referred to by Melkin.




Figure 62 Showing the Huer’s hut on the top of Burgh Island. When the first hotel was built, the hut had been a tea room so that walkers could rest there.

The ‘Huer’s hut’ so named, apparently because of the fact that lookouts from this vantage point, used to give a ‘hue and cry’ to the Pilchard fleets situated out in the Bay, to direct them to the shoals. It is very unlikely that there was ever a job or activity that involved a ‘hue and cry’ as the Bigbury Bay is vast and more often than not the wind would be in a contrary direction to carry voices.  It's more probable that the name echoes from the past and has its roots from those who ‘hewed’ out the vault.  It seems highly unlikely that this is where the St. Michael chapel once stood, but it is quite remarkable that from approximately 100 yards to the right of dead centre in the middle of the Avebury stone circle, is 104 nautical miles to the ‘Huer’s Hut’, the precise number of miles given by Melkin in his riddle, directing us to where Joseph and Jesus lay.  The map shown in figure 49 marks the ‘Huer’s hut’ as the site of the old St. Michael tower and this seems to concur with what Camden had remarked as ‘firmly on a rock is fixed’ which does tend to indicate its dominant position. The island also lies in a ‘Southern Angle’ on a line that is precisely 13 degrees from the St. Michael Ley line which it bifurcates inside the Avebury circle, exactly as Melkin had told us.





Figure 63 Shows the protected landfall at Ictis for visiting foreign trading vessels to beach in safety, on the eastern side of the causeway.

As one crosses the sand causeway, the Pilchard Inn built in 1336, (around the same time as the Templar chapel to St. Michael), sits just below the present Art Deco hotel and is rich in history. It is said to be patrolled by its own friendly ghost Tom Crocker a master smuggler, who was shot to death by a customs officer but this seems unlikely with the remains of such illustrious personages taking their rest close by.  Outwardly, the island in no way reveals its inner contents or its past history, and much has happened since the two hotels have been built upon the site of the old chapel, possibly prompting us to think that it could be the site of the entrance to the underground chamber. The building of the second hotel was completed in 1929 and there had been no use of any original stonework from the chapel.  The original hotel built by George Chirgwin the musical entertainer, was constructed entirely of wood while Archie Nettlefold, the builder of the ‘Great White Palace’ had brought all his building materials across the sand causeway. On 31 May 1942 the hotel was bombed and lost the top two floors of the of the Art Deco structure. Seven months later the church in Aveton Gifford from which Leonardo had painted his Lansdowne perspective, was also destroyed by a Focke-Wulf 190 thinking it was Loddiswell church.

There had of course been rumours, since the discovery in 1991 of the tin ingots at the mouth of the River Erm, that Burgh Island could have been the Island of Ictis, but tradition and modern research had placed it in St. Michael’s Mount, Marazion.



Figure 64 showing the impracticality of arriving to pick up tin on a rocky foreshore on the tidal causeway of St. Michael’s Mount near Marazion in Cornwall. The picture is taken looking toward Marazion in the fog.

High up on Bolt tail the old iron age encampment on the headland from Inner Hope Cove looks down across Bigbury Bay and would have been a perfect look out and signalling station for alerting the tin Agency of approaching Roman ships trying to interfere with the trade; a local trade that had existed for more than a thousand years before their arrival. The entrance to the Hillfort is oddly aligned to look directly over Ictis as seen in figure 65 and probably worked in conjunction with the hill enclosure of Folly Hill just above Bigbury on Sea as look out stations for approaching vessels.


Figure 65 Showing the entrance to the Iron age hill fort on Bolt tail with the Island of Ictis in the foreground. The Burgh Island hotel is to the right of the Island and the distant hill on the right of the picture is the tin producing area of Southern Dartmoor.

The Folly Hill site which is being archeologically excavated shows evidence of a large community living along the hillside from the present  Bigbury Golf course to the other side of what used to be the cart route down from the tin deposits on the moors. Bronze Age pits were uncovered underneath the Iron Age surfaces and have been dated by ceramics. Only a small area along this ridge at Folly hill has been archeologically surveyed but there is evidence through high resolution magnetic gradiometry and from surface evidence that a large community lived along the ridge. This was probably the gate community that controlled Ictis and through which the cart traffic carrying tin had to pass.

Presently the archaeological excavation carried out by Dr Eileen Wilkes has dated the site to around 300BC through to approximately 300 AD and shows evidence of extensive trade with the continent.Around 800 shards have been found, dated to this era including examples of ‘South West Decorative Ware’ usually found in Cornwall, local ‘Coarse Ware’, ‘Black Burnished Ware’ from the Poole area and Exeter ‘Fortress Ware’.  Amongst these shards were red ‘Samian Roman pottery’, Romano British Ware and pieces of pottery from Brittany and Germany. This does show early evidence of trade but what is most interesting is the find of some locally made granite clays and these are surely evidence of the earlier culture that initially set up Ictis as the Agency and are probably commensurate with the earlier dwellings. Other Iron Age sites are all within sight of each other , one just east of the mouth of the Erm, were obviously strategically placed as communities engaged in commerce and the support of Ictis.



Figure 66 Showing a view from the Folly hill community down over Bantham harbour. Also showing the ‘Long Stone’ to the right.

In the great storm of 1703, apart from destroying the Eddystone lighthouse, it uncovered a Roman camp on the beach at Bantham ham. At the time of the Roman invasion of Britain, Ictis had ceased to exist as the tin agency, but the Romans had obviously eventually made use of the little port of Bantham.  With the recent building of the lifeguard hut on Bantham beach, archaeologists have noticed signs of settlement from a very early time through the iron age with the discovery of later artefacts confirming trade with the Mediterranean and Phoenicians.

The translation of the word Emporium is now more plainly understood as Ictis acts as a trading post with a safe haven harbour that serves both coastal traffic bringing tin to market and tin transported by cart on an ancient trackway from the southern edge of Dartmoor.

 In 2003 a component of an Iron-age ‘Linch-pin’ was found south west of the iron-age hill fort of ‘Blackdown Rings’. No other iron-age finds have been found in the area, which indicates that the cart pin was lost ‘en route’ down from Shipley Bridge to Ictis. The Pin is of the Kirkburn type and dated to around 300BC. Where this pin was found is right next to the oldest road down from the alluvial tin deposits on Southern Dartmoor which leads to the tidal road in Aveton Gifford, the same track that the wagons took to get to Ictis.  Just as Pytheas had said, carts brought the tin to the beach. The use of carts is rare in the hilly terrain of Devon, compared with the rest of the country and for the most part, pack horses were used. So this really is a singular link to the usage of carts in a prehistoric period because the tin ingots would have been too cumbersome for the back of a pack horse. The Devon Archaeological Society goes on to say in their report:

‘The Loddiswell find is the only example known so far in Devon of a piece of equipment which can with reasonable confidence be attributed to the prehistoric chariot or cart. It therefore provides the earliest evidence in the county for the use of a wheeled vehicle. Such vehicles seem not to have been common in many parts of rural Devon even in the 17th and 18th centuries, when pack horses were preferred’.

The most amazing evidence which confirms this as the old trackway where the linch pin was found, is the trackway’s continued use into Roman times where Mr Terence Hockin has found many Roman artifacts such as coin dated to Claudius and a small Roman statue. It should not be forgotten that the tinners of old in Pytheas’ day would have only comparatively light trade goods in effect to take back up to the southern hills of Dartmoor by cart. It seems probable that the transport facility would have been organised by the Ictis Agency and may well have gone along the shoreline of the river when the carts were too full to go uphill Folly Hill from the end of the tidal road. These heavy loads not stored at Ictis would have been transferred onto boats having come further upstream. The main route that Pytheas would have witnessed being carted down through Bigbury having come along the tidal road portrayed by Leonardo.




Figure 66a Showing the view from the spot where the Linch Pin was found leading down to Hatch Bridge and the Aveton Gifford tidal road that leads out to Ictis.


Figure 66b Showing signs of wear from ancient cart tracks running along the shore a few meters further on from the end of the present tidal road

There have been other finds beneath the shifting dunes of Bantham Ham, but it is the remarkable find of some 40 tin ingots by divers of the South West Maritime Archaeological Group that really goes a long way to concur with the story related by Strabo over 2000 years ago that a sea captain deliberately ran his boat on the rocks to keep Ictis secret.

Figure 67 Shows the perfect landfall of Ictis for any foreign trading vessel at all states of the tide by comparison with the rocky foreshore of St. Michael’s Mount.

The entrance to the Erme mouth is partly obstructed by West Mary's Rock and East Mary's Rock and the chain of small rocks lurking beneath the water that join them.  There is evidence of a small harbour at Oldaport but this with a hazardous entrance was probably not as well used by foreign vessels as Bantham was.  East and West Mary's rocks are uncovered only slightly at low tide and on a floodtide the entrance looks navigable and the reef is unseen. This is obviously what fooled the Roman ship following our brave Phoenician captain that we related earlier.

Most of the ingots found just to the north of West Mary’s Rock, were spread out and worn by the tidal flow while also being encrusted with marine life and the ingots had eroded and become oxidised.  Most were plano–convex (bun shaped), all of them different shapes and sizes having been probably cast in many different locations upon Dartmoor. The shaped ingots described by Diodorous as ‘astragali’ (some commentators Astralagi Astragalus) seems obtuse as a reference to shape as most examples found were once bun shaped before oxidation due to rock moulds caused by eddies at the sides of the rivers where the cassiterite was collected. The most probable explanation of the etymology of this term in reference to an ingot is some reference to its metallic brightness  and provenance as it could have been termed a Gallic star or Astro-Gallus.

 It seems Pytheas, if indeed this word is his was originally commenting on the uniformity of shape, caused by similar rock pool indentations, but size differs greatly amongst all the existing examples,  as the Tinners used different moulds along the river edges. From the earliest time, a collection of cassiterite would have been placed in an indent in the rock and a fire lit above it, as tin melts at the low temperature of about 230°C.

  However, the heaviest example found at the mouth of the Erm was rectangular and flat with a slightly thickened rim, indicating that it was cast in a fabricated mould of stone and could be of a more modern date. It could be the case that Ictis was releasing a stockpile of ancient tin ingots along with more later and larger moulded ones in the Roman era which is the era Strabo relates. The reason for change of shape could be the result of stronger vessel design from wood and fastenings. Certainly at this late period in Ictis’ history the Ingots shape would not have been wholly dependent upon fitting them within a vessel fabricated from animal skin nor would the tin have only been collected next to water. After all, just before the invasion, the ingots would have been sold by weight with no regard to inventory date.  The most famous tin ingot found in 1812 just off the sand at St. Mawes Falmouth (another account makes it Carrick or 1823), weighed 72 kg and is obviously of a much later date and could as some say be a hoax of 18th century fabrication to support the Ictis theory in Cornwall.   The variation in the Tinners ingot sizes and shapes indicates that Ictis was in business over a long period of time and would not have been concerened with how long it kept its stock. Strabo was writing around 40 BC and this is the precise time that Ictis would have been under a lot of Roman pressure causing the operators to liquidate their stock. This could be the reason found for the differing sises and shapes found at the Erm site. One would assume that it was during this 70 to 80 year period before Jesus was entombed in Ictis around 36AD, that the Island went through its decline and closure.


Figure 67a Showing the entrance to the Erm estuary looking west at mid tide in a southerly wind, where the Phonecian captain’s cargo of tin ingots were found just north of West Mary’s rocks just inshore of the breaking reef.

 The fact that if indeed these are the very ingots of our brave Phonecian captain at the mouth of the Erm, it would indicate by the vast array of ingots from old ‘Astragali’ to the more recent moulding, that Ictis was running down its long held stock. The fact that these Ingots are found so close to Ictis and there is a story to account for what otherwise would have been nigh on impossible to account for (given that a trader would hardly exit a port full of cargo which he had successfully navigated into it), the tin in this place can only be explained reasonably by two explanations. The fact that the most part of the Ingots were found to the north and west of West Mary’s reef definitely indicates the boat was on its way entering rather than exiting when it hit the rock’s. The location further adds credibility to the find being the product of the same account that Strabo had related considering a boat with Devonian cargo should be exiting a port not entering and Ictis is only a stone’s throw away. The only other alternative explanation is that a local boat was trying to exit with cargo from the tinners based on the Erm for a delivery to Ictis, but he would hardly founder inshore of a reef he was perfectly aware of.



Figure 67b Showing the entrance to the Erm estuary at Low tide where the tin ingots were found from the Phoenician trading ship, just inshore from where the swell is seen, caused by the two rocks.

As one can see in figure 67b with the sand showing, the Phonecian trader must have worked out to lure his Roman pursuer at half or full tide when the estuary appears navigable with a favourable entrance in fair weather. In these conditions there is little to warn any navigator of the reef that lurks beneath.

Just to the east of the Avon dam above Shipley Bridge where there are several settlements, recent excavations have found in the hut encampments, tin slag and a pebble of cassiterite confirming that these were, in fact, the living quarters of the Bronze Age tinners.  By the time Pytheas wrote of his exploits in the fourth century BC, the small craft which were once used, were being changed to more solidly built craft from wood, and the reason for Astragali shaped ingots became redundant. It does logical that the local traders that worked down stream on the other rivers apart from the Avon brought their ingots to Ictis by sea in their coracles as Pytheas relates just for small coastal distances ranging each side of Ictis from the Dart to Plymouth. The Tinners up on the moors however used the route down through Loddiswell as Pytheas had witnessed.
One wonders if it was Joseph who, through his exploits as a tin merchant, discovered that the people of the kingdom of Belerion were the descendants of Zerah. How did he first establish that these people were related to Calcol? It seems sure that Joseph is bringing Jesus’s body to Sarras to where Jacob’s Prophecy on Judah was to be fulfilled. What was it that established this common ancestry from Judah when Joseph of Arimathea and Zerah’s offspring on the Belerion promontory first spoke, or was it known for a long time previously? Melkin is certainly the derivative for the Grail writers reference to Zerah as having a descendant king of Sarras but this connection must have been made by Joseph and it must have been him who purchased the island in which to Lay Jesus’ body.
 Professor Rhys thinks, tracing the etymological roots that the Celts who spoke the language of the Celtic Epitaphs in the 5th and 6th centuries were "in part the ancestors of the Welsh and Cornish people," He thinks that they subsequently changed their language from a Gaelic or "Goidelic" form to a Gallo-British or "Brythonic" form. Certainly there are no evident signs of a Hebraic heritage except that witnessed by the population of the South’s preponderance to adherence to the Law and the evidence of an understanding since Neolithic times of a ley and circle system, the use and knowledge of which has now become lost.
 Diodorus, when commenting on British dress says that the British had learned the art of using alternate colours for their weave so as to bring out a pattern of stripes and squares ‘the cloth  was woven of divers colours, and making a gaudy show. It was covered with an infinite number of little squares and lines, as if it had been sprinkled with flowers. They seem to have been fond of every kind of ornament and they wore collars and "torques" of gold, necklaces and bracelets, and strings of brightly-coloured beads, made of glass or of a material like the Egyptian porcelain.’  Archeologists have thought that the glass was brought by traders from Alexandrian factories.  Butglass-making is often the by product and manufactured by smelting metal and often the residue from bronze-furnaces produces a kind of glass, a silicate of soda, coloured blue or green by the silicate of copper mixing with melted sand particles and this will have been the reason why beads are recorded long before the art of glass making. It is possibly the reason that Pytheas initially set out to look for ‘Amber’ confusing this with British glass, that he might have seen coming from the Phoenician traders as they passed by Marseilles on their way to the Eastern Mediterranean.
Why does the Genesis account of Solomon’s precedence over Zerah’s offspring even occur, if there was no threat of one of Zerah’s descendants being the inheritor of Jacob’s blessing?  Did the offspring of Zerah have some object as proof that they were of Judah’s line and will this object or proof be found in the tomb along with all the other artefacts establishing the Kings of Sarras?  Was Blake being prophetical and is ‘Jerusalem builded here’ in England, fulfilling the prophecy of Jacob upon Judah?



Figure 68 Showing the mouth of the river Avon flowing out toward Avalon as seen from Folly hill.





In the Dark Ages a monk called Melkin left a riddle that purported to expose the burial site of Joseph of Arimathea. This Location has long been thought to exist within the Glastonbury grounds but the author has meticulously studied some of the oldest Latin texts from Glastonbury Abbey and has uncovered not only deliberate obfuscation of the facts surrounding King Arthur and Joseph of Arimathea but has solved the monks riddle which spells out with pinpoint accuracy the whereabouts of the resting place of these illustrious men in the Island of Avalon. The geometric puzzle describes directions that are derived from the Ley line system built by Neolithic man and the book describes how this huge display of geometrical precision across the British landscape was understood and known to exist as late as late the 1300’s. An array of churches was built upon this ancient system to point out to posterity the location of the tomb.

 This secret location is called the Island of Avalon and the same monk visited this island at the death of Britain’s famous King Arthur. Here he found arcane information from the Temple in Jerusalem that was brought to England by Joseph of Arimathea. This information with an account of the first Christians arrival with Mary Magdalene was written in a book called The Grail that found its way to France and gave rise to the wide array of Grail stories.

‘And did those feet’ proves that the body of Jesus is in fact buried with Joseph of Arimathea and the whereabouts of this island is in Devon. It used to be known as the ancient Island of Ictis and contains within it an ancient tin vault that became their tomb which had originally been used to store tin ingots. The confirmation of the whereabouts of this tomb is given by precise geometry upon the British landscape left in the complex Latin puzzle by the monk Melkin but its position is also verified by a Jesuit priest who lived in the sixteenth century who was unaware of the significance of the clue he was given.

 The Templars in the middle ages were aware of the location of this tomb and deposited their treasure in the same tomb on Christmas day 1307. However they removed one item from the sepulchre within the island. This was what has now become known as the Turin Shroud. The Turin Shroud in the monk’s Latin puzzle has the same description once the Latin puzzle is deciphered. This artefact due to Melkin’s description, later became known as the Holy Grail by an inordinate amount of misunderstanding and direct obfuscation, but the Holy Grail is in fact something inestimably more valuable and this book sets out and explains what the Grail is and how the Grail stories came about. The body of Jesus, around which the Turin Shroud was once wrapped, is still within the tomb, steeped in Cedar oil and this is what formed the image on the Shroud over a period of six hundred years as it was formed within what became known as the Grail Arc.

 The reason this Island was chosen to house what is the holiest relic of all, is because it was not widely known in the ancient world except through a report by one of the first Greek explorers to Britain. Devon and Cornwall have a history in the tin industry and it was from this island that tin was traded with Joseph of Arimathea who, Cornish tradition has always maintained, was a tin merchant and was accompanied on his trading missions by Jesus. The book uncovers an ancient Biblical link to the Devon and Cornish peninsula through a bloodline from the first born of Judah one of the twelve sons of Israel, called Zerah. It is from his heritage a Line of Kings was born in the South west of England known as the kings of Sarras which culminated with the famous King Arthur.

 King Arthur, Jesus and Joseph of Arimathea are known to be buried on the Island today called Burgh Island but there is also with them the Arc of the Covenant and the Templar treasure. The book traces these events pulling together a wide source of detail linking the most powerful people in Europe like Eleanor of Aquitaine and kings with these events.

Leonardo Da Vinci visited this Island in the last three years of his life and left clues within four paintings, that show the geographical features of the Island and he let the world know by his picture puzzle (rebus) in the Windsor Library, that he was showing us a great mystery and went as far as saying he would show where it is, in his two paintings of the Yarnwinder.

 

 The amazing coincidences that have brought this knowledge into the modern era can only be viewed as having been determined by supernatural forces as this whole drama is played out to specific times that are spoken of by the biblical prophets. The implication and ramifications of the discovery of this tomb will have ramifications across the world as the book uncovers the relationship between this tomb’s unveiling and how it was predicted by the Prophets.


la légendedu roiarthur,la littératurearthurienneromansGraal,le Graalà Glastonbury,l'île d'Avalonde l'île deictis,la formationde l'image surle Suaire de Turin, Turinimageslinceul,le Saint-Graaldansavalon, levausd'avarone,glostonburyabbayelégendeset les mythesde la tombe dejosephArimathie, le tombeaude Jésus-Christ.


You can find the whole story of how Glastonbury has misrepresented itself as King Arthur’s burial site and the Glastonbury tor as being synonymous with the Isle of Avalon by Clicking on the following links



http://templartreasure.blogspot.co.uk







øen Avalon og øen Sarras var aldrig på Glastonbury

$
0
0







Insula auallonis auida funere paganorum, pre ceteris in orbe ad sepulturam eorum omnium sperulis propheciae vaticinantibus decorata, & in futurum ornata erit altissimum laudantibus. Abbadare, potens in Saphat, paganorum nobilissimus, cum centum et quatuor milibus domiicionem ibi accepit. Inter quos ioseph de marmore, ab Armathia nomine, cepit sompnum perpetuum; Et iacet in linea bifurcata iuxta meridianum angulum oratori, cratibus praeparatis, super potentem adorandam virginem, supradictis  sperulatis locum habitantibus tredecim. Habet enim secum Ioseph in sarcophago duo fassula alba & argentea, cruore prophete Jhesu & sudore perimpleta. Cum reperietur ejus sarcofagum, integrum illibatum in futuris videbitur, & erit apertum toto orbi terrarium. Ex tunc aqua, nec ros coeli insulam nobilissimam habitantibus poterit deficere. Per multum tempus ante diem Judioialem in iosaphat erunt aperta haec, & viventibus declarata. 
  Hucusque melkinus.

I oldtiden omkring 350 f.Kr. en græsk navigator, der besøgte Storbritannien skrev et tidsskrift og i det han beskrev en ø, hvor tin blev produceret, og han kaldte det fisk ø eller i græske Ichthys, Ichthus og Ikhthus dvs øen Ictis. Denne ø er omgivet af Sardin på bestemte tidspunkter af året deraf navnet. Det tin handel, som havde eksisteret siden 1000bc gennem fønikiske handlende blev senere kommenteret af en latinsk krønikeskriver ved navn Diodorus og hans bemærkninger om den britiske var, at. De indbyggere, der bor i nærheden af ​​forbjerget i Storbritannien, er kendt som Belerium, mine tin og når de har smeltet den i tin ingots, de bærer det til en vis ø, der ligger ud for Storbritannien, og kaldes Ictis. For ved ebbe er af tidevandet, er rummet mellem denne ø og fastlandet til venstre tørre og derefter kan de formidle tin i store mængder over til øen på deres vogne. Dette er øen Burgh Island i S.Devon med sand Causeway, der udtørrer en lavvande, hvorpå vognene af tin nævnt af Pytheas blev bragt ned fra det sydlige Dartmoor gennem Loddiswell på en gammel cart bane. Den eneste 'split' fra en af ​​disse vogne findes i Devon og Cornwall fra pytheas 'æra blev fundet på samme spor fra Dartmoor til Ictis. De rejste langs en tidevands vej i Aveton Gifford at nå øen IctisSom mange er klar over at der er en legende i Cornwall, at Josef af Arimatæa Jesu onkel var en Tin købmand, og at han kom til denne kyst for at hente tin med Jesus, da han stadig var en dreng. Ingen var helt sikker på, hvorfor Ictis blev kaldt en Emporium, hvilket betyder markedet, men det er nu kendt, at inden for denne ø er en gammel hvælving oprindeligt brugt til opbevaring af tin ved de gamle minearbejdere, men omkring det tidspunkt hvor romerne invaderede England dette kom stadig vanskeligere at holde hemmeligt, så købte Josef denne ø med den store tin hvælving i det. Jesu legeme er endnu at blive opdaget i Island. Dette er grunden til evangelierne vedrører tre relevante fakta, graven tilhørte Josef, det var en hugget grav, at ingen anden mand havde ligget i før, og i det var en hvid klud. Dette er, hvad evangelierne enige om på, men de lad ikke på, at den grav site er i England. Faktisk Strabo anden krønikeskriver, at en kaptajn kørte sin båd på klipperne i stedet for at give væk øerne position til romerne, og det bare sådan, at siden denne ø har vi de eneste to maritime vrag fra den gamle tin branchen. Det er her den største cache tin ingots blev fundet blot et par miles fra ictis.Melkin en profet og munk, som levede omkring 450 til 650AD skrev en meget mærkelig profeti på latin, som indtil nu har været en obskur stykke litteratur, som giver anvisninger til begravelsen sted, Josef af Arimatæa. Joseph formodes at have med ham, hvad der menes at være den hellige gral med ham, hvor han er begravet på øen Avalon.I mange år Grail jægere har antaget, at gral og Joseph ligger på Glastonbury, men profetien blev givet i form af et puslespil, og for nylig denne gåde er blevet låst op og er nu afsløret i en bog kaldet 'Og gjorde de Feet'. Bogen "Og gjorde de ben" er opkaldt efter digtet er skrevet af William Blake, der som de fleste briter kender, er hymne af Jerusalem, der taler i New Jerusalem findes i Storbritannien og stiller spørgsmålet 'Jesus' fødder går på Englands hyggelige græsgange grøn. Nå nu har vi svaret, fordi Jesus er begravet inden for denne ø ved siden af ​​Josef af Arimatæa.Profeten melkin besøgte graven efter kong Arthur blev begravet der, og forlod disse retninger for eftertiden, at vi kan afdække hans grav stedet og kalder øen øen Avalon.Øen Avalon, begære hedninge i døden, over alle andre (steder) i verden, fordi de har deres Gravlæggelsen der, og det er hædret med en cirkel, der varsler om en profeti (og denne cirkel er stenen cirkel af Avebury). Derefter fortsætter med at sige, at der i fremtiden på øen vil blive udsmykket med dem, der giver ros til den højeste og 'Abbadare "(der oversat betyder Faderens perle, der er selvfølgelig Jesus) mægtig i dom ædleste af disse udlændinge sover 104 nautiske miles fra Avebury, og af hvem han modtaget bisættelse af havet fra Joseph, der er opkaldt efter Arimatæa, og han har også taget sin evige hvile der, og de ligger på den sydlige gaffel af en "tvedelt meridional 'linie i en vinkel på en kyst Tor, i et krater, over hvilken man kan gå på enden af ​​randen som det allerede blev udarbejdet højt oppe i Ictis. denne grav er nu deres bolig og er beliggende 13 grader fra st. Michael Ley linje.Dette er, hvad melkin fortæller os, og det er lagt ud ord for ord, så profetien kan forstås fuldt ud i bogen og gjorde disse fødder. Klik på linket ovenfor.De Templars bygget en række af kirker alle dedikeret til St. Michael som omfatter St Michael Ley linie og som St Michael mount i Cornwall denne lille ø havde en St. Michael kirke på det, men det er far god en femtende århundrede Jesuit munk, der bekræfter denne holdning der fortæller os, at Josef af Arimatæa er 'omhyggeligt skjult "i Montacute, og du kan se, at den linje går gennem St.Michaels bakke, hvor der engang stod også en kirke viet til ham præcis 104 miles på en linje, der er tvedelt AT Tretten grader og gennemløber MONTECUTE. Mange forskere og historikere, der har beskæftiget sig med Glastonbury materialet siger Melkin var en opfindelse af twelvth eller trettende århundrede. Det er simpelthen ikke sandt, og denne position er kun kommet til, fordi ingen har været i stand til at dechifrere Melkin spådom før den nuværende æra. Spørg dig selv, hvorfor skulle nogen gøre en gåde, som ingen kunne forstå endnu alle detaljer i det, er så præcise, og fører til den meget øen navngivet i profetien. Ikke alene har Melkin skrive originale Gralen bog, der fastlægger placeringen af ​​denne ø, men Leonardo Da Vinci var klar over, hvor øen var, og også fortalt os, at i hans malerier af Madonna og yarnwinder han ville vise os, hvor dette Øen er. Han malede to Yarnwinder malerier, der viser præcis, hvor den geografiske placering er. Vi kan se, om vi fusionerer de to malerier, som vi ved at være malet af ham, han giver alle geografiske detaljer, som lokaliserer øen Avalon, som i dag Burgh ø i Devon, hvor vi kan også se den samme perspektiv på Google Earth.Det er en kompliceret historie, men det er afsløret i denne nye og oplysende bog, som giver beviser på, hvordan denne ø blev kendt som øen Sarras i Gralen historierne og hvordan Torino svøb, er i virkeligheden den rigtige grav klæde Jesu set af Melkin og at han omtalte det som 'Duo Fassula'.Faktisk kan du se Melkin latinske beskrivelse passer til skærmen helt, hvis vi forstår, at hans gåde Duo Fassula er virkelig en Duplico Fasciola eller fordoblet i løbet af graven klud, fordi det siger, at ....Habet ENIM secum Ioseph i sarcophago duo fassula alba & argentea, cruore prophète Jhesu & sudore perimpleta: Joseph har med ham i sarkofag en fordoblet hvid svøb klæde dækket med blod og sved af profeten Jesus, der blev foldet omkring ham.De Templars, der byggede St.Michael kirker til at markere denne gravstedet begravet deres skat på denne ø på juledag i 1307 efter at være ankommet i tre skattekister skibe. Da de tømte skat og før de lukkede op grav for sidste gang en af ​​dem, (sandsynligvis Geoffrey de Charney) fjernede Ligklædet af Jesus fra graven, der er i øjeblikket på exibit i Torino.Kong Arthur krop blev også begravet i denne ø, og det er her, at han kom til at lede efter et mirakel for at kurere hans fatale sår efter slaget for hans Rige, som han vidste, at Jesus blev begravet i det. Goeffrey af Monmouth også fortæller, at Arthur er begravet på øen Avalon, men det er Melkin, der bekræfter, at vi har det rigtige sted ved at sige ordet Supradictis betyder højt op i IctisOg gjorde de fødderne af Michael Goldsworthy, er en afslørende bog med alle de kort og beviser, der forklarer, hvordan det er, hvad der blev kendt som gral ark i Gralen romancer indeholder Jesu legeme og bekræfter, hvor billedet på Torino svøb blev formuleret i cedertræ olie. Mysteriet er nu afdækket, men hvad vil verden lære af denne afsløringen af ​​graven på denne hellige ø, og hvad der vil være effekten af ​​opdagelsen af ​​denne grav og dens indhold på alle de store religioner i dag.Dette er en spændende bog udgivet på e-bog eller i paperback og er fuld af gode billeder og diagrammer, der giver beviser.













het eiland van Avalon en het eiland Sarras waren nooit op Glastonbury

$
0
0









Insula auallonis auida funere paganorum, pre ceteris in orbe ad sepulturam eorum omnium sperulis propheciae vaticinantibus decorata, & in futurum ornata erit altissimum laudantibus. Abbadare, potens in Saphat, paganorum nobilissimus, cum centum et quatuor milibus domiicionem ibi accepit. Inter quos ioseph de marmore, ab Armathia nomine, cepit sompnum perpetuum; Et iacet in linea bifurcata iuxta meridianum angulum oratori, cratibus praeparatis, super potentem adorandam virginem, supradictis  sperulatis locum habitantibus tredecim. Habet enim secum Ioseph in sarcophago duo fassula alba & argentea, cruore prophete Jhesu & sudore perimpleta. Cum reperietur ejus sarcofagum, integrum illibatum in futuris videbitur, & erit apertum toto orbi terrarium. Ex tunc aqua, nec ros coeli insulam nobilissimam habitantibus poterit deficere. Per multum tempus ante diem Judioialem in iosaphat erunt aperta haec, & viventibus declarata. 
  Hucusque melkinus.

In oude tijden rond 350 voor Christus een Griekse zeevaarder die een bezoek aan Groot-Brittannië schreef een dagboek en daarin beschreef hij een eiland waar tin werd geproduceerd en hij noemde het vissen eiland of in het Grieks Ichthys, Ichthus en Ikhthus dat wil zeggen het eiland Ictis. Dit eiland is omgeven door sardines op bepaalde tijden van het jaar vandaar de naam. De tin handel die had sinds de 1000bc bestond door Fenicische handelaars werd later becommentarieerd door een Latijns-kroniekschrijver, genaamd Diodorus en zijn commentaar op de Britten waren dat. De inwoners die wonen in de buurt van de kaap van Groot-Brittannië, bekend als Belerium, de mijne tin en wanneer zij het smolt tot een tin ingots, ze dragen het naar een zeker eiland, dat ligt buiten Groot-Brittannië, en heet Ictis. Voor op het wegebben is van het getij, wordt de ruimte tussen dit eiland en het vasteland vertrokken droog en dan kunnen ze het blik over te brengen in grote hoeveelheden naar het eiland op hun wagens. Dit is het eiland van Burgh Island in S.Devon met zijn zand, verhoogde weg, dat droogt uit een laag water waarop de karren van tin genoemd door Pytheas werden naar beneden gebracht uit het zuiden van Dartmoor via Loddiswell op een oude kartbaan. De enige 'splitpen' uit een van deze wagens te vinden in Devon en Cornwall van tijd Pytheas 'werd gevonden op dezelfde track van Dartmoor naar Ictis. Ze reisden langs een getijde-weg in aveton Gifford naar het eiland te bereiken IctisZoals velen weten is er een legende in Cornwall dat Jozef van Arimathea Jezus 'oom was een Tin koopman en dat hij kwam om de kust te halen tin met Jezus toen hij nog een jongen. Niemand was helemaal zeker waarom Ictis werd genoemd een Emporium die markt betekent, maar het is nu bekend dat er binnen dit eiland is een oude kluis oorspronkelijk gebruikt voor het opslaan van tin door de oude mijnwerkers, maar rond de tijd dat de Romeinen Groot-Brittannië binnen dit kwam steeds moeilijker om geheim te houden, zodat Joseph kocht dit eiland met de grote tin gewelf binnen het. Het lichaam van Jezus is nog niet ontdekt op het eiland. Dit is de reden waarom de evangeliën betrekking hebben drie relevante feiten, het graf behoorde tot Jozef, het was een uitgehouwen graf dat er geen andere man was gelegen in voor en het was een witte doek. Dit is wat de evangeliën eens op, maar ze niet laten merken dat het graf site is in Engeland. In feite Strabo een andere kroniekschrijver stelt dat een kapitein zijn boot liep op de rotsen in plaats van weg te geven de eilanden positie aan de Romeinen en het gewoon zo gebeurt het dat naast dit eiland hebben we de enige twee scheepswrakken uit de oude tin-industrie. Dit is waar de grootste cache van tin ingots werd gevonden op slechts een paar mijl van ictis.Melkin een profeet en monnik die leefde in ongeveer 450 tot 650AD schreef een heel vreemd profetie in het Latijn, die tot nu toe bleef een obscuur stukje literatuur die richting geeft aan de begraafplaats van Jozef van Arimathea. Joseph wordt verondersteld te hebben met hem wat wordt beschouwd als de Heilige Graal met hem, waar hij wordt begraven op het eiland Avalon te zijn.Al vele jaren Graal jagers hebben aangenomen dat de Graal en Jozef liggen op Glastonbury, maar de profetie werd gegeven in de vorm van een puzzel en onlangs dit raadsel is ontgrendeld en wordt nu onthuld in een boek met de titel 'En Heeft die voeten'. Het boek 'En deed die voeten' is vernoemd naar het gedicht geschreven door William Blake, die zoals de meeste Britten weten is het volkslied van Jeruzalem, die spreekt van Nieuw Jeruzalem bestaande in Groot-Brittannië en stelt de vraag 'heeft de voeten van Jezus treden op aangename weiden van Engeland groen. Nou nu hebben we het antwoord, want Jezus is begraven op dit eiland naast Jozef van Arimathea.De profeet melkin bezocht het graf nadat koning Arthur werd daar begraven en deze aanwijzingen achtergelaten voor het nageslacht opdat wij zouden zijn graf bloot te leggen en noemt het eiland het eiland Avalon.Eiland van Avalon, begeren de heidenen in de dood, boven alle anderen (plaatsen) in de wereld, omdat ze hun graflegging er en het is vereerd met een cirkel die voorspelt van een profetie (en deze cirkel is de steencirkel van Avebury). Het gaat dan verder met te zeggen dat in de toekomst van het eiland zal worden versierd door degenen die lof geven aan de hoogste en 'Abbadare' (dat vertaalde de vader parel, die is natuurlijk Jezus betekent) mighty het oordeel van de edelste van die buitenlanders slaapt 104 nautische mijlen van Avebury, en door wie hij ontvangen begrafenis door de zee van Joseph, die is vernoemd naar Arimathea, en hij heeft ook zijn eeuwige rust daar, en ze liggen op de zuidelijke vork van een 'gevorkte meridionale' lijn in een hoek een kust Tor in een krater waarboven kan gaan op het uiteinde van de rand zoals reeds bereid hoog in Ictis. Dit graf is nu hun woning en ligt op 13 graden van de st. Michael ley lijn.Dit is wat melkin ons zegt en het wordt aangelegd woord voor woord, waardoor de profetie volledig begrepen kan worden in het boek en deed die voeten. Klik op de link hierboven.De Tempeliers bouwden een scala aan kerken gewijd aan St. Michael die de St Michael leylijn bestaan ​​en net als St Michael's Mount in Cornwall dit kleine eiland had een St Michael kerk op, maar het is de vader goed een vijftiende-eeuwse jezuïet monnik die bevestigt deze positie die ons vertelt dat Jozef van Arimathea is 'zorgvuldig verborgen' in Montacute en je kunt zien dat de lijn loopt door St.Michaels heuvel waar er ooit stond ook een kerk gewijd aan hem precies 104 mijl op een lijn die is gesplitst op dertien graden en loopt door MONTECUTE. Veel geleerden en historici die zijn ingegaan op de Glastonbury materiaal zeggen dat de Melkin was een uitvinding van de twelvth of dertiende eeuw. Dit is gewoon niet waar is en deze positie wordt alleen aangekomen op, want niemand heeft kunnen ontcijferen Prophecy Melkin, voordat de huidige tijd. Vraag jezelf af, waarom zou iemand een puzzel die nog niemand kon begrijpen alle details in het zo nauwkeurig en leiden tot de zeer eiland genoemd in de profetie. Niet alleen Melkin schrijft het origineel van de Graal boek dat de locatie van dit eiland wordt, maar Leonardo Da Vinci de hoogte was van waar dit eiland was en vertelde ons ook dat in zijn schilderijen van de Madonna en de yarnwinder hij zou ons te laten zien waar dit eiland. Hij schilderde twee Yarnwinder schilderijen die precies aangeven waar de geografische locatie is. We kunnen kijken of we het samenvoegen van de twee schilderijen waarvan we weten dat geschilderd worden door hem, hij geeft elke geografische detail dat de locatie van het eiland Avalon als de dag van vandaag Burgh eiland in Devon, die zien we ook deze zelfde kijk op google earth.Dit is een ingewikkeld verhaal, maar het is geopenbaard in deze nieuwe en verhelderende boek dat het bewijs van hoe dit eiland werd bekend als het eiland van Sarras in de Graal verhalen en hoe de lijkwade van Turijn is in feite het echte graf doek van Jezus gezien door Melkin geeft en dat hij noemde het de 'Duo Fassula'.In feite kun je zien latin beschrijving Melkin's komt overeen met de lijkwade volledig als we begrijpen dat zijn raadsel van de Duo Fassula echt een Duplico Fasciola of verdubbeld graf doek, omdat het zegt dat ....Habet Enim secum Ioseph in sarcophago duo fassula alba & argentea, cruore Prophete Jhesu & sudore perimpleta: Joseph heeft met hem in de sarcofaag een dubbele witte inbakeren doek bedekt met het bloed en zweet van de profeet Jezus die werd gevouwen om hem heen.De Tempeliers die de bouw van de St.Michael kerken om dit graf te markeren begraven hun schat op dit eiland op eerste kerstdag in 1307 na zijn aankomst in drie schat schepen. Toen ze gelost de schat en voordat ze sloot het graf voor de laatste keer een van hen, (waarschijnlijk Geoffrey de Charney) verwijderd van de Lijkwade van Jezus uit het graf die op dit moment op exibit in Turijn.King Arthur's lichaam werd ook begraven op het eiland en het is hier dat hij kwam om te zoeken naar een wonder om zijn fatale wonden te genezen na de strijd om zijn koninkrijk als hij wist dat Jezus werd begraven in zich. Goeffrey van Monmouth vertelt ook dat Arthur wordt begraven op het eiland Avalon, maar het is Melkin die bevestigt dat we de juiste locatie door te zeggen dat het woord Supradictis betekent hoog in IctisEn die voeten heeft gedaan door Michael Goldsworthy, is een onthullend boek met alle kaarten en bewijzen dat uitlegt hoe het komt dat, wat bekend stond als de Graal ark in de Graal romances Jezus lichaam bevat en bevestigt hoe de afbeelding op de lijkwade van Turijn werd geformuleerd in cederhout olie. Het mysterie is nu ontdekt, maar wat wordt de wereld van deze onthulling van het graf te leren op dit heilige eiland en wat zal het effect van de ontdekking van dit graf en de inhoud ervan op alle grote religies vandaag de dag zijn.Dit is een spannend boek uitgebracht op ebook of in paperback en is vol van uitstekende foto's en diagrammen die bewijzen te verstrekken.












Island of Avalon ja saarelle Sarras ollut koskaan at Glastonbury

$
0
0









Insula auallonis auida funere paganorum, pre ceteris in orbe ad sepulturam eorum omnium sperulis propheciae vaticinantibus decorata, & in futurum ornata erit altissimum laudantibus. Abbadare, potens in Saphat, paganorum nobilissimus, cum centum et quatuor milibus domiicionem ibi accepit. Inter quos ioseph de marmore, ab Armathia nomine, cepit sompnum perpetuum; Et iacet in linea bifurcata iuxta meridianum angulum oratori, cratibus praeparatis, super potentem adorandam virginem, supradictis  sperulatis locum habitantibus tredecim. Habet enim secum Ioseph in sarcophago duo fassula alba & argentea, cruore prophete Jhesu & sudore perimpleta. Cum reperietur ejus sarcofagum, integrum illibatum in futuris videbitur, & erit apertum toto orbi terrarium. Ex tunc aqua, nec ros coeli insulam nobilissimam habitantibus poterit deficere. Per multum tempus ante diem Judioialem in iosaphat erunt aperta haec, & viventibus declarata. 
  Hucusque melkinus.


Muinoin noin 350 eaa kreikkalainen navigaattori joka vieraili Britanniassa kirjoitti päiväkirjaa, ja siinä hän kuvaili saari, jossa tinaa on tuotettu, ja hän kutsui sitä kalaa saari tai kreikaksi Ichthys, Ichthus ja Ikhthus eli saaren Ictis. Tämä saari ympäröi sardiini tiettyinä aikoina vuodesta joten sen nimi. Tina kauppaa, joka oli ollut olemassa 1000bc kautta foinikialaisten kauppiaiden myöhemmin kommentoitiin jota Latinalaisen kronikoitsija nimeltään Diodorus ja hänen kommentteja Britit olivat sitä. Asukkaat, jotka asuvat lähellä niemeke of Britain, tunnetaan Belerium, minun tina ja kun he ovat sulaneet sen tina harkot, he kantavat sitä tietty saari, joka sijaitsee pois Britanniasta, ja kutsutaan Ictis. Sillä on häviämässä se on vuorovesi, väli tämän saaren ja mantereen jää kuivaa ja sitten he voivat välittää tina suuria määriä yli saareen vaununsa. Tämä saari Burgh Island S.Devon sen hiekalla pengertie että kuivattaa laskuvesi, johon kärryt tinan mainitsemista Pytheas kaatoi Etelä Dartmoor kautta Loddiswell kun ikivanha cart radalla. Vain "Linch pin" jostakin näistä vaunujen löytyy Devonin ja Cornwallin pytheas "aikakausi löytyi tästä samoilla linjoilla siitä Dartmoor ja Ictis. He matkustivat pitkin vuorovesi tie Aveton Gifford päästä saarelle IctisKuten monet tietävät on legenda Cornwall, että Joosef Arimathea Jeesuksen setä oli Tin kauppias ja että hän tuli tänne rannikolle hakemaan tina Jeesuksen kanssa, kun hän oli vielä poika. Kukaan ei ollut aivan varma, miksi Ictis kutsuttiin Emporium eli markkinoilla, mutta nyt tiedetään, että tämän saari on vanha holvi alunperin säilytykseen tinaa, jonka vanha kaivostyöläisten mutta aikoihin roomalaiset valtasivat Britanniassa tämä tuli yhä vaikeampaa pitämään salassa, jotta Joseph ostivat tämän saaren valtava tina holvi sisällä. Jeesuksen ruumista on vielä tunnistamatta sisällä Island. Siksi evankeliumien liittyvät kolme olennaisia ​​tosiasioita, hauta kuului Joosef oli hakattu pois haudasta, että mikään muu ihminen oli maannut ennen ja se oli valkoinen liina. Tämä on mitä evankeliumit ovat yhtä mieltä siitä, mutta he eivät anna siitä, että hauta sivusto on Englannissa. Itse Strabo toisessa kronikoitsija mukaan kapteeni juoksi hänen veneensä kiville eikä lahjoittaa saaret kannan roomalaiset ja se vain tapahtuu niin, että vieressä tämä saari meillä on vain kaksi merenkulun hylyt muinaisen tina teollisuudelle. Tässä on suurin välimuisti tinaa harkot löytyi vain muutaman mailin päässä ictis.Melkin profeetta ja munkki, joka asui noin 450 650AD kirjoitti hyvin outoa profetiaa latinaksi, jota tähän asti on säilynyt hämärä esitteen, joka antaa ajo hautapaikka Joosef Arimathea. Joseph on tarkoitus olla hänen kanssaan, mitä on ajateltu olevan Graalin hänen kanssaan, missä hän on haudattu saarelle Avalon.Monta vuotta Grail metsästäjät ovat olettaneet, että Graalin ja Joseph makaavat Glastonbury, mutta profetia annettiin muodossa palapelin ja hiljattain tämä arvoitus on avattu, ja nyt paljastuu teos, ja teki Ne Feet ". Kirjan ja teki Ne Feet "on nimetty runo William Blake, joka sillä useimmat britit tietävät on hymni Jerusalemin, joka puhuu Uuden Jerusalemin olemassa Britanniassa, ja kysyy," Jeesus "jalkain kun Englannin miellyttävä laitumia vihreä. No nyt meillä on vastaus, koska Jeesus on haudattu tässä Island vieressä Joosef Arimathea.Profeetta melkin vieraili hautapaikka jälkeen kuningas Arthur oli haudattu sinne ja jätti nämä ohjeet jälkipolville että voisimme löytää hänen hautansa päällä ja kutsuu saaren saaren Avalon.Island of Avalon, himoitsevat pakanat kuolemaan, ylitse muiden (paikat) maailmassa, koska heillä on entombment siellä ja se on kunnia ympyrä, joka ennakoi ja profetoi (ja tämä ympyrä on kivi ympyrän Avebury). Sen jälkeen sanotaan, että tulevaisuudessa saari on koristanut jotka ylistämään korkeinta ja "Abbadare" (joka tarkoittaa käännettynä Isän helmi, joka on tietenkin Jeesus) voimallinen tuomiossa jaloin ne ulkomaalaiset nukkuu 104 meripeninkulman päässä Avebury, ja kenen hän saapumisjärjestyksessä hautaus meren Joseph, joka on nimetty Arimathea, ja hän on myös ottanut hänen ikuinen lepo siellä, ja he makaavat Etelä haarukassa "kaksihaarainen sivuviivan" linjan kulmassa on rannikko Tor vuonna kraatteri, jonka yläpuolella voi mennä ääripäähän partaalla, koska se oli jo valmis korkealla Ictis. Tämä hauta on nyt heidän asunnon, ja sijaitsee 13 astetta st. Michael ley line.Juuri melkin sanoo, ja se on vahvistetut sanasta sanaan niin, että profetia voidaan täysin ymmärtää kirjan ja tekivät ne jalat. Klikkaa linkkiä.Templars rakennettu erilaisia ​​kirkot omistettu Pyhän Mikaelin jotka muodostavat Pyhän Mikaelin ley linjaa ja kuten Mikaelin vuoren Cornwallissa tämä pieni saari oli Mikaelin kirkossa sitä, mutta se on isä Hyvä viidennentoista vuosisadan Jesuiitta munkki, joka vahvistaa tämän kannan joka kertoo, että Joosef Arimathea on "huolellisesti piilossa" Montacute ja voit nähdä, että viiva kulkee St.Michaels kukkulan jossa kerran myös seisoi kirkon omistettu hänelle tarkalleen 104 mailia johto on kaksihaarainen Kolmetoistavuotiaana Asteet ja kulkee MONTECUTE. Monet tutkijat ja historioitsijat, jotka ovat käsitelleet Glastonbury materiaalin sanovat Melkin oli keksintö twelvth tai kolmastoista luvulla. Tämä ei yksinkertaisesti ole totta, ja tämä asema on vain saapunut koska kukaan ei ole pystynyt tulkitsemaan Melkin profetia ennen nykyistä aikakautta. Kysy itseltäsi, miksi joku tekisi palapeliä, ettei kukaan voisi ymmärtää vielä kaikki yksityiskohdat siinä ovat niin tarkkoja, ja johtaa hyvin saarelle nimetty ennustuksessa. Ei ainoastaan ​​Melkin kirjoittaa alkuperäinen Graalin kirjan jossa vahvistetaan sijainti saarella, mutta Leonardo Da Vinci oli tietoinen siitä, missä tämä saari oli ja kertoi myös, että hänen maalauksia Madonna ja yarnwinder hän näyttää meille, missä tämä saari on. Hän maalasi kaksi Yarnwinder maalauksia osoittaa tarkasti, missä maantieteellinen sijainti on. Voimme nähdä, jos voimme yhdistää kaksi maalausta, jotka tiedämme on maalannut häntä, hän antaa jokaiselle maantieteellisiä yksityiskohtia joka etsii saaren Avalon kuin nykypäivään Burgh saari Devon jossa voimme nähdä tämän saman näkökulman Google Earth.Se on monimutkainen juttu, mutta se paljasti tämän uuden ja valaiseva kirja, joka tuo esiin, kuinka tämä saari tuli tunnetuksi saaren Sarras on Graalin tarinoita ja miten Torinon käärinliina on itse asiassa todellinen hauta kangas Jeesuksen nähdä Melkin ja että hän viittasi siihen "Duo Fassula".Itse näet Melkin n latin kuvaus vastaa suojus kokonaan, jos ymmärrämme, että hänen arvoitus Duo Fassula on todella Duplico Fasciola tai kaksinkertaistunut hautaan liinalla, koska siinä sanotaan, että ....Habet enim secum Ioseph vuonna sarcophago duo fassula alba & argentea, cruore prophète Jhesu & sudore perimpleta: Joseph on hänen kanssaan sarkofagin kaksinkertaistui valkoinen Swaddling liinalla peitetty verta ja hikeä profeetta Jeesuksen, joka oli taitettu hänen ympärillään.Templars joka rakensi St.Michael kirkkoja merkitä tämän vakavan sivuston hautasivat aarre saarella joulupäivänä vuonna 1307 saapumisensa jälkeen kolmessa aarre aluksia. Koska ne puretaan aarre ja ennen sulkenut hauta viimeisen kerran yksi heistä, (luultavasti Geoffrey de Charney) poistetaan käärinliinasta Jeesuksen haudasta, joka on tämänhetkisillä exibit Torinossa.Kuningas Arthur ruumis haudattiin myös tämän saaren ja se on täällä, että hän tuli etsimään ihmettä parantaa hänen kuoliniskut taistelun jälkeen hänen valtakuntansa sillä hän tiesi, että Jeesus haudattiin siinä. Goeffrey Monmouthin myös kertoo, että Arthur on haudattu saarelle Avalon mutta Melkin joka vahvistaa meillä on oikea paikka sanomalla sanan Supradictis tarkoittaa jopa runsaasti IctisJa teki Ne jalat Michael Goldsworthy, on paljastava kirja kaikkien karttojen ja todisteita siitä, että selvitetään, miten se on sitä, mitä kutsutaan Graalin arkki on Graalin romansseja sisältää Jeesuksen ruumiin ja vahvistaa miten kuvan Torinon käärinliina oli muotoiltu Cedar öljyä. Mysteeri on nyt paljaana, mutta mitä maailma oppia paljastustilaisuudessa haudan tämän pyhän saarella ja mikä vaikutus havaitsi tämän haudan ja sen sisältö kaikkien suurten uskontojen tänään.Tämä on jännittävä kirja julkaistiin e-kirja tai pokkari, ja on täynnä erinomaisia ​​valokuvia ja kaavioita, jotka tarjoavat todisteita.














l'île d'Avalon et l'île de Sarras n'ont jamais été à Glastonbury

$
0
0





Insula auallonis auida funere paganorum, pre ceteris in orbe ad sepulturam eorum omnium sperulis propheciae vaticinantibus decorata, & in futurum ornata erit altissimum laudantibus. Abbadare, potens in Saphat, paganorum nobilissimus, cum centum et quatuor milibus domiicionem ibi accepit. Inter quos ioseph de marmore, ab Armathia nomine, cepit sompnum perpetuum; Et iacet in linea bifurcata iuxta meridianum angulum oratori, cratibus praeparatis, super potentem adorandam virginem, supradictis  sperulatis locum habitantibus tredecim. Habet enim secum Ioseph in sarcophago duo fassula alba & argentea, cruore prophete Jhesu & sudore perimpleta. Cum reperietur ejus sarcofagum, integrum illibatum in futuris videbitur, & erit apertum toto orbi terrarium. Ex tunc aqua, nec ros coeli insulam nobilissimam habitantibus poterit deficere. Per multum tempus ante diem Judioialem in iosaphat erunt aperta haec, & viventibus declarata. 
  Hucusque melkinus.



Dans les temps anciens vers 350 avant JC un navigateur grec qui a visité la Grande-Bretagne a écrit un journal et en elle il a décrit une île où l'étain a été produit et il l'a appelé le poisson île ou dans Ichthys grecs, Ichthus et ikhthus dire l'île de Ictis. Cette île a été entouré par Pilchards à certains moments de l'année où son nom. Le commerce de l'étain qui avait existé depuis le 1000BC par les marchands phéniciens a été plus tard commenté par un chroniqueur nommé Diodore latine et ses commentaires sur les Britanniques étaient que.
Les habitants qui habitent près du promontoire de la Grande-Bretagne, connue sous le nom Belerium, la mine d'étain et quand ils l'ont fait fondre en lingots d'étain, ils le portent à une certaine île, qui se trouve hors Grande-Bretagne, et est appelé Ictis. Pour le reflux de la marée est, l'espace entre cette île et le continent est laissé à sec, puis ils peuvent transmettre l'étain en grandes quantités dans l'île sur leurs wagons.
C'est l'île de Burgh Island dans S.Devon avec son pont-jetée de sable qui assèche à marée basse sur laquelle les chariots de l'étain mentionné par Pythéas ont été portées contre le sud de Dartmoor dans Loddiswell sur une piste panier ancienne. Le seul «cheville ouvrière» de l'un de ces wagons trouvés dans le Devon et Cornwall de l'époque PYTHEAS 'a été trouvé sur cette même piste de Dartmoor à Ictis. Ils ont voyagé le long d'une route de marée dans Aveton Gifford pour atteindre l'île de Ictis. Comme beaucoup le savent il ya une légende à Cornwall que Joseph d'Arimathie oncle de Jésus était un marchand d'étain et qu'il est venu à cette côte pour ramasser l'étain avec Jésus quand il était encore un garçon. Personne n'était vraiment pourquoi Ictis a été appelé un 'Emporium' qui signifie place du marché, mais il est maintenant connu que, dans cette île est une ancienne chapelle à l'origine utilisé pour l'étain de stockage par les anciens mineurs, mais à l'époque les Romains ont envahi la Grande-Bretagne est venu ce plus en plus difficile de garder le secret si Joseph, ayant acheté cette île avec la voûte d'étain énorme en son sein. Le corps de Jésus est encore à découvrir dans l'île. C'est pourquoi les évangiles rapportent trois faits pertinents, le tombeau appartenait à Joseph, il était un tombeau taillé qu'aucun autre homme avait couché dans avant et il était dans un drap blanc. C'est ce que les évangiles d'accord sur, mais ils ne laissent pas le que le site tombe est en Angleterre.



 
En fait Strabon autre Etats chroniqueur qu'un capitaine a couru son bateau sur les rochers, plutôt que donner la position des îles aux Romains et il se trouve que à côté de cette île, nous avons les deux seules épaves maritimes de l'industrie de l'étain antique. C'est là que le plus grand cache de lingots d'étain a été trouvé seulement quelques miles de ictis.Melkin un prophète et un moine qui vivait dans environ 450 à 650AD écrit une prophétie très étrange en latin, qui jusqu'à présent est resté une pièce obscure de la littérature qui donne des directions au lieu d'inhumation de Joseph d'Arimathie. Joseph est censé avoir avec lui ce qui est pensé pour être le Saint-Graal avec lui où il est enterré dans l'île d'Avalon.Pendant des années, de nombreux chasseurs du Graal ont supposé que le Graal et le mensonge Joseph à Glastonbury, mais la prophétie a été donnée sous la forme d'un puzzle et récemment cette énigme a été débloqué et est maintenant révélé dans un livre intitulé «Et ce que ces pieds» (And Did Those Feet).



 
Le livre «Et ce que ces pieds» est nommé d'après le poème écrit par William Blake qui, comme la plupart des Britanniques sais, c'est l'hymne de Jérusalem, qui parle de la Nouvelle Jérusalem existantes en Grande-Bretagne et pose la question «avez-pieds de Jésus marcher sur les pâturages agréables d'Angleterre verte. Eh bien maintenant, nous avons la réponse, parce que Jésus est enterré dans cette île à côté de Joseph d'Arimathie.Le prophète melkin visité la tombe après le roi Arthur a été enterré là-bas et à gauche ces directions pour la postérité que nous puissions découvrir son lieu de sépulture et appelle l'île de l'île d'Avalon.Île d'Avalon, convoitant les païens dans la mort, au-dessus de tous les autres (lieux) dans le monde parce qu'ils ont leur sépulture là-bas et il est honoré par un cercle qui laisse présager d'une prophétie (et ce cercle est le cercle de pierres d'Avebury). Il va ensuite à dire que dans l'avenir de l'île seront parés par ceux qui rendent gloire à la plus élevée et «Abbadare» (dont la traduction signifie perle Le père, qui est bien sûr Jésus) puissant dans le jugement le plus noble de ces étrangers dort 104 miles marins à partir de Avebury, et par qui il a reçu l'inhumation par la mer de Joseph, qui est nommé d'après Arimathie, et il a également pris son repos éternel là, et ils se trouvent sur la fourche sud d'une ligne «bifurqué méridienne» dans un angle Tor sur un côtier, dans un cratère, au-dessus duquel on peut aller à l'extrémité de la verge comme il a été déjà préparé en haut dans Ictis. ce tombeau est maintenant de leur logement et se trouve à 13 degrés de la  Saint Michael ley ligne.

C'est ce que nous dit melkin et il est disposé, mot pour mot afin que la prophétie ne peut être pleinement compris dans le livre et fait ces pieds. Cliquez sur le lien ci-dessus.Les Templiers construit un tableau de toutes les églises dédiées à Saint-Michel qui composent le St Michael ley ligne et comme le mont Saint-Michel en Cornouailles cette petite île avait une église Saint-Michel sur elle, mais il est bon père une quinzième siècle moine jésuite qui confirme cette position qui nous dit que Joseph d'Arimathie est «soigneusement caché» dans Montaigu et vous pouvez voir que la ligne passe par St.Michaels colline où il se tenait aussi une fois une église dédiée à lui exactement 104 miles sur une ligne qui est bifurqué À treize degrés ET Et au milieu coule MONTECUTE.
De nombreux chercheurs et historiens qui ont traité avec le matériel de Glastonbury dire la Melkin était une invention du siècle Douzième ou treizième. Ce n'est tout simplement pas vrai, et cette position est seulement arrivé à parce que personne n'a été en mesure de déchiffrer la prophétie Melkin avant l'ère actuelle. Demandez-vous pourquoi pourrait-on faire un puzzle que personne ne pouvait comprendre encore tous les détails qui s'y trouvent sont tellement précis et conduit à l'île très nommée dans la prophétie.

 



Non seulement at-Melkin écrire le livre original de la Graal qui établit l'emplacement de cette île, mais Léonard de Vinci était au courant de l'endroit où cette île était et nous a également dit que, dans ses peintures de la Vierge et l'yarnwinder il nous montrer où cette île est. Il peint deux tableaux qui montrent Yarnwinder exactement où l'emplacement géographique est. Nous pouvons voir si nous fusionnons les deux tableaux que nous connaissons à peindre par lui, il donne à chaque détail géographique qui localise l'île d'Avalon que l'actuelle île de Burgh dans le Devon, qui on peut aussi voir dans cette même perspective sur google earth.C'est une histoire compliquée, mais il est révélé dans ce nouveau livre et instructif qui donne des preuves de la façon dont cette île est devenue connue comme l'île de Sarras dans les histoires du Graal et de la façon dont le Suaire de Turin est en fait le vrai tissu tombe de Jésus vu par Melkin et que il s'est référé à lui comme «Fassula Duo».En fait, vous pouvez voir la description latin Melkin correspond à l'enveloppe complètement si nous comprenons que son énigme de la Fassula Duo est vraiment un fasciola Duplico ou doublé au cours de chiffon grave parce qu'il dit que ....Habet enim Secum Ioseph dans sarcophago duo alba fassula & argentea, cruore prophete Jhesu & sudore perimpleta:

 

 
Joseph a avec lui dans le sarcophage un doublé drap blanc maillot couvert du sang et la sueur du prophète Jésus qui a été plié autour de lui.Les Templiers qui ont construit les églises St.Michael à l'occasion de ce site tombe enterré leur trésor sur cette île le jour de Noël en 1307 après son arrivée à bord des navires de trésor trois. Comme ils ont déchargé le trésor et avant la fermeture de la tombe pour la dernière fois l'un d'eux, (probablement Geoffroy de Charney) enlevés le Saint-Suaire de Jésus de la tombe qui est actuellement sur exibit à Turin.Corps du roi Arthur a également été enterré dans cette île et c'est là qu'il est venu chercher un miracle pour guérir ses blessures mortelles après la bataille pour son royaume, comme il savait que Jésus a été enterré en son sein.

Geoffrey de Monmouth raconte également que Arthur est enterré dans l'île d'Avalon, mais il est Melkin qui confirme que nous avons le bon endroit en disant le mot qui signifie Supradictis haut dans IctisEt ce que ces pieds par Michael Goldsworthy, est un livre révélateur avec toutes les cartes et les preuves qui explique comment il se fait, ce qui était connu comme l'arche du Graal dans les romans du Graal contient le corps de Jésus et confirme à quel point l'image sur le linceul de Turin a été formulée dans de l'huile de cèdre. Le mystère est maintenant à découvert, mais ce sera le monde d'apprendre à partir de ce dévoilement de la tombe sur cette île sacrée et ce sera l'effet de la découverte de ce tombeau et de son contenu sur toutes les grandes religions d'aujourd'hui.C'est un livre passionnant publié le ebook ou en livre de poche et il est plein d'excellentes photographies et des diagrammes qui fournissent des preuves.














Et-ce que ces pieds écrites par Michael Goldsworthy est une explication qui réunit les traditions histoire du Graal avec les légendes de Glastonbury du roi Arthur et Joseph d'Arimathie.En 1191, les ossements du roi Arthur ont été prétendument déterré à l'abbaye de Glastonbury. On disait que la croix a été trouvé avec lui, qui a déclaré que commodément le roi Arthur, (c'est à dire les os vient de déterrer), ont été trouvés 'dans Avalon », confirmant à ceux qui devaient être persuadé, que Avalon était à Glastonbury fait. La raison pour laquelle les moines de Glastonbury a commis une fraude comme celle-ci était à cause des légendes du Graal concernant la Matière de Bretagne en provenance de France. Il s'agissait d'une manière en concurrence avec la tradition établie à Glastonbury qui a associé le roi Arthur avec Joseph d'Arimathie.

Les nouvelles de cette littérature du Graal est maintenant répandue en Angleterre et au Glastonbury avait besoin d'une association avec un saint pour attirer les pèlerins. Elle est due à la prophétie Melkin que Joseph avait toujours été associé à Glastonbury car elle est liée informations concernant les «virginem adorandam 'qui a été assumé par les moines de Glastonbury se rapporter à l'église construite en acacia à Glastonbury qui a été dédiée à la vierge Marie. Cela a également été pris en charge par Guillaume de Malmesbury quand il a mentionné la même église. Cette partie de l'énigme est en fait Melkin fournir des informations exactes sur les détails du site de la position du lieu de sépulture de Joseph d'Arimathie à Burgh Island. Elle était due à cette mauvaise interprétation de la prophétie Melkin que Glastonbury repose actuellement son cas comme étant à l'emplacement d'Avalon et de la terre sacrée où Joseph établit. Si Joseph étaient là, il aurait déjà été découverts.Personne n'était trop où l'île d'Avalon a été, mais tout le monde depuis les écrits de Geoffrey de Monmouth savaient que le roi Arthur a également été enterré dans Avalon. Cela indique en fait que Geoffrey a fait matériel source écrit par Melkin ce qui restait en Grande-Bretagne Melkin est responsable de renommer l'île de Ictis à Avalon.Joseph d'Arimathie, par la prophétie Melkin a également indiqué a été enterré dans Avalon. Ni Guillaume de Malmesbury, ni Geoffroy de Monmouth associé Glastonbury avec l'île d'Avalon au moment où ils écrit.


Ce fut une corruption plus tard, par des moines et dans le seul but de produire la croix frauduleuse déterré était d'établir que Glastonbury Avalon. Si Glastonbury ne pouvait être établie que par la mise au jour d'Avalon du roi Arthur, alors il doit suivre le Joseph d'Arimathie a également été enterré dans l'enceinte de l'abbaye, si tous ont été convaincus que Glastonbury est Avalon. Pour dénicher Joseph d'Arimathie, cependant, peut se révéler difficile car il était connu qu'il a été enseveli avec le Saint-Graal. Étant donné que les moines n'étaient pas au courant de ce que le Graal se compose, il était plus facile à fabriquer l'exhumation du roi Arthur avec une croix attestant le fait que là où il a été déterré a en effet été Glastonbury et par conséquent il doit être l'île d'Avalon. La raison pour laquelle Joseph d'Arimathie avait besoin d'être associé à Glastonbury est parce que les moines avaient besoin de financement pour reconstruire leur abbaye après l'incendie.Avant l'incendie de 1184, il existait une prophétie écrite par un moine appelé Melkin.



 Dans cette prophétie, (une fois qu'il est décodé), Melkin fournit des informations très pertinentes dans les instructions géométriques, qui donne des indications précises sur une île dans le Devon. Cette île est Burgh Island, dans le Devon. Etats Melkin que le corps de Joseph d'Arimathie réside dans l'angle sud d'une ligne à deux volets. Une fois le code Melkin est déchiffré, il dépeint clairement que Avebury est le point sur la ligne du St. Michael ley, qui, à son casse-tête, il se réfère à une sphère sperula'or ', ce qui signifie un cercle de pierres. C'est le point de l'intérieur du complexe Avebury cercle de pierre qui, à 13 °, si un scribe est une ligne à travers Montaigu à Burgh Island (qui Melkin appelle l'île d'Avalon), il est exactement cent quatre miles nautiques, le nombre exact que Melkin donne. Nous ne devons pas oublier que le Père William Good déposé cet indice dans le collège anglais à Rome.




Quelqu'un ou quelque organisation avait tenté d'éliminer cette information de «Trophea Maihew de« pour empêcher la ligne de Joseph, étant trouvé, mais heureusement, cet indice a été preseved dans la collection privée Stillingfleet et agit donc comme une confirmation que la ligne est authentique. Il semble aussi que les églises marqueurs plusieurs identifié le véritable Avalon ont également été détruits afin d'empêcher cette information à venir dans l'arène publique.L'emplacement d'Avalon a toujours été pensé pour exister à Glastonbury, mais avec une étude récente d'une partie du plus ancien texte et la découverte de la fraude concernant le Roi Arthur réalisé par les moines de Glastonbury, il est évident que Avalon est dans le Devon.



 Les références qui donne Melkin font partie d'une énigme géométrique qui une fois résolu, points de suite pour l'île de Devon, qui est s'inscrit évidemment la description de Diodore comme Ictis.Il s'agit en fait du nom dans les histoires du Graal que l'île de Sarras nommées d'après Zarah Juda fils aîné, qui a battu le premier sein. Son nom a la même prononciation que Sarra en français et de ses descendants est venu vers le sud-ouest et étaient des mineurs d'étain primordiales dans le Dartmoor du Sud qui ont apporté leur étain à cette île pour être vendus. C'est la raison pour laquelle dans les histoires du Graal, l'île est appelée Sarras et à laquelle le Graal a été apporté. C'est à cette île qui, après la crucifixion de Jésus, quand son corps a été descendu de la croix par son oncle, Joseph d'Arimathie, il a ensuite été transporté à une boîte remplie d'huile de cèdre, afin qu'il puisse préserver son cadavre. Cette boîte ou le cercueil connu sous le nom de l'Arche du Graal a ensuite été transporté avec Joseph et plusieurs autres de Jérusalem à l'île de Sarras, qui connaissait bien Joseph, après avoir visité de nombreuses fois auparavant lors de ses voyages mercantiles avec Jésus. Cette île avait été connue dans les chroniques grecques parce Pythéas un explorateur grec avait visité l'île lors de son expédition pour trouver l'ambre dont ils ne se rendent pas compte a été le. Parfois sous-produit de l'étain et la fonte du cuivre L'île a été gardé secret pendant de nombreuses années depuis la visite de Pythéas ", jusqu'à ce que Joseph d'Arimathie a visité l'île avec Jésus sur l'un de ses voyages à l'étranger des métaux de collecte.




Il était de cette île auparavant connu sous le nom Ictis que Joseph d'Arimathie a choisi de transmettre l'arche du Graal et la place de Jésus dans un coffre-fort vieille boîte qui avait été arrêté ou licenciés en raison de l'invasion romaine. Pour environ 1000 ans, l'île appelée Burgh Island avait été le lieu sur la côte où tous les mineurs d'étain s'allume sur le sud de Dartmoor avaient apporté leur étain pour être stockés dans le coffre. Cette transpiré sorte que les commerçants en visite pourrait enlever l'étain à tout moment et l'île a agi comme un poste de traite. C'est pour cette raison que Diodorous se réfère à elle comme un «emporium». Il devient clair maintenant la raison pour laquelle Joseph d'Arimathie savait l'île très bien. Strabon rapporte même l'histoire derrière le cache de lingots d'étain trouvés à la tête de l'Erm.Les évangiles rapportent que Jésus a été enterré dans un tombeau taillé dans appartenant à Joseph d'Arimathie et les rumeurs persistaient tant que témoins oculaires avaient vu le doublé au cours de linceul blanc qui couvrait son corps comme il était dans l'arche du Graal. On peut se demander si les récits évangéliques de la sépulture de Jésus ne sont que les échos des récits de témoins oculaires mal interprétés qui existaient à Jérusalem, juste après la résurrection. Cet ensemble d'événements aslo explique pourquoi les empreintes de fleurs ont été trouvés sur le linceul de Turin.



Ceci est entièrement expliquée en détail dans un livre intitulé «Et fait ces pieds", écrit par Michael Goldsworthy comme nouvelle théorie sur la façon dont les histoires du Graal, la légende arthurienne à Glastonbury évangiles ainsi que le lien et fournir la preuve de la localisation du corps de Jésus.Melkin, qui a écrit le livre original du Graal, qui a pris fin au-dessus en France et a donné lieu à de nombreux romans arthuriens du Graal est maintenant comprise comme étant la même personne qui a fourni les rumeurs de Joseph d'Arimathie à Glastonbury. Nous avons donc maintenant un tombeau contenant du roi Arthur, Joseph d'Arimathie et de Jésus qui a été éteint la dernière quand Melkin s'installe en France en autour de 600AD, quelque temps après l'invasion saxonne.


Cependant, les Templiers, une fois qu'ils ont été dissous au Moyen Age, étaient également au courant de cette situation insulaire et ils savaient ce qui a été enterré à l'intérieur. Il était là le jour de Noël en 1307 qu'ils ont décidé, (après que le roi Philippe et le Pape avait démantelé leur organisation), à délocaliser leur trésor qu'ils avaient réussi à récupérer et il ammased en trois navires de trésor qui ont quitté La Rochelle le 13th Octobre 1307 .Alors que le dépôt de leur trésor dans la tombe ils ont enlevé le Saint-Suaire de Jésus qui avait été immergé dans l'huile de cèdre depuis 600 ans, alors qu'il couvrait son corps. Il est au coeur de ce coffre-fort que l'image de Jésus sur le Suaire de Turin a été formé en drapé sur le corps de Jésus dans l'huile de cèdre. L'huile de cèdre évaporé a laissé une substance ressemblant à du caramel partout dans le Suaire de Turin, mais l'image elle-même a été formé par les détritus laissés par des bactéries anaérobies.Seulement 50 ans plus tard, l'un des Templiers qui sont morts avec Jack de Molay près de Notre-Dame de Paris, avait une petite-fille qui a produit le Suaire de Turin. Ce n'est pas par hasard et répond aux nombreuses questions de savoir pourquoi il n'y a pas de provenance pour le Saint Suaire de Turin avant 1354. Le Saint-Suaire avait existé au sein de la voûte d'étain jusqu'à ce que les Templiers arrivent et retirez-le. La chanson qui est devenu un chant de Noël; «J'ai vu trois navires se voile dans le jour de Noël le matin» est vraiment l'écho des Templiers qui apportent leur trésor à l'île d'Avalon dans le Devon.





Toutefois, cette chanson a toujours été associé dans la tradition de Cornouailles à la visite de Jésus et Joseph d'Arimathie. Ce sont les Templiers, cependant, qui a marqué tous les églises dédiées à Saint-Michel qui se trouvent le long de la ligne de Saint-Michel Ley. Curieusement, ce sont les autres églises St. Michael que nous avons utilisés comme marqueurs, qui confirment que l'île d'Avalon est en effet Burgh Island, dans le Devon.


 C'est cette ligne qui se réfère à Melkin, qui, lorsqu'il est bifurquée dans les pierres d'Avebury à 13 ° et une ligne est tracée pour 104 miles nautiques il atterrit sur cette même île. Sans équivoque Melkin comprend le lien entre l'île de Ictis utilisés par Joseph d'Arimathie et appelle clairement l'île d'Avalon. Tout d'abord, il est connu par les Grecs comme Ictis, d'autre part, comme l'île de Sarras par les écrivains français du Graal et, troisièmement, que l'île d'Avalon nommé comme tel par Melkin origine et faire apparaître comme appartenant à Glastonbury Tor par certains médiévale retors moines. Il est même fait référence à l'île de Avaron par quelques-uns des écrivains du Graal.L'hymne officieux rédigé par William Blake appelait Jérusalem commence par la ligne »et ne les pieds».



 Tel est le titre du livre écrit par Michael Goldsworthy, qui transporte la même histoire que Jésus a visité l'Angleterre, tout en accompagnant son père, Joseph d'Arimathie en Grande-Bretagne. Le livre intitulé «Et ceux qui ont fait la prophétie feet'clearly déchiffre Melkin, de sorte qu'il devient évident que Melkin savait où l'île d'Avalon a été et ce qui existait en son sein. Pour bien comprendre cet ensemble extraordinaire d'événements, cliquez sur le lien ci-dessous et d'acheter l'ebook
Lorsque le Saint-Suaire a été définitivement retiré du tombeau de Joseph n'est pas clair, mais si notre affirmation selon laquelle le «duo fassula 'est le linceul, pourquoi Melkin déclarer qu'il s'attendait à ce qu'on trouve dans ce qui devait être un« non perturbé »tombe, s'il est responsable de la prendre à la France avec le livre du Graal. La seule raison pour postuler une telle proposition c'est parce qu'il ya un cas possible où l'on entend de l'enveloppe avant son apparition d'abord accepté, mais la preuve n'est pas solide. De toutes les preuves produites ici, Melkin semble avoir enlevé le Saint-Suaire et plié de le laisser se sécher dans la chambre de sépulture.




De son propre aveu, il croyait que la chambre n'avait pas être ouvert avant l'heure fixée dans «Temps biblique» et ne connaissait pas le son des Templiers allaient déposer leur trésor dans la tombe et de supprimer le Saint-Suaire. Pour l'avoir mentionné dans sa prophétie indique qu'il savait ce que l'impact de l'enveloppe pourrait avoir sur le monde, agissant comme une preuve du sacrifice de Jésus et de la souffrance, mais il n'a jamais envisagé qu'il soit séparé de l'Arche du Graal qui l'a établi que le véritable linceul visée à l'Évangile. Il est très probable que, lorsque le Saint-Suaire Melkin vu l'image (le positif d'une formation négative) était beaucoup plus clair avant de sécher.Maintenant, nous savons que les auteurs du Graal ont allegorised un corpus de connaissances dans leurs propres façons imaginatives, il pourrait également faire la lumière sur la référence étrange à Josephes et d'autres qui traversent le canal sur une chemise (qui est un concept étrange) et doit être comprise comme un autre exemple d'une référence à une erreur de traduction ou le sens d'être mal interprété et dans cet exemple le linceul ou un chiffon de l'original devient une chemise dans le roman. Cette incarne réellement l'allégorisation aléatoire qui a été perpétré par les romanciers. Ce ne serait pas surprenant, comme nous l'avons déjà vu plus mutations de la forme originale dans d'autres aspects des Romances. Mais ce morceau particulier de l'information pourrait indiquer que l'Arche du Graal a été en fait transporté à travers la France comme certains comptes-il, puis la cinquante (dit pour accompagner le Graal), s'est ensuite rendu à l'île de Sarras, à l'endroit du dernier repos de le Graal.À l'inquisition du templier les Chevaliers, Arnaut Sabbatier, un jeune Français qui a rejoint l'ordre des Templiers en 1287, a témoigné que dans le cadre de son initiation, il a été emmené à "un endroit secret à laquelle seuls les frères du Temple a eu accès". Là, il a été montré "une toile de lin long sur lequel a été impressionné de la figure d'un homme" et il a ensuite été chargé de vénérer l'image en embrassant ses pieds à trois reprises. Si le templier éclairer, qui possédait les manuscrits d'enregistrement au début l'histoire britannique, a également eu en leur possession le Suaire retiré du corps de Jésus à la mort du roi Arthur à son enterrement à Avalon? Si c'est le cas cela met une date antérieure à 1307 pour l'ouverture de la tombe et l'extraction du Saint Suaire de lui, mais nous allons couvrir ce sujet sous peu. Les Templiers ont été accusés de l'adoration des idoles, en particulier un "personnage barbu» qui certains ont indiqué que une tête barbue, mais était ce but, ils avaient secrètement vénéré, le Saint-Suaire qui, bien sûr représente un barbu Jésus.La voûte d'étain ancien premier étant utilisé comme un tombeau sembleont eu lieu lors de l'enterrement de Jésus et par la suite par ceux qui ont enterré Joseph. Elle est aussi liée que tout ou partie des Rois de cette ligne au début royale jusqu'à Arthur sont aussi enterrés là. Galahad meurt à Sarras, dit Hardyng, mais envoie Percival avec son cœur à Arthur, en priant le roi d'enterrer le cœuraux côtés du roi et le duc Evalak Seraphe, qui ont été enterrés à côté de Joseph (dans la chapelle de Notre-Dame à Glastonbury). La dernière phrase entre crochets est une réflexion après coup être une affirmation et une interpolation d'un dossier plus tôt. Enfin, Melkin doit avoir été témoin d'inhumation d'Arthur d'avoir raconté que le duo 'fassula »a été enterré dans le même endroit que Joseph. Donc, c'est seulement Sabbatier et le Codex Pray Le (La Hongrie PriezManuscrit) une collection de manuscrits médiévaux, qui offrent aucune connaissance préalable de l'enveloppe avant la 1350, de sorte qu'il n'est pas clair quand ou si elle était de Charney qui l'a retirée.Le Codex Pray est un vieux Hongrois manuscritetexte datant de 1192-1195 entre en montrant une image similaire de repos pour Jésus imprimé sur le linceul de Turin, mais aucune autre preuve ou la ressemblance, sauf une impression exagérée artistiquedu motif croisé qui pourrait être considéré comme frappant, mais très exagéré et toute ressemblance complètement fortuite.la similitude de repos du corps de Jésus comme étant semblable à l'image formée sur le Saint Suaire.Bien sûr, cela pourrait être juste une coïncidence et ne prouve en rien un lien avec le linceul, et même si c'était le cas il pourrait simplement indiquer que les Templiers déposé l'arche de l'alliance dans la tombe avant 1195AD que nous entendons des rumeurs de la l'Arche de l'enlèvement et rien dans la documentation des Templiers. Le codex Pray est seulement donné comme crédibilité en tant quereprésentant de l'enveloppe fondée sur trois similitudes. Le repos du corps est le premier, des trous de poker les marques de brûlures ou dans le vrai linceul qui semblent être en forme un «L» et le motif des quatre trous représentés ici à l'envers 'L', et enfin la censé représentation de tissu de la «Twill à chevrons», qui comprend le Saint-Suaire. Il semblerait que les trous de poker ne sont que la décoration par l'artiste, la fonction que l'on retrouve sur ce qui semble être la courroie de l'Ange et de son aile,mais aussi constaté ci-dessus la poitrine du saint féminin administration. La scène du haut est tout simplement Joseph et Nicodème préparer le corps et la seconde est que les trois femmes témoins de la toile blanche laissée dans le tombeau, en tant que représentant de récits évangéliques. Làest pas fait mention dans le codex de l'image étant representant de l'enveloppe et le motif supposé de la trame de la toile a été considérée comme une caractéristique plus importante par l'artiste de représenter l'image de Jésus sur la toile ce qui est légèrement redondante si l'image ont été véritablement dépeignant une connaissance du Saint Suaire. Le fait que Jésus est d'avoir lotions appliquées comme le récit de l'Evangile semble indiquer que par hasard la façon dont le corps est mis en place est similaire à l'enveloppe, mais la véritable intention est de montrer le corps reçoit une attention après avoir été retiré de la croix comme l'évangile comptes transmettre.On pourrait penser que si l'on devait en quelque sorte essayer derecréer l'image véhiculée sur le suaire comme quelque chose de l'artiste avait été témoin, il s'agit d'un trait le plus frappant de constater que la barbe n'est pas inclus. N'aurait-il pas frapper n'importe qui à venir à travers lelinceul que Jésus portait une barbe plutôt que de laisser à la fonction. Dans l'image du Saint Suaire de Turin, la paume droite est sur la base de la main gauche, tandis que dans le codex Pray, les bras se croisent au-dessus des poignets. Si l'on devaitTenter de décrire les 14 pieds de long carénage, beaucoup plus grands que la petite enveloppe représenté ici dans le codex, on aurait au moins présenter une image qui existait sur le Saint Suaire. Il semble que la principale raison pour considérer les similitudes de la Pray Codex était de réfuter la datation fournie par les résultats de C14 1260-1390 AD et d'établir le Saint-Suaire existé à une date antérieuredate. Les similitudes ne sont dû au fait qu'ils véhiculent des représentations différentes d'un événement historique au sujet de la même personne à travers différents médiums.La dernière fois que le tombeau semble avoir été ouverte est le 25 Décembre 1307, sept ans avant la mort de De Charney ou cinquante ans avant le Saint-Suaire a d'abord été affichés en 1357. Il semble peu probable que le Suaire était en Europe continentale jusqu'au moment de sa première diffusion, et pourquoi serait Melkin dire que le tissu est avec Joseph, s'il l'avait enlevé à la France.Ce n'est sûrement pas par hasard, que la société des Templiers même qui a construit les églises Saint-Michael a eu connaissance du Graal, une preuve physique du Suaire de Turin et la connaissance de la localisation de l'île d'Avalon. Ce serait certainement l'endroit parfait pour déposer leur trésor.Trouver un tombeau vide à Jérusalem par lui-même ne prouve pas une résurrection. Toutefois, le fait que la tombe dans laquelle Joseph avait mis Jésus était vide, il est essentiel à la véracité de la résurrection pour les fondamentalistes. Si quelqu'un aurait été en mesure de produire le corps de Jésus, la résurrection toute réclamation serait annulée et le christianisme ne serait pas fondé sur les principes qu'il possède aujourd'hui. Donc, ici, nous sont présentés avec deux options, Jésus a survécu à l'épreuve de la croix et réalisé ses apparitions, ce qui expliquerait Thomas voyant les deux trous dans les mains de Jésus et Luc d'avoir Jésus dire: «Voyez mes mains et mes pieds, c'est bien moi! . Touchez-moi et voyez: un esprit n'a ni chair ni os, comme vous voyez que j'ai ", Ou, les comptes de résurrection sont inexactes et il n'y avait, pas de résurrection et s'il y avait un aspect, il doit avoir été un aspect spirituel plutôt que témoin ou Luc Thomas. Cette forme de l'apparence est bien attesté par la conversion de saint Paul, de persécuteur à partisane et constitue une preuve de Jésus durable en tant que leader spirituel du patrimoine de Juda comme en témoigne par les prophètes.
 



The Messire Johan, Seingnor of Neele, can only be ‘John de Nesle’ who was present at the battle of Bouvines in 1214.This ‘Seingnor of Neele’ can be found in Migne, Dictionnairedes Abbayes et Monastères, and the reference relates to the founding of the Abbaye aux Bois, near Nesle, in 1202 (or 1200) by ‘Jean, seigneur de Neele, chatelain de Bouges (Bruges) et Eustachie de St.Paul (Pol), sa femme.’ Their marriage is also later confirmed, so we are referencing the same person. 
This is written after the discovery of Arthur at Glastonbury and 30 years after the Glastonbury fire, but this is a copy of Henry’s ‘Perlesvaux’ written earlier around 1150. There are certain bits in the ‘high history’ that may have been used by Henry to convince people that Glastonbury was Avalon, even before the great necessity to do so after the fire by the subsequent Glastonbury polemicists. However he stuck to the story which for the most part revolves around a Chapel on a tidal Island near a valley and a river. Hardly an exact description of Glastonbury tor.

 We must not forget that William of Malmesbury did not know where Avalon was, but if anyone could get away with this transformation, (or even later find it convenient to promote such a position),  it would be the one person who knew all the tales of the Graal. Although Henry never directly sets out to say that Glastonbury is Avalon and can be seen to recount the tales of King Arthur and the Grail Keepers faithfully from Melkin’s text and previous oral accounts from troubadours, there are certain ways of persuading others, if one does not  attentively take into account, the geographical descriptions in the Branches of the High History.
 After all, to title the entire work Perlesvaus or ‘through the vales’ indicates that all the stories in the Branches, take place in a certain region and revolve around geographical descriptions that apply to a kingdom specifically located by the title of the book; especially with the main protagonist called 'Perceval' (through this Valley). Some commentators have thought that a French version before Henry compiled his, might have been from a mistranslation of Pellesvaus or the vales of King Pelles the sometimes fisher king. 

You have the name of Perceval on this account, that tofore you were born, he (the lord of the moors)had begun to reave your father of the Valleys of Camelot, for your father was an old knight.
"Sir," saith she, "He was the son of Alain li Gros of the Valleys of Camelot, and is named Perlesvax."
"Wherefore Perlesvax?" saith the King.
"Sir," saith she, "When he was born, his father was asked how he should be named in right baptism, and he said that he would he should have the name Perlesvax, for the Lord of the Moors had reft him of the greater part of the Valleys of Camelot,
 

The original story teller lets us know that by right of baptism his name is derived from his inheritance 'from among these valleys'. through Troubadour distortion this later account gets confused often, when the storyteller recounts about islands of the moors unless he is referring to Dartmoor tors.  However the gist is that the Lord of the Moors seems to have overtaken some of the remenant of the Holy families lands in the time of Perceval, but the land that his father is giving him the title to (in name) is the land that stretches across or throughout the valleys (Perlesvaux).

As we posited earlier, Joseph could have owned the Island and there are accounts of Arviragus giving him it, but this may be of later fabrication or an incidental confirmation. We must not forget that Joseph must have been incredibly wealthy being a trader in a commodity that was so sought after in the Roman world and he had known where to source this material......operating a monopolistic enteprise to the Eastern mediterranean. If the Romans had known where Ictis was located, Pliny would have let us know. As we shall cover at the end of this investigation it is this Island that is mentioned in a charter as being accompanied by fisheries and Castles known as an area called Venn, (or Vales).

However, the worst misdirection that scholars have come up with is derived purely from the assumption that the Grail stories and the Perlesvaus in particular, have absolutely no historical basis and are thought of as poems or prose of a didactic nature. This can be seen here in an extract from Nitze:

 The Perlesvaus belongs to the second group and owes its origin to the religious dissentions in England between the Saxons, converts to Roman Christianity, and the Britons, adherents of the heretic Irish Church. The Grail and the Lance, we are told, were originally the national emblems of the Britons. As such they were cherished even after the Britons had accepted Christianity from the Irish. Finally, through the influence of St. Augustine and his followers, they were identified with Christian relics (those of Calvary), and thus they became symbols of the Church. In the Perlesvaus, they are the special insignia of the true faith and the bone of contention between Saxon and British Christians. The theme of the romance is clearly indicated in the words : 'effacer la mauvaise hi et exhausser la loi nouvelle' ; Perceval is the champion of the true faith, and his mission is to overcome and convert the infidels ; viz, the heretic Britons.

James Carley, however, (without whom, much of the research on Glastonbury material would be unavailable), has formed the sceptical opinion that the Melkin prophecy is probably a fabrication and others have followed likeSubdeacon Paul Ashdown ……the enigmatic ‘Prophecy of Melkin’, included in the Chronica of the monk John ‘of Glastonbury’ (John Sheen) of 1342, which built upon the work of William of Malmesbury and Adam of Domerham. The previously unheard-of character of Melkin, who was ‘before Merlin,’ is presented in the same vaticinatory pseudo-Welsh tradition as the Arthurian seer (Merlin) as imagined by Geoffrey of Monmouth, and the Latin is therefore deliberately cryptic. Here we read for the first time of the burial of Joseph of Arimathea at Glastonbury, in a hidden tomb which will be revealed at a millennial future time before the Day of Judgement. He lies (as I have argued elsewhere ) in a folded linen shroud, probably to be identified with that of Christ, and with two vessels containing (presumably one of each) Christ’s blood and sweat’.  Yet translates the Prophecy:

The Isle of Avalon, avid before others in the world for the death of pagans, decorated at the sepulchre of them all with vaticinatory little spheres of prophecy, and in future it will be adorned with those who praise the Most High. Abbadare, powerful in Saphat, noblest of pagans, took his sleep there with 104,000. Among them Joseph named ‘of Arimathea’, took perpetual sleep in [a] marble [tomb]. And he lies in a doubled linen [cloth] by the southern corner of the oratory fashioned of wattles, above the powerful adorable Virgin, the aforesaid thirteen sphered [things] inhabiting the place. For Joseph has with him in the sarcophagus two white and silver vessels filled with the blood and sweat of the prophet Jesus. When his sarcophagus is found, it will be seen whole and undefiled in the future, and will be open to all the orb of the earth. From then on, neither water nor heavenly dew will can be lacking for those who inhabit the most noble island. For a long time before the Day of Judgement in Josaphat these things will be open and declared to the living.

It goes on to say: This rigmarole may well incorporate older elements but, in the form in which we have it, is datable to the aftermath of Edward I’s visit through the inclusion of the figure of Abbadare. As first suggested in 1981 by James Carley, he is to be identified with Baybars (in Arabic al-Malik al-Zahir Rukn al-Din Baybars al-Bunduqdari), Sultan of Egypt and Syria, Edward’s formidable adversary during the Ninth Crusade, who had captured the fortress of Safed, Melkin’s ‘Saphat,’ (and with it the Galilee) from the Templars in 1266, and died of poisoning in July 1277, in the year before Edward’s visit to Glastonbury. I have argued elsewhere that Melkin’s reference originated in some satirical lay which had consigned the deceased Baybars and his paladins to one of the alternative Mediterranean, Oriental or Antipodean locations of an Avalon which has here been repatriated, along (uncomprehendingly) with the Sultan, to its British origin.

 

Included among the sleeping ‘pagans’ (i.e., in contemporary usage, Muslims), perhaps because of his status as a wealthy Jew, is Joseph of Arimathea. Although ‘Melkin’ is the oldest source to tell of his burial at Glastonbury, his tomb’s exact location is clearly regarded as an occult secret. It seems most unlikely that John Sheen was himself the author of the Melkin doggerel. Indeed, he seems to have been the first to confuse the mysterious linea bifurcata, which I have interpreted as a shroud, with some kind of esoteric line in church or churchyard.
 
 
So it is easy to see, with these pronouncements debunking the Prophecy (that short of being granted permission by the owners of the Island to show them where the entrance is, which we shall get to later), we need to look at further evidence provided by the second oldest authority…… from Henry Blois. This, although no-one has ever tried to fit the descriptions in any of the Branches to a location, seems a good way of confirming if Melkin, after all, has left directional instructions that also lead us to the Island described in the text.

It can be seen in the Perlesvaus, (even though the various stories that Henry Blois is recounting seem intermingled) that the geography of the area seems to be constant. This can be explained by accounts that Henry heard orally maintaining these features as part of the logic of the story line or maybe he himself sourced some material in written form.  The one puzzling feature about many of the Grail stories is that even though the stories may have different characters the core back drop is always similar. Melkin’s original work of different generations living in one locale i.e the vales south of Dartmoor is one way of looking at it. 
 Elucidation by the troubadours of  Melkin’s Grail book may go far back, but the stories are never far from their geographical setting even though, once a locale is visualised, (as in our proposed location) the accounts may not  accurately match spatially, as this was accounted as extraneous detail by the trobadours who focused more on character detail. 
 For  those people who are still open-minded enough to accept that the original account of the Grail's arrival in Britain is historical; enough relevant material has survived attaching itself to the storyline, through troubadour embellishments and distortion, that lets us know that  the Island of Avalon is certainly not at Glastonbury.


 

 Even the specifics in accounts that have evolved would not flow in tandem with its original portrayal,  if  for instance the Castle is not opposite the Island of Avalon, as it appears in several varying accounts. In the several branches however, this castle belongs to different people like the Widow Lady, the Queen of Maidens the Fisher king and many others. This can be explained superficially as the generations changed so the muddle of relationships was exacerbated and with this muddle the castle on the shore was muddled with buildings on the island itself. 
However the troubadour accounts have confused the castle with the Grail chapel on the Island opposite and even with Camelot. Whatever the confusion that has been caused by troubadours weaving their tales; directionally and spatially, there is enough incidental information that has been passed on to confirm the Grail romances do not take place at Glastonbury and have nothing in common with the topography which has survived in the storyline from Melkin's original Book of the Grail from which the entire compendium is derived. 
  What seems to have occurred is that Melkin originally is relating accounts that all transpired in the same area, around the Island of Avalon (situated in Devon)..... and troubadours have mixed the generations and stories that Melkin had originally laid down to explain the entire period from the arrival of Joseph up until the death of King Arthur.
 This is not to say though, that Melkin’s Grail book is a purely factual account, even though most or all of his information that he wanted passed on to posterity still exists in one form or another, because I don’t think he ever outwardly stated that the 'Grail object' was Jesus (exept in his prophecy). Rather, he formed stories segmented into branches (probably focusing on characters in each generation) that subliminally transferred information, just as he adeptly has managed to do in his English prophecy. The understanding of the nature of the Grail was subliminally transmitted as he weaved together historical stories  covering a period of about 4-5 hundred years.....from the time of Joseph through the generations of a royal ramily. He also related material pertinent to how these events play out in the elevation of Consciousness of Mankind (better known as the divine plan), but couched in didactic form to be acted out by our Grail Heroes. This is the mess that modern scholarship has pondered over; the answer to how Joseph of Arimathea is concurrent with King Arthur.

 

  It must never be forgotten that Melkin, the originator of all Grail material did not want anyone at the time he was alive to know where Avalon was. This is borne out by the way he constructed his prophecy. So, he is hardly going to describe precisely where the island is in the Grail book or exactly the purport of his exposé, but every detail of what we have proposed as a total scenario (from crucifixion to Arthur) so far, is somewhere mentioned or subliminally related in the various texts.  Melkin determined to set the rich tapestry of drama in the same vales in which they historically transpired and the original 'Grail Book' recorded the travails of a kingdom and bloodline through the Roman era.... up to and including the Saxon invasion. This at a much later date, as explained earlier,  through the troubadours and courtiers, started to include in later editions or reworkings, Templar motifs and occasional references to certain  more recent characters with cameo parts in the storyline.

 Although Melkin’s prophecy was supposed to be a puzzle, it would appear as if the reference in the 'High History' to the difficulty in reading the Latin in Melkin’s original book could be one reason for the troubadours misunderstanding of his work. It also adds credence to age of the Volume.  With the misunderstanding or misinterpretation came embellishment according to the tastes of the storyteller....... sometimes focusing on battle scenes by some  and in other ways,if they had a particular interest or penchant. 
The spiritual nature of the Grail may have been highlighted by some troubadours and in  others ..... the quest or the particular relationships between warring relatives.  The geographical topography is inescapable...... just as much as all the content in the storylines is set in a particular backdrop. Basically, the story is about a body and a cloth that got put in a tomb on an island by Joseph of Arimathea and this island is in Devon or the Vaus d'Avaron.

 It is  advised that the reader should read the various Branches  of the Perlesvaus. After doing so, one can only conclude that what we have elucidated upon up until now, as regarding Joseph having brought a body to England and this body being presently on Avalon........ is exposed in many places throughout the text.

 Let us firstly reassert that the 'High History' is given the authority of the original story from a certain Josephus. This is essentially due to the fact that Melkin asserts (in his Latin text) that his account is derived from original detail supplied by Joseph of Arimathea. The strange thing is that...... the writer of the High history refers to him as a 'narrator' not as Joseph 'the eyewitness', protagonist and author from which the record is derived. Obviously the reference is only refering to that part of the sequence of events that Joseph himself would have been able to relay while alive..... but the veracity of  the authority of this account stems from Joseph and it to his authority that the author is appealing. Later the following accounts get unduly mixed with events that transpired after the death of Joseph yet it is to him the author appeals for his credibility.

 Now is the story silent of Perceval and cometh back to King Arthur, the very matter thereof, as testifies the history, that in no place is corrupted and the Latin lie not.

And all these adventures that you hear in this high record came to pass, Josephus telleth us, for the setting forward the law of the Saviour.

How else could it have been related if it is not an historical record from Joseph himself that Melkin found in the tomb. If Joseph did not come to England then it is a remarkable coincidence that both the Perlesvaus story revolves around a tomb and a shroud on an Island  called Avalon and Melkin's Prophecy (about the Island of Avalon) categorically states that,  there in the tomb of Joseph of Arimathea, lies the body of Jesus along with the Shroud. It would even be a coincidence that Maurus has the 'Holy party' coming as far west as Marseille. But then having established Ictis as an Island that was known to deal in tin...... and have Joseph of Arimathea ingnorant of it, would be a coincidence in the extreme. Especially when Melkin is telling us they are buried up high in Ictis (supra ad Ictis). I believe the reference to 'Solomon's ship' in many of the Grail sagas is a reference to the mode of transport i.e the Tin trading ship used by Joseph to reach Ictis. This in itself would be no great feat of navigation for the Phonecian traders and Maurus' account of the Holy family being blown by chance to Marseille was just a rationalisation of early accounts that the family had passed by that way. 

 If the fact that Jesus' body (the Grail) was brought to England is not historical, then there is no Avalon anyway……… and no point in the monks at Glastobury trying to misrepresent Glastonbury to appear to be synonymous with a purely mythical island.  If this were the case, it would be even more fantastic that a supposed fabricated text called the Prophecy of Melkin gives precise directions to an Island (which he also incidentally called Avalon), that so concisely geographically fits the description of Avalon as described in the 'High History' of the Grail. There is then the further coincidence of  the same story that tells of a mysterious object that was brought to that same Island by Joseph of Arimathea. Further, it just so happens that the prophecy which is supposed to be a 13th or 14th century fabrication, tells us that Joseph and the Grail are buried within this fictitious Island.

 Anyway, Joseph is appealed to as the authority of the High History. What most scholars tend to be misled by, is the fact that Melkin is also relating history after Joseph’s death that takes into account the subsequent years and thus in their minds disqualifies Joseph of Arimathea, as being the one appealed to as a narrator by the High History. Don’t forget that most scholars think there is no historical content in the Grail literature, but it all evolved as a twelfth century fiction. How, if one takes this view, were the French responsible for propagating such a fiction about a mythical island in Britain and what would be the reasoning behind it.  How is it the topography of the island described in these  French tales corresponds to the Island pointed out by this fictitious monk known for his Geometry? 

  Obviously, as we saw in the Alliterative poem from which we derived the eyewitness account of the Grail which we came across earlier, these must have come from Joseph himself, as this deals with the remainder of the holy family’s actual arrival in Britain and the incidents that transpired immediately afterward.

 Josephus telleth us in the scripture he recordeth for us, whereof this history was drawn out of Latin into Romance, that none need be in doubt that these adventures befell at that time in Great Britain and in all the other kingdoms, and plenty enow more befell than I record, but these were the most certain.

 It is Robert de Boron (his original source being derived from Melkin’s book of the Grail) that says the final destination of the Grail (although not explicitly Joseph himself) - is 'En la terre vers Occident / Ki est sauvage durement / En vaus d'Avaron'...... in the land to the West, which is very wild, in the Vales of Avalon. These are the rugged and steep sided forested valleys that cover an area south of Dartmoor.

Scholars claim Robert de Boron wrote after Chrétien, but Robert says  that he wrote his book before 1180, meaning he wrote his book around the time Chrétien was writingEric and Enide and before he wrote Percival. Whoever scholars believe was the first medieval writer, Robert and Chrétien claim they were guided by a pre-existing book ....and so also does the Perlesvaus/High History account. So, it all comes down to Melkin...... as these writers are putting pen to paper probably 3-400 years after King  Arthur died (a bit late to suddenly think about fabricating myths of a British king) and why are French troubadours supposedly inventing this material about an island in Britain? 

Most scholars recognise this incongruous fact, but rationalize the whole Grail edifice as having some relevance to Medieval religious squabbles. This might in part be the case with later infusion, but how is it that Joseph is giving first hand accounts (which obviously Melkin discovered) that pertains to events 1000 years before any of the troubadours wrote. Robert De Boron’s Le liuro de Josep de Arimthea translation from Portuguese says the book he used was ’secret’ and that:

 ‘I dare not and could not tell at the time of writing, but that I had the secret book before me wherein the histories are written by the great clerks of all time. Therein are the great mysteries, which are called the Graal’.

This would seem to be a reference to Joseph and Melkin in antiquity. Whether or not Henry is the compiler of the Perlesvaus from Melkin’s material, we can see that the island of Avalon was never meant as being applicable to Glastonbury except by those with a motive of self-promotion at Glastonbury. As we have discovered, much in Glastonbury was made to concur with Melkin’s prophecy, but from a different perspective, as we look through the text of the High History about allusions to Logres (supposedly Glastonbury) and the chapel dedicated to the Virgin Mary…… we can see that, to the gullible, the link might be made, but most emphatically the Island of Avalon is in the sea and the description in the text fits Burgh Island.

 No matter how tenuous the connection in the High History that the region in which the story is set might apply to Glastonbury, it is surely how it has been understood for the last 800 years.
But before we move on specifically to the Perlesvaus passages, let us just have a look if the geography of Chrétien de Troyes is different and try to understand some of his descriptions that have been delivered unintentionally and yet seem to fit with the Perlesvaus version. Let us not forget however neither Chretien or Henry Blois had a clue where Avalon was... or its surrounding topography.

 He summoned the best artisans in the land, and commanded them to build a tower, and exert themselves to build it well. The stone was quarried by the seaside; for near Gorre on this side there runs a big broad arm of the sea, in the midst of which an island stood, as Meleagant well knew. He ordered the stone to be carried thither and the material for the construction of the tower. In less than fifty-seven days the tower was completely built, high and thick and well-founded. When it was completed, he had Lancelot brought thither by night, and after putting him in the tower, he ordered the doors to be walled up, and made all the masons swear that they would never utter a word about this tower.

Finally, she travelled so far through hill and dale, up and down,(Devon) that more than a month had passed, and as yet she had learned only so much as she knew before—that is, absolutely nothing. One day she was crossing a field in a sad and pensive mood, when she saw a tower in the distance standing by the shore of an arm of the sea. Not within a league around about was there any house, cottage, or dwelling-place. Meleagant had had it built, and had confined Lancelot within.

 Even in Chretien's 'Lancelot' the tower variously synonymous with the Grail chapel was by the sea not at Glastonbury.
The Grail Chapel or Castle as it is variously known is on the Island of Avalon and the tidal causeway as at Burgh Island is the 'Bridge' of varying descriptions in many Grail versions. In the ‘Knight and the Cart’ Chretien who really has never seen the sand causeway to Burgh Island is struggling to describe something in the text from which he is sourcing his material.

One is called the water-bridge, because the bridge is under water, and there is the same amount of water beneath it as above it, so that the bridge is exactly in the middle; and it is only a foot and a half in width and in thickness.

 Copyright Francis Frith
Figure 78. The disappearing bridge that is once narrow and then widens

In this island no thunder is heard, no lightning strikes, nor tempests rage, nor do toads or serpents exist there, nor is it ever too hot or too cold. Graislemier of Fine Posterne brought twenty companions, and had with him his brother Guigomar, lord of the Isle of Avalon. Chrétien

Let us now look at the Perlesvaus:

Opposite the Island of Avalon was a castle that must have been in ‘Bigbury on sea’ and this, with the Folly hill site became known as Camelot. There was however a river behind the castle which had an anchorage and from this castle Avalon was seen. As we have covered already, Camelot never existed as a place and thus it existed in two places in the Perlesvaus. This may have been confused with where Arthur had held court (either at Avalon or in Tintagel), nevertheless the original French transcriber had seen this word in Melkin’s text and included it as being synonymous with a place name.

Behind the castle was a river, as the history testifieth, whereby all good things came to the castle, and this river was right fair and plenteous. Josephus witnesseth us that it came from the Earthly Paradise and compassed the castle around and ran on through the forest as far as the house of a worshipful hermit (Shipley Bridge) and there lost the course and had peace in the earth. All along the valley thereof was great plenty of everything continually, and nought was ever lacking in the rich castle that Perceval had won. The castle, so says the history, had three names. One of the names was Eden, the second, Castle of Joy, and the third, Castle of Souls. Now Josephus saith that none never passed away therein but his soul went to Paradise. 

Showing what might be the location of the house of the worshipful Hermit at Shipley Bridge at the start of the Avon valley as it leaves the moors.

The Text starts:

 Hear ye the history of the most holy vessel that is called Graal, wherein the precious blood of the Saviour was received on the day that He was put on rood and crucified in order that He might redeem His people from the pains of hell. Josephus set it in remembrance by annunciation of the voice of an angel, for that the truth should be known by his record of good knights, and good worshipful men how they were willing to suffer pain and to work for the setting forward of the Law of Jesus Christ, that He has willed to make new by His death and by His crucifixion.

The High history is an account of the travails of family relations connected to the holy family that arrived in Britain and the adventures of knights and property owners that occupied the region around the south coast of Devon in particular, but with references extending through Somerset and Cornwall. These include accounts in Arthur’s court at Tintagel and escapades to Penzance and as far up as the kingdom of Logres which is accounted by most to be synonymous with Glastonbury. Protection of castles by knights and services offered to damsels in distress that interact with colourful characters from across the English channel and the Channel Islands are integrated into an account of Joseph’s effect on having brought such a sacred object to the region.

These adventures or ‘Histoires’ fit in through the ages from the time the Grail was brought to Avalon up until the Death of king Arthur. The whole history, if it is not looked at as some intellectual exercise in conceptual critique and as having some deeper meaning………is just a record of the comings and goings of interrelated families that were established originally in the old Law of the residue of the tin mining Jews and the blood relatives of Jesus.

‘God hath guided and led the ship by day and by night until that she arrived at an island where was a castle right ancient, but it seemed not to be over-rich, rather it showed as had it been of great lordship in days of yore’.

 
‘Certes, I know not to tell you, for the tomb hath been here or ever that my father's father was born, and never have I heard tell of none that might know who it is therein, save only that the letters that are on the coffin say that when the Best Knight in the world shall come hither the coffin will open and the joinings all fall asunder, and then will it be seen who it is that lieth therein.'

There are two things to note that can only be accounted to Melkin directly that he purposely obfuscates……… the exact location of Avalon and the precise nature of the Grail. The first he has given so precisely in his prophecy once it is decoded and also, by faithfully transcribing details of the lay of the land in the valleys of Avalon.

 The second he has hinted at by having the questor’s not asking the question ‘Who does the Grail serve’. We are told it is achievable as this covers the aspect of its relevance to consciousness, but this leaves only one response subliminally and must be that ‘it serves God’... As Jesus had done faithfully. Joseph of Arimathea's Grave is pointed to in the prophecy and the Grail is intimately connected to Jesus but only in the prophecy is it made plain that Jesus is in fact buried with Joseph (who later was to become synonymous  as the Grail, mainly from the misunderstanting and objectivising of the Duo Fassula  . However by posing this question, this subconsciously releases the real question that is behind the essence of the Grail quest as presented in all its literal forms…… ‘Who is the Grail’? The Grail is Jesus who serves all of Mankind and God.

 

As we have already determined by the prophecy, Jesus is buried in Avalon, so let us see whether the Grail is the body of Jesus that sometimes is subterranean to the Grail chapel in the Island of Avalon. It would be an extraordinary coincidence if the faked twelfth century prophecy that says the shroud and the body of Jesus are on Avalon, concurs with French Grail material that speaks of a tomb, a shroud and of Joseph of Arimathea also on the Island of Avalon. This coincidence becomes less extraordinary if both accounts (those derived from the original Grail book in France and the British Prophecy which relates to the same exact material and personages), were derived from the same author.
 We should look into the text and see if the High History points to an Island that is the same as pointed out in Melkin’s prophecy by his precise geometry.

It would be very strange if it wasn’t the same island that both are referring to, since both sources derive from Melkin.

This high history witnesses to us and records that Joseph, who makes remembrance thereof, was the priest who first sacrificed to the body of Our Lord and for this, one ought to believe the words that come from him. You have heard tell how Perceval was of the lineage of Joseph of Abarimacie, whom God so greatly loved for that he took down His body hanging on the cross……… Ab Arimacie shows the original scribal error from the latin ‘of Arimathea’ by Henry.

 

What the ‘High History’ does not ever explicitly express is the names of the people in the historical sense and everyone abides in a castle or hermitage throughout. Whereas the Fisher king seems to be Joseph of Arimathea, the dolourous wound in connection to the loss of a son or nephew and the dripping spear always suggests Jesus. The tomb in which no one knows who the knight is that lies therein; is sometimes understood to be Joseph of Arimathea, or explicitly explained as Lohot, the son of King Arthur, but never Jesus, as this is the intended subliminal meaning being hinted at. The Widow lady who has a castle right opposite the Island of Avalon up on Folly Hill that overlooks Bantham is never mentioned as being Mary Magdalene and is purposely obfuscated as being synonymous with the Virgin Mary, at times defined by where her castle is in relation to Avalon and under which pseudonym she goes under in the various branches (such as the queen of Maidens or Widow Lady). Melkin as we have discussed is probably of this royal line and has cameo parts as the Hermit.

The hazardous tides that are relentless at the heads where the river Avon exits in view of the of the Island of Avalon underneath the position of the Widow's Castle.

We know that the river mouth is not far from the Castle as the river, spendeth itself in the sea is it most foul and most horrible, so that scarce may ship pass that is not wrecked.
 

 We also know that there is a Chapel and holy house on Avalon sometimes referred to as the castle of the Fisher king and the island is close by the mainland because after Perceval and his cousin leave Gohaz all sorrowing on the rock,
Perceval hath rowed until that he is come nigh a castle that was burning fiercely with a great flame, and can see the hermitage upon the sea hard by.

the sweetness of his castle wherein I have often done service in the chapel where the Holy Graal appeareth’.

We know that the Fisherman’s castle of Avalon is in the Sea

"Sir," says the Queen, "just as he challenges me for my castle , so I am in aid of King Fisherman, and every week cometh he from an island that is in this sea……”

What is the castle?"
"Sir, the good King Fisherman's, that is surrounded with great waters and plenteous in all things good, so the lord were in joy.

We Know that the Widow Queen can see the Island and has her vessels down in Bantham Harbour, ‘She takes Perceval by the hand and leads him to the windows of the hall that were closest to the sea. "Sir," she says, "Now you can see the island, there, where your uncle comes to in a galley, and in this island he stays until he has seen where to aim his blow and laid his plans. And here below, see, are my galleys that defend us thereof.’ Her Castle is on the cliffs above Bantham harbour entrance i.e the  heads where the river mouth flows into the sea.
 
 Both Chretien and the Perlesvaus describe the trip down through the forest when both Perceval and Lancelot meet people in a boat on the river that give the same instructions to the Grail Castle. In both stories, to be able to converse, their contact point in reality must have been along the Tidal road in Aveton Gifford and hence the ensuing topographically correct directions to Bigbury on sea and Avalon.

Perceval is in search of his mother, when he comes to a river en la vallee d'une engarde

The river is swift and deep, and he fears to cross it. Proceeding along the bank to a cliff, which apparently blocks the road (the end of the tidal road), he suddenly beholds a boat on the river, in which are two men. Perceval enquires the way of those in the boat and is directed, by the fisher, to the top of the cliff from where, he is told, he will see a castle in the valley beyond, près de rivière et près de bois.

The Tidal road where those fishing could converse with those making their way out to  the island of Avalon. The hills in the background are those to be climbed (mountains) before descending down to the island and the Widows Castle.

Perceval rides to the summit of the cliff, but perceiving at first only land and sky, he blames the fisher for misdirecting him. Finally, however, the tower of a castle hard by comes to view. Perceval is not long in reaching the castle where he is royally welcomed by the host of the castle, who is in fact the fisher. The misdirection that the fisher was maligned for,  can be explained by the fact that when one clears the summit,  after ascending up from the Tidal road, one cannot see the Folly hill site for some considerable time, until one starts to descend toward Bigbury on Sea where it will have come into plain view.

The View looking down on the river from the top of the hill on the way out to Burgh island as per  the directions  given by the fishermen. The river valley is tidal and one can float up and down with the tidal flow in a boat very leisurely.

We find the passage for comparison in Lancelot's Grail quest by Chretien, although the river is now called a stream which highlights the freedom  with which the troubadours inconsequentially included or changed the relevant topographical features because this same episode is derived from the common source of Melkin's Grail book:

Lancelot comes one day to a stream flowing through a meadow. The meadow, which is skirted by a forest on two sides, is covered with flowers. In front of him, on the stream, Lancelot sees a boat in which there are two white-haired knights and a damsel, holding a human head in her lap. In the centre of the boat there is a knight catching many fish. The boat has a smaller one in tow into which the knight is throwing his fish. At the sight of the group, Lancelot stops to ask where he might find shelter nearby. In reply, they direct him to a castle beyond a mountain. In a short time Lancelot has reached the foot of this mountain, and comes upon the cell of a hermit, where he enters the cell to confess his sins.

 
So both lancelot and Perceval arrive at the Grail castle in Bigbury on Sea, which as we know has the island of Avalon and the Grail chapel just opposite. Too much of a coincidence that both Grail searchers, from different raconteurs, find the same Grail castle... both recieving similar instructions. The instructions were recieved along the tidal road where at the end of the tidal road, one would have to rise up the hill (mountain) to get to Avalon or Bigbury on sea. Certainly arriving at the summit all one sees is ‘land and sky’ until going further down where the castle would have been situated and suddenly comes into view.
 What this shows is that by the similarity of storyline containing circumstances that can be transposed onto a geographical location with conversational text that include instructions which concur with the topographical features.... that when followed lead to Avalon; is also a confirmation that originally this particular account is set on the river Avon, which just coincidentally has the island at the mouth of the river and this same island is the one that Melkin refers to as Avalon and his geometry points us right to it.
 What we understand to be the first Grail literature may indeed be derived from a conglomeration of accounts compiled by Henry Blois as he is appealed to as one that knows all the stories, but these accounts appealed to a much older source in Joseph of Arimathea himself as their authority. This therefore evidences there was a common source before Henry, who obviously was Melkin. It is Melkin's words that say the authority for the Perlesvaus is derived from Joseph of Arimathea and it must be  from Melkin we have recieved the accounts up to the time of King Arthur  since  by his prophecy he is showing us the same Island location. 

The view looking back down towards were perceval or Lancelot would have met the fishermen before climbing the hill out toward the Island of Avalon. This is on the same route that the carts of tin would have taken out to the Island of Ictis as it was referred to by classical writers, before Melkin renamed it Avalon.

The Lonely Forest, which would have enveloped Avalon in all the vales below the moors,  is mentioned in the Perlesvaus  as ‘la soteinne forest’ or  ‘la forest souteinne’ or by Chretièn as ‘De la foriest soutaine’. We can deduce that both Chretien and Henry Blois are sourcing  from a common source that supplies the same topographical detail that holds together their stories, which, unless they can be identified as being applicable to a certain locality, they might just seem incidental.

The Elucidation was conceived as a prologue to Chrétien de Troyes' unfinished romance Perceval, le Conte du Graal, but actually gives details that offer contradictory material so it is doubtful that it was written at the same time. In the elucidation it cites a Master Blihis as a source for its contents. As we have discussed Henry Blois would not want to have it known that he wrote this material and even gives himself a cameo role when Gawain defeats the knight Blihos Bliheris. Sent to Arthur's court, Blihos (H. Blois), reveals that the maidens descend from the Maidens of the Wells. Arthur and his knights then seek out the Fisher King and his castle.  If Henry 1098-1171 who as we have said was well connected and heard all these tales in his formative years in France... he seems the most likely candidate.  He is very likely to have put together a volume that thereafter in the Elucidation was credited as one source for Chrètien who between 1160 and 1172 served at the court of his patroness Marie of France, Countess of Champagne, daughter of Eleanor of Aquitaine.

 
 Another reason to be suspicious of the Islands translocation or the peculiarity of the mix up of Avalon and Glastonbury... is that Glastonbury was never tidal nor had beaches,

 

‘He dared no longer endure his blows, but rather he turns quickly toward his galley, and leaps straight in. He pushes out from the shore incontinent, and Perceval follows him right to the beach, feeling low that he has got away from him’.

Where the Queen of the Maidens castle is supposed to be, relative to Glastonbury tor, is not fathomable, nor is the fact that this saga is taking place by the sea where a Castle looks down on the Island of Avalon.

 "Sir," says the hermit, "I know not who he is, save only that the sea is hard by here, where the ship runs past often wherein the knight is, and he goes to an island that is under the castle of the Queen of the Maidens,

  How can Glastonbury ever have been misconstrued as existing by the sea, when we know the castle, (sometimes synonymous with Camelot) has an island opposite and has cliffs below it . It exists beside a river as certain knights rode to it while others were seen rowing down river to it.

‘He rode until he came to the castle of the Queen of the Maidens. When she knew that it was Messire Gawain, she made thereof great joy, and pointed him out the island whither Perceval had gone, and from where he had driven his uncle’.

‘Thereof has Messire Gawain right great joy, and so departs from the knight and the knight from him, and goes back toward the sea a great gallop. But Messire Gawain saw not the ship into which he entered, because it was anchored underneath the cliff. The knight entered into it and put out to sea as he had wont to do’.

 How can anyone seriously confuse these descriptions as happening near Glastonbury. How can Glastonbury tor be confused with coincidental topographical features mentioned incidentally that pertain to the area around Burgh Island. Realisically it can only occur if the Grail stories are accounted as fictitious. If they are, then so is Avalon. So why, one must ask, is Glastonbury witnessed in occupying  itself complying with certain features in Melkin's riddle. Why when one follows the progressive manipulation of the understanding of certain instructional data like the 'bifurcated line' , would Glastonbury acolytes be so eager to convince the world that it is a fictional Island in a fabricated tale. The only reason for doing this is because they knew Melkin was from Antiquity and the Island of Avalon was a reality.
 

The Folly Hill site which back in the fourth or fifth century was where the castle of the Queen of Maidens  or the Widow Lady existed, where one can see the Island, but has cliffs below it.

The Bantham anchorage showing the cliffs where the castle would have stood before recent buildings have obscured the site.

 ‘Lords, think not that it is this Camelot whereof these tellers of tales do tell their tales, there, where King Arthur so often held his court. This Camelot that was the Widow Lady's stood upon the uttermost headland of the wildest isle of Wales by the sea to the West. Nought was there save the hold and the forest and the waters that were round about it. The other Camelot, of King Arthur's, was situate at the entrance of the kingdom of Logres, and was peopled of folk and was seated at the head of the King's land, for that he had in his governance all the lands that on that side marched with his own.’

The translator has obviously translated Celtica or Galles as pertaining to Wales, but as one can see the peninsula where Avalon exists is on the uttermost headland of  Devon  and the Island (which is right by the widow's castle) is the headland described as the 'Avaron' in the vales of the west i.e to the south of Dartmoor and has a river right beside it.

These coastal scenes and escapades show that the whole drama is played out in Valleys or the vales of the west which matches the topography of the area we have been investigating since the beginning of this expose and are clearly the valleys and rivers running off southern Dartmoor. This is the area known as ‘Vennshire’ in the Charter signed by Edward the Confessor for the Monks of Mont-Saint-Michel, bestowing  the Island called ‘St. Michael by the sea’ and this entire area south of Dartmoor....... but we will get to that later.

‘She followeth him weeping, and pointeth out to him the Valleys of Camelot and the castles that were shut in by combes and mountains, and the broad meadow-lands and the forest that girded them about.’

 The forest which is so prevalent throughout the text would have enshrouded the whole Southern peninsula as a forested belt from Dartmouth round to Plymouth in the Dark ages, bordered by the coastline meadows to the south and the moors to the north.

‘She hath ridden so far of her journeys that she is come to the Valley of Camelot, and seeth her mother's castle that was surrounded of great rivers, and seeth Perceval, that was alighted under the shadow of a tree at the top of the forest in order that he might behold his mother's castle.’

 Devon is renowned for its red soil.


Gildas (Concerning the Ruin and Conquest of Britain) says at this time the king of the Summer Region (i. e., Somerset) was Melwas, who had wickedly abducted Guinevere, the wife of King Arthur, and had brought her to his fortress at Glastonbury Tor, an invulnerable position because of 'the fortifications of thickets of reed, river and marsh.' 
We know from various other accounts that the land around the tor flooded at times, but there are no references to ships visiting and no beaches. It seems incredible how the Glastonbury establishment found it so easy to convince so many into thinking Avalon was synonymous with Glastonbury tor. But we have already traced the progression of this myth through the writings of Glastonbury chroniclers.
 We have a Knight from the ‘Red Launde’ and a 'Lord of the Moors' who feature in this rich Perlesvaus text which unintentionally divulges the real location.

This story telleth how he conquered him and by what means, and how Galobrus of the Red Launde came to King Arthur's court to help Lancelot, for that he was of his lineage. This story is right long and right adventurous and weighty, but the book will now forthwith be silent thereof until another time.


The View of the entrance to Salcombe harbour with the red land to the left within the vales of Devon


If Glastonbury became synonymous with Arthur’s kingdom, it is only through occasional sentences such as this:

‘for King Arthur sendeth me in quest of him, and Lancelot hath also gone to seek him in another part of the kingdom of Logres’.

 Again we are made to assume that the story has its authority of a Josephus as a narrator, rather than the real authority of Joseph of Arimathea:

And all these adventures that you hear in this high record came to pass, Josephus tells us, for the setting forward the law of the Saviour’.

Of the most Holy Graal here beginneth another branch in such wise as the authority witnesseth and Joseph that made recoverance thereof, in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost.

 It is almost as if the whole fable is designed so that subconsciously one makes the necessary connections to figure out who is who. Even where the narrator is concerned as being exterior to the textual content, this supposedly unknown source (which is consistenly appealed to as the ultimate authority), bears the same appellation as the only Joseph who could have supplied the account of the Grail’s arrival, but Joseph now becomes a separated persona from the Fisher king.

‘and he came, as you have heard, of the most holy lineage of Josephus and the good King Fisherman’.

‘Josephus recordeth us by this evil king that was so traitorous and false and yet was of the lineage of the Good Soldier Joseph of Abarimacie. This Joseph, as the scripture witnesseth, was his uncle, and this evil king was brother-german of King Fisherman, and brother of the good King Pelles that had abandoned his land, in order that he might serve God, and brother of the Widow Lady that was Perceval's mother, the most loyal that was ever in Great Britain. All these lineages were in the service of Our Lord from the beginning of their lives unto the end, save only this evil King that perished, so evilly as you have heard’.

The Geneology is a can of worms...... probably not originally, but through the oral transference from memory which would pay less attention to the accuracy of relationship and more to the actions carried out by the various characters.

It must not be forgotten that Melkin has seen the Shroud and encrypted its nature by refering to it as the ‘duo fassula’ in his English prophecy, but throughout the Perlesvaus, icons change situations. For instance, the Perilous chapel shape shifts as the Grail chapel or the tower amongst other appellations and changes in location, but  also the Shroud is mentioned in many ways. Nowhere is the text ever explicit in saying that the body over which the image on the cloth was formed is now in England.

"Sir," she says, "I have made vow thereof, and moreover a holy hermit hath told me that the knight that makes war upon us may not be overcome by another knight, except that I bring him some of the cloth wherewith the altar in the chapel of the Grave-yard Perilous is covered. The cloth is of the most holiest, for our Lord God was covered therewith in the Holy Sepulchre, on the third day when He came back from death to life.

The Last mention of the shroud being in the Gopels.


Next we have one of the only connections with the 'Lady chapel' at Glastonbury that are made through the Grail chapel existing on an island and also paying respect to his sweet mother or ‘Our lady’ that associates with the ‘virginem adorandam’ as being synonymous with the Lady chapel. This we know was latterly dedicated to conform with Grail descriptions and comply with Melkin's prophecy.

 ‘The damsel signs herself of the cross and commends her to the Saviour and to His sweet Mother. She looks before her to the head of the grave-yard, and sees the chapel, small and ancient. She hits her mule with her whip, and comes toward it and gets off. She entered within and found a great brightness of light. Within was an image of Our Lady, to whom she prays right sweetly that She will preserve her senses and her life and enable her to depart in safety from this perilous place.’

‘But or ever the King departed he made the head be brought into the Isle of Avalon, to a chapel of Our Lady that was there, where was a worshipful holy hermit that was well loved of Our Lord.’

‘He cutteth off the half of the cloth wherein he is enshrouded, and the coffin beginneth to make a crashing so passing loud that it seemed the chapel were falling. When he hath the piece of the cloth and the sword, he closeth the coffin again, and forthwith cometh to the door of the chapel.’

 

‘He was named Ahuret the Bastard," saith the knight; "And he had but one arm and one hand, and the other was smitten off at a castle that Messire Gawain gave Meliot of Logres when he succoured him against this knight that lieth in the coffin. And Meliot of Logres hath slain the knight that had assieged the castle, but the knight wounded him sore, so that he may not be whole save he have the sword wherewith he wounded him, that lieth in the coffin at his side, and some of the cloth wherein he is enshrouded; and, so God grant me to meet one of the knights, gladly will I convey unto him the damsel's message.’

 

The cloth is prevalent throughout in many places, but the point of the stories which obviously came from Melkin, seems to be to mention the Icons like the tomb, above which a chapel was built, the Grail which is Jesus’ coffin, the shroud, the sepulchre with an unknown occupant, Joseph of Arimathea and the royal line that stems from him. Really, the intended purport is to subtly intonate the widow as Mary Magdalene and the following bloodline. Never at any time does Melkin directly say anything to confute the Roman dogma of a resurrected body by implying that the Grail is the body of Jesus or that the Widow or Queen of Maidens was either Jesus' mother or his wife.

 

‘You are her affiance and her succour, and therefore ought you to remember that the good knight Joseph of Abarimacie, that took down your Body when it hung upon the rood, was her own uncle. Better loved he to take down your Body than all the gold and all the fee that Pilate might give him. Lord, good right of very truth had he so to do, for he took you in his arms beside the rood, and laid your Body in the holy sepulchre, wherein were you covered of the sovran cloth for the which have I come in hither.’

‘Josephus telleth us of a truth, that never did none enter into the chapel that might touch the cloth save only this one damsel.’

‘For the good King Fisherman is dead that made every day our service be done in the most holy chapel there where the most Holy Graal every day appeared, and where the Mother of God abode from the Saturday until the Monday that the service was finished. And now has the King of Castle Mortal seized the castle in such sort that never since then has the Holy Graal appeared, and all the other hallows are hidden, so that none knoweth what hath become of the priests that served in the chapel, nor the twelve ancient knights, nor the damsels that were therein.’

 Photo taken from the top of Burgh Island

As for the geographical location of Avalon as an Island by the sea…… it is expressed not only in the prophecy of Melkin itself ‘Marmore’, but by the various descriptions in the High History. Each branch has its own twist, but the island of Avalon is tidal, by the sea, with beaches, to which sea going vessels frequent, and is situated on the headland of an area full of valleys.

 

‘Perceval is far from land so that he seeth nought but sea only, and the ship speedeth onward, and God guideth him, as one that believeth in Him and loveth Him and serveth Him of a good heart. The ship ran on by night and by day as it pleased God, until that they saw a castle and an island of the sea. He asked his pilot if he knew what castle it was. "Certes," saith he, "Not I, for so far have we run that I know not neither the sea nor the stars." They come nigh the castle, and saw four that sounded bells at the four corners of the town, right sweetly, and they that sounded them were clad in white garments. They are come thither.’

‘So soon as the ship had taken haven under the castle, the sea withdraweth itself back, so that the ship is left on dry land. None were therein save Perceval, his horse, and the pilot. They issued forth of the ship and went by the side of the sea toward the castle, and therein were the fairest halls and the fairest mansions that any might see ever.’

‘I saw the Graal," saith the Master, "or ever Joseph, that was uncle to King Fisherman, collected therein the blood of Jesus Christ. Know that well am I acquainted with all your lineage, and of what folk you were born. For your good knighthood and for your good cleanness and for your good valour came you in hither, for such was Our Lord's will, and take heed that you be ready when place shall be, and time shall come, and you shall see the ship apparelled.’

 

"Sir," saith he to Messire Gawain, "I am the King for whom you slew the giant, whereby you had the sword wherewith St. John was beheaded, that I see on this altar. I made baptize me before you and all those of my kingdom, and turn to the New Law, and thereafter I went to a hermitage by the sea, far from folk, where I have been of a long space. I rose one night at matins and looked under my hermitage and saw that a ship had taken haven there. I went thither when the sea was retreated, and found within the ship three priests and their clerks, that told me their names and how they were called in baptism.

 

We should also be aware of how often the word rich is used in the text and in regards to castles and objects and clothing and tombs etc...... this most probably by foreign trade in tin. Robert de Boron however has  'Rich Fishermen' and Bron has the title Rich Fisher King. It is all fairly indecipherable as regards to how characters interrelate, but I think the fact that the Fisher king dies in the Perlesvaus reflects the death of Joseph of Arimathea and the commencement of family quarrels.


The Pilchard inn on Burgh Island.

'All along the valley thereof was great plenty of everything continually, and nought was ever lacking in the rich castle that Perceval had won'.
          

 As we know the Pilchards were plentiful even in Pytheas' time and the 'Plenty' that surrounds the Island, could refer to the fishing or tin. The river valley today abounds in fish, mussels and oysters. We know they are at the Grail castle and in the tin district of Devon by the fabrication of Bells that causes much wonderment elsewhere in the text, but it is the forested land of the vales, south of Dartmoor, that provides the backdrop for many of the encounters.

She departeth from the castle and goeth the speediest she may toward the Valleys of Camelot. 

 She followeth him weeping, and pointeth out to him the Valleys of Camelot and the castles that were shut in by combes and mountains, and the broad meadow-lands and the forest that girded them about.'

 

 Figure 68a. The combes of Devon and the various river valleys of the area described as the vales of Avalon or Vaus d'Avaron.

The description of a journey leaving the forest as they enter onto the uninhabited moors is just one example:

They were right well lodged the night and lay in the hold until the morrow, when they departed thence, and rode right busily on their journeys until they came into a very different land, scarce inhabited of any folk, and found a little castle in a combe’.

 The coffin, tomb or sepulchre features heavily as an icon throughout the various branches:

......and how none might know yet who lay in the coffin until such time as the Best Knight of the world should come thither, but that then should it be known. Perceval would fain have passed by the chapel, but the damsel says to him: "Sir, no knight passes hereby save he go first to see the coffin within the chapel.’

 ‘He showeth them the tomb of King Fisherman, and telleth them that none had set the tabernacle there above the coffin, but only the commandment of Our Lord, and he showeth them a rich pall that is upon the coffin, and telleth them that every day they see a new one there not less rich than is this one. King Arthur looketh at the sepulchre and saith that never before hath he seen none so costly. A smell issueth therefrom full delicate and sweet of savour. The King sojourneth in the castle and is highly honoured, and beholdeth the richesse and the lordship and the great abundance that is everywhere in the castle, insomuch that therein is nought wanting that is needful for the bodies of noble folk’.

‘For otherwise never would the coffin have opened, nor would any have known who he is that you now see openly.’

‘She makes her chaplain take certain letters that were sealed with gold in the coffin. He looks thereat and reads, and then says that these letters witness of him that lies in the coffin that he was one of them that helped to un-nail Our Lord from the cross. They looked beside him and found the pincers all bloody wherewith the nails were drawn, but they might not take them away, nor the body, nor the coffin, according as Josephus tells us, for as soon as Perceval was forth of the chapel, the coffin closed again and joined together even as it was before’.


‘About a couple of bowshots above the bridge (the tidal causeway) was a chapel fashioned like the one at Camelot, wherein was a sepulchre, and none knew who lay therein’.

He goeth forth and findeth the bridges broad and long, and goeth his way a great pace beside a great river that runneth in the midst of the valley.


 the first bridge is a bowshot in length and in breadth not more than a foot. Strait seemeth the bridge and the water deep and swift and wide. He knoweth not what he may do, for it seemeth him that none may pass it, neither afoot nor on horse’.

The bridge which disappears as one looks back on the way to the Grail Chapel and which Gawain crosses on his way to the Grail Castle is called the ‘pont de l’Anguile’. This could have been Melkin’s appelation for the bridge of the 'Angel island' or 'Ange Ile', but whatever way it is construed or embellished as being more than one; it was originally the sand causeway. It was probably Melkin himself who obscured this detail because as we know, it was him that has obscured this entire area from being recognised until now.

‘Thereupon, lo you, a knight that issueth forth of the castle and cometh as far as the head of the bridge, that was called the Bridge of the Eel, and shouteth aloud: "Sir Knight, pass quickly before it shall be already night, for they of the castle are awaiting us."
"Ha," saith Messire Gawain, "Fair sir, but teach me how I may pass hereby."
"Certes, Sir Knight, no passage know I to this entrance other than this, and if you desire to come to the castle, pass on without misgiving."
Messire Gawain hath shame for that he hath stayed so long, and forthinketh him of this that the Hermit told him, that of no mortal thing need he be troubled at the entrance of the castle, and therewithal that he is truly confessed of his sins, wherefore behoveth him be the less adread of death. He crosseth and blesseth himself and commendeth himself to God as he that thinketh to die, and so smiteth his horse with his spurs and findeth the bridge wide and large as soon as he goeth forward, for by this passing were proven most of the knights that were fain to enter therein. Much marvelled he that he found the bridge so wide that had seemed him so narrow’.


Sand ‘eels’ are still dug up for bait on the beach below the island at low tide and the size of the bridge is ever changing.

 

Thereupon the Widow Lady ariseth up and her daughter likewise, and they go over the bridge of the castle and see Messire Gawain that was yet looking on the coffin within the chapel.

The bridge, seems to be thin and then get wider which possibly is the analogy of the tidal causeway to the island, but again, back to the coffin that is ever prevalent throughout:

‘The Widow Lady had made bear thither the body that lay in the coffin before the castle of Camelot in the rich chapel that she had builded there. His sister brought the cerecloth that she took in the Waste Chapel, and presented there where the Graal was. Perceval made bring the coffin of the other knight that was at the entrance of his castle within the chapel likewise, and place it beside the coffin of his uncle, nor never thereafter might it be removed. Josephus telleth us that Perceval was in this castle long time, nor never once moved therefrom in quest of no adventure; rather was his courage so attorned to the Saviour of the World and His sweet Mother, that he and his sister and the damsel that was therein led a holy life and a religious.’

A 'cerecloth' is a waxed or oiled cloth used for covering bodies but uncannily by adding a ‘d’ which, surely given Melkin’s penchant for subliminal information, would have been a ‘cedre’ cloth or cedar cloth, especially as we are informed it was sweet smelling.

 He beholdeth the sepulchre, that was right fair, and forthwith the sepulchre openeth and the corners parted and the stone lifts up in such wise that a man might see the knight that lay within, of whom came forth a smell of so sweet savour that it seemed to the good men that were looking on that it had been all embalmed. They found a letter which testified that this knight was named Josephus.’

In this instance the tomb is Joseph’s, even though no one knows who is in it. One can witness how things have got so mixed up that the narrator who is supposedly Josephus is now synoymous with Joseph of Arimathea. The smell of the coffin that is remarked upon many times in the text, is the embalming cedar oil that the Grail ark contained. As always, in the text, the coffin ‘who no one knew who was inside’, is said to contain Joseph the Fisher king or the son of Arthur a knight, but never Jesus. One of the branches features two coffins which indicates it was after Joseph of Arimathea's death.

 

‘At the tomb shall we be well able to see whether it be he!"
They go to the chapel right speedily, and Messire Gawain seeth them coming and alighteth. "Lady, saith he, "Welcome may you be, you and your company."
The Lady answereth never a word until that they are come to the tomb. When she findeth it not open she falleth down in a swoon. And Messire Gawain is sore afraid when he seeth it.’

 

‘The coffin was rich and the tabernacle costly and loaded of precious stones. And the priests and knights bear witness that as soon as the body was placed in the coffin and they were departed thence, they found on their return that it was covered by the tabernacle all dight as richly as it is now to be seen, nor might they know who had set it there save only the commandment of Our Lord’.

 ‘She followeth him weeping, and pointeth out to him the Valleys of Camelot and the castles that were shut in by combes and mountains, and the broad meadow-lands and the forest that girded them about.’

 When considering Arthur’s Kingdom, it does, (as we have maintained before), seem to cover the whole extent West of Saxon Wessex. So Cardoil was Tintagel in Cornwall which also doubled as the court of Camelot as well as the Folly Hill Camelot where the Widows castle was situated and the ‘Fu venuz de vers Carlion / Li rois Artus et tenu ot / Cort molt riche a Camaalot’, from Chrétien, provided the link to Caerleon of South Wales for the Welsh protagonists and polemisists.

 Could it be that Master Blihis, wrote the Perlesvaus before Chrétien de Troyes? Most scholars think that the Perlesvaus is the continuation of Chrétien de Troyes unfinished ‘Perceval, the Story of the Grail’, but what is more likely is they were both using Melkin’s book or common troubadour sources. This next excerpt shows that the descriptions are relatively accurate because this is still how Tintagel looks today.

 They came thitherward and saw that the enclosure of the castle was sunk down into an abysm, so that none might approach it on that side, but it had a right fair gateway and a door tall and wide whereby one entered. They beheld a chapel that was right fair and rich, and below was a great ancient hall. They saw a priest appear in the midst of the castle, bald and old, that had come forth of the chapel. They are come thither and alighted, and asked the priest what the castle was, and he told them that it was the great Tintagel. "Damsel," saith he, "My name is Arthur, and I am of Tincardoil."

Arthur and Lancelot have heard the tidings, there will they be. He goeth thitherward as fast as he may, and as straight, and scarce hath he ridden away or ever he met a squire that seemed right weary, and his hackney sore worn of the way. Messire Gawain asked him whence he came, and the squire said to him. "From the land of King Arthur, where is great war toward, for that none knoweth not what hath become of him. Many folk go about saying that he is dead, for never since that he departed from Cardoil, and Messire Gawain and Lancelot with him, have no tidings been heard of him; and he left the Queen at Cardoil to take his place, and also on account of her son's death, and the most part say that he is dead.
 

‘The knights that may not leave Cardoil lest Briant of the Isles should seize the city, they sent me to the kingdom of Logres.’

But Camelot was not at Tintagel and the Grail was not there, but on an Island near the other Camelot. As we have discussed already the inclusion of Camelot in the story is solely its connection as ‘Shirei ha Ma'a lot’.  Thus the unsure nature of the meaning of the word becoming a place, but through trying to rationalise this misunderstanding, it ended up having two different locations. It was Melkin who had included the occult material from the Hebrew texts found in the tomb which had been brought by Joseph,(Grades to the Temple), but the deeper meaning of the ascension of the steps to the temple eventually was portrayed as the quest for the Grail itself.

 "Sir," saith Lancelot to the King, "So it please you, and Messire Gawain be willing, I will go back toward Cardoil, and help to defend your land to the best I may, for sore is it discounselled, until such time as you shall be come from the Graal." 

 

 Here the Graal at the Camelot opposite Avalon is plainly different from the Cardoil of Tintagel.
The central theme and many accessory episodes are similar to   Chrètien’s Perceval and its first two continuations. However the story of the Chess board is elongated in Gautier’s continuation of Perceval, but barely mentioned in Perlesvaus, the Welsh text making no mention of the board. How this allusion to the chess board fits in,(thinking historically) as it is not just an arbitrary icon, is not clear; unless in the subliminal sense the chess board originally in the book of the Grail was alluding to the valleys of Avaron as the board where Kings, Queens, Holy men(Bishops), Knights and Castles, (which all the grail literature incorporates) was somehow incorporated in some misunderstood sense as part of the story from its original potent meaning. 
Chrètien’s exemption could be for many reasons, but Gautier’s embellishment does imply the Perlesvaus as primary and of equal or older than Chrètien. I think that Henry heard much of his Grail material in the court circles of France as a youngster and may have put alot of material together from memory. It would seem that in the end the Grail which may have moved from the Island at one time and was located in a chapel above ground was in the end secreted due to outside and family feuds.

He hath won the land that belonged to good King Fisherman from the evil King of Castle Mortal, that did away thence the good believe, and therefore was it that the Graal was hidden.

At what stage after Joseph's arrival these feuds appear is not certain, as all the characters seem so interchangeable along with how they are related, but the offspring of the Holy family are concerned with the guardianship of the Grail and known as Grail Keepers. 
 Even Dugdale's account who follows the Glastonbury tradition seems to think St. Philip is responsible for 'Despatching' Joseph. This however could be of a later tradition where Joseph leaves Sarras (Avalon) and goes off to Proselytise. Even though Dugdale thinks the Island he refers to is Glastonbury he confirms the Small Island which by the time he wrote had become synonymous with Glastonbury Tor : " About sixty-three years after the Incarnation of our Lord, St. Joseph of Arimathea, accompanied by eleven other disciples of St. Philip, was despatched by that Apostle into Britain, to introduce in the place of barbarous and bloody rites, long exercised by the bigotted and besotted druids, the meek and gentle system of Christianity. They succeeded in obtaining from Arviragus, the British king, permission to settle in a small island………”

William of Malmesbury also tells us how Joseph of Arimathea was sent over by St. Philip, and how a king of Britain, whom he does not name, gave Joseph and his companions the island called Ynyswitryn, where, by admonition of the Archangel Gabriel appearing to him in a vision, he built a chapel which he dedicated to the Virgin. This Island originally had been called Sarras or Avalon. William, however, makes no allusion to the Graal,Josephes, Mordrains, and Sarras or to Lancelot or Gawain, or even to the prophecy of Melkin.  Obviously (as we have discussed previously), he thinks any other tradition about Joseph bringing with him holy relics i.e the Graal is a frivolous invention and basically just associates the old church with Joseph but omits to inform us of whole legend of Joseph. It is mainly Williams omission of a reference to Melkin's prophecy on which most scholars base their  assumption that it must be of a later invention. This presumption of course has been added to with such trite pronouncements upon 'Abbadare', 'saphat' and the Baybars having an eastern connection..... when the prophecy itself is so obviously concerned with its subject... which is clearly the Island of Avalon.  How modern scholarship has made this contrived drivel stick and supposedly prove that Melkin and his prophecy was of a later invention is a curious mirroring of the earlier contrivances carried out by Glastonbury chroniclers. This is especially true when we consider  Glastonbury chroniclers themselves attesting he was a geometer and his Geometry locates an island with stunning geometrical precision. We will assess in a moment the source of this misdirection by modern scholarship which is mainly derived from a publication known as ' Melkin the Bard and Esoteric tradition at Glastonbury Abbey' in the Downside review.


However, William gives short shrift to Arthur and does not want to mention Sarras or Avalon because of its connection with what he believes to be fabalized Graal material. After Arthur's last battle he was brought for the most part down the Tamar as William of Malmesbury portrays and this account might even be from a source extant in England, as we know Melkin had written another book about Arthur that is not the Grail Book. However William's reluctance to associate himself with this material is probably the reason he does not mention Melkin's prophecy. 

Illuc post bellum Camblani vulnere lesum duximus Arcturum nos conducente Barintho, equora cui fuerant et celi sydera nota. Hoc rectore ratis cum principe venimus illuc, et nos quo decuit Morgen suscepit honore, inque suis talamis posuit super aurea regem fulcra manuque sibi detexit vulnus honesta inspexitque diu, tandemque redire salute posse sibi dixit, si secum tempore longo esset et ipsius vellet mendicamine fungi. Gaudentes igitur regem commisimus illi et dedimus ventis redeundo vela secundis.

 

‘To that place after the battle of Camblan we brought Arthur, hurt by wounds, with Barinthus leading us, to whom the waters and the stars of the sky were known. With this guide for our raft we came to that place with our leader, and with what was fitting Morgan did honor to us, and in her rooms she placed the king upon a golden couch and with her own honourable hand she uncovered his wound and inspected it for a long time, and at last she said that health could return to him, if he were with her for a long time and wished to undergo her treatment. Therefore rejoicing we committed the king to her and returning gave sails to the assisting winds.’

Wherever William obtained his account from, he surely would not have envisaged Glastonbury as the place where Arthur was sailed to, when he was wounded. Williams reluctance to mention the  location of Avalon is indicative of his propensity to steer clear of what he considers Grail material, but he does mention Morgan which clearly coelesces with Grail material and the destination of the Island of Avalon as the place to which King Arthur was conveyed by sea.  What we can understand is that Avalon was a remote location and he was left there to try to heal (maybe hoping miraculous assistace, given who is buried there) and this is how all the rumours started, as only a few knew where he was. Obviously he did not survive and was buried on the island as the story goes, alongside Guinevere and the other illustrious occupants.


 
Probably derived from the same source (Melkin) as to Arthur’s destination after the battle of Camlann is Thomas Malory’s account in his Morte D'Arthur as seen here in thisshort exerpt: 
 
‘Now put me into that barge,’ seyde the kynge. 
And so he ded sofftely, and there resceyved hym three ladyes
with grete mournyng. And so they sette hem downe, and in one
of their lappis kyng Arthure layde hys hede. And then the quene seyde, 
“A, my dere brothir! Why have ye taryed so longe frome me?
Alas, thys wounde on youre hede hath caught overmuch coulde!"
And anone they rowed fromward the londe, and sir Bedyvere 
behylde all tho ladyes go frowarde hym. Than sir Bedwere cryed 
and seyde,
“A, my lorde Arthur, what shall becom of me, now ye go frome
me and leve me here alone amonge myne enemyes?”
“Comforte thyselff,” seyde the kynge, “and do as well as thou 
mayste, for in me ys no truste for to truste in. For I must into the
vale of Avylyon to hele me of my grevous wounde. And if thou 
here nevermore of me, pray for my soule!”
But ever the quene and ladyes wepte and shryked, that hit was 
pité to hyre. And as sone as sir Bedwere had loste the
syght of the barge he wepte and wayled, and so toke the foreste
and wente all that nyght.
 (Malory, Vinaver edition p. 716).


It is probably due to accounts that had the Queen living at the advent of Arthur's death, that we get the whole 'Second wife' scenario from Glastonbury, as earlier material had the king buried alonside Guinevere who had died previously. 
Both Goeffrey’s account('sed et inclytus Arturus letalier vulneratus est,qui… ad sananda vulnera sua in insulam avalloniam evectus') given around 1138 and this one from Malory probably stem from an entry in the tenth centuryAnnales Cambriae under the year 539 which states in a matter of fact way that Arthur and Mordred fell in the Battle of Camlann. Even by 1150 the Vita Merlini relating that Arthur was taken to Avalon refers to Avalon as Insula pomorum which shows that at this early date...... the change of location of Avalon was already a transformation in progress.


We hear in the Perlesvaus that before Arthur’s death, Guinevere was buried in Avalon.......   and thus the necessity to include her presence into the fabrication of Arthur’s disinterment at Glastonbury.

 ‘There were three hermits therewithin that had sung their vespers, and came over against Lancelot. They bowed their heads to him and he saluted them, and then asked of them what place was this? And they told him that the place there was Avalon. They make stable his horse. He left his arms without the chapel and entereth therein, and saith that never hath he seen none so fair nor so rich. There were within three other places, right fair and seemly dight of rich cloths of silk and rich corners and fringes of gold. He seeth the images and the crucifixes all newly fashioned, and the chapel illumined of rich colours; and moreover in the midst thereof were two coffins, one against the other, and at the four corners four tall wax tapers burning, that were right rich, in four right rich candlesticks. The coffins were covered with two pails, and there were clerks that chanted psalms in turn on the one side and the other.’

"Sir," says Lancelot to one of the hermits, "For whom were these coffins made?" "For King Arthur and Queen Guenievre." "King Arthur is not yet dead," says Lancelot.

"No, in truth, please God! but the body of the Queen lies in the coffin before us and in the other is the head of her son, until such time as the King shall be ended, unto whom God grant long life! But the Queen bade at her death that his body should be set beside her own when he shall end. Hereof have we the letters and her seal in this chapel, and this place made she be builded new on this wise or ever she died."  But no semblant of grief durst he make other than such as might not be perceived, and right great comfort to him was it that there was an image of Our Lady at the head of the coffin.’

 Here we have the evidence that the queen is buried in Avalon (which is next to one of the Camelot's) and king Arthur is off to Tintagel (the other Camelot).

'Of Meliot the story is here silent, and saith that King Arthur and Messire Gawain have ridden so far that they are come into the Isle of Avalon, there where the Queen lieth. They lodge the night with the hermits, that made them right great cheer. But you may well say that the King is no whit joyful when he seeth the coffin where the Queen lieth and that wherein the head of his son lieth. Thereof is his dole renewed, and he saith that this holy place of this holy chapel ought he of right to love better than all other places on earth. They depart on the morrow when they have heard mass. The King goeth the quickest he may toward Cardoil’…..,

 

‘The King sojourned at Cardoil of a long space. He believed in God and His sweet Mother right well. He brought thither from the castle where the Graal was the pattern whereby chalices should be made, and commanded make them throughout all the land so as that the Saviour of the world should be served more worshipfully. He commanded also that bells be cast throughout his land after the fashion of the one he had brought, and that each church should have one according to the means thereof. This much pleased the people of his kingdom, for thereby was the land somewhat amended.’

Josephus telleth us that as at this time was there no bell neither in Greater Britain nor in Lesser; but folk were called together by a horn, and in many places there were sheets of steel, and in other places clappers of wood. King Arthur marvelled him much of this sound, so clear and sweet was it, and it well seemed him that it came on God's behalf, and right fain was he to see a bell and so he might.

Here we witness the advent of Bells made presumably of bronze.  In this era, the copper mines of Dartmoor were in full production and this might well have been some of the reason that the Monks of Mont-Saint-Michel so craved the area of Venn which they cajoled Edward the Confessor to hand over to them before the Norman conquest. Although tin is not mentioned in the Charter it might be a reason for part of the mix up in misidentifying St. Michael's Mount in Cornwall with their intended goal of 'St Michael by the sea' which we will show later was Burgh Island. The tin and copper were highly sought after later in Medieval times across Europe for bell making.

We can see here that the Camelot of the Queen of Maidens or the Widow’s castle of the Folly hill site, (which we know was in sight of the Island of Avalon) is overlooking the chapel on the Island. Also on the Island is the same house of religion or monastery attested to have been on Burgh island at one time and later was to become known as ‘St. Michael by the sea’.

His mother remained long time, and his sister, at Camelot, and led a good life and a holy. The lady made make a chapel right rich about the sepulchre that lay by the forest and Camelot, and had it adorned of rich vestments, and established a chaplain that should sing mass there every day. Since then has the place been so builded up as that there is an abbey there and folk of religion, and many bear witness that there it is still, right fair.’

The Abbey is obviously synonymous with the rumoured monastic buildings of which no trace persists from the sixth century. As mentioned before the more recent St. Michael chapel leaves no physical trace either yet this is attested to by Camden and others. The head of the forest where Avalon existed when the forest flourished... is the same as the island that exists at the head of hazardous tides. Those who have preferred to associate Avalon with Glastonbury and have translated the word for 'tides' as 'moors'.i.e 'At the head of the moors adventurous'  need to question where the moors are located and ought to watch this link to understand the reference to 'Hazardous Tides' in relation to Avalon. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kRAyaxw2CIs
 

‘They rode until they came to the head of the forest and caught sight of the sea that was nigh enough before them, and saw that there was a great clashing of arms at the brink of the sea. A single knight was doing battle with all them that would fain have entered into a ship, and held stour so stiffly against them that he toppled the more part into the sea. They went thither as fast as they might, and when they drew nigh to the ship they knew that it was Perceval by his arms and his shield. Or ever they reached it, the ship was put off into the midst of the sea, wherein he was launched of his own great hardiment, and they went on fighting against him within the ship.

 

The Island of Avalon in Bigbury Bay.

It seems that in the end, reading between the lines, that most of the holy family that were the offspring of either Joseph or Mary Magdalene were also buried in the same vault under the Grail chapel.  From thereafter, because the rich and varied transformations of the characters, the icons and the geographical references that became so intermingled……… the Island of Avalon became not a part of history, but a part of Legend.

 There are so many references to that which we have posited, which seem to be subliminally indicating Mary Magdalene buried Jesus in Britain.

The Widow Lady had made bear thither the body that lay in the coffin before the castle of Camelot in the rich chapel that she had builded there. His sister brought the cerecloth that she took in the Waste Chapel, and presented there where the Graal was. Perceval made bring the coffin of the other knight that was at the entrance of his castle within the chapel likewise, and place it beside the coffin of his uncle, nor never thereafter might it be removed. Josephus telleth us that Perceval was in this castle long time, nor never once moved therefrom in quest of no adventure; rather was his courage so attorned to the Saviour of the World and His sweet Mother, that he and his sister and the damsel that was therein led a holy life and a religious. Therein abode they even as it pleased God, until that his mother passed away and his sister and all they that were therein save he alone. The hermits that were nigh the castle buried them and sang their masses, and came every day and took counsel of him for the holiness they saw him do and the good life that he led there. So one day whilst he was in the holy chapel where the hallows were, forthwith, behold you, a Voice that cometh down therein: "Perceval," saith the Voice, "Not long shall you abide herein; wherefore it is God's will that you dispart the hallows amongst the hermits of the forest, there where these bodies shall be served and worshipped, and the most Holy Graal shall appear herein no more, but within a brief space shall you know well the place where it shall be."

 

When the Voice departed, all the coffins that were therein crashed so passing loud that it seemed the master-hall had fallen. He crosseth and blesseth him and commendeth him to God. On a day the hermits came to him. He disparted the holy relics among them, and they builded above them holy churches and houses of religion that are seen in the lands and in the islands. Joseus the son of King Hermit, remained therein with Perceval, for he well knew that he would be departing thence betimes.

 

Perceval heard one day a bell sound loud and high without the manor toward the sea. He came to the windows of the hall and saw the ship come with the white sail and the Red Cross thereon, and within were the fairest folk that ever he might behold, and they were all robed in such manner as though they should sing mass. When the ship was anchored under the hall they went to pray in the most holy chapel. They brought the richest vessels of gold and silver that any might ever see, like as it were coffins, and set therein one of the three bodies of knights that had been brought into the chapel, and the body of King Fisherman, and of the mother of Perceval. But no savour in the world smelleth so sweet. Perceval took leave of Joseus and commended him to the Saviour of the World, and took leave of the household, from whom he departed in like manner. The worshipful men that were in the ship signed them of the cross and blessed them likewise. The ship wherein Perceval was drew far away, and a Voice that issued from the manor as she departed commended them to God and to His sweet Mother. Josephus recordeth us that Perceval departed in such wise, nor never thereafter did no earthly man know what became of him, nor doth the history speak of him more. But the history telleth us that Joseus abode in the castle that had been King Fisherman's, and shut himself up therein so that none might enter, and lived upon that the Lord God might send him. He dwelt there long time after that Perceval had departed, and ended therein. After his end, the dwelling began to fall. Natheless never was the chapel wasted nor decayed, but was as whole thereafter as tofore and is so still. The place was far from folk, and the place seemed withal to be somewhat different. When it was fallen into decay, many folk of the lands and islands that were nighest thereunto marvel them what may be in this manor. They dare a many that they should go see what was therein, and sundry folk went thither from all the lands, but none durst never enter there again save two Welsh knights that had heard tell of it. Full comely knights they were, young and joyous hearted. So either pledged him to other that they would go thither by way of gay adventure; but therein remained they of a long space after, and when again they came forth they led the life of hermits, and clad them in hair shirts, and went by the forest and so ate nought save roots only, and led a right hard life; yet ever they made as though they were glad, and if that any should ask whereof they rejoiced in such wise, "Go," said they to them that asked, "thither where we have been, and you shall know the wherefore.


The High History witnesseth us that when the conquest of the castle was over, the Saviour of the World was right joyous and well pleased thereof. The Graal presented itself again in the chapel, and the lance whereof the point bleedeth, and the sword wherewith St John was beheaded that Messire Gawain won, and the other holy relics whereof was right great plenty. For our Lord God loved the place much. The hermits went back to their hermitages in the forest and served Our Lord as they had been wont. Joseus remained with Perceval at the castle as long as it pleased him, but the Good Knight searched out the land there where the New Law had been abandoned and its maintenance neglected.

 

Here endeth the story of the most Holy Graal. Josephus, by whom it is placed on record, giveth the benison of Our Lord to all that hear and honour it. The Latin from whence this history was drawn into Romance was taken in the Isle of Avalon, in a holy house of religion that standeth at the head of the hazardous tide, there where King Arthur and Queen Guenievre lie, according to the witness of the good men religious that are therein, that have the whole history thereof, true from the beginning even to the end. After this same history beginneth the story how Briant of the Isles renounced King Arthur on account of Lancelot whom he loved not, and how he assured King Claudas that reft King Ban of Benoic of his land. This story telleth how he conquered him and by what means, and how Galobrus of the Red Launde came to King Arthur's court to help Lancelot, for that he was of his lineage. This story is right long and right adventurous and weighty, but the book will now forthwith be silent thereof until another time.’


 


 

die Insel Avalon und die Insel Sarras waren nie in Glastonbury

$
0
0





Insula auallonis auida funere paganorum, pre ceteris in orbe ad sepulturam eorum omnium sperulis propheciae vaticinantibus decorata, & in futurum ornata erit altissimum laudantibus. Abbadare, potens in Saphat, paganorum nobilissimus, cum centum et quatuor milibus domiicionem ibi accepit. Inter quos ioseph de marmore, ab Armathia nomine, cepit sompnum perpetuum; Et iacet in linea bifurcata iuxta meridianum angulum oratori, cratibus praeparatis, super potentem adorandam virginem, supradictis  sperulatis locum habitantibus tredecim. Habet enim secum Ioseph in sarcophago duo fassula alba & argentea, cruore prophete Jhesu & sudore perimpleta. Cum reperietur ejus sarcofagum, integrum illibatum in futuris videbitur, & erit apertum toto orbi terrarium. Ex tunc aqua, nec ros coeli insulam nobilissimam habitantibus poterit deficere. Per multum tempus ante diem Judioialem in iosaphat erunt aperta haec, & viventibus declarata. 
  Hucusque melkinus.

In der Antike um 350 v. Chr. ein griechischer Seefahrer, Großbritannien besuchte, schrieb eine Zeitschrift und Darin beschrieb er eine Insel, wo Zinn hergestellt und er nannte es Fisch in der griechischen Insel oder Ichthys, Ichthus und ikhthus dh der Insel Ictis. Diese Insel wurde von Sardinen zu bestimmten Zeiten des Jahres, daher sein Name umgeben. Die Zinn-Handel, die seit dem 1000BC durch phönizische Händler bestanden hatte wurde später kommentiert von einem lateinischen Chronisten namens Diodor und seine Kommentare zu den Briten waren, dass. Die Einwohner, die in der Nähe der Landzunge von Großbritannien, als Belerium, Mine Zinn und wenn sie es in Zinn Barren geschmolzen, tragen sie es bis zu einem gewissen Insel, die aus Großbritannien bekannt, liegt wohnen, und nennt Ictis. Für die am Abebben der Flut ist, wird der Raum zwischen dieser Insel und dem Festland verließ trocken und dann können sie die Dose in großen Mengen zu vermitteln über die Insel auf ihrem Wagen. Dies ist die Insel Burgh Island in S.Devon mit seinen Sand-Damm trocknet aus, dass eine Ebbe, auf denen die Wagen aus Zinn von Pytheas erwähnt nach unten aus dem südlichen Dartmoor durch Loddiswell gebracht wurden, auf einem alten Karrenweg. Die einzige "Klappvorstecker 'aus einem dieser Wagen in Devon und Cornwall aus PYTHEAS' Ära gefunden wurde, auf dieser gleichen Spur von Dartmoor zu Ictis gefunden. Sie reisten entlang einer Gezeiten-Straße in Aveton Gifford, um die Insel zu erreichen IctisWie viele sind uns bewusst, gibt es eine Legende in Cornwall, dass Josef von Arimathäa Jesu Onkel ein Tin Kaufmann war und dass er an dieser Küste kam zu holen Zinn mit Jesus, als er noch ein Junge war. Niemand war ganz sicher, warum Ictis hieß ein Emporium, der Marktplatz bedeutet, aber es ist jetzt bekannt, dass innerhalb dieser Insel ist ein altes Gewölbe ursprünglich für die Speicherung von Zinn durch die alten Bergleute, sondern um die Zeit der Römer in Britannien kam dies immer schwieriger geheim zu halten, um so Joseph kaufte die Insel mit dem riesigen Gewölbe Zinn in ihr. Der Leichnam Jesu wird noch innerhalb der Insel entdeckt zu werden. Deshalb ist der Evangelien drei relevanten Fakten beziehen, das Grab von Joseph gehörte, war es ein Grab gegraben, dass kein anderer Mann hatte in vor und es war in ein weißes Tuch gelegen. Dies ist, was die Evangelien über überein, aber sie lassen nicht auf, dass das Grab vor Ort in England ist. In der Tat ein anderer Chronist Strabo besagt, dass ein Kapitän sein Schiff lief auf den Felsen, anstatt verraten die Inseln Stellung zu den Römern und es passiert einfach so, dass neben dieser Insel haben wir die nur zwei maritime Wracks aus dem alten Zinn-Industrie. Dies ist, wo die größte Cache von Zinn Barren nur ein paar Meilen von ictis gefunden wurde.Melkin ein Prophet und Mönch, der in etwa 450 bis 650AD schrieb eine sehr seltsame Prophezeiung in lateinischer Sprache, die bis jetzt blieb eine obskure Stück Literatur, das Richtungen gibt, die Grabstätte von Joseph von Arimathäa gelebt hat. Joseph soll mit ihm zu haben, was wird gedacht, um den Heiligen Gral mit ihm, wo er auf der Insel Avalon begraben sein.Seit vielen Jahren Gral Jäger sind davon ausgegangen, dass der Gral und Joseph Lüge in Glastonbury, aber die Prophezeiung in Form eines Puzzles gegeben wurde und vor kurzem dieses Rätsel wurde freigeschaltet und ist nun in einem Buch mit dem Titel enthüllt "Und habe diese Feet '. Das Buch "Und tat Diese Feet 'ist nach dem Gedicht von William Blake, die als die meisten Briten wissen, geschrieben mit dem Namen ist die Hymne von Jerusalem, die von New Jerusalem bestehenden in Großbritannien spricht und stellt die Frage" hat Jesus' Füße gehen auf angenehmen Wiesen Englands grün. Nun haben wir die Antwort, weil Jesus ist innerhalb dieser Insel neben Josef von Arimathäa bestattet.Der Prophet melkin besuchte das Grab nach König Arthur wurde dort begraben und verlassen Sie diese Anweisungen für die Nachwelt, dass wir vielleicht sein Grab vor Ort aufzudecken und ruft die Insel auf der Insel Avalon.Insel Avalon, begehren die Heiden in den Tod, mehr als alle anderen (Plätze) in der Welt, weil sie ihre Grablegung dort haben und es wird von einem Kreis, der von einer Prophezeiung (und dieser Kreis ist der Steinkreis von Avebury) deutet geehrt. Es geht dann auf zu sagen, dass in Zukunft die Insel von denen, die Lob geben, auf den höchsten und 'Abbadare' (was übersetzt das Vaters Perle, der natürlich ist Jesus bedeutet), mächtig im Urteil die edelste jener Ausländer schläft wird geschmückt sein 104 nautische Meilen von Avebury, und von wem er erhielt Bestattung durch das Meer aus, die nach Joseph Arimathia benannt ist, und er hat auch seine ewige Ruhe dort getroffen, und sie liegen an der südlichen Gabel eines "gegabelte meridionale 'Linie in einem Winkel auf einer Küste Tor, in einem Krater vor dem man am Ende der Schwelle gehen, wie es bereits hergestellt wurde hoch in Ictis. Dieses Grab ist jetzt ihre Wohnung und befindet sich 13 Grad aus dem st. Michael Ley-Linie.Dies ist, was uns sagt, melkin und es wird Wort für Wort so verlegt, dass die Prophezeiung sich voll in das Buch zu verstehen und habe diese Füße. Klicken Sie auf den Link oben.Die Templer errichtet eine Reihe von Kirchen alle nach St. Michael geweiht, die das St. Michael Ley-Linien umfassen und wie St Michael Berg in Cornwall diese kleine Insel hatte eine St. Michael-Kirche auf, aber es ist Vater gut ein fünfzehnten Jahrhundert Jesuiten-Mönch, der diese Position bestätigt wer sagt uns, dass Josef von Arimathäa ist "sorgfältig versteckt" in Montacute und Sie können sehen, dass die Linie durch St.Michaels Hügel geht, wo es einst stand auch eine ihm geweihte Kirche genau 104 Meilen auf einer Linie, die mit dreizehn Grad gegabelt ist UND Runs Through MONTECUTE. Viele Gelehrte und Historiker, die mit dem Glastonbury Material beschäftigt haben sagen die Melkin war eine Erfindung des zwölften oder dreizehnten Jahrhundert. Das ist einfach nicht wahr, und diese Position wird erst dann gelangen, weil niemand in der Lage war zu entziffern Melkin Prophezeiung vor der aktuellen Zeit. Fragen Sie sich, warum sollte jemand ein Puzzle machen, niemand könne doch verstehen, alle Details in ihr sind so genau und führen zu dem sehr Insel in der Prophezeiung genannt. Nicht nur, dass Melkin schreiben das Original des Grals Buch, das die Lage dieser Insel etabliert, aber Leonardo Da Vinci war bewusst, wo diese Insel war und erzählte uns auch, dass in seinen Bildern der Madonna mit der Spindel und er würde uns zeigen, wo diese Insel ist. Er malte zwei Bilder, die Yarnwinder genau, wo die geografische Lage ist zu zeigen. Wir können sehen, ob wir die beiden Bilder, die wir kennen, um von ihm gemalt werden verschmelzen, gibt er jedes Detail, dass geographische lokalisiert die Insel Avalon, wie auf den heutigen Tag Burgh Island in Devon, die wir auch sehen, können dieses gleiche Perspektive auf Google Earth.Dies ist eine komplizierte Geschichte, aber es wird in diesem neuen und aufschlussreichen Buch, das belegt, wie diese Insel wurde bekannt als die Insel der Sarras in den Gral Geschichten und wie das Turiner Grabtuch ist in der Tat die wirkliche Grabtuch Jesu durch Melkin gesehen gibt enthüllt und dass er auf die ihm als dem "Duo Fassula '.In der Tat sieht man Melkin die lateinische Beschreibung stimmt mit dem Leichentuch vollständig, wenn wir, dass seine Rätsel der Duo Fassula ist wirklich ein Duplico Fasciola oder verdoppelt Grabtuch verstehen, weil es sagt, dass ....Habet enim secum Ioseph in sarcophago Duo fassula Alba & argentea, cruore Prophete Jhesu & sudore perimpleta: Joseph hat mit ihm in dem Sarkophag ein verdoppelt weißen Wickeltuch mit dem Blut und Schweiß des Propheten Jesus, die um ihn herum gefaltet bedeckt war.Die Templer, die die St.Michael Kirchen gebaut, um diese Grabstätte markieren begraben ihren Schatz auf dieser Insel am Weihnachtstag im Jahr 1307 nach der Ankunft in drei Schiffe Schatz. Als sie den Schatz und entladen, bevor sie geschlossen das Grab zum letzten Mal einer von ihnen, (wahrscheinlich Geoffrey de Charney) entfernt das Grabtuch Jesu aus dem Grab, die derzeit auf exibit in Turin.König Artus 'Körper wurde auch innerhalb dieser Insel begraben, und es ist hier, dass er auf ein Wunder zu seinem tödlichen Wunden nach der Schlacht für sein Reich zu heilen, wie er, dass Jesus in ihm begraben wurde wusste aussehen kam. Geoffrey von Monmouth auch erzählt, dass Arthur auf der Insel Avalon begraben liegt, aber es ist Melkin, die wir haben den richtigen Ort mit den Worten das Wort Supradictis was bedeutet, hoch oben in Ictis bestätigtUnd habe diese Füße von Michael Goldsworthy, ist ein aufschlussreiches Buch mit allen Karten und Hinweise, wie es dass, was als die Arche Gral in der Gral Romanzen bekannt enthält Jesus Körper ist und bestätigt, wie das Bild auf dem Turiner Grabtuch formuliert wurde, erklärt in Zedernöl. Das Geheimnis ist jetzt aufgedeckt, aber wie wird die Welt von dieser Enthüllung des Grabes erfahren auf dieser heiligen Insel und was wird die Wirkung der Entdeckung des Grabes und dessen Inhalt auf allen großen Religionen heute sein.Dies ist eine spannende Buch über eBook oder als Taschenbuch veröffentlicht und ist voll von hervorragenden Fotografien und Diagramme, die Beweise liefern.













l'isola di Avalon e l'isola di Sarras non sono mai stati a Glastonbury

$
0
0



Insula auallonis auida funere paganorum, pre ceteris in orbe ad sepulturam eorum omnium sperulis propheciae vaticinantibus decorata, & in futurum ornata erit altissimum laudantibus. Abbadare, potens in Saphat, paganorum nobilissimus, cum centum et quatuor milibus domiicionem ibi accepit. Inter quos ioseph de marmore, ab Armathia nomine, cepit sompnum perpetuum; Et iacet in linea bifurcata iuxta meridianum angulum oratori, cratibus praeparatis, super potentem adorandam virginem, supradictis  sperulatis locum habitantibus tredecim. Habet enim secum Ioseph in sarcophago duo fassula alba & argentea, cruore prophete Jhesu & sudore perimpleta. Cum reperietur ejus sarcofagum, integrum illibatum in futuris videbitur, & erit apertum toto orbi terrarium. Ex tunc aqua, nec ros coeli insulam nobilissimam habitantibus poterit deficere. Per multum tempus ante diem Judioialem in iosaphat erunt aperta haec, & viventibus declarata. 
  Hucusque melkinus.



http://isleofavallon.blogspot.co.uk #3


Nei tempi antichi intorno al 350 aC un navigatore greco che ha visitato la Gran Bretagna ha scritto un giornale e in esso egli descrive un'isola dove è stato prodotto lo stagno e lo chiamò pesce isola o in Ichthys greci, Ichthus Ikhthus e cioè l'isola di Ictis. Questa isola era circondata da sardine in certi periodi dell'anno cui il nome. Il commercio di stagno che aveva esisteva dal 1000 aC con i commercianti fenici fu poi commentata da un cronista di nome latino Diodoro ed i suoi commenti sul inglesi erano che.
Gli abitanti che abitano nei pressi del promontorio di Gran Bretagna, noto come Belerium, stagno mia e quando l'hanno fuso in lingotti di stagno, lo portano ad una certa isola, che si trova fuori la Gran Bretagna, e si chiama Ictis. Per il riflusso della marea, lo spazio tra questa isola e il continente è rimasto a secco e poi si può trasmettere la teglia in grandi quantità verso l'isola sui loro carri.
Questa è l'isola di Burgh Island in S.Devon con sabbia causeway sua che si asciuga una marea bassa su cui venivano portati i carri di stagno citato da Pitea giù dal sud del Dartmoor attraverso Loddiswell su una carrareccia antico. L'unico 'coppiglia' da uno di questi carri si trovano nel Devon e in Cornovaglia era Pitea 'stato trovato su questa pista stessa da Dartmoor a Ictis. Hanno viaggiato lungo una strada di marea in aveton Gifford per raggiungere l'isola di IctisCome molti sanno è una leggenda in Cornovaglia che Giuseppe d'Arimatea lo zio di Gesù 'era un commerciante Tin e che egli è venuto a questa costa, per raccogliere lo stagno con Gesù quando era ancora un ragazzo. Nessuno era abbastanza sicuro perché Ictis è stato chiamato uno Emporium, che significa luogo del mercato, ma è ormai noto che all'interno di questa isola è un'antica volta originariamente utilizzato per la memorizzazione tin dai vecchi minatori, ma tutto il tempo i Romani invasero la Gran Bretagna questo è venuto sempre più difficile di mantenere il segreto così Giuseppe ha acquistato l'isola con la volta stagno enorme all'interno di esso. Il corpo di Gesù è ancora da scoprire nell'isola. È per questo che i Vangeli riferiscono tre fatti pertinenti, la tomba apparteneva a Giuseppe, si trattava di un sepolcro scavato che nessun altro uomo era rimasto in prima e in essa era un panno bianco. Questo è ciò che i Vangeli concordano su, ma non lasciare che il sito sulla tomba è in Inghilterra.
Infatti Strabone un altro cronista afferma che un capitano correva la sua barca sugli scogli, piuttosto che cedere la posizione isole ai Romani e si dà il caso che accanto a questa isola abbiamo gli unici due relitti di navi, provenienti dall'industria stagno antico. Questo è dove il più grande cache di lingotti di stagno è stato trovato solo un paio di miglia da ictis.Melkin un profeta e monaco che visse intorno al 450 a 650AD scrisse una profezia molto strana in latino, che fino ad oggi è rimasto un pezzo oscuro della letteratura, che fornisce le indicazioni per il luogo di sepoltura di Giuseppe d'Arimatea. Joseph si suppone di avere con lui ciò che è pensato per essere il Santo Graal con lui dove è sepolto nell'isola di Avalon.Per molti anni i cacciatori del Graal hanno assunto che il Graal e la menzogna Joseph a Glastonbury, ma la profezia è stata data la forma di un puzzle e recentemente questo indovinello è stato sbloccato e ora si rivela in un libro intitolato 'E lo ha fatto quei piedi'.
Il libro 'E fatto quei piedi' prende il nome dalla poesia scritta da William Blake, che come la maggior parte britannici sapere è l'inno di Gerusalemme, che parla della Nuova Gerusalemme esistenti in Gran Bretagna e pone la domanda 'Gesù' piedi camminano su pascoli piacevoli dell'Inghilterra verde. Bene, ora abbiamo la risposta, perché Gesù è sepolto all'interno di questa isola accanto a Giuseppe d'Arimatea.Il melkin profeta ha visitato la tomba dopo che il re Artù fu sepolto lì e ha lasciato queste istruzioni per i posteri che potremmo scoprire il suo sito tomba e chiama l'isola l'isola di Avalon.Isola di Avalon, desiderare i pagani nella morte, sopra tutti gli altri (posti) del mondo, perché hanno la loro sepoltura lì ed è onorata da un cerchio, che preannuncia di una profezia (e questo cerchio è il cerchio di pietre di Avebury). Si passa quindi a dire che in futuro l'isola sarà ornato da quelli che danno la lode al massimo e 'Abbadare' (che tradotto significa perla del padre, che è naturalmente Gesù) possente a giudizio del più nobile di quegli stranieri dorme 104 miglia nautiche da Avebury, e da chi ha ricevuto sepoltura al mare da Giuseppe, che prende il nome da Arimatea, e ha anche preso il suo riposo eterno lì, e giacciono sulla forcella meridionale di un 'biforcata meridionale' line in un angolo su un Tor costiera, in un cratere, sopra del quale si può andare all'estremità del bordo come è stato già preparato alto in Ictis. questa tomba è ora la loro abitazione e si trova a 13 gradi dal st. Michael ley line.Questo è ciò che ci dice melkin ed è disposto parola per parola in modo che la profezia può essere pienamente compreso nel libro e ha fatto quei piedi. Clicca sul link qui sopra.I Templari costruita una matrice di tutte le chiese dedicate a San Michele che compongono il San Michele linea ley e come Mont Saint-Michel in Cornovaglia questa piccola isola aveva una chiesa di San Michele su di essa, ma è buon padre uno quindicesimi monaco secolo gesuita che conferma questa posizione che ci dice che Giuseppe d'Arimatea è 'accuratamente nascosto' in Montacute e si può vedere che la linea passa attraverso St.Michaels collina dove un tempo sorgeva anche una chiesa a lui dedicata ESATTAMENTE 104 miglia su una linea che si biforca a gradi tredici e Runs Through MONTECUTE.
Molti studiosi e storici che hanno affrontato con il materiale Glastonbury dicono che il Melkin era un'invenzione del secolo twelvth o tredicesimo. Questo semplicemente non è vero e questa posizione è solo arrivato al perché nessuno è stato in grado di decifrare Prophecy Melkin prima dell'era corrente. Chiedetevi perché qualcuno dovrebbe fare un puzzle che nessuno riusciva a capire ancora tutti i dettagli in esso sono così precisi e portare alla isola chiamata nella profezia.
Non solo Melkin scrivere l'originale del libro del Graal che stabilisce la posizione di questa isola, ma Leonardo Da Vinci era a conoscenza di questa isola in cui è stato e ci ha anche detto che nei suoi quadri della Madonna e il Fusi che ci mostrano dove questo isola è. Ha dipinto due quadri Fusi che mostrano esattamente dove la posizione geografica è. Possiamo vedere se unire i due dipinti che sappiamo essere dipinta da lui, egli dà ogni dettaglio geografico che individua l'isola di Avalon, come l'attuale Burgh Island Devon in cui possiamo vedere anche questa stessa prospettiva su Google Earth.Questa è una storia complicata, ma si rivela in questo libro nuovo e illuminante che dà prova di come questa isola divenne nota come l'isola di Sarras nelle storie del Graal e di come la Sindone di Torino è infatti la tela vera tomba di Gesù vista da Melkin e che si riferiva ad esso come il 'Duo Fassula'.In realtà è possibile vedere la descrizione latin Melkin corrisponda al sudario completamente se ci rendiamo conto che il suo enigma della Fassula Duo è davvero un fasciola Duplico o raddoppiato nel corso panno grave perché si dice che ....Habet enim SECUM Rapporto IOSEPH in sarcophago duo fassula alba e argentea, cruore prophete Jhesu & sudore perimpleta:
Joseph ha con lui nel sarcofago uno raddoppiato panno bianco fasce coperte con il sangue e il sudore di Gesù profeta che è stato piegato intorno a lui.I Templari che hanno costruito le chiese San Michele a segnare questo sito tomba sepolto il loro tesoro su questa isola il giorno di Natale nel 1307 dopo essere arrivato a tre navi del tesoro. Mentre scaricate il tesoro e prima hanno chiuso la tomba per l'ultima volta uno di loro, (probabilmente Geoffrey de Charney) rimosso la Sindone di Gesù dal sepolcro che è attualmente in exibit a Torino.Il corpo di Re Artù fu sepolto all'interno di questa isola, ed è qui che è venuto a cercare un miracolo per curare le sue ferite mortali dopo la battaglia per il suo regno come sapeva che Gesù è stato sepolto all'interno di esso. Goeffrey di Monmouth racconta anche che Arthur è sepolto nell'isola di Avalon, ma è Melkin che conferma abbiamo la giusta posizione, dicendo la parola che significa Supradictis in alto in IctisE hanno fatto quei piedi da Michael Goldsworthy, è un libro rivelatore con tutte le mappe e le prove che spiega come sia possibile che, quello che era conosciuto come l'arca Graal nei romanzi del Graal contiene il corpo di Gesù e conferma come l'immagine sulla Sindone di Torino è stato formulato in olio di cedro. Il mistero è ora scoperto, ma che cosa sarà il mondo, imparare da questo svelamento della tomba su questa isola sacra e quale sarà l'effetto della scoperta di questa tomba e dei suoi contenuti su tutte le principali religioni oggi.Questo è un libro entusiasmante rilasciato il ebook o in edizione economica ed è pieno di eccellenti fotografie e diagrammi che forniscono evidenze.

øya Avalon og øya Sarras var aldri på Glastonbury

$
0
0



Insula auallonis auida funere paganorum, pre ceteris in orbe ad sepulturam eorum omnium sperulis propheciae vaticinantibus decorata, & in futurum ornata erit altissimum laudantibus. Abbadare, potens in Saphat, paganorum nobilissimus, cum centum et quatuor milibus domiicionem ibi accepit. Inter quos ioseph de marmore, ab Armathia nomine, cepit sompnum perpetuum; Et iacet in linea bifurcata iuxta meridianum angulum oratori, cratibus praeparatis, super potentem adorandam virginem, supradictis  sperulatis locum habitantibus tredecim. Habet enim secum Ioseph in sarcophago duo fassula alba & argentea, cruore prophete Jhesu & sudore perimpleta. Cum reperietur ejus sarcofagum, integrum illibatum in futuris videbitur, & erit apertum toto orbi terrarium. Ex tunc aqua, nec ros coeli insulam nobilissimam habitantibus poterit deficere. Per multum tempus ante diem Judioialem in iosaphat erunt aperta haec, & viventibus declarata. 
  Hucusque melkinus.

I antikken rundt 350 f.Kr. en gresk navigatør som besøkte Storbritannia skrev en dagbok, og i den beskrev han en øy der tinn ble produsert, og han kalte det fisk øy eller i greske Ichthys, Ichthus og Ikhthus dvs. øya Ictis. Denne øya var omgitt av Pilchards på visse tider av året derav navnet. Den tinn handelen som hadde eksistert siden 1000bc gjennom fønikiske handelsmenn ble senere kommentert av en latinsk kronikør heter Diodorus og hans kommentarer på britisk var det.
Innbyggerne som bor nær odden of Britain, kjent som Belerium, mine tinn og når de har smeltet det inn i tinn ingots, bærer de det til en viss øy, som ligger utenfor Storbritannia, og kalles Ictis. For ved ebbe er av tidevannet, er mellomrommet mellom denne øya og fastlandet forlot tørre og så kan de formidle tinn i store mengder over til øya på sine vogner.
Dette er øya Burgh Island i S.Devon med sin sand moloen som tørker ut en lavvann hvorpå vognene av tinn omtalt av Pytheas ble brakt ned fra sørlige Dartmoor gjennom Loddiswell på en eldgammel kjerreveg. Det eneste "klaffpluggene 'fra en av disse vognene som finnes i Devon og Cornwall fra Pytheas' era ble funnet på denne samme sporet fra Dartmoor til Ictis. De reiste langs en tidevanns vei i Aveton Gifford å nå øya Ictis
Som mange er klar over det er en legende i Cornwall at Josef av Arimatea Jesu onkel var en Tin kjøpmann og at han kom til denne kysten for å plukke opp tinn med Jesus da han fortsatt var en gutt. Ingen var helt sikker på hvorfor Ictis ble kalt en Emporium som betyr markedsplass, men det er nå kjent at innenfor denne øya er et gammelt hvelv opprinnelig brukt for lagring av tinn av de gamle gruvearbeiderne, men rundt den tiden romerne invaderte England denne kom stadig vanskeligere å holde hemmelig, slik Joseph kjøpte denne øya med den enorme tinn hvelvet i det. Jesu legeme er ennå ikke oppdaget i Island. Dette er grunnen til at evangeliene forholde tre relevante fakta, graven tilhørte Joseph, var det en kvistet ut grav som ingen annen mann hadde ligget i før og i den var en hvit klut. Dette er hva evangeliene enige på, men de slipper ikke på at graven nettstedet er i England.
Faktisk Strabo en annen kronikør sier at en kaptein kjørte båten sin på steinene i stedet gi bort øyene posisjon til romerne, og det bare skjer slik at neste til denne øya vi har bare to maritime vrak fra den gamle formen bransjen. Det er her den største cache av tinn ingots ble funnet bare et par miles fra ictis.Melkin en profet og munk som levde i ca 450 til 650AD skrev en veldig merkelig profeti i latin, som inntil nå har holdt en obskur stykke litteratur som gir anvisninger til gravstedet til Josef av Arimatea. Joseph er ment å ha med seg hva som er tenkt å være den hellige gral med ham hvor han er gravlagt på øya Avalon.For mange år Grail jegere har antatt at gralen og Joseph løgn på Glastonbury, men profetien ble gitt i form av et puslespill og nylig denne gåten har blitt låst og er nå avslørt i en bok som heter "Og gjorde de Feet".
Boken «Og de som hadde Feet 'er oppkalt etter diktet er skrevet av William Blake som i de fleste briter vet er hymne av Jerusalem, som taler for New Jerusalem eksisterende i Storbritannia og stiller spørsmålet« Har Jesu føtter vandre på Englands hyggelige beite grønn. Vel nå har vi svaret fordi Jesus er gravlagt innenfor denne øya ved siden av Josef av Arimatea.Profeten melkin besøkte gravstedet etter kong Arthur ble begravet der, og forlot disse retningene for ettertiden at vi kan avdekke hans gravsted og kaller øya øya Avalon.
Island of Avalon, begjære hedningene i døden, fremfor alle andre (steder) i verden, fordi de har sin Gravlegging der og det er hedret av en sirkel som portends av en profeti (og denne sirkelen er steinringen av Avebury). Den fortsetter deretter med å si at i fremtiden øya vil bli utsmykket med de som gir ros til den høyeste og 'Abbadare' (som oversatt betyr at fars perle, som er selvsagt Jesus) mektig i dom den edleste av disse utlendinger sover 104 nautiske miles fra Avebury, og av hvem fikk han interment ved sjøen fra Joseph som er oppkalt etter Arimatea, og han har også tatt sin evige hvile der, og de ligger på den sørlige gaffelen av en "splittnagler meridionale 'linje i en vinkel på en kystby Tor, i et krater, over hvor man kan gå på ytterpunkt på randen som den var allerede forberedt høyt opp i Ictis. denne graven er nå deres bolig og ligger 13 grader fra st. Michael Ley linje.Dette er hva melkin forteller oss, og det er lagt ut ord for ord slik at profetien kan forstås fullt ut i boken og gjorde disse føttene. Klikk på linken ovenfor.De Templars bygget en rekke kirker viet til St. Michael, som utgjør St Michael Ley linje og som St. Michaels Mount i Cornwall denne lille øya hadde en St Michael kirken på det, men det er far god femtende århundre jesuitt munk som bekrefter denne posisjonen som forteller oss at Josef av Arimatea er "nøye skjult" i Montacute og du kan se at linjen går gjennom St.Michaels bakketopp der det en gang sto også en kirke viet til ham akkurat 104 miles på en linje som er splittnagler AT Tretten grader og går gjennom MONTECUTE.
Mange forskere og historikere som har behandlet den Glastonbury materialet si Melkin var en oppfinnelse av twelvth eller trettende århundre. Dette er rett og slett ikke sant, og denne stillingen er bare kommet til fordi ingen har kunnet tyde Melkin profeti før gjeldende epoke. Spør deg selv, hvorfor skulle noen gjøre en gåte at ingen kunne forstå enda alle detaljene i den er så presis og ført til svært øya navngitt i profetien.
Ikke bare gjorde Melkin skrive originalen av gralen boken som etablerer plasseringen av denne øya, men Leonardo da Vinci var klar over hvor denne øya var og fortalte også at i hans malerier av Madonna og yarnwinder ville han vise oss hvor dette øya er. Han malte to Yarnwinder malerier som viser nøyaktig hvor den geografiske plasseringen er. Vi kan se om vi slå de to maleriene som vi vet er malt av ham, gir han hver geografiske detaljer som lokaliserer øya Avalon som i dag Burgh øy i Devon der vi kan også se det samme perspektiv på Google Earth.Dette er en komplisert historie, men det er åpenbart i denne nye og opplysende bok som gir bevis for hvordan denne øya ble kjent som øya Sarras i gralen historier og hvordan Torino likkledet er faktisk den virkelige grav duken av Jesus sett med Melkin og at han refererte til det som "Duo Fassula '.Faktisk kan du se Melkin latinske beskrivelse samsvarer med likkledet fullstendig hvis vi forstår at hans gåte av Duo Fassula er virkelig en Duplico fasciola eller fordoblet over graven klut fordi det sier at ....
Habet enim secum Ioseph i sarcophago duoen fassula alba & argentea, cruore prophete Jhesu & sudore perimpleta:
Joseph har med seg i sarkofagen en doblet hvit bleie dekket med blod og svette av profeten Jesus som ble kastet rundt ham.
De Templars som bygde St. Michael kirkene for å markere dette gravstedet begravde sin skatt på denne øya på juledag i 1307 etter å ha ankommet i tre treasure skip. Som de losset skatten og før de lukket opp graven for siste gang en av dem, (trolig Geoffrey de Charney) fjernet Shroud of Jesus fra graven som er beskjeftiget på exibit i Torino.
King Arthur kropp ble også gravlagt innenfor denne øya, og det er her at han kom for å lete etter et mirakel for å kurere sin dødelige sår etter kampen for sitt rike som han visste at Jesus ble gravlagt i den. Goeffrey av Monmouth forteller også at Arthur er begravet på øya Avalon, men det er Melkin som bekrefter vi har riktig plassering ved å si ordet Supradictis betyr høyt opp i IctisOg de som hadde føtter av Michael Goldsworthy, er en avslørende bok med alle kartene og bevis som forklarer hvordan det er at, det som var kjent som gralen arken i gralen romanser inneholder Jesus legeme og bekrefter hvordan bildet på Torino liksvøpet ble formulert i Cedar olje. Mysteriet er nå avdekket, men hva vil verden lære av denne avsløringen av graven på denne hellige øya og hva som vil være effekten av oppdagelsen av denne graven og innholdet på alle de store religionene i dag.
Dette er en spennende bok utgitt på eBok eller i paperback og er full av gode fotografier og diagrammer som gir bevis.















Wyspa Avalon i Wyspa Sarras nigdy nie były w Glastonbury

$
0
0



Insula auallonis auida funere paganorum, pre ceteris in orbe ad sepulturam eorum omnium sperulis propheciae vaticinantibus decorata, & in futurum ornata erit altissimum laudantibus. Abbadare, potens in Saphat, paganorum nobilissimus, cum centum et quatuor milibus domiicionem ibi accepit. Inter quos ioseph de marmore, ab Armathia nomine, cepit sompnum perpetuum; Et iacet in linea bifurcata iuxta meridianum angulum oratori, cratibus praeparatis, super potentem adorandam virginem, supradictis  sperulatis locum habitantibus tredecim. Habet enim secum Ioseph in sarcophago duo fassula alba & argentea, cruore prophete Jhesu & sudore perimpleta. Cum reperietur ejus sarcofagum, integrum illibatum in futuris videbitur, & erit apertum toto orbi terrarium. Ex tunc aqua, nec ros coeli insulam nobilissimam habitantibus poterit deficere. Per multum tempus ante diem Judioialem in iosaphat erunt aperta haec, & viventibus declarata. 
  Hucusque melkinus.

W dawnych czasach około roku 350 pne grecki żeglarz, który odwiedził Wielką Brytanię napisał dziennik aw nim opisał wyspę, gdzie puszka została wyprodukowana i nazwał to ryba wyspę lub w greckich Ichthys, Ichthus i Ikhthus tj. wyspie Ictis. Ta wyspa była otoczona sardynki w pewnych okresach roku stąd jego nazwa. Handel cyna która istniała od fenickich kupców przez 1000bc później komentowane przez kronikarza łacińskiego nazwie Diodora i jego uwag na temat Brytyjczyków było to. Mieszkańcy, którzy mieszkają w pobliżu cypla Brytanii, znany jako Belerium, cyny kopalni i po ich stopieniu go do wlewek cyny, przenoszą go do pewnej wyspy, która leży poza Wielką Brytanię i nazywa Ictis. Przez co odpływu jest z fali, przestrzeń między wyspie a kontynentem pozostaje sucha i wtedy mogą przekazać puszkę w dużych ilościach na wyspę na swoich wagonów. Jest to wyspa Burgh Island w S.Devon ze swoim piasku grobli że wysycha w czasie odpływu, na których wozy z cyny wymienione przez Pytheasa zostały sprowadzone w dół z południowej Dartmoor przez Loddiswell na starożytną torze koszyka. Tylko "linch pin" z jednego z tych wagonów znajdujących się w Devon i Kornwalii od epoki Pytheas 'był odnaleziony na tym samym torze od Dartmoor do Ictis. Szli wzdłuż drogi oddechowej w Aveton Gifford, aby dotrzeć do wyspy IctisJak wielu wie, że jest legendą w Kornwalii, że Józef z Arymatei wujka Jezusa był kupcem Cyna i że przyszedł na tym wybrzeżu, aby podnieść puszkę z Jezusem, gdy był jeszcze chłopcem. Nikt nie był pewien, dlaczego Ictis nazwano Emporium co oznacza, że ​​miejsce na rynku, ale jest teraz wiadomo, że w tej wyspy jest stary grobowiec pierwotnie używane do przechowywania cyny przez dawnych górników, ale w czasach Rzymianie najechali Brytanię do tego doszło coraz trudniej zachować w tajemnicy tak Józef kupił tę wyspę z ogromnym sklepieniem cyny w jego obrębie. Ciało Jezusa jest jeszcze do odkrycia w Island. Dlatego Ewangelie odnoszą się trzy odnośne fakty, grobowiec należał do Józefa, to żeby wykopać grób, że żaden inny mężczyzna leżał w przed i był białym obrusem. To, co Ewangelie zgadzają się na lecz nie pozwól na tym miejscu grób jest w Anglii. W rzeczywistości Strabon inny kronikarz stwierdza, że ​​kapitan prowadził łódkę na skałach zamiast oddać pozycję wysp do Rzymian i tak się składa, że ​​obok tej wyspy mamy tylko dwa morskie wraki z dawnej branży cyny. To gdzie największym cache wlewków cyny stwierdzono zaledwie kilka mil od ictis.Melkin prorok i mnich, który żył około roku 450 do 650AD napisał bardzo dziwną przepowiednię po łacinie, który do tej pory pozostał nieznany kawałek literatury, który daje wskazówki jak dojechać do miejsca pochówku Józefa z Arymatei. Joseph ma mieć z nim co uważa się za Święty Graal z nim gdzie jest pochowany na wyspie Avalon.Od wielu lat myśliwi Graala założyliśmy, że Graal i kłamstwo Joseph w Glastonbury, ale proroctwo zostało wydane w formie puzzli, a ostatnio to zagadka została odblokowana i jest teraz ujawnił w książce "A czy te stopy". Książka "A czy te stopy 'jest nazwana na cześć poematu autorstwa Williama Blake'a, który jak większość Brytyjczyków znamy jest hymnem Jerozolimie, który mówi o Nowym Jeruzalem istniejących w Wielkiej Brytanii i prosi pytanie" czy stopy Jezusa chodzić po pastwiskach przyjemnych Anglii zielony. No to teraz mamy odpowiedź, ponieważ Jezus został pochowany w obrębie tej wyspie obok Józefa z Arymatei.Prorok melkin odwiedził cmentarza po król Artur został pochowany i zostawił te kierunki dla potomności, że możemy odkryć swoje poważne miejsce i nazywa wyspa wyspa Avalon.Wyspa Avalon, pożądanie pogan śmierć, ponad wszystkimi innymi (miejsca) na świecie, ponieważ mają one swoje pochowane tam i to jest honorowana przez koło, które zapowiada się z przepowiedni (a to koło jest kamienny krąg z Avebury). Następnie mówi dalej, że w przyszłości wyspa zostanie ozdobiony przez tych, którzy chwalili najwyższy i 'Abbadare "(co w tłumaczeniu oznacza ojca perłę, która jest oczywiście Jezusa) potężny w wyroku najszlachetniejszym z tych cudzoziemców śpi 104 mil morskich od Avebury, i przez którą otrzymał pochówku przez morze od Józefa, który po nazwie Arymatei, a on podjął również jego wieczny odpoczynek tam, a oni leżą na południowym rozwidleniu linię 'rozwidlonego południkowej' w kącie na nadmorskich Tora, w kraterze, nad którym można przejść na krańcu granicy jak to było już przygotowane wysoko w Ictis. Grób ten jest teraz ich mieszkanie i znajduje się 13 stopni od ul. Michael ley line.To, co melkin mówi i to jest określone słowo w słowo tak, że proroctwo można w pełni zrozumieć w książce A czy te stopy. Kliknij na link powyżej.Templariusze zbudowali szereg kościołów wszystko pod wezwaniem św Michała które składają się na St Michael linii magicznych i jak Mount St Michała w Kornwalii to mała wyspa miała kościół św Michała na niego, ale on jest ojcem Dobra 1/15 w. mnich jezuita, który potwierdza to stanowisko który mówi nam, że Józef z Arymatei jest "starannie ukryty" w Montacute i widać, że linia przechodzi przez St.Michaels wzgórzu, gdzie niegdyś również stał kościół poświęcony mu dokładnie 104 mil na linii, która rozwidlonego AT TRZYNASTU stopni i biegnie przez MONTECUTE. Wielu badaczy i historyków, które dotyczyły materiału Glastonbury powiedzieć Melkin było wynalezienie wieku twelvth lub XIII wieku. To jest po prostu nieprawda i ta pozycja jest tylko przybył, bo nikt nie był w stanie rozszyfrować Melkin Proroctwa, zanim obecnej epoki. Zadaj sobie pytanie, dlaczego ktoś miałby zrobić puzzle że nikt nie mógł zrozumieć, ale wszystkie szczegóły w nim są tak precyzyjne i ołowiu do samej wyspie nazwanej w proroctwie. Nie tylko Melkin napisać oryginał książki Graala, która ustala położenie tej wyspie, ale Leonardo da Vinci był świadomy tego, gdzie ta wyspa była i również powiedział nam, że w jego obrazach Madonny i yarnwinder chciał pokazać nam, gdzie to Wyspa jest. Malował obrazy dwa Yarnwinder, które pokazują dokładnie, gdzie położenie geograficzne jest. Możemy sprawdzić czy połączenie tych dwóch obrazów, które znamy do malowania przez niego, on daje każdemu geograficzny szczegół, który lokalizuje wyspa Avalon jako dzisiejszej Burgh Island w hrabstwie Devon, który możemy zobaczyć tę samą perspektywę na Google Earth.Jest to skomplikowana historia, ale okazuje się w tej nowej i pouczająca książka, która daje dowód jak wyspa ta stała się znana jako Wyspa Sarras w historii Graala i jak Całunu Turyńskiego w rzeczywistości jest prawdziwy grób tkanina Jezusa widziana przez Melkin i że mówi o nim jako 'Duo Fassula strony'.W rzeczywistości można zobaczyć latin opis Melkin na dopasowuje osłonę całkowicie, jeśli zrozumiemy, że jego zagadkę Duo Fassula jest naprawdę Duplico Fasciola lub podwoiła się poważnego materiału, ponieważ mówi, że ....Habet enim secum Ioseph w sarcophago duet fassula Alba argentea i cruore Prophete Jhesu & sudore perimpleta: Joseph ma z nim w sarkofagu dwukrotnie biały powijaki tkaniny pokryte krwią i potem proroka Jezusa, który był owinięty wokół niego.Templariusze, którzy budowali kościoły St.Michael z okazji tej poważnej witryny pochowany swój skarb na tej wyspie w dzień Bożego Narodzenia w 1307 roku po przybyciu w trzech statków skarbów. Gdy rozładował skarb i zanim zamknął grób po raz ostatni jeden z nich (prawdopodobnie Geoffrey de Charney) usunął Całun Jezusa z grobu, który jest obecnie na exibit w Turynie.Ciało króla Artura był również pochowany w tej wyspie i to właśnie tutaj, że przyszedł szukać na cud wyleczenia jego śmiertelne rany po walce o Jego królestwo, jak wiedział, że Jezus został pochowany w jego obrębie. Goeffrey Monmouth również wspomina, że ​​Artur został pochowany na wyspie Avalon, ale jest Melkin który potwierdza, mamy odpowiednią lokalizację, mówiąc słowo Supradictis czyli wysoko w IctisA czy te stopy przez Michaela Goldsworthy, jest odkrywcza książka ze wszystkimi mapami i dowodów, które wyjaśnia, jak to jest, że to, co było znane jako Graala Arką w Graala romansów zawiera ciało Jezusa i potwierdza, jak obraz na Całunu Turyńskiego została sformułowana w oleju cedrowego. Tajemnica jest już odkryte, ale co będzie świat się z tego odsłonięcia grobu na tej świętej wyspie i jaki będzie efekt odkrycia tego grobu i jego zawartości na wszystkich głównych religii dzisiaj.To ekscytujący książka wydana ebook lub w miękkiej oprawie i jest pełen doskonałych zdjęć i schematów, które dostarczają dowodów.












a Ilha de Avalon e da Ilha de Sarras nunca estiveram em Glastonbury

$
0
0



Insula auallonis auida funere paganorum, pre ceteris in orbe ad sepulturam eorum omnium sperulis propheciae vaticinantibus decorata, & in futurum ornata erit altissimum laudantibus. Abbadare, potens in Saphat, paganorum nobilissimus, cum centum et quatuor milibus domiicionem ibi accepit. Inter quos ioseph de marmore, ab Armathia nomine, cepit sompnum perpetuum; Et iacet in linea bifurcata iuxta meridianum angulum oratori, cratibus praeparatis, super potentem adorandam virginem, supradictis  sperulatis locum habitantibus tredecim. Habet enim secum Ioseph in sarcophago duo fassula alba & argentea, cruore prophete Jhesu & sudore perimpleta. Cum reperietur ejus sarcofagum, integrum illibatum in futuris videbitur, & erit apertum toto orbi terrarium. Ex tunc aqua, nec ros coeli insulam nobilissimam habitantibus poterit deficere. Per multum tempus ante diem Judioialem in iosaphat erunt aperta haec, & viventibus declarata. 
  Hucusque melkinus.



http://isleofavallon.blogspot.co.uk #3

Nos tempos antigos, em torno de 350 aC, um navegador grego que visitou a Grã-Bretanha, escreveu um diário e em que ele descreveu uma ilha onde o estanho foi produzido e chamou-lhe peixe ilha ou em Ichthys gregos, Ichthus e Ikhthus ou seja, a ilha de Ictis. Esta ilha foi cercada por sardinhas em determinadas épocas do ano daí o seu nome. O comércio do estanho, que existia desde o 1000BC através de comerciantes fenícios mais tarde foi comentado por um cronista latino chamado Diodoro e seus comentários sobre os britânicos eram isso. Os habitantes que moram perto do promontório da Grã-Bretanha, conhecido como Belerium, mina de estanho e quando eles derreteram-lo em lingotes de estanho, que levá-lo para uma ilha, que fica fora da Grã-Bretanha, e é chamado Ictis. Para a vazante da maré, o espaço entre esta ilha eo continente fica seco e então eles podem transmitir o estanho em grandes quantidades para a ilha em seus vagões. Esta é a ilha de Burgh Island em S.Devon com a sua areia calçada que seca na maré baixa em que os carrinhos de lata mencionado por Pytheas foram trazidos para baixo de Dartmoor sul através Loddiswell sobre uma trilha de carro antigo. A única 'pin Linch "de um desses vagões encontrados em Devon e na Cornualha, era Pytheas' foi encontrado nesta mesma faixa de Dartmoor para Ictis. Eles viajavam por uma estrada corrente em Aveton Gifford para chegar à Ilha de IctisComo muitos sabem, há uma lenda em Cornwall que José de Arimatéia tio de Jesus era um comerciante de estanho e que ele veio a esta costa para pegar lata com Jesus quando ele ainda era um menino. Ninguém sabia ao certo por que Ictis foi chamado um empório que significa lugar de mercado, mas sabe-se agora que, dentro desta ilha é um cofre antigo usado originalmente para o estanho de armazenamento pelos mineiros antigos, mas na época os romanos invadiram a Grã-Bretanha este veio cada vez mais difícil manter em segredo para que José comprou esta ilha com a abóbada de estanho enorme dentro dela. O corpo de Jesus ainda está para ser descoberto dentro da Ilha. É por isso que os evangelhos dizem três fatos pertinentes, o túmulo pertencia a José, que era um túmulo cortou-se que nenhum outro homem havia se deitado no antes e no que era um pano branco. Isto é o que os evangelhos concordam em cima, mas eles não deixam em que o local da tumba é na Inglaterra. Na verdade Estrabão outros estados cronista que um capitão correu o barco nas pedras ao invés de ceder a posição ilhas para os romanos e acontece que junto a esta ilha temos os únicos dois naufrágios marítimos da indústria do estanho antigo. Este é o lugar onde o maior cache de lingotes de estanho foi encontrado apenas um par de quilômetros de ictis.Melkin um profeta e monge que viveu em aproximadamente 450 a 650AD escreveu uma profecia muito estranho em latim, que até agora tem permanecido um pedaço obscuro da literatura que dá instruções para o local de sepultamento de José de Arimatéia. Joseph é suposto ter com ele o que é pensado para ser o Santo Graal com ele onde ele está enterrado na ilha de Avalon.Por muitos anos, os caçadores do Graal ter assumido que o Graal e mentira Joseph em Glastonbury, mas a profecia foi dada na forma de um quebra-cabeça e, recentemente, esse enigma foi desbloqueado e agora é revelado em um livro chamado "E aqueles pés '. O livro "E aqueles pés 'é o nome do poema escrito por William Blake, que como a maioria dos britânicos sabem é o hino de Jerusalém, que fala da Nova Jerusalém existente na Grã-Bretanha e faz a pergunta" se os pés de Jesus caminhar sobre pastagens agradáveis ​​da Inglaterra verde. Bem, agora temos a resposta, porque Jesus é enterrado nesta ilha ao lado de José de Arimatéia.O profeta melkin visitou o túmulo após o rei Arthur foi enterrado lá e deixou estas instruções para a posteridade que possamos descobrir seu túmulo e chama a ilha a ilha de Avalon.Ilha de Avalon, cobiçando os pagãos na morte, sobre todos os outros (locais) no mundo, porque eles têm o seu sepultamento lá e é homenageado por um círculo que anuncia de uma profecia (e este círculo é o círculo de pedras de Avebury). Em seguida, ele continua a dizer que, no futuro da ilha será adornado por aqueles que louvam a maior e 'Abbadare' (que traduzido significa pérola do pai, que é, naturalmente, Jesus), poderoso em julgamento o mais nobre dos estrangeiros dorme 104 milhas náuticas a partir de Avebury, e por quem ele recebeu o enterro à beira-mar de José, que tem o nome de Arimatéia, e ele também teve seu descanso eterno lá, e eles ficam na forquilha sul de uma linha 'meridional bifurcado "em um ângulo em um Tor costeira, em uma cratera, acima do qual se pode deslocar-se a extremidade da beira como já foi preparada no alto Ictis. esta tumba é agora a sua habitação e está localizado a 13 graus a partir do st. Michael linha ley.Isto é o que melkin nos diz e é colocado para fora, palavra por palavra, para que a profecia pode ser plenamente compreendido no livro E aqueles pés. Clique no link acima.Os Templários construído uma variedade de igrejas, dedicada a São Miguel que compõem o St Michael linha ley e, como montagem de St Michael em Cornwall esta pequena ilha tinha uma Igreja St Michael sobre isso, mas é bom pai 1/15 do século monge jesuíta que confirma esta posição que nos diz que José de Arimatéia é "cuidadosamente ocultos" em Montalvânia e você pode ver que a linha passa por St.Michaels colina onde uma vez também havia uma igreja dedicada a ele exatamente 104 milhas em uma linha que é bifurcado em graus treze e Runs Through MONTECUTE. Muitos estudiosos e historiadores que lidaram com o material de Glastonbury dizer o Melkin foi uma invenção do século twelvth ou XIII. Isso simplesmente não é verdade e esta posição é apenas chegou, porque ninguém foi capaz de decifrar Profecia Melkin antes da era atual. Pergunte a si mesmo, por que alguém iria fazer um quebra-cabeça que ninguém conseguia entender ainda todos os detalhes que são tão precisas e chumbo para a ilha muito chamado na profecia. Não só Melkin escrever o original do livro Graal que estabelece a localização da Ilha, mas Leonardo Da Vinci estava ciente de que esta ilha foi, e também nos disse que em suas pinturas da Madonna e da Yarnwinder ele iria nos mostrar onde esta ilha. Pintou dois quadros Yarnwinder que mostram exatamente onde a localização geográfica é. Podemos ver se fundir as duas pinturas que sabemos ter sido pintado por ele, ele dá a cada detalhe geográfico que localiza a ilha de Avalon como a atual Burgh ilha Devon, que também podemos ver esta mesma perspectiva no Google Earth.Esta é uma história complicada, mas é revelado neste novo livro esclarecedor e que dá provas de como a ilha tornou-se conhecida como a ilha de Sarras nas histórias do Graal e como o Sudário de Turim é de fato o verdadeiro pano túmulo de jesus visto por Melkin e que ele se referiu a ele como o "Duo Fassula '.Na verdade, você pode ver a descrição latin Melkin coincide com a mortalha completamente se entendermos que o seu enigma da Fassula Duo é realmente um fasciola Duplico ou pano dobrado sepultura, porque diz que ....Habet enim secum Ioseph em sarcophago duo fassula alba & argentea, cruore prophete Jhesu & sudore perimpleta: José tem com ele no sarcófago um pano branco dobrado swaddling coberto com o sangue e suor do profeta Jesus, que foi dobrado em torno dele.Os Templários que construíram as igrejas St.Michael para marcar este túmulo enterrado seu tesouro na ilha no dia de Natal em 1307 depois de chegar em três navios do tesouro. Como eles descarregaram o tesouro e antes que fechou o túmulo pela última vez um deles, (provavelmente Geoffrey de Charney) removeu o Sudário de Jesus do túmulo que está atualmente em exibit em Turim.Corpo do Rei Arthur também foi enterrado nesta ilha e é aqui que ele chegou a procurar um milagre para curar seus ferimentos fatais depois da batalha de seu reino, como ele sabia que Jesus foi enterrado dentro dele. Goeffrey de Monmouth também relata que Arthur é enterrado na ilha de Avalon, mas é Melkin que confirma temos o local certo ao dizer a palavra significa Supradictis no alto IctisE aqueles pés por Michael Goldsworthy, é um livro revelador com todos os mapas e as provas que explica como é que, o que ficou conhecido como a arca Graal nos romances do Graal contém o corpo de Jesus e confirma como a imagem no Sudário de Turim foi formulado em óleo de cedro. O mistério agora é descoberto, mas o que o mundo vai aprender com esta revelação do túmulo nesta ilha sagrada e qual será o efeito da descoberta desta tumba e seu conteúdo em todas as religiões atuais importantes.Este é um livro emocionante lançado em ebook ou em brochura e está cheio de excelentes fotografias e diagramas que fornecem evidências.
















Остров Авалон и остров Sarras никогда не были в Гластонбери

$
0
0


В древние времена около 350 до н.э. греческий навигатор, который посетил Великобританию пишет журнал, и в нем он описал остров, где был произведен олова и назвал его рыбой острова или в переводе с гречес


Insula auallonis auida funere paganorum, pre ceteris in orbe ad sepulturam eorum omnium sperulis propheciae vaticinantibus decorata, & in futurum ornata erit altissimum laudantibus. Abbadare, potens in Saphat, paganorum nobilissimus, cum centum et quatuor milibus domiicionem ibi accepit. Inter quos ioseph de marmore, ab Armathia nomine, cepit sompnum perpetuum; Et iacet in linea bifurcata iuxta meridianum angulum oratori, cratibus praeparatis, super potentem adorandam virginem, supradictis  sperulatis locum habitantibus tredecim. Habet enim secum Ioseph in sarcophago duo fassula alba & argentea, cruore prophete Jhesu & sudore perimpleta. Cum reperietur ejus sarcofagum, integrum illibatum in futuris videbitur, & erit apertum toto orbi terrarium. Ex tunc aqua, nec ros coeli insulam nobilissimam habitantibus poterit deficere. Per multum tempus ante diem Judioialem in iosaphat erunt aperta haec, & viventibus declarata. 
  Hucusque melkinus.кого Ichthys, Ichthus и Ikhthus к острову Ictis. Этот остров был окружен Сардины в определенное время года, поэтому его имя. Олово торговли, которая существовала с 1000bc через финикийских торговцев позже прокомментировал латинского имени летописец Диодор и его комментарии по англичане что.
Жителей, живущих вблизи мыса Великобритании, известный как Belerium, мой олова и, когда она растворила его в оловянных слитков, они несут его в какой-нибудь остров, который находится вне Великобритании, и называется Ictis. Ибо в это отступает прилива, пространство между этим островом и материком остается сухой, а затем их можно передать банку в больших количествах на остров на вагоны.
Это остров Бург острова S.Devon с песком дамбу, что высыхает отлива, на котором тележки олова упоминается Пифей были сбиты из южных Дартмур через Loddiswell на древний трек корзину. Только "Линч контактный" от одного из этих вагонов обнаружили в Девоне и Корнуолле от эпохи Пифей "был найден на этой же трассе из Дартмур на Ictis. Они путешествовали по дороге в приливной Aveton Гиффорд, чтобы достигнуть острова Ictis
Как многие знают существует легенда, в Корнуолле, что Иосиф Аримафейский дяди Иисуса была Тина купца и, что он пришел на этот берег, чтобы забрать олово с Иисусом, когда он был еще мальчиком. Никто не был уверен, почему Ictis называется Emporium, что означает рынок, но теперь известно, что в течение этого острова является старый свод первоначально использовался для хранения олова старые шахтеры, но во времена римляне вторглись в Великобритании это стало все труднее держать в тайне столь Иосиф купил этот остров с огромным сводом олова в нем. Тело Иисуса до сих пор не обнаружены в Острове. Вот почему Евангелие относятся три относящихся к делу фактов, гробница принадлежала Иосифу было выкопал могилу, что никакой другой мужчина лежал в перед и в нем была белая ткань. Это то, что Евангелие от согласны, но они не позволяют на этом сайте могила находится в Англии.
На самом деле Страбон другой летописец утверждает, что капитан провел лодку на скалах, а не отдавать положение острова римлянами и так уж случилось, что рядом с этим островом у нас есть только два морских обломки древних промышленности олово. Это где самый большой кэш олова слитки были обнаружены только в нескольких милях от ictis.Melkin пророка и монах, который жил примерно в 450 650AD написал очень странные пророчества на латинском языке, который до сих пор остается неясным часть литературы, которая дает направления для захоронения Иосифа Аримафейского. Иосиф, как предполагается, с ним то, что считается Святой Грааль с ним, где он похоронен на острове Авалон.На протяжении многих лет Грааль охотники считали, что Грааль и Иосиф лежат в Гластонбери, а пророчество было дано в виде головоломки и недавно эта загадка была разблокирована, и сейчас проявляется в книге под названием «И ли эти ноги.
В книге «И ли эти ноги" названа в честь стихотворения Уильяма Блейка, который, как большинство британцев знают, гимн Иерусалима, в котором говорится о Новом Иерусалиме, существующих в Великобритании и задает вопрос: "Иисус" ногами ходить по приятным пастбища Англии зеленый. Ну, теперь у нас есть ответ, потому что Иисус был похоронен в этом острове у Иосифа Аримафейского.Пророк melkin посетил могилу после того, как король Артур был похоронен там и оставил эти направления для будущих поколений, чтобы мы могли раскрыть его могилы и вызывает острова на остров Авалон.
Остров Авалон, зависти язычников к смерти, выше всех остальных (места) в мире, потому что у них есть захоронения там, и это большая честь кругом, что предвещает о пророчестве (и этот круг каменный круг Эйвбери). Затем говорится, что в будущем на острове будет украшен те, которые дают похвалу на самом высоком и «Abbadare» (что в переводе означает жемчужина отца, который, конечно, Иисус), сильный в решении самых благородных тех иностранцев, спит 104 морских миль от Эйвбери, и кем он получил погребения в море Иосифа, который назван в честь Аримафейского, и он также принимал его вечный покой там, и они лежат на южном вилка "раздвоенные меридиональной« линии в угол на береговой Tor, в кратере, над которыми можно пойти на оконечности грань, как это было уже подготовлено высоко в Ictis. эта могила сейчас их обитания и расположен в 13 градусах от ул. Майкл силовых линий.Это то, что melkin говорит нам, и он выложил слово в слово так, что пророчество может быть полностью понят в книге, и те же ноги. Нажмите на ссылку выше.Тамплиеры построили множество церквей всех посвященный Св. Михаила, которая включает Михайловском силовых линий и, как гора Святого Майкла в Корнуолле этом маленьком острове была церковь святого Михаила на это, но он является отцом Хорошо пятнадцатого века иезуитский монах, который подтверждает эту позицию , который говорит нам, что Иосиф Аримафейский является "тщательно скрытые" в Montacute и вы можете видеть, что линия проходит через St.Michaels холме, где когда-то стояли также церковь, посвященная его ТОЧНО 104 милях от линии, которая раздвоенный в тринадцать степеней и Пробегает MONTECUTE.
Многие ученые и историки, которые занимались рассмотрением материалов Гластонбери сказать Melkin было изобретение twelvth или тринадцатого века. Это просто неправда, и это положение только прибыл в потому что никто не сумел расшифровать пророчества Melkin перед нынешней эпохи. Спросите себя, зачем кому-то сделать пазл, что никто не мог понять, но все детали в ней настолько точны, что приведет к очень остров назван в пророчестве.
Не только Melkin писать оригинальные книги Грааль, который устанавливает местонахождение этого острова, но Леонардо да Винчи знал, где этот остров, а также сообщил нам, что в его картинах Мадонны и yarnwinder он покажет нам, где это Остров. Он написал две картины, которые Yarnwinder показать, где именно географическое положение. Мы можем увидеть, если мы объединить две картины, которые мы знаем должны быть написаны, он дает каждому географическому деталь, которая расположена на острове Авалон, как и по сей день остров Бург в Девоне который мы видим тот же взгляд на Google Планета Земля.Это сложная история, но она проявляется в этой новой и просветительских книг, что свидетельствует о том, как этот остров стал известен как остров Sarras в истории Грааля и как Туринской плащаницы, на самом деле реальных серьезных тканью Иисус видел Melkin и что он назвал его "Duo Fassula.На самом деле можно увидеть латинские описание Melkin в соответствующий кожух полностью, если мы понимаем, что его загадку Duo Fassula действительно Duplico фасциола или удвоить над могилой ткани, потому что он говорит, что ....
Habet эним secum Иосиф в sarcophago дуэт fassula Альба и argentea, cruore Prophete Jhesu и sudore perimpleta:
Джозеф имеет с ним в саркофаге удвоил белый пеленания ткань покрыта кровью и потом пророка Иисуса, что сложилась вокруг него.
Тамплиеров, который построил Михайловский церкви в честь этого захоронения хоронили своих сокровищ на острове на Рождество в 1307 году после прибытия в трех кораблей сокровище. Когда они разгрузили сокровища и, прежде чем они закрыли гробницу в последний раз один из них (вероятно, Жоффруа де Чарни) удалена Плащаницы Иисуса из гроба, который в настоящее время в выставочном в Турине.
Тело короля Артура был похоронен в этом острове, и именно здесь, что он пришел посмотреть на чудо, чтобы вылечить его смертельных ран после боя в его царство, как он знал, что Иисус был похоронен в ней. Goeffrey Монмутский также рассказывает, что Артур был похоронен на острове Авалон, но это Melkin который подтверждает, что мы вправе месте, говоря слово Supradictis означает, высоко в IctisИ те ли ноги Майкла Goldsworthy, является показательным книга со всеми картами и доказательств того, что объясняет, как она заключается в том, что было известно как Грааль в ковчег Грааля романсы содержит Иисуса телом и подтверждает, насколько изображение на Туринской плащаницы была сформулирована в кедровом масле. Тайна раскрыта, но теперь то, что мир будет извлечь из этого открытия гробницы в этот священный остров и каким будет эффект от открытия этой могиле и его содержание на всех основных религий сегодня.
Это захватывающая книга выпущена книга в мягкой обложке или и полный отличные фотографии и диаграммы, которые предоставляют доказательства.

la isla de Avalon y la isla de Sarras nunca estuvieron en Glastonbury

$
0
0





Insula auallonis auida funere paganorum, pre ceteris in orbe ad sepulturam eorum omnium sperulis propheciae vaticinantibus decorata, & in futurum ornata erit altissimum laudantibus. Abbadare, potens in Saphat, paganorum nobilissimus, cum centum et quatuor milibus domiicionem ibi accepit. Inter quos ioseph de marmore, ab Armathia nomine, cepit sompnum perpetuum; Et iacet in linea bifurcata iuxta meridianum angulum oratori, cratibus praeparatis, super potentem adorandam virginem, supradictis  sperulatis locum habitantibus tredecim. Habet enim secum Ioseph in sarcophago duo fassula alba & argentea, cruore prophete Jhesu & sudore perimpleta. Cum reperietur ejus sarcofagum, integrum illibatum in futuris videbitur, & erit apertum toto orbi terrarium. Ex tunc aqua, nec ros coeli insulam nobilissimam habitantibus poterit deficere. Per multum tempus ante diem Judioialem in iosaphat erunt aperta haec, & viventibus declarata. 
  Hucusque melkinus.En la antigüedad, alrededor de 350 aC, un navegante griego que visitó Gran Bretaña escribió un diario y en él se describe una isla donde se produjo el estaño y la llamó Isla del Pescado o en Ichthys griegos, Ichthus y IKHTHUS es decir, la isla de Ictis. Esta isla estaba rodeada de sardinas en ciertas épocas del año, de ahí su nombre. El comercio del estaño que había existido desde el año 1000 aC a través de comerciantes fenicios más tarde fue comentado por un cronista de América nombró a Diodoro y sus comentarios sobre los británicos eran eso. Los habitantes que habitan cerca del promontorio de Gran Bretaña, conocido como Belerium, mina de estaño, y cuando lo han fundido en lingotes de estaño, lo llevan a una isla determinada, que se encuentra fuera de Gran Bretaña, y se llama Ictis. Porque en el reflujo de la marea es, el espacio entre esta isla y el continente se deja secar y luego se puede transmitir el estaño en grandes cantidades a la isla en sus vagones. Esta es la isla de Burgh Island en S.Devon con su arena calzada que se seca una marea baja en la que los carros de estaño mencionado por Piteas fueron derribados desde el sur a través de Dartmoor Loddiswell sobre un camino de carro antiguo. El único 'pin Linch' de uno de estos vagones se encuentran en Devon y Cornualles de la época de Piteas fue encontrado en esta misma pista de Dartmoor a Ictis. Viajaron a lo largo de un camino de marea en Aveton Gifford para llegar a la Isla de IctisComo muchos saben que hay una leyenda en Cornwall que José de Arimatea, tío de Jesús era un comerciante de estaño y que llegó a esta costa para recoger la lata con Jesús cuando él todavía era un niño. Nadie estaba muy seguro de por qué se llamaba Ictis un emporio que significa mercado, pero ahora se sabe que dentro de esta isla es una bóveda de edad utilizado originalmente para el estaño, el almacenamiento de los antiguos mineros, pero en la época de los romanos invadieron Gran Bretaña esto se produjo cada vez más difícil mantener en secreto lo que José compró esta isla con la bóveda de estaño enorme dentro de ella. El cuerpo de Jesús aún no se ha descubierto en la isla. Esta es la razón por los evangelios se refieren los tres hechos pertinentes, la tumba perteneció a José, que era una tumba cavaron para sí que ningún otro hombre había estado antes y en que era una tela blanca. Esto es lo que los evangelios de acuerdo a, pero no dejan de que el sitio de la tumba se encuentra en Inglaterra. De hecho Estrabón otro cronista de los estados que un capitán dirigió su barco en las rocas en lugar de ceder la posición de las islas a los romanos y da la casualidad de que junto a esta isla tenemos los dos únicos restos de naufragios marítimos de la industria del estaño antiguo. Aquí es donde el mayor alijo de lingotes de estaño se encontró sólo un par de millas de Ictis.Melkin un profeta y un monje que vivió en alrededor de 450 a 650AD escribió una profecía muy extraño en América, que hasta ahora se ha mantenido una pieza oscura de la literatura que da instrucciones para llegar al lugar del entierro de José de Arimatea. José se supone que tiene con él lo que se piensa que es el Santo Grial con él donde él está enterrado en la isla de Avalon.Durante muchos años, los cazadores del Grial ha supuesto que el Grial y la mentira José en Glastonbury, pero la profecía fue dada en forma de un rompecabezas y, recientemente, este enigma ha sido desbloqueado y ahora se revela en un libro llamado 'e hizo esos pies ". El libro 'e hizo esos pies los lleva el nombre del poema de William Blake, que como la mayoría de los británicos saben es el himno de Jerusalén, que habla de la Nueva Jerusalén que existe en Gran Bretaña y plantea la pregunta' qué los pies de Jesús caminar sobre los pastos agradables de Inglaterra verde. Bueno, ahora tenemos la respuesta, porque Jesús está enterrado en esta isla al lado de José de Arimatea.El profeta Melkin visitó la tumba después de la del rey Arturo fue enterrado allí y dejó para la posteridad estas instrucciones para que podamos descubrir su tumba y llama a la isla de la isla de Avalon.Isla de Avalon, la codicia de los paganos en la muerte, sobre todos los demás (lugares) en el mundo, porque ellos tienen su sepultura allí y que es reconocido por un círculo que presagia una profecía (y este círculo es el círculo de piedra de Avebury). A continuación, pasa a decir que en el futuro de la isla será adornado por las que dar gracias a la más alta y 'Abbadare "(que traducido significa perla del padre, que es, por supuesto, Jesús), poderoso en el juicio el más noble de los extranjeros duerme 104 millas náuticas de Avebury, y por quien recibió sepultura en el mar de José, que lleva el nombre de Arimatea, y él también ha tenido su eterno descanso allí, y que se encuentran en el sur de tenedor de una "bifurcación meridional" línea en un ángulo en un Tor costera, en un cráter, por encima del cual se puede ir en la extremidad de punto, ya que se preparó ya lo alto de Ictis. esta tumba es ahora su vivienda y se encuentra a 13 grados de la st. Michael Ley línea.Esto es lo que nos dice Melkin y se presenta palabra por palabra, de modo que la profecía puede ser plenamente comprendido en el libro ¿Y esos pies. Haga clic en el enlace de arriba.Los templarios construyeron una serie de iglesias de todo dedicadas a San Miguel, que comprenden el de San Miguel de línea Ley y al igual que el Monte de San Miguel en Cornualles esta pequeña isla tenía una iglesia de San Miguel en él, pero es el padre bueno un siglo XV monje jesuita que confirma esta posición que nos dice que José de Arimatea es "cuidadosamente ocultado" en Montería y se puede ver que la línea pasa a través de St.Michaels colina donde una vez allí también había una iglesia dedicada a él exactamente 104 millas en una línea que se bifurca de trece grados y Runs Through Montecute. Muchos eruditos e historiadores que han tratado con el material de Glastonbury dicen que el Melkin fue una invención del siglo doceavo o XIII. Esto simplemente no es verdad y esta posición sólo se llegó a porque nadie ha sido capaz de descifrar la profecía Melkin antes de la era actual. Pregúntate a ti mismo, ¿por qué alguien haría un rompecabezas que nadie podría entender sin embargo, todos los detalles en que son tan precisas y llevar a la isla muy nombrado en la profecía. No sólo Melkin escribir el original del libro del Grial, que establece la ubicación de esta isla, pero Leonardo Da Vinci era consciente de que esta isla era y también nos dijo que en sus pinturas de la Virgen y la Rueca él nos muestre donde esta es esta isla. Él pintó dos cuadros que muestran Rueca exactamente donde la ubicación geográfica es. Podemos ver si podemos combinar los dos cuadros que conocemos para ser pintado por él, le da a cada detalle geográfico que se sitúa la isla de Avalon como el presente día Burgh Island en Devon, que también podemos ver esta misma perspectiva en Google Earth.Esta es una historia complicada, pero se revela en este libro nuevo y esclarecedor que da evidencia de cómo esta isla llegó a ser conocido como la isla de Sarras en las historias del Grial y de cómo la Sábana Santa de Turín es la tela, de hecho, verdadera tumba de Jesús visto por Melkin y que se refería a él como el "Fassula Duo".De hecho, usted puede ver la descripción latina Melkin coincide con la cubierta por completo si entendemos que el enigma de la Fassula Duo es realmente una fasciola Duplico o duplicado en tela de grave porque se dice que ....Habet enim SECUM Ioseph en sarcophago dúo fassula alba y argentea, cruore prophete Jhesu y perimpleta Sudore: José tiene con él en el sarcófago de una doble tela blanca pañales empapados de la sangre y el sudor de Jesús, el profeta que estaba doblado a su alrededor.Los Templarios, que construyeron las iglesias St.Michael para marcar este sitio de la tumba enterrado su tesoro en la isla el día de Navidad en 1307 después de llegar en tres barcos del tesoro. A medida que se descarga el tesoro y antes de que se cerró con un alza de la tumba de la última vez que uno de ellos, (probablemente Godofredo de Charney) que se retiró el sudario de Jesús de la tumba que se encuentra actualmente en exibit en Turín.El cuerpo del rey Arturo también fue enterrado en esta isla y es aquí que él vino a buscar un milagro para curar sus heridas mortales después de la batalla de su reino que él sabía que Jesús fue enterrado en su interior. Goeffrey de Monmouth también se cuenta que Arturo está enterrado en la isla de Avalon, pero es Melkin que confirma que tenemos el lugar correcto al decir la palabra que significa Supradictis en lo alto de IctisE hizo esos pies de Michael Goldsworthy, es un libro revelador con todos los mapas y las pruebas que explican cómo es que, lo que se conoce como el arca del Grial en los romances del Grial contiene el cuerpo de Jesús y confirma cómo la imagen de la Sábana Santa de Turín fue formulado en el aceite de cedro. El misterio ahora está cubierto, pero cómo estará el mundo aprender de este descubrimiento de la tumba en esta isla sagrada y cuál será el efecto del descubrimiento de esta tumba y su contenido en todas las grandes religiones de hoy en día.Este es un libro apasionante publicado el libro electrónico o en libro en rústica y está lleno de excelentes fotografías y diagramas que proporcionan evidencias.




















ön Avalon och ön Sarras var aldrig på Glastonbury

$
0
0



Insula auallonis auida funere paganorum, pre ceteris in orbe ad sepulturam eorum omnium sperulis propheciae vaticinantibus decorata, & in futurum ornata erit altissimum laudantibus. Abbadare, potens in Saphat, paganorum nobilissimus, cum centum et quatuor milibus domiicionem ibi accepit. Inter quos ioseph de marmore, ab Armathia nomine, cepit sompnum perpetuum; Et iacet in linea bifurcata iuxta meridianum angulum oratori, cratibus praeparatis, super potentem adorandam virginem, supradictis  sperulatis locum habitantibus tredecim. Habet enim secum Ioseph in sarcophago duo fassula alba & argentea, cruore prophete Jhesu & sudore perimpleta. Cum reperietur ejus sarcofagum, integrum illibatum in futuris videbitur, & erit apertum toto orbi terrarium. Ex tunc aqua, nec ros coeli insulam nobilissimam habitantibus poterit deficere. Per multum tempus ante diem Judioialem in iosaphat erunt aperta haec, & viventibus declarata. 
  Hucusque melkinus.

I forna tider runt 350 f.Kr. en grekisk navigator som besökte Storbritannien skrev en dagbok och i den han beskrev en ö där tenn producerades och han kallade det fisk ö eller på grekiska Ichthys, Ichthus och Ikhthus dvs ön Ictis. Denna ö var omgiven av sardiner vid vissa tider på året därav namnet. Den tenn handel som funnits sedan 1000bc genom feniciska handlare senare kommenteras av en latinsk krönikör heter Diodorus och hans kommentarer på den brittiska var att.
De invånare som bor nära udden av Storbritannien, som kallas Belerium, min tenn och när de har smält den i tenn tackor, de bär den till en viss ö, som ligger utanför Storbritannien, och kallas Ictis. För vid ebbar är av tidvattnet, är utrymmet mellan denna ö och fastlandet lämnade torra och sedan kan förmedla tenn i stora mängder över till ön på sina vagnar.
Detta är ön Burgh Island i S.Devon med sand gångbro som torkar ut en lågvatten på vilken vagnarna av tenn som nämns av Pytheas fördes ner från södra Dartmoor via Loddiswell på en gammal cart bana. Den enda "Linch pin" från en av dessa vagnar finns i Devon och Cornwall från pytheas "ERA hittades på samma spår från Dartmoor till Ictis. De färdades längs en tidvatten väg i Aveton Gifford för att nå ön Ictis
Eftersom många är medveten om att det är en legend i Cornwall att Josef från Arimataia Jesu farbror var en burk köpman och att han kom till den här kusten för att plocka upp burk med Jesus när han fortfarande var en pojke. Ingen var riktigt säker på varför Ictis kallades en Emporium, vilket innebär marknaden, men det är nu känt att det inom denna ö är ett gammalt valv som ursprungligen användes för att lagra tenn av de gamla gruvarbetarna, men runt den tid då romarna invaderade Storbritannien detta kom allt svårare att hemlighålla Josef köpte denna ö med den enorma tenn valvet i den. Jesu kropp är ännu inte upptäckt i Island. Det är därför evangelierna avser tre relevanta fakta, tillhörde graven till Josef, var det en högg sig grav som ingen annan människa hade legat i före och det var en vit duk. Detta är vad evangelierna instämmer på men de har inte låtsas om att graven platsen är i England.
I själva verket Strabo annat krönikören anges att en kapten körde sin båt på klipporna hellre än att ge bort öarna position till romarna och det råkar vara så att intill denna ö har vi bara två maritima vrak från den antika tenn branschen. Det är där den största cache tenn göt hittades bara ett par miles från ictis.Melkin en profet och munk som levde i ca 450 till 650AD skrev en mycket märklig profetia på latin, som fram till nu har varit en obskyr del av litteratur som ger anvisningar till gravplats för Josef från Arimataia. Josef är tänkt att ha med honom vad som tros vara den heliga Graal med honom där han är begravd på ön Avalon.Under många år Graal jägare har antagit att Graal och Josef ligger på Glastonbury, men profetian gavs i form av ett pussel och nyligen denna gåta har låsts upp och nu avslöjas i en bok som heter "Och gjort dessa Feet".
Boken "Och gjort dessa fötter" har fått sitt namn efter den dikt skriven av William Blake, som de flesta britter vet är hymnen i Jerusalem, som talar om Nya Jerusalem som finns i Storbritannien och ställer frågan "var Jesu fötter gå på Englands trevliga betesmarker grönt. Ja nu har vi svaret eftersom Jesus är begravd i denna ö bredvid Josef från Arimataia.Profeten melkin besökte grav efter kung Arthur begravdes där och lämnat dessa anvisningar för eftervärlden att vi skulle avslöja hans grav plats och kallar ön ön Avalon.
Ön Avalon, åtrå hedningarna i döden, framför alla andra (platser) i världen, eftersom de har sin begravning där och det är hedras av en cirkel som förebådar en sia (och detta cirkel är sten cirkel av Avebury). Den fortsätter sedan med att säga att i framtiden ön kommer att smyckas av dem som ger beröm till den högsta och "Abbadare" (vilket översatt betyder Faderns pärla, som ju är Jesus) mäktig i dom ädlaste av dessa utlänningar sover 104 nautiska miles från Avebury, och av vem han fått gravsättning vid havet Josef som är uppkallad efter Arimataia, och han har också tagit sin eviga vila där, och de ligger på södra gaffeln av en "tvådelad meridionala" linje i en vinkel på en kust Tor, i en krater, över vilken man kan gå i änden på väg eftersom det redan förberett högt upp i Ictis. denna grav är nu deras bostad och ligger 13 grader från st. Michael Ley line.Detta är vad melkin berättar och det läggs ut ord för ord, så att profetian helt kan förstås i boken och gjorde dessa fötter. Klicka på länken ovan.Tempelriddarna byggde en rad kyrkor dedikerade till St Michael som omfattar St Michael vall linje och som St Michael montering i Cornwall denna lilla ö har en St Michael kyrka på det men det är far bra 1/15 talet jesuit munk som bekräftar denna position som berättar att Josef från Arimataia är "försiktigt dolda" i Montacute och du kan se att linjen går genom St.Michaels kulle där det en gång också stod en kyrka tillägnad honom exakt 104 mil på en linje som är tudelad vid TRETTON grader och flyter fram MONTECUTE.
Många forskare och historiker som har behandlat med Glastonbury materialet sagt Melkin var en uppfinning av Tolfte eller trettonde århundradet. Detta är helt enkelt inte sant och denna position endast kom till eftersom ingen har kunnat tolka Melkin profetia före den aktuella tiden. Fråga dig själv, varför skulle någon göra ett pussel som ingen kunde förstå men alla detaljer i den är så exakt och leder till den mycket ön heter i profetian.
Inte nog med Melkin skriva original Graal bok som fastställer platsen för denna ö, men Leonardo Da Vinci var medveten om var denna ö var och dessutom berättade att i hans målningar av Madonnan och yarnwinder han skulle visa oss där detta Ön är. Han målade två Yarnwinder målningar som visar exakt var det geografiska läget är. Vi kan se om vi slå ihop de två målningar som vi vet skall målas av honom, ger han varje geografisk detalj som placerar ön Avalon som dagens Burgh Island i Devon där vi kan också se samma perspektiv på Google Earth.Detta är en komplicerad historia, men det är uppenbarat i denna nya och upplysande bok som ger bevis på hur denna ö blev känd som ön Sarras i Graal historier och hur Turin höljet är i själva verket den verkliga graven tyg jesus ses av Melkin och att han hänvisade till det som "Duo Fassula".Faktum är att du kan se Melkin latinska beskrivning matchar manteln helt om vi förstår att hans gåta Duo Fassula är verkligen en Duplico Fasciola eller fördubblats under graven trasa, eftersom det sägs att ....
Habet enim secum Ioseph i sarcophago duo fassula alba & argentea, cruore prophete Jhesu & sudore perimpleta:
Joseph har med honom i sarkofagen en fördubblad vit linda duk täckt med blod och svett profeten Jesus som veks omkring honom.
Tempelriddarna som byggde St.Michael kyrkorna för att markera denna gravplats begravde sina skatter på ön på juldagen år 1307 efter ankomsten till tre treasure fartyg. När de lossas skatten och innan de stängde upp graven för sista gången en av dem, (förmodligen Geoffrey de Charney) bort Dölja av Jesus från graven, som är närvarande på exibit i Turin.
Kung Arthur kropp begravdes också inom denna ö och det är här som han kom för att leta efter ett mirakel för att bota hans dödliga sår efter striden för hans rike som han visste att Jesus begravdes i den. Goeffrey av Monmouth berättar också att Arthur är begravd på ön Avalon men det är Melkin som bekräftar att vi har rätt plats genom att säga ordet Supradictis mening högt i IctisOch gjorde dessa fötter av Michael Goldsworthy är en avslöjande bok med alla kartor och bevis som förklarar hur det är att den så kallade Graal arken i Graal romanser innehåller Jesus kropp och bekräftar hur bilden på Turin höljet formulerades i Cedar olja. Mysteriet är nu avtäckt men vad blir det världen lära av detta avtäckningen av graven på denna heliga ön och vad som kommer att vara effekten av upptäckten av denna grav och dess innehåll på alla de stora religionerna idag.
Detta är en spännande bok släpps på ebook eller i pocket och är full av utmärkta fotografier och diagram som ger bevis.

otok Avalon i Otok Sarras nikada nisu bili na Glastonbury

$
0
0



Insula auallonis auida funere paganorum, pre ceteris in orbe ad sepulturam eorum omnium sperulis propheciae vaticinantibus decorata, & in futurum ornata erit altissimum laudantibus. Abbadare, potens in Saphat, paganorum nobilissimus, cum centum et quatuor milibus domiicionem ibi accepit. Inter quos ioseph de marmore, ab Armathia nomine, cepit sompnum perpetuum; Et iacet in linea bifurcata iuxta meridianum angulum oratori, cratibus praeparatis, super potentem adorandam virginem, supradictis  sperulatis locum habitantibus tredecim. Habet enim secum Ioseph in sarcophago duo fassula alba & argentea, cruore prophete Jhesu & sudore perimpleta. Cum reperietur ejus sarcofagum, integrum illibatum in futuris videbitur, & erit apertum toto orbi terrarium. Ex tunc aqua, nec ros coeli insulam nobilissimam habitantibus poterit deficere. Per multum tempus ante diem Judioialem in iosaphat erunt aperta haec, & viventibus declarata. 
  Hucusque melkinus.




http://isleofavallon.blogspot.co.uk #3

U davna vremena oko 350. godine prije Krista grčki moreplovac koji je posjetio Britaniju napisao dnevnik iu njemu je opisao jedan otok gdje je tin je izrađeno i on je to nazivao riba ili otok u grčkim Ichthys, Ichthus i Ikhthus odnosno otoka Ictis. Ovaj otok je okružen srdela u određeno doba godine odatle i njezino ime. Tin trgovina koja je postojala od 1000bc kroz feničkom trgovaca Kasnije je komentirao po po Latinskoj kroničar imenom Diodor i njegove komentare o Britancima koji su bili. Stanovnici koji žive u blizini rta Britanije, poznat kao Belerium, rudnika kositra i kada su ga otopili u limenim ingota, oni ga nose do određene otoka, koji se nalazi izvan Britanije, a zove se Ictis. Za na ebbing je od plime, prostor između ovog otoka i kopna ostaje suha i onda oni mogu prenijeti kositra u velikim količinama preko otoka na svojim vagonima. To je otok Pittsburgh otoka u S.Devon sa svojim pješčanim nasipom koji presušuje za oseke na kojoj su kolica od kositra spominje tvrdi i Piteja su odmaknu od južne Dartmoor kroz Loddiswell na drevnom kolni put. Samo 'osigurač' iz jedne od tih vagona se nalaze u Devon i Cornwall od tvrdi i Piteja To doba je pronađen na ovoj istoj stazi od Dartmoor na Ictis. Putovali su zajedno plimnog ceste u Aveton Gifford do otok IctisKao i mnogi su svjesni da je legenda u Cornwallu da je Josip od Arimateje Isusova ujaka je Tin trgovac i da je došao na ovoj obali pokupiti kositra s Isusom dok je još bio dječak. Nitko nije sasvim sigurni zašto Ictis zvao Emporium što znači tržnicu, ali sada je poznato da se u ovom otoku je stara sef izvorno se koristi za spremanje kositra po starim rudarima, ali u vrijeme kada su Rimljani izvršili invaziju na Britaniju se to dogodi sve teže držati u tajnosti, tako Joseph kupio ovaj otok sa velikom limenom sefu u njemu. Isusovo tijelo je još da budu otkrivene unutar otoka. To je razlog zašto evanđelja odnose tri važne činjenice, grobnica pripadala Josipu je iskopao grob da ni jedan drugi čovjek je ležalo prije nego i to je bijelo platno. To je ono što Evanđelja se slažu na, ali ne dopustite da na grob site je u Engleskoj. U stvari jedan kroničar Strabon navodi da je kapetan vodio njegov brod na stijenama nego dati otoke poziciju na Rimljana i to samo tako dogodi da pokraj ovog otoka imamo samo dva pomorska olupina iz drevne kositra industriji. Ovo je mjesto gdje je najveća predmemorija ingota kositra pronađen je samo nekoliko milja od ictis.Melkin prorok i redovnik koji je živio oko 450 do 650AD napisao vrlo čudnu proročanstvo na latinskom jeziku, što do sada je ostalo nejasno dio literature koji daje upute na mjesto pokopa Josipa iz Arimateje. Josip Pretpostavlja se da s njim ono što je mislio da je Sveti gral s njim, gdje je pokopan na otoku Avalon.Već dugi niz godina Gral lovci pretpostaviti da Gral i Josip laž na Glastonbury ali proroštva je dano u obliku slagalice i nedavno to zagonetka je otključana, a sada objavio u knjizi pod nazivom 'A su ti noge'. Knjiga 'i učinio Te Feet' je dobio ime po pjesmi koju je napisao William Blake koji kao i većina Britanaca zna je himna u Jeruzalemu, koji govori o Novom Jeruzalemu koji postoje u Velikoj Britaniji i postavlja pitanje 'je Isusove noge hoda po Engleskoj ugodnih pašnjaka zelena. Pa sad imamo odgovor, jer Isus je pokopan u tom otoku pokraj Josipa iz Arimateje.Prorok melkin posjetio grobnicu nakon kralj Arthur pokopan je tamo i ostavio ove upute za buduće naraštaje da bismo mogli otkriti svoje grobnice i poziva otok otok Avalon.Otok Avalon, coveting pogane u smrti, iznad svih ostalih (mjesta) u svijetu, jer oni imaju svoje sahranjivanje tamo i to je poštovan od strane kruga koje portends od prorokuje (i to krug kamen krug Avebury). Nakon toga odlazi na to reći da će u budućnosti otok će biti ukrašena od onih koje daju hvalu najveći i 'Abbadare' (što u prijevodu znači oca biser, koji je naravno Isus) silan u presudi najplemenitije od tih stranaca spava 104 nautičkih milja od Avebury i po kojemu je dobio pogreb uz more od Josipa, koji je dobio ime po Arimateje, a on je također uzeo svoj vječni počinak tamo, i oni leže na južnoj tanjura o 'dvokraki meridionalnim To linije u kut na obalnom Tor, u krateru, iznad koje se može ići u krajnost na rubu, kao što je već pripremljena visoko u Ictis. ovaj grob je sada njihov stan i nalazi se 13 stupnjeva iz sv. Michael Ley linije.To je ono što melkin govori nam i to je legao vanjska strana od riječi do riječi tako da se proročanstvo može se u potpunosti razumio u knjizi i učinio te noge. Kliknite na gornju vezu.U templari izgrađen niz crkava sve posvećene sv Mihovila koji se sastoje od St Michael Ley linije i kao Sv Mihovila gori u Cornwall ovaj mali otok ima crkvu sv Michael na njega, ali to je otac Dobro petnaestog stoljeća isusovački redovnik koji potvrđuje ovu poziciju koji nam govori da je Josip iz Arimateje je "pažljivo skriveno 'u Montacute i možete vidjeti da je linija prolazi kroz St.Michaels brdu gdje i kada stajala crkva posvećena njemu Točno 104 milja na liniju koja JE dvokraki U trinaestoj stupnjeva i prolazi kroz MONTECUTE. Mnogi znanstvenici i povjesničari koji su se bavili na Glastonbury materijala reći Melkin je izum twelvth ili trinaesti stoljeća. To je jednostavno nije istina, a takav stav je samo stigao, jer nitko nije bio u stanju dešifrirati Melkin proročanstvo prije sadašnjeg doba. Zapitajte se zašto bi netko napraviti puzzle da nitko nije mogao razumjeti ali sve detalje u njoj su tako precizni i dovesti do samog otoka navedenoj u proročanstvu. Ne samo da Melkin pisati izvornik Gral knjizi koja se utvrđuje položaj ovog otoka, ali Leonardo da Vinci je bio svjestan gdje je ovaj otok bio je i rekao nam je da u njegovim slikama Madone i yarnwinder će nam pokazati gdje je to Otok je. On je naslikao dvije slike Yarnwinder koji pokazuju točno gdje je geografski položaj. Možemo vidjeti ako mi spojiti dvije slike koje znamo biti obojana po njemu, on daje svaki detalj da je geografski smješta otok Avalon kao današnjeg Pittsburgh otoka Devon u kojima također možete vidjeti istu perspektivu na Google Earth.To je komplicirana priča, ali to se otkriva u ovom novom i poučnim knjizi koja daje dokaze o tome kako ovaj otok postao poznat kao otok u Sarras Gralskih priča i kako je Torino plašt je u stvari pravi grob platno Isusovo vidjeti Melkin i da iz njega kao 'Duo Fassula'.U stvari možete vidjeti Melkin je latinski opis odgovara prekrivač u potpunosti, ako shvatimo da je njegova zagonetka Duo Fassula stvarno Duplico fasciola ili udvostručio groba krpom jer kaže da je ....Habet enim secum Ioseph u sarcophago duo fassula alba i Argentea i cruore prophete Jhesu & sudore perimpleta: Josip je s njim u sarkofagu udvostručio bijeli swaddling tkanina prekrivena krvi i znoja proroka Isusa koji je namotana oko njega.U templari koji su gradili crkve St.Michael označiti ovu grobnice pokopan svoje blago na ovom otoku na Božić u 1307 nakon dolaska u tri blago brodova. Dok su se iskrcali blago i prije nego što zatvori grob po posljednji put jedan od njih, (vjerojatno Geoffrey de Charney) uklonili pokrov Isusa iz groba koji je trenutno na predispoziciju u Torinu.Kralj Arthur tijelo i pokopan u ovom otoku a to je ovdje da je došao tražiti čudo izliječiti svoje fatalne rane poslije bitke za njegovo kraljevstvo je znao da je Isus bio pokopan u njemu. Goeffrey od Monmouth također pripovijeda da je Arthur pokopan na otoku Avalon, ali to je Melkin koji potvrđuje da smo pravo mjesto tako da izgovorite riječ Supradictis znači da se visoko u IctisI su ti noge Michael Goldsworthy, je knjiga otkriva sa svim kartama i dokaza da objašnjava kako je to, što je bio poznat kao Gral Kovčeg u Gral romanca sadrži Isusa tijelo i potvrđuje kako je slika na Torinskom platnu je formulirana u cedrovim uljem. Otajstvo je sada otkrio, ali što će svijet naučiti iz ove otkrivanja grobnice na ovom svetom otoku, a što će biti posljedica otkrića ovog groba i sadržaja na svim većim religijama danas.Ovo je uzbudljiva knjiga objavljena na eBook ili u meki i prepun je izvrsnih fotografija i dijagrama koje pružaju dokaze.






















ostrov Avalon a ostrov Sarras nikdy nebyli v Glastonbury

$
0
0




Insula auallonis auida funere paganorum, pre ceteris in orbe ad sepulturam eorum omnium sperulis propheciae vaticinantibus decorata, & in futurum ornata erit altissimum laudantibus. Abbadare, potens in Saphat, paganorum nobilissimus, cum centum et quatuor milibus domiicionem ibi accepit. Inter quos ioseph de marmore, ab Armathia nomine, cepit sompnum perpetuum; Et iacet in linea bifurcata iuxta meridianum angulum oratori, cratibus praeparatis, super potentem adorandam virginem, supradictis  sperulatis locum habitantibus tredecim. Habet enim secum Ioseph in sarcophago duo fassula alba & argentea, cruore prophete Jhesu & sudore perimpleta. Cum reperietur ejus sarcofagum, integrum illibatum in futuris videbitur, & erit apertum toto orbi terrarium. Ex tunc aqua, nec ros coeli insulam nobilissimam habitantibus poterit deficere. Per multum tempus ante diem Judioialem in iosaphat erunt aperta haec, & viventibus declarata. 
  Hucusque melkinus

V dávných dobách kolem 350 př.nl řecký navigátor, který navštívil Británii napsal deník a v něm popsal ostrov, kde se cín vyrábí a on volal to ryba ostrov, nebo v řeckých Ichthys, Ichthus a Ikhthus tj. ostrově Ictis. Tento ostrov byl obklopen sardinky v určitých obdobích roku proto jeho jméno. Plechová obchod, který existoval od 1000BC přes fénických obchodníků byl později okomentoval latinské kronikáře jmenoval Diodorus a jeho poznámky k Britům bylo, že. Obyvatelé, kteří bydlí v blízkosti mysu Británie, známý jako Belerium a důlní cínu a když se roztavil do cínových ingotů, nesou ji do jisté ostrova, který leží mimo Británii, a je nazýván Ictis. Pro Na klesáním je přílivu, je prostor mezi tímto ostrovem a pevninou vlevo suché a pak mohou zprostředkovat cín ve velkém množství na ostrov na jejich vozech. Je to ostrov Burgh ostrově v S.Devon s pískem hráz, která vede k vysychání v odlivu, na němž byly vozíky z cínu zmínil Pytheas zhroutily z jižní Dartmoor přes Loddiswell na staré trati košíku. Pouze "linch kolík" z jednoho z těchto vozů se nacházejí v Devonu a Cornwallu z éry Pytheas 'byl nalezen na stejné trati z Dartmooru do Ictis. Putovali podél silnice v přílivové Aveton Gifford až na ostrov IctisJak mnozí jsou si vědomi, že je legenda v Cornwallu, že Josef z Arimatie strýcem Ježíšovy byl cín obchodník a že on přišel k tomuto pobřeží vyzvednout plechovku s Ježíšem, když byl ještě chlapec. Nikdo nebyl zcela jist, proč byl nazýván Ictis středisko, což znamená tržní místo, ale to je nyní známo, že v rámci tohoto ostrova je stará klenba původně používán pro ukládání cínu starými horníky, ale v době Římané napadl Británii to přišlo stále obtížnější udržet v tajnosti, takže Joseph koupil tento ostrov s obrovskou plechovou trezoru v něm. Ježíšovo tělo je zatím být objeven v rámci ostrova. To je důvod, proč evangelia se týkají tři relevantní skutečnosti, hrob patřil Josefovi, byl vytesal z hrobky, že žádný jiný muž ležel v před a to bylo bílá látka. To je to, co evangelia se shodují na nich, ale nenechají na tom místě hrob je v Anglii. Ve skutečnosti Strabo další kronikář uvádí, že kapitán loď přejel na skalách a ne vzdát pozice ostrovy pro Římany a jen tak se stane, že vedle tohoto ostrova máme jen dvě námořní vraky z období antického cínu průmyslu. To je místo, kde byla největší cache cínových ingotů nachází jen pár kilometrů od ictis.Melkin prorok a mnich, který žil asi 450 až 650AD napsal velmi zvláštní proroctví v latině, která až doposud zůstala obskurní kousek literatury, který dává pokyny do pohřební místo Josefa z Arimatie. Joseph má mít s sebou to, co je myšlenka být svatý grál s ním, kde je pohřben na ostrově Avalon.Po mnoho let Grálu lovci předpokládá, že grál a Josefa leží v Glastonbury, ale proroctví bylo dáno v podobě puzzle a nedávno tato hádanka byla odemčena, a je nyní odhalen v knize s názvem "A dělal ty nohy". Kniha "A dělal ty nohy To je pojmenované po básni napsal William Blake, který jako většina Britů vím, je hymnou Jeruzalémě, který mluví o Novém Jeruzalémě existuje v Británii, a žádá otázku" si Ježíšovi nohy chodit po příjemném pastviny anglických zelená. No teď máme odpověď, protože Ježíš je pohřben v tomto ostrově vedle Josefa z Arimatie.Prorok melkin navštívil hrobu poté, co král Artuš byl pohřben tam a nechal tyto pokyny pro další generace, které bychom mohli odhalit jeho hrob a volá ostrov ostrov Avalon.Ostrov Avalon, coveting pohany smrt, nad všechny ostatní (místa) na světě, protože oni mají jejich pohřbení tam a to je ctěn v kruhu, který věští z proroctví (a to je kruh kamenný kruh v Avebury). To pak dále říká, že v budoucnu bude ostrov se zdobí ty, které dávají chválu nejvyšší a 'Abbadare "(což v překladu znamená otec je perla, která je samozřejmě Ježíše) mocní v rozsudku nejušlechtilejší z těchto cizinců spí 104 námořních mil od Avebury a kým mu dostávalo pohřeb u moře od Josefa, který je pojmenovaný po Arimatie, a on také vzal svůj věčný odpočinek tam, a oni leží na jižním vidlice o 'Rozdvojené Meridional "line v úhlu na pobřežní Tor, v kráteru, nad kterou se dá jít na výběžku pokraji jak již bylo připraveno vysoko v Ictis. Tento hrob je nyní jejich obydlí a nachází se 13 stupňů od sv. Michael Ley linky.To je to, co nám říká melkin a je vyložen slovo od slova tak, aby proroctví být plně chápán v knize A dělal ty nohy. Klikněte na odkaz výše.Templáři vybudovali řadu kostelů všichni věnují svatého Michala, které tvoří St Michael Ley linku a jako Mount St Michala v Cornwallu tento malý ostrov měl St Michael církev na to, ale je to otec Dobrý patnáctého století jezuitský mnich, který potvrzuje tento postoj , který nám říká, že Josef z Arimatie je "pečlivě ukryty" v Montacute a můžete vidět, že linka prochází St.Michaels kopec, kde kdysi také stál kostel zasvěcený mu přesně 104 MIL NA řádek, který je Rozdvojené Ve třinácti stupňů a projde MONTECUTE. Mnoho učenců a historiků, které se zabývaly materiálu Glastonbury říkají Melkin byl vynález twelvth nebo třinácté století. To prostě není pravda, a tato pozice je jen dorazili, protože nikdo nebyl schopen dešifrovat proroctví Melkin je před dnešní době. Zeptejte se sami sebe, proč by někdo udělat puzzle, které nikdo nerozuměl ještě všechny podrobnosti v něm jsou tak přesné a vedou k samotné ostrov jmenoval v proroctví. Nejen, že Melkin napsat originál knihy Grálu, který stanoví polohu tohoto ostrova, ale Leonardo da Vinci byla vědoma, kde tento ostrov byl, a také nám řekl, že v jeho obrazech madony a yarnwinder, že by nám ukázal, kde to Ostrov je. On maloval dva obrazy, které ukazují Yarnwinder přesně tam, kde je zeměpisná poloha. Můžeme zjistit, jestli jsme sloučit dva obrazy, které víme, že je maloval mu dává každý geografický detail, který lokalizuje ostrov Avalon jako dnešní Burgh ostrově Devon, které můžeme také vidět stejný pohled na Google Earth.Je to komplikovaný příběh, ale to je ukázal, v tomto novém a poučné knihy, která svědčí o tom, jak tento ostrov stal se známý jako ostrov Sarras v příbězích Grálu a jak Turínského plátna je ve skutečnosti skutečný hrob Ježíše hadřík vidět Melkin a že on se odkazoval na něj jak 'Duo Fassula ".Ve skutečnosti můžete vidět Melkin je latinský popis se shoduje s rubáš zcela chápeme-li, že jeho hádanka Duo Fassula je opravdu Duplico Fasciola nebo zdvojnásobil vážného látkou, protože říká, že ....Habet enim secum Ioseph v sarcophago duo fassula alba a argentea a cruore prophete Jhesu & sudore perimpleta: Joseph má s ním v sarkofágu zdvojnásobil bílé swaddling tkaniny pokryté krví a potem z proroka Ježíše, který byl složen kolem něj.Templáři, kteří stavěli kostely Michala označit tento hrob svůj poklad pohřben na tomto ostrově na Štědrý den v roce 1307 poté, co přišel na tři lodě pokladů. Jak se vykládá poklad a před tím, než uzavřel hrobku za poslední dobu jeden z nich, (pravděpodobně Geoffrey de Charney) odstranil rubáš Ježíše z hrobu, který je v současné době na exibit v Turíně.King Arthur tělo bylo pohřbeno také v rámci tohoto ostrova a je to tady, že se přišel podívat na zázrak léčit své fatální rány po bitvě na jeho království, jak věděl, že Ježíš byl pohřben v něm. Goeffrey Monmouthu také líčí, že Arthur je pohřben na ostrově Avalon, ale je Melkin který potvrzuje, že jsme tu správnou polohu tím, že říká slovo Supradictis znamená vysoko v IctisA dělal ty nohy Michael Goldsworthy, je výmluvným rezervovat s všech map a důkazů, které vysvětluje, jak to je, že co bylo známé jako Grálu archy v romancích Grálu obsahuje Ježíše tělo a potvrzuje, jak byla formulována obraz na Turínského plátna v oleji cedru. Tajemství je nyní odhalili, ale co svět bude učit z tohoto odhalení hrobky na tomto posvátném ostrově a co bude vliv tohoto objevu hrobky a jeho obsahu na všech hlavních náboženství dnes.To je vzrušující kniha propuštěn na ebook nebo v brožované a je plná skvělých fotografií a grafů, které poskytují důkazy.























Island of Avalon ja saare Sarras olid kunagi at Glastonbury

$
0
0




http://www.amazon.co.uk/And-Did-Those-Feet-ebook/dp/B00864NTWI/ref=sr_1_14?ie=UTF8&qid=1338806617&sr=8-14





http://isleofavallon.blogspot.co.uk #3



And Did those feet written by Michael Goldsworthy is an explanation that brings together the Grail story traditions with the Glastonbury legends of King Arthur and Joseph of Arimathea. 



In 1191 the bones of King Arthur were supposedly dug up at Glastonbury Abbey. It was rumoured that a cross was found with him which conveniently stated that King Arthur, (i.e the bones just unearthed), were found  ‘in Avalon’, confirming to those that needed to be persuaded, that Avalon was in fact Glastonbury. The reason the monks at Glastonbury committed a fraud such as this was because of the Grail legends concerning the Matiere de Bretagne coming from France.  These were in a way competing with the established tradition at Glastonbury which associated King Arthur with Joseph of Arimathea. The news of this Grail literature was now prevalent in England and Glastonbury needed an association with a saint to attract Pilgrims. It is due to Melkin’s prophecy that Joseph had always been associated with Glastonbury since it related information concerning ‘virginem adorandam’  which was assumed by Glastonbury monks to relate to the church built in wattle at Glastonbury that was dedicated to the virgin Mary. This was also assumed by William of Malmesbury when he mentioned the same church.  This part of Melkin’s riddle is infact providing accurate on site details of the position of the burial place of Joseph of Arimathea  at Burgh Island. It was due to this misinterpretation of Melkin’s prophecy that Glastonbury presently rests its case as to being the Location of Avalon and the hallowed ground where Joseph lays. If Joseph were there he would have already been discovered.



Nobody was too sure where the island of Avalon was, but everybody since the writings of Geoffrey of Monmouth knew that King Arthur was also buried in Avalon. This actually indicates that Geoffrey did source material written by Melkin that remained in Britain as Melkin is responsible for renaming the island from Ictis to Avalon.

Joseph of Arimathea, by Melkin’s prophecy also indicated was buried in Avalon.  Neither William of Malmesbury nor Geoffrey of Monmouth associated Glastonbury with the Island of Avalon at the time they wrote. This was a later corruption by monks and the sole purpose of producing the fraudulent unearthed cross was to establish Glastonbury as Avalon. If Glastonbury could only be established as Avalon by the unearthing of King Arthur, then it must follow the Joseph of Arimathea was also buried within the Abbey grounds if all were convinced that Glastonbury was Avalon. To unearth Joseph of Arimathea, however, would prove difficult as it was known that he was buried with the holy Grail. Since the monks were not apprised of what the holy Grail consisted of, it was easier to fabricate the unearthing of King Arthur with a cross attesting to the fact that where he was unearthed was indeed Glastonbury and therefore it must be the island of Avalon. The reason Joseph of Arimathea needed to be associated with Glastonbury is because the monks needed funding to rebuild their Abbey after the fire.



Prior to the fire of 1184, there existed a prophecy written by a monk called Melkin. In this prophecy, (once it is decoded), Melkin supplies very pertinent information in geometric instructions, that gives precise directions to an island in Devon. This island is Burgh island in Devon. Melkin states that the body of Joseph of Arimathea lies in the southern angle of a bifurcated line. Once Melkin's code is deciphered, it clearly portrays that Avebury is the point on the St. Michael’s ley line, which in his puzzle, he refers to as a ‘sperula’or sphere, meaning a stone circle. This is the point within the Avebury stone circle complex which, at 13°, if one scribe's a line through Montacute to Burgh island (which Melkin calls the island of Avalon), it is exactly one hundred and Four nautical miles, the exact number that Melkin gives. We should not forget that Father William good deposited this clue in the English college at Rome. Someone or some organisation had tried to eliminate this information from ‘Maihew's Trophea’ to prevent the Joseph line being found but luckily this clue was preseved in Stillingfleet’s private collection and thus acts as a confirmation that the line is Genuine. It also seems that several marker churches that identified the genuine Avalon were also destroyed to prevent this information coming into the public arena.



The location of Avalon has always been thought to exist at Glastonbury but with a recent study of some of the oldest text and the uncovering of the fraud concerning King Arthur carried out by the monks at Glastonbury, it is evident that Avalon is in Devon . The references that Melkin gives are part of a geometric riddle that once solved, points straight to the island in Devon which is obviously fits Diodorus’s description as Ictis.



This is in fact named in the Grail stories as the island of Sarras named after Judah’s eldest son Zarah, who broke the womb first. His name has the same pronunciation as Sarra in French and his descendants came to the south-west and were the primordial miners of tin on southern Dartmoor who brought their tin to this island to be sold. This is the reason that in the Grail stories, the island is called Sarras and to which the holy Grail was brought. It is to this island that after the crucifixion of Jesus, when his body was taken down from the cross by his uncle, Joseph of Arimathea, it was then conveyed to a box filled with Cedar oil so that it might preserve his corpse. This box or coffin known as the Grail Ark was then conveyed with Joseph and several others from Jerusalem to the island of Sarras, which Joseph knew well, having visited many times previously on his mercantile trips with Jesus. This island had been known about in the Greek chronicles because Pytheas a Greek explorer had visited the island on his expedition to find amber which they did not realise was the sometime by product of tin and copper smelting. The island was kept secret over many years since Pytheas’ visit, until Joseph of Arimathea visited the island with Jesus on one of his trips abroad gathering metals.



It was to this island previously known as Ictis that Joseph of Arimathea chose to convey the Grail ark and place Jesus in an old tin vault that had been shut down or made redundant due to the Roman invasion. For about 1000 years, the island called Burgh island had been the place on the coast where all the tin miners up on southern Dartmoor had brought their tin to be stored in the vault. This transpired so that visiting traders could take away tin at any time and the island acted as a trading post. It is for this reason that Diodorous refers to it as an ‘emporium’. It becomes clear now the reason that Joseph of Arimathea knew the island very well. Strabo even relates the story behind the cache of tin ingots found at the head of the Erm.



The gospels relate that Jesus was laid to rest in a hewed out tomb belonging to Joseph of Arimathea and the rumours still persisted as eyewitnesses had seen the doubled over white shroud that covered his body as he lay in the Grail ark. One wonders if the Gospel accounts of the burial of Jesus are just the echoes of the misconstrued eyewitness accounts that existed in Jerusalem just after the resurrection. This set of events aslo explains why the flower imprints were found on the Turin shroud. This is fully explained in detail in a book called ‘And did those feet’, written by Michael Goldsworthy as new theory as to how the Grail stories, the Arthurian legend at Glastonbury and the gospels interlink and provide evidence of the whereabouts of the body of Jesus.



Melkin, who actually wrote the original book of the Grail, which ended up over in France and gave rise to the many Arthurian Grail romances now is understood to be the same person who provided the rumours of Joseph of Arimathea at Glastonbury. So now we have a tomb containing King Arthur, Joseph of Arimathea and Jesus that was last shut when Melkin moved to France in around 600AD, sometime after the Saxon invasion. However the Templars, once they have been disbanded in the Middle Ages, were also privy to this island location and they knew what was buried within. It was here on Christmas Day in 1307 that they decided, (after King Philip and the Pope had disbanded their organisation), to relocate their treasure that they had managed to recuperate and ammased it into three treasure ships that left La Rochelle on 13Tth October 1307.



While depositing their treasure in the tomb they removed the Shroud of Jesus that had been submerged in the Cedar oil for 600 years while covering his body. It is inside this vault that the image of Jesus on the Turin Shroud was formed while draped over the body of Jesus in Cedar oil. The evaporated Cedar oil has left a caramel like substance all over the Turin Shroud, but the image itself was formed by the detritus left behind by anaerobic bacteria.



Only 50 years later, one of the Templars that died with Jack de Molay near Notre Dame in Paris, had a granddaughter that produced the Turin Shroud. This is not coincidence and answers the many questions of why there is no provenance for the Shroud of Turin prior to 1354. The Shroud had existed within the tin vault until the Templars arrive and remove it. The song which became a Christmas Carol; ‘I saw three ships come sailing in on Christmas Day in the morning’ is really the echo of the Templars bringing their treasure to the island of Avalon in Devon. However, this song had always been associated in Cornish tradition to the visit of Jesus and Joseph of Arimathea. It was the Templars, however, that marked out all the churches dedicated to St. Michael that lie along the St. Michael Ley line. Oddly enough, it is the other St. Michael churches that we used as markers, that confirm that the island of Avalon is indeed Burgh island in Devon



It is this line that Melkin refers to, which, when bifurcated within the Avebury stones at 13° and a line is scribed for 104 nautical miles it lands on this same island. Unequivocably Melkin understands the connection between the island of Ictis used by Joseph of Arimathea and clearly calls it the island of Avalon. Firstly, it is known by the Greeks as Ictis, secondly, as the island of Sarras by the French Grail writers and thirdly, as the island of Avalon named as such by Melkin originally and made to appear as pertaining to Glastonbury tor by some devious medieval monks . It is even referred to as the island of Avaron by some of the Grail writers.

The unofficial anthem written by William Blake called Jerusalem starts with the line ‘And did those feet’. This is the title of the book written by Michael Goldsworthy , which conveys the same story that Jesus visited England while accompanying his father, Joseph of Arimathea to Britain. The book called ‘And did those feet’clearly deciphers Melkin’s prophecy, so that it becomes apparent that Melkin knew where the island of Avalon was and what existed within it. To fully understand this extraordinary set of events, go to the link provided below and buy the ebook




Insula auallonis auida funere paganorum, pre ceteris in orbe ad sepulturam eorum omnium sperulis propheciae vaticinantibus decorata, & in futurum ornata erit altissimum laudantibus. Abbadare, potens in Saphat, paganorum nobilissimus, cum centum et quatuor milibus domiicionem ibi accepit. Inter quos ioseph de marmore, ab Armathia nomine, cepit sompnum perpetuum; Et iacet in linea bifurcata iuxta meridianum angulum oratori, cratibus praeparatis, super potentem adorandam virginem, supradictis  sperulatis locum habitantibus tredecim. Habet enim secum Ioseph in sarcophago duo fassula alba & argentea, cruore prophete Jhesu & sudore perimpleta. Cum reperietur ejus sarcofagum, integrum illibatum in futuris videbitur, & erit apertum toto orbi terrarium. Ex tunc aqua, nec ros coeli insulam nobilissimam habitantibus poterit deficere. Per multum tempus ante diem Judioialem in iosaphat erunt aperta haec, & viventibus declarata. 
  Hucusque melkinus

Iidsetel aegadel umbes 350 eKr Kreeka meresõitja, kes külastasid Suurbritannia kirjutas ajakirjas ning see ta kirjeldas saar, kus tina on toodetud ja ta nimetas seda kala saarel või kreeka Ichthys, Ichthus ja Ikhthus st saarel Ictis. See saar oli ümbritsetud pilchards teatud aegadel aastas seega tema nimi. Tina kaubandus, mis oli tegutsenud alates 1000bc läbi Foiniikia kauplejad hiljem kommenteeris lepitud Ladina kroonik nimega Diodorus ja tema kommentaare Briti olid seda.
Elanikud, kes elavad lähedal neem Briti tuntud Belerium, minu tina ja kui nad on sulanud see tina valuplokid, nad teevad seda teatud saar, mis asub off Suurbritannias ja kutsutakse Ictis. Juures aegamööda vaibub see on tõusulaine, vahe selles saare ja mandri jääb kuiv ja siis nad saavad edasi tina suurtes kogustes üle saare oma vaguneid.
See on saare Burgh Island S.Devon oma liiva tamm, mis kuivab mõõna, mil vankrid tina mainitud Pytheas toodi alla Lõuna Dartmoor läbi Loddiswell upon vana cart track. Ainult "fiksaatoriga" ühest nende vagunite leida Devon ja Cornwalli Pytheas "ajastu leiti sama rada Dartmoor et Ictis. Nad sõitsid mööda loodete tee Aveton Gifford jõuda saare IctisNagu paljud teavad on legend Cornwallis, et Joosep Arimaatiast Jeesuse onu oli Tin kaupmees ja et ta tuli nimetatud ranniku korja tina koos Jeesusega kui ta oli veel üks poiss. Keegi oli üsna kindel, miks Ictis kutsuti Emporium, mis tähendab, turg, kuid nüüd on teada, et selle saare on vana võlvkelder algselt kasutatud ladustamiseks tina poolt vana kaevurid, aga umbes samal ajal roomlased tungisid Briti see tuli üha raskem hoida salajas, et Joseph ostsid selle saare suur tina võlvkelder sees. Jeesuse ihu on veel avastamata jooksul Island. Seetõttu evangeeliumid käsitlevad 3 asjakohased faktid, haud kuulus Joseph oli raius läbi haud, et ükski teine ​​mees oli Lain enne ja see oli valge lapiga. See, mida evangeeliumid nõustu lepitud, kuid nad ei lase sel haud saidil on Inglismaal.
Tegelikult Strabo teine ​​kroonik, et Captain jooksis tema paat kivide asemel kinkida saarte seisukoht roomlased ja see just nii juhtub, et kõrval see saar on meil ainult kaks mere rusud iidsest tina tööstusele. See on koht, kus suurim cache tina valuplokid leiti paar miili kaugusel ictis.Melkin prohvet ja munk, kes elas umbes 450 kuni 650AD kirjutas väga kummaline ettekuulutus ladina keeles, mis siiani on jäänud ebaselgeks tükk kirjandust, mis annab juhiseid, et matmise koht Joosep Arimaatiast. Joseph on väidetavalt koos temaga, mida peetakse Püha Graal temaga, kus ta on maetud saarele Avalon.Aastaid Graal jahimehed on eeldada, et Graal ja Joseph vale at Glastonbury kuid ettekuulutus anti kujul puzzle ja hiljuti see mõistatus on lukustamata ja nüüd selgus, raamat nimega "Ja ei need Feet".
Raamatu "Ja kas need Feet" on oma nime saanud luuletuse autor William Blake, mis on kõige Britid teada on hümn Jeruusalemma, mis räägib New Jerusalem olemasolevate Suurbritannias ja küsib küsimuse "Jeesus" jalad käima peale Inglismaa meeldiv karjamaa roheline. Noh nüüd on meil vastus, sest Jeesus on maetud selle saare kõrval Joosep Arimaatiast.Prohvet melkin külastas matmispaik pärast kuningas Arthur maeti sinna ja lahkus neid juhiseid tulevaste põlvede jaoks, et me võiks paljastada tema haud kohas ning nõuab saare saar Avalon.Island of Avalon, coveting paganad surma ennekõike teised (kohtades) maailmas, sest neil on oma entombment olemas ja see on au ring, mis portends of ennustama (ja see ring on kivi ring Avebury). Siis öeldakse, et tulevikus saarel on kaunistatud need, mis annavad au kõrgeima ja "Abbadare" (mis tõlkes tähendab isa pärl, kes on muidugi Jeesus) vägev otsus isetumaks nende välismaalaste magab 104 meremiili miili kaugusel Avebury ja kelle poolt ta saanud vastava matmine mere alates Joseph, kes on oma nime saanud Arimaatiast, ja ta on võtnud ka oma igavest puhata seal, ja nad asuvad Lõuna-kahvli "kahestunud Meridional" rida nurk aasta ranniku-Tor, et kraater, mille ületamisel võib minna otsa juures äärel, sest see oli juba valmis kõrgel Ictis. see haud on nüüd oma eluruumi ja asub 13 kraadi st. Michael jõuväljajoonte.Seda melkin ütleb meile ja see on sätestatud sõna-sõnalt nii, et ennustus saab täielikult mõista raamatu ja tegi need jalga. Klõpsa lingil.Templars ehitatud hulgaliselt kirikuid kõik pühendatud St Michael, mis sisaldab St Michael jõuväljajoonte ja nagu Mihkli mount Cornwallis see väike saar oli Mihkli kirikus, kuid see on isa Hea viieteistkümnenda sajandi jesuiitide munk, kes kinnitab seda seisukohta kes ütleb, et Joosep Arimaatiast on "hoolikalt peidetud" Montacute ja te näete, et liin läbib St.Michaels mäe, kus kunagi ka seisnud kirik pühendatud talle täpselt 104 miili joon, mis on kahestunud kolmteist kraadi ja läbib MONTECUTE.
Paljud teadlased ja ajaloolased, kes on tegelenud Glastonbury materjal öelda Melkin oli väljamõeldis twelvth või 13. sajandil. See ei ole lihtsalt tõsi ja see seisukoht on ainult jõudsime, sest keegi on suutnud dešifreerida Melkin s Prophecy enne praeguse ajastu. Küsige endalt, miks peaks keegi tegema puzzle, et keegi ei mõista veel kõiki üksikasju ta on nii täpsed ja viia väga saarel nimetatud ettekuulutus.
Mitte ainult ei Melkin kirjutada originaal Graal raamat, mis kehtestab asukoha see saar, vaid Leonardo Da Vinci teadis kus see saar oli ka öelnud, et tema maalid Madonna ja yarnwinder ta näitaks meile, kus see Saar on. Ta maalis 2 Yarnwinder maalid mis näitavad täpselt, kui geograafiline asukoht on. Me näeme, kui me ühendada kaks maali, et me teame, tuleb maalitud teda, ta annab iga geograafilise detail, mis paikneb saare Avalon kui tänapäeva Burgh saar Devon mis me näeme ka seda sama perspektiivi Google Earth.See on keeruline lugu, kuid see väljendub see uus ja õpetlik raamat, mis annab tunnistust sellest, kuidas saarel sai tuntuks saarel Sarras aastal Graali lood ja kuidas Torino surilina on tegelikult päris tõsine lapiga Jeesuse näinud Melkin ja et ta viitas sellele kui "Duo Fassula".Tegelikult näete Melkin tema Ladina kirjeldus vastab surilina täiesti kui me mõistame, et tema mõistatus Duo Fassula on tõesti Duplico fasciola või kahekordistunud hauda lapiga, sest see ütleb, et ....Habet enim secum Ioseph sisse sarcophago duo fassula alba & argentea, cruore Prophete Jhesu & sudore perimpleta:
Joosep on temaga sarkofaag kahekordistunud valge Swaddling riidega kaetud vere ja higi prohvet Jeesus, mis oli murtud tema ümber.Templars kes ehitas St.Michael kirikud tähistada seda hauda saidi matsid oma varanduse saarel jõulupüha aastal 1307 pärast saabumist 3 aare laevad. Kuna nad maha aare ja enne kui nad sulges haud viimast korda üks neist (ilmselt Geoffrey de Charney) eemaldada Shroud Jeesuse hauast, mis on praegu on exibit Torinos.King Arthur keha oli ka maetud selle saarel ja see on siin, et ta tuli otsida ime, et ravida tema surmaga haavade pärast lahingut tema kuningriiki, sest ta teadis, et Jeesus maeti sees. Goeffrey of Monmouth ka meenutab, et Arthur on maetud saarele Avalon, kuid see on Melkin kes kinnitab, et oleme õiges kohas, öeldes sõna Supradictis st kuni kõrge IctisJa kas need jalad Michael Goldsworthy on paljastav raamat kõik kaardid ja tõendid, mis selgitab, kuidas see on see, mis oli tuntud Graal ARK Graal romansside sisaldab Jeesuse keha ja kinnitab, kuidas pilt Torino surilina formuleeriti aastal seedriõli. Saladus on nüüd avastatud, kuid see, mis maailmas õppida seda Avastamise haud selle püha saarel ja milline saab olema mõju avastamine see haud ja selle sisu on kõigi suuremate religioonide täna.See on põnev raamat avaldati ebook või paperback ja on täis suurepäraseid fotosid ja diagramme, mis annavad tõendeid.
















http://www.powells.com/biblio/61-9781780883007-1

Ní raibh an Oileán na Avalon agus Oileán na Sarras ag Glastonbury

$
0
0



Insula auallonis auida funere paganorum, pre ceteris in orbe ad sepulturam eorum omnium sperulis propheciae vaticinantibus decorata, & in futurum ornata erit altissimum laudantibus. Abbadare, potens in Saphat, paganorum nobilissimus, cum centum et quatuor milibus domiicionem ibi accepit. Inter quos ioseph de marmore, ab Armathia nomine, cepit sompnum perpetuum; Et iacet in linea bifurcata iuxta meridianum angulum oratori, cratibus praeparatis, super potentem adorandam virginem, supradictis  sperulatis locum habitantibus tredecim. Habet enim secum Ioseph in sarcophago duo fassula alba & argentea, cruore prophete Jhesu & sudore perimpleta. Cum reperietur ejus sarcofagum, integrum illibatum in futuris videbitur, & erit apertum toto orbi terrarium. Ex tunc aqua, nec ros coeli insulam nobilissimam habitantibus poterit deficere. Per multum tempus ante diem Judioialem in iosaphat erunt aperta haec, & viventibus declarata. 
  Hucusque melkinus.

I am ársa thart ar 350 RC scríobh Navigator Gréigis a thug cuairt ar an Bhreatain iris agus i sé cur síos air oileán nuair a tháirgtear stáin agus d'iarr sé ar iasc é oileán nó i Ichthys Gréigis, Ichthus agus Ikhthus ie oileán na Ictis. Bhí timpeallaithe ag an Oileán Pilchards ag amanna áirithe den bhliain sin a ainm. An trádáil stáin a bhí ann a bhfuil ó 1000bc trí trádálaithe Phoenician raibh trácht ar Níos déanaí ag croiniceoir Laidin ainmnithe Diodorus agus a chuid tuairimí ar na Breataine a bhí go.
Na háitritheoirí a dwell in aice leis an ceann tíre na Breataine, ar a dtugtar Belerium, stáin mianach agus nuair a leáigh siad é isteach i dtinní stáin, a dhéanann siad é ar oileán áirithe, atá suite amach sa Bhreatain, agus ar a dtugtar Ictis. Chun ag an Ebbing Tá an taoide, tá an spás idir an oileán agus an mórthír fhág tirim agus ansin is féidir iad a chur in iúl an stáin i gcainníochtaí móra ar aghaidh go dtí an oileán ar a n-vaigíní.
Is é seo an t-oileán de Burgh Oileán i S.Devon lena gaineamh cabhsa go dtriomaítear amach lag trá ar ar tugadh na cairteacha de stáin a luaitear ag Pytheas síos ó dheas trí Dartmoor Loddiswell ar an rian cart ársa. Fuarthas go raibh an t-aon 'bioráin linch' ó cheann amháin de na vaigíní le fáil i Devon agus Corn na Breataine ó ré pytheas 'ar an mbóthar céanna ó Dartmoor go Ictis. Thaistil siad ar bhóthar taoide i Aveton Gifford chun teacht ar an Oileán na Ictis
Toisc go bhfuil go leor ar an eolas go bhfuil finscéal i gCorn na Breataine go raibh Joseph de uncail Arimathea Íosa 'ceannaí Stáin agus gur tháinig sé chun an chósta seo a phiocadh suas stáin le Íosa nuair a bhí sé fós ina bhuachaill. Aon duine a bhí go leor cinnte cén fáth go raibh ar a dtugtar Ictis ar Emporium rud a chiallaíonn áit an mhargaidh, ach tá sé ar eolas anois go bhfuil an taobh istigh den oileán ar cruinneachán d'aois ar dtús a úsáidtear le haghaidh stáin a stóráil ag an mianadóirí d'aois ach thart ar an am na Rómhánaigh ionradh ar an Bhreatain tháinig seo ag éirí níos deacra rún a choinneáil mar sin cheannaigh Joseph an oileán seo leis an cruinneachán stáin ollmhór laistigh de. Is é an comhlacht Íosa fós le amach laistigh den oileán. Sin é an fáth mbaineann na soiscéil trí fíricí ábhartha, bhain an tuama a Joseph, go raibh sé ina tuama hewed amach go raibh lain aon fhear eile i roimh agus i raibh sé ina éadach bán. Is é seo a Comhthoilım leis na soiscéil ar ach nach bhfuil siad in iúl ar go bhfuil an suíomh tuama i Sasana.
Go deimhin aimsir Strabo eile stáit croiniceoir a bhí ar siúl ina Chaptaen a bhád ar na carraigeacha seachas a thabhairt ar shiúl an seasamh hoileáin chun na Rómhánaigh agus é a tharlaíonn ach mar sin go aice leis an oileán seo ní mór dúinn an t-aon dá raiceanna muirí ón tionscal stáin ársa. Tá sé seo ina bhfuarthas an taisce is mó de na dtinní stáin ach cúpla míle ó ictis.Melkin fáidh agus manach a bhí ina gcónaí i thart ar 450 chun 650AD scríobh sé an-aisteach tuar i Laidin, a bhfuil suas go dtí anois fhan píosa doiléir de litríocht a tugann treoracha go dtí an áit adhlactha de Joseph de Arimathea. Joseph ceaptha a bheith acu leis an méid atá a chreidtear a bheith iomaíocht don duais Naofa leis an áit a bhfuil sé curtha in oileán na Avalon.Le blianta fada tá hunters Soitheach glacadh leis gur tugadh an Soitheach agus Joseph bréag ag Glastonbury ach an tuar i bhfoirm a bhfreagra agus le déanaí tá an tomhas a unlocked agus tá sé le fios anois i leabhar ar a dtugtar 'Agus raibh na Feet'.
Tá an leabhar Tá 'Agus raibh na Feet' ainmnithe tar éis an dán a scríobh William Blake atá mar atá a fhios Britons is é an roscamhrán Iarúsailéim, a labhrann ar Iarúsailéim Nua atá ann cheana féin sa Bhreatain agus iarrann an cheist 'raibh Íosa' siúl cosa ar féarach taitneamhach Shasana glas. Bhuel anois tá an freagra toisc go bhfuil Íosa faoi thalamh laistigh den oileán in aice le Joseph de Arimathea.An melkin fáidh cuairt ar an gravesite tar éis do hadhnaiceadh rí Arthur ann agus d'fhág na treoracha do na glúine go bhféadfaimis a uncover a suíomh uaigh agus iarrann an t-oileán go hoileán na Avalon.
Oileán na Avalon, coveting an pagans i bás, thar aon ní eile (áit) ar fud an domhain toisc go bhfuil siad a n-entombment ann agus tá sé onóir ag a bhfuil ciorcal go portends de tairngreacht (agus is é seo ciorcal an ciorcal cloiche Avebury). Téann sé ansin ar a rá go bhfuil sa todhchaí beidh an t-oileán a adorned ag siúd a thabhairt moladh is airde agus 'Abbadare' (rud a chiallaíonn aistrithe an athar Pearl, atá ar ndóigh Íosa) mighty i mbreithiúnas an uaisle na Codlaíonn eachtrannaigh 104 míle farraige ó Avebury, agus cé a recieved sé adhlacadh ag na farraige ó Joseph atá ainmnithe i ndiaidh Arimathea, agus tá sé tar éis glacadh freisin ar a chuid eile síoraí ann, agus a bheidh siad ar an forc theas de líne 'gabhlaithe meridional' in uillinn ar Tor chósta, i crater, thuas ar féidir le duine dul ag extremity ar an imeall mar a bhí ullmhaithe cheana ard ar bun i Ictis. Is é an tuama anois a n-áit chónaithe agus tá sé suite 13 céim ó ú. Michael Ley líne.Is é seo a insíonn melkin dúinn agus tá sé leagtha amach focal ar fhocal ionas gur féidir an tuar a thuiscint go hiomlán sa leabhar agus a rinne na cosa. Cliceáil ar an nasc thuas.An Templars tógtha le sraith de eaglaisí go léir atá tiomnaithe do Naomh Micheál a chuimsíonn an Michael Naomh Ley líne agus cosúil le mount Naomh Mhichíl i gCorn na Breataine go raibh an oileán beag ina Michael Naomh séipéal ar sé ach tá sé athair an Chéasta agus céad bliain Íosánach manach a dhearbhaíonn an post seo déag a insíonn dúinn go bhfuil Joseph de Arimathea 'go cúramach i bhfolach' i Montacute agus is féidir leat a fheiceáil go Gabhann an líne trí St.Michaels cnoc áit a bhfuil uair amháin bhí chomh maith le séipéal tiomanta dó go díreach 104 MILES AR LÍNE GO BHFUIL AG gabhlaithe CÉIMEANNA déag agus ritheann tríd MONTECUTE.
Rá go leor scoláirí agus staraithe gur déileáladh leis an ábhar Glastonbury an Melkin bhí aireagán an chéid twelvth nó déag. Tá sé seo nach bhfuil ach fíor agus tá an post seo a tháinig ach amháin ag toisc nach bhfuil aon duine in ann a dhéanamh amach tuar Melkin ar roimh ré faoi láthair. Iarr ar tú féin, cén fáth go mbeadh duine éigin a dhéanamh bhfreagra go bhféadfadh aon duine a thuiscint go fóill na sonraí go léir ann atá chomh beacht agus mar thoradh ar an oileán an-ainmnithe sa tuar.
Ní amháin go raibh Melkin scríobh an bunaidh an leabhar Soitheach a bhunaíonn an suíomh seo Oileán, ach Leonardo Da Vinci a bhí ar an eolas i gcás ina raibh an oileán seo agus freisin in iúl dúinn gur ina phictiúir de na Madonna agus an yarnwinder bheadh ​​sé a thaispeáint dúinn nuair seo Is oileán. Phéinteáil sé dhá phictiúir Yarnwinder a léiríonn go díreach ina bhfuil an suíomh geografach. Is féidir linn a fheiceáil má merge muid ar an dhá pictiúir go bhfuil a fhios againn a bheith péinteáilte aige, tugann sé gach mion geografach a aimsíonn an oileán na Avalon mar an lá Burgh oileán i Devon láthair ar féidir linn a fheiceáil chomh maith leis an dearcadh céanna ar google domhan.Is é seo an scéal casta ach tá sé le fios sa leabhar nua agus enlightening a thugann fianaise ar conas an oileán seo bhí ar a dtugtar an oileán na Sarras sna scéalta Soitheach agus an chaoi a bhfuil an shroud Torino i ndáiríre an éadach fíor uaigh jesus feicthe ag Melkin agus gur thagair sé dó mar an 'Duo Fassula'.Go deimhin is féidir leat a fheiceáil oireann cur síos ar an Laidin Melkin shroud hiomlán má tuigimid go bhfuil a riddle an Fassula Duo ndáiríre fasciola Duplico nó dhó níos mó ná éadach uaigh mar a deir sé go ....
Habet enim secum Ioseph i sarcophago duo fassula alba & argentea, cruore prophete Jhesu & sudore perimpleta:
Joseph tá leis an sarcophagus éadach bán dhó gcrios ceangail atá clúdaithe leis na fola agus allas an Íosa fáidh a bhí fillte go timpeall air.
An Templars a thóg na heaglaisí St.Michael chun ceiliúradh a dhéanamh ar an suíomh seo faoi thalamh a n-uaigh stór ar an oileán seo ar lá Nollag i 1307 tar éis di teacht i dtrí longa stór. Mar a díluchtú siad an stór agus roimh dhún siad suas an tuama don uair dheireanach a bhaint ar cheann acu, (is dócha Geoffrey de Charney) an Shroud Íosa as an tuama go bhfuil faoi láthair ar exibit i Torino.
Comhlacht Rí Artúr cuireadh freisin laistigh den oileán agus is anseo a tháinig sé chun breathnú ar a miracle a leigheas a wounds marfach tar éis an cath ar a ríocht mar a fhios aige go raibh Íosa faoi thalamh laistigh de. Goeffrey de Monmouth Insíonn chomh maith go bhfuil Arthur curtha in oileán na Avalon ach tá sé Melkin a dhearbhaíonn go bhfuil muid ar an suíomh ceart a rá Supradictis an focal a chiallaíonn suas ard i IctisAgus raibh na cosa ag Michael Goldsworthy, tá leabhar nochtadh leis na léarscáileanna agus fianaise a mhíníonn conas é sin, tá an méid a bhí ar a dtugtar an airc Soitheach sa romances Soitheach Íosa comhlacht agus dearbhaíonn sé conas a cuireadh an íomhá ar an shroud Torino i Cedar ola. Tá an Mystery nochtadh anois ach céard a fhoghlaim ar fud an domhain as an nochtadh an tuama ar an oileán naofa agus cad a bheidh ar an éifeacht ar an teacht ar an tuama agus a bhfuil ann ar gach mór-reiligiúin an lá atá inniu ann.
Is é seo an leabhar spreagúil a foilsíodh ar an ebook nó i bog agus go bhfuil iomlán na grianghraif agus léaráidí den scoth a chur ar fáil evidences.

Остров на Авалон и на островот Sarras никогаш не биле во Гластонбери

$
0
0



Insula auallonis auida funere paganorum, pre ceteris in orbe ad sepulturam eorum omnium sperulis propheciae vaticinantibus decorata, & in futurum ornata erit altissimum laudantibus. Abbadare, potens in Saphat, paganorum nobilissimus, cum centum et quatuor milibus domiicionem ibi accepit. Inter quos ioseph de marmore, ab Armathia nomine, cepit sompnum perpetuum; Et iacet in linea bifurcata iuxta meridianum angulum oratori, cratibus praeparatis, super potentem adorandam virginem, supradictis  sperulatis locum habitantibus tredecim. Habet enim secum Ioseph in sarcophago duo fassula alba & argentea, cruore prophete Jhesu & sudore perimpleta. Cum reperietur ejus sarcofagum, integrum illibatum in futuris videbitur, & erit apertum toto orbi terrarium. Ex tunc aqua, nec ros coeli insulam nobilissimam habitantibus poterit deficere. Per multum tempus ante diem Judioialem in iosaphat erunt aperta haec, & viventibus declarata. 
  Hucusque melkinus.

Во антички времиња околу 350 п.н.е. грчки навигатор кој го посети Велика Британија напиша списание и во него тој го опиша еден остров каде што калај е произведен и тој го нарече риба островот или на грчки ихтисот, Ichthus и Ikhthus односно на островот Ictis. Овој остров е опкружен со Pilchards во одредени периоди од годината па оттаму и името. Калај трговија која постои уште од 1000bc преку феникиски трговци подоцна беше коментира од страна на латински хроничар име Диодор и неговите коментари на британскиот беа тоа. Жителите кои живеат во близина на испакнат на Велика Британија, познат како Belerium, рудникот калај и кога тие го стопи во калај инготи, тие го носат до некој остров, кој се наоѓа надвор Велика Британија, и се нарекува Ictis. За на опаѓа е на плима, во просторот помеѓу овој остров и на копното е оставена сува и тогаш тие може да се пренесе на калај во големи количини во текот на островот на нивните вагони. Ова е на островот Бурх остров во S.Devon со песок насип што се суши надвор мала плима врз кои коли на метални спомнува Pytheas биле донесени надолу од јужна Dartmoor преку Loddiswell по древна количка песна. Единствениот "linch игла 'од една од овие вагони пронајдени во Девон и Корнвол од ерата pytheas" е пронајден на истиот пат од Dartmoor да Ictis. Тие патувале заедно со прилив на пат во Aveton Gifford да стигнат на островот IctisКако и многумина се свесни постои легенда во Корнвол дека Јосиф од Ариматеја чичко Исус беше конзервата трговец и дека тој дошол до овој брег да ги собереш калај со Исус кога тој сè уште беше момче. Никој не беше сосема сигурни зошто Ictis беше наречен Emporium што значи место на пазарот, но тоа сега е познато дека во рамките на овој остров е стар свод првично се користи за чување на калај од страна на старите рудари, но околу времето на Римјаните ја нападна Британија ова дојде многу тешко да се задржи тајна, па Јосиф купи овој остров со големи метални свод во неа. Телото на Исус е допрва треба да бидат откриени во рамките на островот. Ова е причината зошто евангелијата се однесуваат три релевантни факти, гробот му припаѓал на Јосиф, тоа беше hewed од гробот кој постои друг човек што го остана во пред и во него беше бело платно. Тоа е она што евангелијата се согласуваат врз но тие нека не се на тој сајт гробот е во Англија. Всушност Страбон друг хроничар наведува дека капетанот трчаше неговиот брод на карпите наместо подарите на позиција острови до Римјаните и тоа само така се случува, дека до овој остров имаме само два поморски урнатините од античкиот калај индустрија. Ова е местото каде најголемите кеш на метални шипки се најде само неколку милји од ictis.Melkin пророк и монах кој живеел во околу 450 до 650AD напиша многу чудно пророштво на латински, кој до сега остана една мрачна фигура на литература која дава насоки за погребот место на Јосиф од Ариматеја. Џозеф би требало да има со него она што се смета за Светиот грал со него каде тој е погребан на островот Авалон.За многу години Грал ловци се претпоставува дека Грал и Јосиф лага на Гластонбери но пророштво беше дадена во форма на мозаик и неодамна оваа загатка е отклучена и сега е откриено во една книга наречена 'И дали тие нозе ". На книгата Дали и оние Feet "е именуван по песната напишана од Вилијам Блејк кој како и повеќето Британци знаеме е химната на Ерусалим, кој зборува за Нов Ерусалим кои постојат во Велика Британија и го поставува прашањето" Исус "нозе одиме по пријатен пасишта на Англија зелена боја. Па сега имаме одговор, бидејќи Исус е погребан во рамките на овој остров покрај Јосиф од Ариматеја.На пророкот melkin го посети гробот откако кралот Артур бил погребан таму и остави овие насоки за своето потомство дека би можеле да се открие неговиот гроб сајт и повикува на остров на остров Авалон.Островот на Авалон, coveting незнабожците во смртта, над сите други (места) во светот, бидејќи тие имаат свои Погребението таму и тоа е почестен со кружница која portends на пророштвото (и овој круг е камен круг на Avebury). Таа потоа продолжува да се каже дека во иднина на островот ќе бидат украсени од страна на оние кои даваат пофалби до највисоките и 'Abbadare "(што преведено значи бисер на таткото, кој е, се разбира Исус) силен во пресудата на највозвишените на оние странци спие 104 наутички милји од Avebury, и од кого тој recieved погребване од страна на морето од Јосиф кој е именуван по Ариматеја, и тој исто така ги презема неговиот вечен одмор таму, и тие лежат на јужните вилушка на "bifurcated Meridional" линијата во еден агол на крајбрежниот Tor, во кратер, над кој може да се обратите на крај на работ како што беше веќе подготвени високо во Ictis. оваа гробница е сега нивната живеалиште и се наоѓа 13 степени од ул. Мајкл Ley линија.Тоа е она што melkin ни кажува и тоа е изнесена од збор до збор така дека пророштвото може потполно да се разберат во книгата и дали тие нозе. Кликнете на линкот погоре.Темпларите изградено низа на цркви посветена на свети Мајкл кои се состојат од Михаил Ley линија и како Свети Михаил монтирање во Корнвол овој мал остров имаше Михаил црква на тоа, но тоа е татко Добра 1/15 век лицемер монахот кој ја потврдува оваа позиција кој ни кажува дека Јосиф од Ариматеја е "внимателно скриени" во Montacute и може да се види дека линијата поминува низ St.Michaels ридот каде што има еднаш, исто така, стоеше една црква посветена на него точно 104 милји на А линија која е BIFURCATED ВО ТРИНАДЕСЕТА диплома и тече низ MONTECUTE. Многу научници и историчари дека се занимавале со материјал Гластонбери велат дека Melkin беше изум на twelvth или XIII век. Ова едноставно не е точно и оваа позиција е само пристигна во затоа што никој не бил во можност да Пророштво дешифрира Melkin пред сегашната ера. Запрашајте се, зошто некој би се направи мозаик дека никој не може да се разбере уште сите детали во неа, се толку прецизни и да доведе до многу островот име во пророштвото. Не само што Melkin пишуваат оригиналот на книгата Грал со кој се воспоставува на локацијата на овој остров, но Леонардо да Винчи бил свесен за тоа каде овој остров бил и исто така ни кажаа дека во неговите слики на Мадона и yarnwinder тој ќе ни покаже каде оваа Островот е. Тој сликал две Yarnwinder слики кои покажуваат точно каде на географска локација е. Можеме да видиме дали ние се спојат двете слики кои знаеме дека се дело на него, тој дава секој географски детали што лоцира островот на Авалон како денешен ден Бурх остров во Девон кои ние исто така може да се види на истата оваа перспектива на Google Earth.Ова е комплицирана приказна, но тоа се открива во овој нов и просветителската книга, која дава докази за тоа како овој остров станал познат како остров на Sarras во Грал приказни и како Торино покров е всушност вистинскиот гроб крпа на Исус видел од страна Melkin и дека тој се осврна на тоа како "Duo Fassula".Всушност може да се види латински опис Melkin е совпаѓа со покровот целосно, ако ние се разбираме дека неговата загатка на дуото Fassula е навистина Duplico Fasciola или двојно повеќе од гробот крпа поради тоа што вели дека ....Habet enim secum Ioseph во sarcophago дуо fassula Алба и argentea, cruore prophete Jhesu & sudore perimpleta: Џозеф има со него во ковчегот на двојната бели ленени крпа покриени со крв и пот на пророкот Исус, кој беше укината околу него.Темпларите кој го изградил St.Michael цркви да се одбележи овој гроб сајт закопувале и своите богатство на овој остров на Божик во 1307 по пристигнувањето во три богатство бродови. Како ги истоваруваат богатство и пред тие да затвори гробот за последен пат еден од нив, (веројатно Џефри де Charney) отстранета од Покровот на Исус од гробот кој е моментално на exibit во Торино.Тело кралот Артур исто така, беше погребан во рамките на овој остров а тоа е дека тука дошол да се погледне за чудо да се излечи неговата фатална рани по битката за неговото царство како знаеше дека Исус бил погребан во него. Goeffrey на Соединетите Американски Држави, исто така, раскажува дека Артур е погребан на островот Авалон но тоа е Melkin кој потврдува имаме право локација со кажување на зборот Supradictis што значи до високо IctisИ дали тие нозете од Мајкл Goldsworthy, е откривајќи книга со сите карти и доказ дека објаснува како тоа е тоа, она што беше познат како Грал Ковчегот во Грал романси содржи Исус тело и го потврдува тоа како на сликата на Торино Покровот беше формулирана во кедар масло. Мистеријата е сега откри, но она што светот ќе учат од ова откривањето на гробот на ова свето островот и каков ќе биде ефектот на откривањето на оваа гробница и неговата содржина на сите поголеми религии денес.Ова е возбудлива книга објавен на ebook или во мат и е полн со одлични фотографии и дијаграми кои обезбедуваат докази.


















Avalon sala ir sarras sala buvo niekada ne Glastonbury

$
0
0



Insula auallonis auida funere paganorum, pre ceteris in orbe ad sepulturam eorum omnium sperulis propheciae vaticinantibus decorata, & in futurum ornata erit altissimum laudantibus. Abbadare, potens in Saphat, paganorum nobilissimus, cum centum et quatuor milibus domiicionem ibi accepit. Inter quos ioseph de marmore, ab Armathia nomine, cepit sompnum perpetuum; Et iacet in linea bifurcata iuxta meridianum angulum oratori, cratibus praeparatis, super potentem adorandam virginem, supradictis  sperulatis locum habitantibus tredecim. Habet enim secum Ioseph in sarcophago duo fassula alba & argentea, cruore prophete Jhesu & sudore perimpleta. Cum reperietur ejus sarcofagum, integrum illibatum in futuris videbitur, & erit apertum toto orbi terrarium. Ex tunc aqua, nec ros coeli insulam nobilissimam habitantibus poterit deficere. Per multum tempus ante diem Judioialem in iosaphat erunt aperta haec, & viventibus declarata. 
  Hucusque melkinus.

Senovėje apie 350 bc Graikijos navigatorius, kuris aplankė Didžiąją Britaniją parašė žurnalą ir jame jis apibūdino sala, kai alavas buvo pagamintas, ir jis vadinamas žuvis saloje arba Graikijos Ihtiss,, Ichthus ir Ikhthus ty iš Ictis salos. Ši sala buvo apsupta, sardinės prie tam tikru metų, todėl jos pavadinimas. Skardos prekyba, kuri egzistavo nuo 1000bc per finikiečių prekybininkai vėliau buvo aptartas Lotynų kronikininko vardu Diodora ir savo pastabas dėl britų, kad. Gyventojai, gyvenantys netoli Britanijos iškyšulio, žinomas kaip Belerium, alavo kasyklų ir kai jie ištirps į alavo luitų, jos atlieka tam tikrą saloje, kuri yra ne Britaniją, ir yra vadinamas Ictis,. Ne ebbing tai potvynio, tarpas paliekamas tarp šios salos ir žemyno sausas ir tada jie gali perteikti alavo dideliais kiekiais per savo vagonų saloje. Tai S.Devon Burgh sala sala su savo smėlio tiltą, kad atoslūgis išsausėja, nuo kurių vežimėliai kai pagal Pytheas nurodyta alavo buvo užgesinti iš pietų Dartmoor per Loddiswell nuo senovės šunkelis. Tik "linch kaištis iš Devon ir Cornwall pytheas" eros rasti šių vagonų buvo rasta tame pačiame kelio nuo Dartmoor Ictis. Jie nukeliavo išilgai potvynio kelio Aveton Gifford pasiekti Ictis IslandKaip daugelis žino, jog yra Kornvalio legenda, kad Juozapas iš Arimatėjos Jėzaus dėdės Alavo prekybininkas ir kad jis atėjo į krantą pasiimti skardos su Jėzumi, kai jis dar buvo berniukas. Niekas buvo visiškai tikras,, kodėl Ictis buvo vadinamas Emporium, kuris reiškia rinką vietą, tačiau dabar žinoma, kad šioje saloje yra senas požemis, iš pradžių naudojamas saugojimo alavo senųjų kalnakasių, bet maždaug tuo metu, romėnai įsiveržė į Didžiąją Britaniją atvyko vis sunkiau išlaikyti paslaptį, todėl Juozapas nupirko šią salą su didžiule alavo Vault joje. Jėzaus kūnas dar bus atrasta per salą. Tai kodėl evangelijos susiję tris faktus, kapas priklausė Juozapui buvo sugriauti,, kapas kad joks kitas žmogus reiškėsi prieš ir jis buvo baltas audinys. Tai, ką evangelijos sutaria, tačiau neleiskite, kad kapas svetainė yra Anglijoje. Iš tiesų Strabo kitą metraštininkas teigia, kad kapitonas bėgo savo laivą ant uolų, o ne atiduoti Salos poziciją, romėnai ir jis tiesiog taip atsitinka, kad šalia į šią salą mes turime tik du jūrų iš senovės alavo pramonės nuolaužos. Tai yra, kur buvo rastas didžiausias talpyklos iš alavo luitų tik pora mylių nuo ictis.Melkin pranašas ir vienuolis, kuris gyveno apie 450 650AD rašė lotynų kalba, kurios iki šiol išliko miglotas literatūros kūrinys, kuris duoda nurodymus laidojimo vietoje Juozapas iš Arimatėjos labai keistą pranašystę. Juozapas Manoma, kad su juo kas yra manoma, kad Šventasis Gralis su juo, kur jis yra palaidotas Avalon saloje.Jau daugelį metų Gralio medžiotojai prielaida, kad Gralis ir Glastonbury, tačiau pranašystės Juozapas melas buvo dėlionė ir neseniai šis mįslė buvo atrakinta, o dabar paaiškėjo, knygos pavadinimu "Ar tas kojas". Knyga "Ir Ar Tos Kojos", pavadintas po į poemos Parašė William Blake kuris kaip dauguma britų žinoti Jeruzalės, kuris kalbėtų Naujosios Jeruzalės Britanijoje esamas ir klausia himnas "buvo Jėzaus kojų vaikščioti ant Anglijos malonių ganyklose žalia. Na, dabar mes turime atsakymą, nes Jėzus yra palaidotas per šioje saloje šalia Juozapo iš Arimatėjos.. Pranašas melkin aplankė kapo po King Arthur buvo palaidotas ir paliko ateities kartoms šiuos nurodymus, kad galėtume atskleisti savo rimtą svetainę ir ragina sala Avalon sala.Sala Avalon,, pagonims mirties coveting, virš visų kitų vietų) pasaulyje, nes jie turi savo palaidojimas ir tai yra didelė garbė apskritimo portends pranašauti ir šis ratas akmuo ratas iš Avebury). Jis tada eina apie, kad pasakyti, kad ateityje saloje bus galima puošia tie, kad duoti pagirti didžiausias ir "Abbadare" [kuris išverstas reiškia tėvo perlą, kuris žinoma, Jėzaus) galingas, sprendimo tų užsieniečių miega kilniausių 104 jūrmylių nuo Avebury ir kam jis irgi gavo Grzebalny iš Juozapo jūrą, kuris yra pavadintas po Arimatėjos, jis taip pat ėmėsi savo amžinojo poilsio, ir jie guli ant pietinės šakutės "bifurkacinio Meridional" linijos kampu pakrantės Tor, kraterių, kurį viršijus gali eiti, kaip tai jau buvo paruošti aukštai, Ictis netrukus galūnių. šis kapas yra jų buveinė ir yra 13 laipsnių st. Michael žolynai linija.Tai, ką melkin mums sako, ir išdėstyti pažodžiui, kad pranašystė gali būti visiškai suprantama, knygos ir padarė tas kojas. Spustelėkite aukščiau esančią nuorodą.Tamplierių ordinas pastatė daugybę bažnyčių visi skirtų St Michael, kuri sudarančių į St Michael nama liniją ir kaip Michailo kalno Kornvalyje tai maža sala turėjo su St Michael bažnyčią ant jo, bet jis yra tėvas Geras 15. amžiaus jėzuitų vienuolis, kurie patvirtina šią poziciją kuris mums sako, kad Juozapas iš Arimatėjos yra kruopščiai paslėptas ", Montacute, ir jūs galite pamatyti, kad linija eina per St.Michaels kalvos, kur kadaise stovėjo bažnyčia, skirtą jam Lygiai 104 mylių linijos, KURIS bifurkacinio Jau trylikos LAIPSNIŲ IR Veikia PER MONTECUTE. Daugelis mokslininkų ir istorikai, kurie nagrinėjami su Glastonbury medžiagos, sako, Melkin buvo twelvth arba trylikto amžiaus išradimas. Tai tiesiog nėra tiesa, ir ši pozicija yra tik atvyko, nes niekas pavyko iššifruoti Melkin pranašystė iki dabartinės eros. Paklauskite savęs, kodėl kas nors padaryti įspūdį, kad niekas negalėjo suprasti, tačiau visi joje esantys duomenys yra tokie tikslūs, ir švino pačioje saloje, pavadintą pranašystės. Ne tik Melkin rašyti Gralio knygos, kuri nustatyta šios salos vietą originalas, bet Leonardo da Vinci žinojo, kur ši sala buvo ir taip pat mums sakė, kad jo paveikslų Madona ir yarnwinder, jis parodys mums, jei tai Sala yra. Tapė du Yarnwinder paveikslų, kurie rodo, kur tiksliai geografinė vieta yra. Mes galime pamatyti, jei mes sujungti du paveikslus, kad mes žinome būti nudažyti jį, jis duoda kiekvieną geografinę detalės, suranda, Avalon salų, kaip šiandieninės Burgh saloje Devon, kurią mes taip pat galime pamatyti tą pačią perspektyvą Google Earth.Tai sudėtinga istorija, tačiau jis yra atskleidžiamas šioje naujoje ir informatyvi knyga, kuri suteikia įrodymų, kaip ši sala tapo žinoma kaip Gralis istorijų sarras saloje ir kaip Turinas įvynioti į drobulę yra iš tiesų realus kapas Jėzaus matyti Melkin audinys ir kad jis nurodytas kaip "Duo Fassula".Iš tikrųjų jūs galite pamatyti "lotyniškas Melkin aprašymas atitinka gaubtų visiškai, jei mes suprantame, kad jo mįslė Duo Fassula, yra tikrai Duplico fasciola arba dvigubai daugiau nei rimtą skudurėliu, nes ji sako, kad ....Habet enim secum Ioseph, sarcophago dueto fassula alba & argentea, cruore Prophete Jhesu & sudore perimpleta.: Juozapas su juo į sarkofag dvigubai baltas vystyklais audinio, su krauju ir prakaitu pranašo Jėzaus, kuris buvo apvyniojamas apie jį.Tamplieriai, kurie pastatyti St.Michael bažnyčias pažymėti šią rimtą svetainę palaidotas lobis šios salos Kalėdų dieną, 1307 m, atvykus į tris lobių laivus. Kaip jie iškraunami lobis, ir prieš jos uždarytas kapas paskutinį kartą, vienas iš jų (tikriausiai Geoffrey de Charney), pašalino Jėzų iš kapo, kad šiuo metu exibit Turino drobulė.King Arthur kūnas buvo palaidotas šioje saloje, ir tai, kad jis atėjo ieškoti stebuklas išgydyti jo mirtinas žaizdas po jo karalystės mūšio, kaip jis žinojo, kad Jėzus buvo palaidotas per. Goeffrey Monmouth taip pat pasakoja, kad Arthuras palaidotas, Avalon salos, bet tai Melkin, kuris patvirtina, mes turime tinkamą vietą: žodis Supradictis, reiškia iki aukštos IctisIr Ar tas kojas pateikė Michael goldsworthy, atskleisti geriausia užsakyti pas visus žemėlapius ir įrodymų, kurie paaiškina, kaip ji yra tai, kas buvo žinoma kaip Gralio skrynią Gralio romansų yra Jėzaus kūną ir patvirtina, kaip Turino drobulė vaizdas buvo suformuluota kedro aliejaus. Paslaptis dabar atidengta bet ką pasaulis turės išmokti iš šio kapo atidengimo šio švento saloje ir, kas bus šio kapo atradimo ir jos turinys visų pagrindinių religijų šiandien poveikis.Tai įdomi knyga, išleista eBook arba minkštas ir pilnas puikių fotografijų ir diagramos, kurios teikia įrodymus.


















gada Avalon sala un no Sarras sala nekad pie Glastonbury

$
0
0



Insula auallonis auida funere paganorum, pre ceteris in orbe ad sepulturam eorum omnium sperulis propheciae vaticinantibus decorata, & in futurum ornata erit altissimum laudantibus. Abbadare, potens in Saphat, paganorum nobilissimus, cum centum et quatuor milibus domiicionem ibi accepit. Inter quos ioseph de marmore, ab Armathia nomine, cepit sompnum perpetuum; Et iacet in linea bifurcata iuxta meridianum angulum oratori, cratibus praeparatis, super potentem adorandam virginem, supradictis  sperulatis locum habitantibus tredecim. Habet enim secum Ioseph in sarcophago duo fassula alba & argentea, cruore prophete Jhesu & sudore perimpleta. Cum reperietur ejus sarcofagum, integrum illibatum in futuris videbitur, & erit apertum toto orbi terrarium. Ex tunc aqua, nec ros coeli insulam nobilissimam habitantibus poterit deficere. Per multum tempus ante diem Judioialem in iosaphat erunt aperta haec, & viventibus declarata. 
  Hucusque melkinus.

Senos laikos ap 350 pmē grieķu navigators, kurš apmeklēja Lielbritāniju rakstīja dienasgrāmatu un tajā viņš aprakstījis salu, kur alva tika saražots, un viņš nosauca tā zivs salu vai Grieķijas Ichthys, Ichthus un Ikhthus ti salas Ictis. Šī sala bija apkārt sardīnes noteiktos laikos gadā līdz tās nosaukuma. Alvas tirdzniecību, kas pastāvēja kopš 1000bc ar feniķiešu tirgotāji vēlāk komentēt latīņu hronists nosaukts Diodorus un viņa komentārus par briti to. Iedzīvotāji, kas dzīvo netālu no zemesraga Lielbritānijas, kas pazīstams kā Belerium un mīnu alvas un kad tie ir izkusis to alvas stieņi, tie veic to noteiktu salu, kas atrodas pie Lielbritāniju, un sauc Ictis. Par pie ebbing ir no plūdmaiņas, tad starp šo salu un kontinentu telpa paliek sauss, un tad viņi var nodot skārda lielos daudzumos vairāk nekā uz salas savu vagonu. Tas ir sala Burgh salas S.Devon ar tās smilšu Causeway kas žūst uz bēguma uz kuru alvas minēja Pytheas rati tika nogāzta no dienvidu Dartmoor caur Loddiswell pēc senā lauku ceļš. Tikai "linch tapa" no viena no šiem vagoniem atrastas Devon un Cornwall no pytheas "ERA tika atrasts šajā pašā trasē no Dartmoor līdz Ictis. Viņi ceļoja pa paisuma ceļa Aveton Gifford, lai sasniegtu salu IctisKā daudzi zina, ka ir Cornwall leģenda, ka Jāzeps no Arimatijas Jēzus tēvoci bija Alva tirgotājs un ka viņš atnāca uz šo krastu uzņemt alvu ar Jēzu, kad viņš vēl bija zēns. Neviens nebija diezgan pārliecināts, kāpēc Ictis sauca Emporium kas nozīmē tirgus laukumu, bet tagad zināms, ka šajā salā ir vecs nauda sākotnēji izmanto uzglabāšanai alvas, ko vecās ogļrači, bet ap to laiku romieši iebruka Lielbritānijai tas nāca arvien grūtāk saglabāt noslēpumā tik Jāzeps nopirka šo salu ar milzīgu alvas velve tajā. Jēzus ķermenis vēl ir atklāti salas. Tas ir iemesls, kāpēc evaņģēliji attiecas trīs derīgie fakti, kaps piederēja Jāzepam, tas bija cirta ārā kaps ka neviens cits cilvēks bija gulējis pirms un tas bija balta auduma. Tas ir tas, ko evaņģēliji piekrist norādīto, bet tie neļauj uz to kaps vieta ir Anglijā. Patiesībā Strabo citu hronists, ka kapteinis vadīja savu laivu uz klintīm, nevis atdot salām nostāju romieši un tā nu ir sanācis, ka nākamais šīs salā mums ir tikai divas kuģu vraki no seno alvas rūpniecības. Tas ir, ja lielākā kešatmiņu alvas stieņi tika atrasts tikai pāris jūdzes no ictis.Melkin pravietis un mūks, kas dzīvoja apmēram 450 līdz 650AD uzrakstīja ļoti dīvaini pravietojumu latīniski, kas līdz šim ir palicis neskaidrs gabals literatūras, kas dod norādījumus apbedīšanas vietu Joseph no Arimatijas. Jāzeps ir paredzēts, lai būtu kopā ar Viņu, kas tiek uzskatīts Svētais Grāls ar viņu, kur viņš ir apglabāts salas Avalon.Daudzus gadus Grāla mednieki ir pieņemts, ka Grāls un Jāzeps atrodas pie Glastonbury, bet pravietoja, tika dots veidā mīklu un nesen tas siets ir atbloķēts un tagad atklājas grāmatā ar nosaukumu "Un Vai Šos Feet". Grāmata "un darīja šie Pēdas 'ir nosaukta pēc dzejoļa rakstiskas William Blake kas kā lielākā daļa Britiem zinām, ir himnu Jeruzālemi, kurā runāts par Jaunās Jeruzālemes esošo Lielbritānijas un uzdod jautājumu" neko Jēzus kājām staigāt uz Anglijas patīkamām ganībām zaļš. Nu tagad mums ir atbilde, jo Jēzus ir apglabāts šajā salā pie Joseph no Arimatijas.Pravietis melkin apmeklēja gravesite pēc karalis Artūrs tika aprakts tur un atstāj šos norādījumus nākamajām paaudzēm, ka mēs varētu atklāt viņa kapa vietas, un aicina salas sala Avalon.Island of Avalon, iekārot pagānu nāve, virs visiem pārējiem (vietas) pasaulē, jo viņiem ir pašiem entombment tur, un tas ir cienījams ar apli, kas portends par pravietot (un šis aplis ir akmens loks Avebury). Tā turpinājumā teikt, ka nākotnē sala tiks izrotātas ar tiem, kas dod slavas augstāko un 'Abbadare "(kas tulkojumā nozīmē tēva pērle, kas ir, protams, Jēzus) varens spriedumā Kramu no tiem ārzemniekiem neguļ 104 jūras jūdzes no Avebury, un ar kuru viņš Virzīt apbedīšana pa jūru no Jāzepu, kas ir nosaukts pēc Arimatijas, un viņš ir arī ieņēmis mūžīgo atpūtas tur, un tie atrodas uz dienvidu dakša ar 'dubultkniedes meridionāls Tieši līnijas leņķi uz piekrastes Tor, kas krāteris, virs kura var doties pie galā, draudēja, kā tas jau tika sagatavots liela augšu Ictis. šis kaps ir tagad viņu mājoklis un atrodas 13 grādus no st. Michael Ley līnija.Tas ir tas melkin stāsta mums, un tas ir izklāstīts vārdu pa vārdam, lai pravietojums var pilnībā saprast grāmatā un darīja tos kājām. Noklikšķiniet uz saites iepriekš.Kā Templiešu būvēts masīvs baznīcu visi veltīta St Michael kas veido St Michael Ley līniju un tāpat Kornvolas St Michael mount šī mazā sala bija St Michael baznīcu par to, bet tas ir tēvs Labi piecpadsmitā gadsimta jezuītu mūks, kas apstiprina šo nostāju kas stāsta mums, ka Jāzeps no Arimatijas, ir "uzmanīgi apslēpts" Montacute un jūs varat redzēt, ka līnija iet caur St.Michaels kalna, kur reiz arī bija baznīca veltīta viņam tieši 104 jūdzes līniju, kas ir dubultkniedes AT trīspadsmit grādu un iet caur MONTECUTE. Daudzi zinātnieki un vēsturnieki, kas saskārās ar Glastonberijas materiālu teikt Melkin bija izgudrojums twelvth vai 13. gadsimtā. Tas vienkārši nav taisnība, un šis amats ir tikai ieradās tāpēc, ka neviens nav spējis atšifrēt Melkin s Prophecy pirms mūsu ēras. Uzdot sevi, kāpēc būtu kāds padara mīklu ka neviens nevarēja saprast, bet visi to dati ir tik precīzs un noved pie ļoti salā nosaukts pravietojumu. Ne tikai Melkin rakstīt oriģinālu Grāls grāmatas, kas nosaka piekļuvi šai salā, bet Leonardo da Vinči bija zināms, kur šī sala bija un arī pastāstīja, ka viņa gleznas Madonna un yarnwinder viņš parādīs mums, kur tas Sala ir. Viņš gleznoja divus Yarnwinder gleznas, kas parāda, kur tieši ģeogrāfiskā atrašanās vieta ir. Mēs varam redzēt, ja mēs apvienos divas gleznas ka mēs zinām, ko gleznojis viņa, viņš dod katru ģeogrāfisko detaļas, kas atrod salā Avalon kā mūsdienu Burgh salas Devon, ko mēs varam arī redzēt šo pašu perspektīvu Google Earth.Tas ir sarežģīts stāsts, bet tas ir atklāts šī jaunā un izskaidrojošs grāmatu, kas sniedz pierādījumus par to, kā šī sala kļuva pazīstams kā salas Sarras skaits Grāla stāstu un kā Turīnas līķauts ir patiesībā reālā kapa Jēzus audums redz Melkin un ka viņš atsaucās uz to par 'Duo Fassula ".Patiesībā jūs varat redzēt Melkin s latīņu apraksts sakrīt ar apvalku pilnībā, ja mēs saprotam, ka viņa mīkla Duo Fassula tiešām Duplico fasciola vai divkāršojās smagā auduma, jo tas saka, ka ....Habet enim secum Ioseph jo sarcophago duets fassula alba un argentea un cruore prophete Jhesu & sudore perimpleta: Jāzeps ir ar viņu sarkofāga dubultojies balts swaddling auduma klāj asinīm un sviedriem no pravieša Jēzus, kas bija salocīts ap viņu.Kā Templiešu kurš būvēts St.Michael baznīcas, lai atzīmētu šo nopietno vietni apglabāja savu dārgumu uz šīs salas Ziemassvētku dienā 1307 pēc ierašanās trīs dārgumu kuģiem. Jo tie izkrauti kasi un pirms tās slēgts līdz kaps pēdējā laikā viens no viņiem (iespējams, Geoffrey de Charney) atcēlusi Vanšu Jēzus no kapa, kas ir pašlaik uz Izstādes koncepcija Turīnā.King Arthur ķermenis tika apglabāts šajā salā, un tas ir šeit, ka viņš nāca meklēt brīnumu izārstēt viņa nāves brūces pēc kaujas par savu valstību, jo viņš zināja, ka Jēzus tika apglabāts tajā. Goeffrey no Monmouth arī stāsta, ka Artūrs ir aprakti salas Avalon bet tas ir Melkin kas apliecina mums ir tiesības vietā, pasakot vārdu Supradictis nozīmē augšu ar augstu IctisUn Vai Šos kājas Michael Goldsworthy, ir atklāt grāmata ar visām kartēm un pierādījumiem, kas paskaidro, kā tas ir, ka, kas bija pazīstams kā Grāls šķirsta tajā Grāls romancēm ir Jēzus ķermeni un apstiprina kā par Turīnas Vanšu attēls tika noformulēta ar ciedru eļļā. Noslēpums tagad uncovered bet kāda būs pasaule mācīties no šīs atklāšana kaps šajā svētajā salas un kāda būs ietekme atklāšanu šā kapa un tā saturu par visu lielāko reliģiju šodien.Šī ir aizraujoša grāmata izlaista ebook vai brošēta grāmata, un ir pilns ar lieliskiem fotogrāfijas un diagrammas, kas sniedz liecības.


















Viewing all 25 articles
Browse latest View live